Turkey detains cartoonists over satirical drawing allegedly depicting prophets
The cartoon, widely seen as a commentary on religious harmony in contrast to conflict on Earth, drew strong condemnation from government officials and religious conservatives.
Interior Minister Ali Yerlikaya shared a video on X showing police officers detaining cartoonist Dogan Pehlevan and dragging him up the stairs of a building with his hands cuffed behind his back.
"I once again curse those who try to sow discord by drawing caricatures of our Prophet Muhammad," Mr. Yerlikaya wrote.
"The individual who drew this vile image, D.P., has been apprehended and taken into custody. These shameless people will be held accountable before the law."
Mr. Yerlikaya later posted two other videos, showing two other men being laid on the ground and forcibly taken from their homes, as policemen dragged them into vans— one of them walking barefoot.
Justice Minister Yilmaz Tunc said an investigation had been launched under Article 216 of the Turkish Penal Code, which criminalises incitement to hatred and enmity, and that detention orders had been issued for six people in total.
In its statement on X, the Leman magazine apologised to readers who felt offended and said the cartoon had been misunderstood.
It said Mr. Pehlevan had sought to highlight "the suffering of a Muslim man killed in Israeli attacks", and that there was no intent to insult Islam or its prophet.
"The name Muhammad is among the most widely used in the world by Muslims honoring the Prophet. The cartoon does not depict the Prophet and was not drawn to mock religious values," the magazine said, calling some interpretations "deliberately malicious."
Leman also urged judicial authorities to act against what it called a smear campaign, and asked security forces to protect freedom of expression.
Earlier in the evening, video footage on social media showed a group of protesters marching to Leman's office building in central Istanbul, chanting slogans and kicking its entrance doors.
Turkey's ranking for freedom of expression is consistently low, reflecting significant restrictions on media and public discourse. Reporters Without Borders ranks Turkey 158th out of 180 countries in its 2024 Press Freedom Index.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
22 minutes ago
- First Post
Ukraine war impact? Russian supplies stalled, Iran eyes China jets amid tension with Israel, US
Iran is negotiating with China to buy 36 J-10C fighter jets as it looks to modernise its ageing air force, after facing delays in getting Russian Su-35 aircraft due to Moscow's focus on the Ukraine war. The talks come amid rising threats from Israel and the US. read more People walk next to a mural with a picture of Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, on a street in Tehran, Iran. Reuters Iran is in advanced talks with China to buy dozens of Chengdu J-10C fighter jets after facing problems with a deal to purchase Russian Su-35 aircraft due to supply and delivery disruptions, as the Kremlin remains occupied with its war in Ukraine. Tehran is eager to modernise its ageing air force amid growing threats from Israel and the US following recent military escalations and strikes on its nuclear facilities. According to The Moscow Times, Iran is negotiating to purchase 36 J-10C jets from China. This follows Iran's stalled plan to acquire 50 Russian Su-35s, with only four aircraft delivered since the 2023 agreement. The urgency for new warplanes increased after last month's joint Israeli-American air strikes on Iranian targets, including nuclear sites. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD J-10C vs Su-35 Iran has shown interest in the J-10 series for years, reportedly trying to buy up to 150 jets as early as 2015. However, those talks fell apart over payment issues, as China demanded foreign currency while Iran, under heavy sanctions and low on cash, offered oil and gas in exchange. A now-lifted UN arms embargo had also complicated the negotiations. The J-10C is a modern, 4.5-generation fighter jet capable of carrying long-range PL-15 missiles. It's already in service with the Pakistani air force and is viewed as a cost-effective yet capable alternative to Russia's Su-35, costing about $40–60 million less per aircraft. Problems with the Su-35 deal Iran signed a deal with Moscow in 2022 for Su-35 fighter jets to upgrade its air force. However, deliveries have been repeatedly delayed. Despite Tehran's official statements that deliveries would begin in early 2023, only a handful of aircraft have materialised. Reports from March 2025 indicated that a batch of Su-35s originally slated for Iran was instead redirected to Algeria. Iran's ageing air fleet As of early 2025, Iran's air force operates around 150 fighter jets, most of which are ageing American aircraft purchased before the 1979 Islamic Revolution. These include 64 F-4 Phantom II, 35 F-5E/F Tiger II, and 41 F-14A Tomcat aircraft. Many of these planes are either non-operational or require constant maintenance to remain flight-worthy. Iran also has about 18 MiG-29A/UB jets acquired in the late 1980s and early 1990s, but these too are showing their age and limitations. For the past decade, Iran has relied heavily on domestically produced surface-to-air missile systems to protect its skies. However, during the recent 'Twelve Day War'—the term unofficially used for the Israeli-American strikes—these systems were quickly suppressed by Israeli air power.
