
Plan commission member cleared by Chesterton Town Council for conduct during meeting
Chesterton Town Council President Sharon Darnell, D-4th, confirmed by email that Kowalski was told he had been cleared by the Town Council. She had no further comment.
Kowalski, 73, a veteran member of the Advisory Planning Commission and Board of Zoning Appeals, was thankful when he learned about the council's decision. He admits that he was worried and had some 'sleepless nights' before the council rendered its decision.
'I've got a job to do. I put the community in front of my own opinions. That's my creed,' Kowalski said. 'I try to do the right thing. Do you have to pay the price for doing the right thing for what you thought?'
Councilwoman Jennifer Fisher, R-5th, at the May 30 Town Council meeting requested the executive session, citing state code that it was to receive information concerning an individual's 'misconduct.'
She didn't publicly name whom she was talking about, but Kowalski, who was at that May 30 meeting, told the Post-Tribune that she clearly was 'throwing him under the bus.'
Fisher said the council did have an executive session on June 13 to discuss allegations of misconduct.
'I'm not sure what he (Kowalski) means by cleared,' Fisher said. 'There were no pending charges.'
Fisher said a result of the meeting is that board members were going to be reminded of their obligations under the Shared Ethics Commission rules that the town follows.
Some of the standards of conduct include treating every person with dignity and respect and acting in a professional, responsive and courteous manner.
Fisher was upset with Kowalski after a May 15 Advisory Plan Commission meeting, when the proposed development of the Brassie Golf Club property was discussed.
During the presentation by PMM Chesterton, Kowalski was sharply critical and at one juncture used the vulgarity for bull waste.
After the meeting, Fisher told the Post-Tribune, 'It is really inappropriate for an advisory plan commission (member) to be yelling and cussing when talking to people.'
Kowalski apologized for using the word 'BS.' But Kowalski said his real concerns dealt with the proposed density of the project — 600 housing units on 200 acres — and its impact on the community.
PMM Chesterton is currently reworking its proposal for the Brassie property.
Councilwoman Darnell, during the May 30 council meeting, seemed to come to Kowalski's defense, noting that people should have a 'First Amendment' right to express their opinion during a meeting. She is a plan commission member who shares Kowalski's concerns about the proposed density of housing on the Brassie property.
Fisher has made it a point that Chesterton needs to improve its reputation in the economic development community.
The town last year created the position of economic development and operations, appointing Rebecca Parker. The town also retained two consultants to help with economic development-related issues.
Fisher said they are striving to have a more collaborative approach with prospective developers.
The town's economic development team met with PMM Chesterton before the plan for the Brassie Golf Club property was presented. Fisher also noted Chesterton's Advisory Plan Commission has been known for its adversarial approach to developers.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hamilton Spectator
17 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Supreme Court to consider reviving lawsuit restricting evangelizing in small Mississippi town
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court said Thursday it will consider whether to revive a lawsuit from a man barred from evangelizing outside a small-town Mississippi amphitheater after authorities say he shouted insults at people over a loudspeaker. Gabriel Olivier, an evangelical Christian, says restricting him from public property violated his religious and free speech rights, but a legal Catch-22 has barred him from challenging the law in court. Lower courts found he couldn't file a civil-rights lawsuit because he'd been arrested, and instead needed to file under habeas corpus, a legal remedy open to prisoners. But because he was ticketed rather than imprisoned, his lawyers say that option wasn't open either, effectively denying him a day in court. The city of Brandon, Mississippi, on the other hand, says the restrictions aren't about religious speech, but rather about limiting disturbances caused when he and his group yelled insults like 'Jezebel,' 'nasty,' and 'drunkards' at people passing by. The ordinance restricts demonstrations near the amphitheater but does allow him to preach from a designated 'protest zone,' and has already survived another lawsuit, the city said. The city says the case is about Olivier and his group's 'desire to have their preferred method of protest, without regard for the rights or interests of anyone else.' Olivier's attorneys say he was engaging in respectful and protected speech at the time of his arrest, and the case centers on a key legal issue affecting free speech across the political spectrum. 'Every American has First Amendment rights to free speech; and every American has a right to their day in court,' said Kelly Shackelford, president and CEO for First Liberty Institute, which is representing him along with attorney Allyson Ho of the firm Gibson Dunn. 'Both of these rights were violated for Gabe Olivier. The Supreme Court will now decide whether those rights will be protected for all Americans.' The court is expected to hear arguments in the fall. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .


New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
E.P.A. Puts 144 Employees on Leave for Signing Letter Criticizing Trump
The Environmental Protection Agency on Thursday placed 144 employees on administrative leave and launched an investigation into their decision to sign a letter accusing the Trump administration of politicizing the agency. Current and former E.P.A. employees, lawyers and advocates expressed alarm at the development, saying the agency appeared to be ignoring the employees' First Amendment rights. The E.P.A. said its actions were warranted because the employees had signed the letter using their official titles and because the letter had denigrated the agency's leadership. 'The Environmental Protection Agency has a zero-tolerance policy for career bureaucrats unlawfully undermining, sabotaging and undercutting the administration's agenda as voted for by the great people of this country last November,' the E.P.A. press secretary, Brigit Hirsch, wrote in an email. The 144 employees received emails on Thursday saying they had been placed on leave for the next two weeks 'pending an administrative investigation,' according to a copy of the email reviewed by The New York Times. 'You are required to provide a current email address and phone number so that we can contact you as part of our investigation,' the email said, adding that the staff members would continue to collect paychecks while on leave. In the letter that prompted today's action, which was sent on Monday to E.P.A. Administrator Lee Zeldin, the employees voiced concern that the agency had made decisions based on a political agenda, not on science and the law. Recent E.P.A. news releases and newsletters have repeated some of President Trump's rhetoric on the environment, the letter said, citing agency statements describing coal as 'beautiful' and 'clean.' Coal is the dirtiest of the fossil fuels and is a significant source of greenhouse gases. The letter was organized by Stand Up for Science, a group that planned a March rally in Washington to protest the Trump administration's steep cuts to federally funded scientific research. Of the 278 E.P.A. employee who signed the letter, 173 signed their names, while 105 signed anonymously for fear of retaliation. Colette Delawalla, the founder and executive director of Stand Up for Science and a graduate student in psychology at Emory University, was not immediately available for comment. Tim Whitehouse, executive director of Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, a nonprofit group that defends the rights of civil servants, said the First Amendment generally protects the speech of federal workers. 'We believe strongly that these federal employees have First Amendment rights and the government should not retaliate against these employees for expressing their viewpoints,' Mr. Whitehouse said.


Boston Globe
2 hours ago
- Boston Globe
In lawsuit settlement, Smithfield, R.I. school district to unblock critic from social media accounts
Advertisement The organization had alleged the block violated Mayer's First Amendment rights 'to speak and to petition the government for redress of grievances.' Both accounts are used to announce school policies and operations; 'to share content produced for the town's schools; and to communicate with constituents,' the ALCU said. Get Rhode Map A weekday briefing from veteran Rhode Island reporters, focused on the things that matter most in the Ocean State. Enter Email Sign Up Under the The district will also pay for attorney's fees and court costs. Advertisement 'Blocking a constituent from expressing their opinions on the basis of their identity or viewpoint undermines their fundamental First Amendment right to speak and to petition the government for redress of grievances,' ACLU cooperating attorney David Cass said in a statement. 'Thankfully, with the assistance of counsel for the Smithfield School Committee, we were able to achieve a quick resolution to the constitutionally inappropriate social media limitations that had been imposed by the Smithfield School Department and Superintendent.' Bartz said in a statement on Thursday the district 'respects and values the right to free speech and remains committed to open communication with all members of our school community.' 'We recognize that social media is one avenue for public discourse, but we continue to believe that concerns are best addressed through the many in-person meetings and discussions we regularly offer to families and community members with any questions or concerns,' Bartz said. 'My focus remains on serving our students and ensuring our schools are safe, supportive, and welcoming environments for all.' Richard Iannitelli, chair of the Smithfield School Committee, said the committee 'respects our legal guidance and is moving forward in full compliance with the settlement.' Inannitelli also reaffirmed the committee's 'full support' for Bartz. 'While public officials must accept scrutiny, no one should be subjected to targeted or persistent negative online comments –particularly when there have been continued pathways for discussion and in-person engagement. We're focused on our leading priority – providing the best possible education for our students," Inannitelli said in a statement. In 2021, Advertisement Material from a previous Globe story was used in this report. Christopher Gavin can be reached at