Economic Times
22 minutes ago
- Economic Times
The GCC and the Global South: Voices in an age of civilisational crisis
AP Trump speaks at a recent Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) Summit in Riyadh We are not living in a moment of crisis — we are living through a clash of civilisations. But this clash is not merely geopolitical; it is deeply existential. At its core, humanity is grappling with an identity crisis, a crisis of meaning, which then spills over into politics, international relations, and institutions. The Indo-Mediterranean region — stretching from the Middle East through the Indian subcontinent — remains the cradle of this ongoing civilisational struggle. This region is home to the roots of most major world religions. Christianity was born in what we now call Israel and Palestine. Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism and Sikhism also emerged from this geographic corridor. Even Zoroastrianism, which once thrived in Iran, was gradually replaced by Shia traditions. These religious and spiritual legacies continue to define the cultural, philosophical and political foundations of our global society. However, we are now witnessing a fragmentation of these traditions. Islam, though born in Saudi Arabia, now has its largest populations in the Indian subcontinent — Pakistan, India, and Bangladesh — and in Indonesia, the world's largest Muslim-majority country, far removed from the Middle East. Islam itself faces a deep institutional crisis, particularly within its Sunni tradition. A century after the abolition of the caliphate, the Muslim world is struggling to define itself internally — between the moderate majority and the radical minority that, as is often the case, shouts louder, acts more violently, and dominates the global narrative. Amidst this spiritual and institutional confusion stands the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) — a coalition of Arab states that, in many ways, serves as both the protector and reformer of the Islamic world. The GCC countries, especially the UAE, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar, have increasingly positioned themselves as stabilisers not just within their region, but also across the broader Indo-Mediterranean and African spheres. Their growing influence in African states like Sudan and Somalia underscores their evolving role as both geopolitical actors and cultural intermediaries. US President Donald Trump seemed to intuitively grasp this reality. His first overseas visit as president in his second term was to the Gulf states, reflecting a recognition — whether strategic or symbolic — that the future of Islam and, by extension, global stability, will in part be shaped by what happens in the GCC and West Asia. Trump's controversial yet telling diplomacy is less an aberration and more a reflection of our collective identity crisis in the democratic world. In democracies, after all, leaders are often mirrors of the political consciousness — or the lack of it — of the societies that elect them. While attention continues to focus on the Israel-Palestine conflict, the broader transformation happening in the Gulf—and its impact on the Global South — deserves equal scrutiny. The demographic center of the world has shifted. It no longer lies in the United States or Europe. It lies between Africa and Asia, among the younger, more populous, and often voiceless societies that constitute the Global this context, the emergence and evolution of BRICS — a coalition of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa — becomes relevant. Though the grouping may appear contradictory, given the vast differences in political systems, ideologies, and economic structures, it has endured and expanded. Countries like the UAE have joined, and Saudi Arabia has been invited. BRICS may not be an ideal or coherent bloc, but it is becoming a platform where the Global South seeks visibility and participation in BRICS reflects its pursuit of 'strategic autonomy.' It tries to walk a tightrope: engaging with powers that are at times ideologically opposed or even hostile, while maintaining its democratic values and domestic coherence. India's experience in multilateral forums — like the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, where it recently faced silence over a terrorist attack it endured — highlights the limits of these alliances. Yet India persists, not as a hegemon, but as a voice of the Global is what distinguishes India from China in the BRICS configuration. While China seeks to lead, India seeks to represent. And in this effort, the civilisational ties between India and the GCC become critical. With over 250 million Muslims, India maintains deep, enduring and largely peaceful relationships with Gulf countries. These are bonds not just of labour and trade, but of shared history, migration and cultural affinity. It is a relationship unlikely to BRICS contemplates alternative financial systems, such as moving away from the US dollar, it's important to remember that most member countries are still trying to ensure basic survival for large segments of their populations. While such initiatives may be symbolically powerful, they are unlikely to succeed unless grounded in the lived realities of the Global the growing convergence between the GCC and BRICS is not merely a matter of strategic interest — it is a civilizational necessity. The world's largest populations and youngest citizens now reside between Asia and Africa. This is where the future will be negotiated. And while the current world order still reflects the architecture of the Cold War, it is in these regions — the Indo-Mediterranean, the Gulf, and the broader Global South — where a new, plural, more inclusive order is being is here that the existential questions of identity, belief, governance, and coexistence will be addressed. The GCC's evolving role, alongside India's civilisational diplomacy and BRICS' expanding platform, may well shape the contours of a new global equilibrium — one that better reflects the voices of the majority of humanity. Vas Shenoy is an Italian entrepreneur and author of Indian origin. He is the founder of The Indo-Mediterranean Initiative ( He serves as the Chief Representative for Italy, Indian Chamber of Commerce (ICC).
Time of India
25 minutes ago
- Time of India
The GCC and the Global South: Voices in an age of civilisational crisis
We are not living in a moment of crisis — we are living through a clash of civilisations. But this clash is not merely geopolitical; it is deeply existential. At its core, humanity is grappling with an identity crisis, a crisis of meaning, which then spills over into politics, international relations, and institutions. The Indo-Mediterranean region — stretching from the Middle East through the Indian subcontinent — remains the cradle of this ongoing civilisational struggle. This region is home to the roots of most major world religions . Christianity was born in what we now call Israel and Palestine. Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism and Sikhism also emerged from this geographic corridor. Even Zoroastrianism, which once thrived in Iran, was gradually replaced by Shia traditions. These religious and spiritual legacies continue to define the cultural, philosophical and political foundations of our global society. However, we are now witnessing a fragmentation of these traditions. Islam, though born in Saudi Arabia, now has its largest populations in the Indian subcontinent — Pakistan, India, and Bangladesh — and in Indonesia, the world's largest Muslim-majority country, far removed from the Middle East. Islam itself faces a deep institutional crisis, particularly within its Sunni tradition. A century after the abolition of the caliphate, the Muslim world is struggling to define itself internally — between the moderate majority and the radical minority that, as is often the case, shouts louder, acts more violently, and dominates the global narrative. Amidst this spiritual and institutional confusion stands the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) — a coalition of Arab states that, in many ways, serves as both the protector and reformer of the Islamic world. The GCC countries, especially the UAE, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar, have increasingly positioned themselves as stabilisers not just within their region, but also across the broader Indo-Mediterranean and African spheres. Their growing influence in African states like Sudan and Somalia underscores their evolving role as both geopolitical actors and cultural intermediaries. US President Donald Trump seemed to intuitively grasp this reality. His first overseas visit as president in his second term was to the Gulf states , reflecting a recognition — whether strategic or symbolic — that the future of Islam and, by extension, global stability, will in part be shaped by what happens in the GCC and West Asia. Trump's controversial yet telling diplomacy is less an aberration and more a reflection of our collective identity crisis in the democratic world. In democracies, after all, leaders are often mirrors of the political consciousness — or the lack of it — of the societies that elect them. Live Events While attention continues to focus on the Israel-Palestine conflict, the broader transformation happening in the Gulf—and its impact on the Global South — deserves equal scrutiny. The demographic center of the world has shifted. It no longer lies in the United States or Europe. It lies between Africa and Asia, among the younger, more populous, and often voiceless societies that constitute the Global South. In this context, the emergence and evolution of BRICS — a coalition of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa — becomes relevant. Though the grouping may appear contradictory, given the vast differences in political systems, ideologies, and economic structures, it has endured and expanded. Countries like the UAE have joined, and Saudi Arabia has been invited. BRICS may not be an ideal or coherent bloc, but it is becoming a platform where the Global South seeks visibility and voice. India's participation in BRICS reflects its pursuit of 'strategic autonomy.' It tries to walk a tightrope: engaging with powers that are at times ideologically opposed or even hostile, while maintaining its democratic values and domestic coherence. India's experience in multilateral forums — like the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, where it recently faced silence over a terrorist attack it endured — highlights the limits of these alliances. Yet India persists, not as a hegemon, but as a voice of the Global South. This is what distinguishes India from China in the BRICS configuration. While China seeks to lead, India seeks to represent. And in this effort, the civilisational ties between India and the GCC become critical. With over 250 million Muslims, India maintains deep, enduring and largely peaceful relationships with Gulf countries. These are bonds not just of labour and trade, but of shared history, migration and cultural affinity. It is a relationship unlikely to fracture. As BRICS contemplates alternative financial systems, such as moving away from the US dollar, it's important to remember that most member countries are still trying to ensure basic survival for large segments of their populations. While such initiatives may be symbolically powerful, they are unlikely to succeed unless grounded in the lived realities of the Global South. Ultimately, the growing convergence between the GCC and BRICS is not merely a matter of strategic interest — it is a civilizational necessity. The world's largest populations and youngest citizens now reside between Asia and Africa. This is where the future will be negotiated. And while the current world order still reflects the architecture of the Cold War, it is in these regions — the Indo-Mediterranean, the Gulf, and the broader Global South — where a new, plural, more inclusive order is being imagined. It is here that the existential questions of identity, belief, governance, and coexistence will be addressed. The GCC's evolving role, alongside India's civilisational diplomacy and BRICS' expanding platform, may well shape the contours of a new global equilibrium — one that better reflects the voices of the majority of humanity. Vas Shenoy is an Italian entrepreneur and author of Indian origin. He is the founder of The Indo-Mediterranean Initiative ( He serves as the Chief Representative for Italy, Indian Chamber of Commerce (ICC).
