Elton John and Brandi Carlile vs Trump administration's cuts to HIV/AIDS relief
After his inauguration in January, Trump passed an executive order slashing the funding for the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), which has resulted in major setbacks for many HIV/AIDS programs that rely on USAID funding.
The World Health Organization (WHO) said: 'A funding halt for HIV programmes can put people living with HIV at immediate increased risk of illness and death and undermine efforts to prevent transmission in communities and countries,' warning that Trump's prolonged pause on foreign assistance could take 'the world back to the 1980s and 1990s when millions died of HIV every year globally'.
Now, Elton John has teamed up with American singer-songwriter Brandi Carlile to launch a campaign to offset the Trump administration's
cuts to HIV / AIDS funding
.
Sir Elton and Carlile, who released their collaborative album 'Who Believes In Angels' on 4 April, are now working together on a joint-venture between the
Elton John AIDS Foundation
and Carlile's
Looking Out Foundation
.
Voir cette publication sur Instagram
Une publication partagée par Looking Out Foundation (@lookingoutfoundation)
Sir Elton said in a statement: 'Without prompt action, decades of progress in the global fight against HIV could be reversed, creating a global health crisis that we have both the power and the tools to prevent.'
'Our mission is more important than ever – we refuse to leave anyone behind – and I'm so fortunate that Brandi is not only a wonderful collaborator and artist, but a dear friend who shares my vision of a world where HIV care is prioritised and protected.'
Carlile said: 'It was a lifelong dream come true for me to come together with my hero and friend Elton John to make our album 'Who Believes in Angels?', and now, we're excited to announce that our foundations are also partnering to make our music mean even more.'
She added: 'Elton's activism and work with the Elton John AIDS Foundation was what led me to Elton before I even heard a note of his music. It's an incredible honour to launch this partnership and raise funds for the life-saving work of the Elton John AIDS Foundation and the Rocket Response Fund at a time when support is needed the most.'
The
Elton John AIDS Foundation
, which was launched in 1992 and is reported to have raised more than $500million over the past three decades, has worked with USAID to co-fund HIV prevention and treatment programs around the world. In response to the cuts, the Foundation launched the Rocket Fund and Rocket Response Fund in an attempt to fill the gaps left by Trump's actions.
Carlile's
Looking Out Foundation
has committed to matching every donation up to $100,000, claiming it will 'double the impact to protect HIV prevention and care services across the US and around the world'.
Carlile and her wife Catherine Shepherd were honored amongst People's 2023 Women Changing the World for their work with the Looking Out Foundation.
Elton and Brandi
Looking Out Foundation
Elsewhere, the Elton John AIDS Foundation was recently
banned by Russia
, who accused it of taking a negative stance towards countries like Russia and claiming the charity undermines 'traditional spiritual and moral values'.
The Elton John AIDS Foundation said it was "devastated" by the decision, which it said would prevent it from providing lifesaving care to people living with HIV in Russia.
"For more than two decades, we have worked in collaboration with federal and non-governmental partners in Russia to provide hundreds of thousands of people with vital HIV services, including testing, treatment, and care," it said in a statement.
'This work is urgent: in 2024, there were over 1.2 million people living with HIV in Russia, with over 430,000 not receiving treatment. Today's decision by the Russian Federation will undoubtedly endanger lives and disrupt critical HIV prevention efforts for ordinary Russian citizens. At a time when we have the tools and knowledge to defeat HIV, it is heartbreaking to be unable to support them.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
19 hours ago
- Euronews
Why is Disney suing a Hong Kong jewellery company?
The Walt Disney Co. has said it is suing a Hong Kong jewellery company due to the illegal sale of Mickey Mouse ornaments. The international media and entertainment conglomerate filed a lawsuit in federal court in Los Angeles on Wednesday against the Red Earth Group, which sells jewellery online under the name Satéur. Disney says the marketing and branding of the rings, necklaces and earrings in Satéur's 'Mickey 1928 Collection' violate its trademark rights and that the Hong Kong company is deliberately trying to fool customers into thinking the pieces are official Disney merchandise. Disney's lawsuit claims that Red Earth is 'intentionally trying to confuse consumers' with the 'Mickey 1928 Collection' and the impression created "suggests, at a minimum, a partnership or collaboration with Disney.' Satéur, the suit alleges, 'intends to present Mickey Mouse as its own brand identifier for its jewelry merchandise and "seeks to trade on the recognizability of the Mickey Mouse trademarks and consumers' affinity for Disney and its iconic ambassador Mickey Mouse.' The lawsuit seeks an injunction against Red Earth trading on Disney's trademark in any other way, along with monetary damages to be determined later. The lawsuit is indicative of Disney's continued efforts to protect its intellectual property from unauthorized appropriation. Although the earliest version of Mickey Mouse entered the public domain last year, the company still holds trademark rights to the character. Even if a character is in the public domain, it cannot be used on merchandise in a way that suggests it is from the company with the trademark, as Disney alleges Red Earth is doing. Mickey Mouse first appeared publicly in the short film Steamboat Willie in 1928. That version of the most iconic character in American pop culture is now free from Disney's copyright and creators are able to make use of only the more rat-like, non-speaking boat captain from Steamboat Willie. 'This is it. This is Mickey Mouse. This is exciting because it's kind of symbolic,' said Jennifer Jenkins, a professor of law and director of Duke's Center for the Study of Public Domain, last year. 'It's sometimes derisively referred to as the Mickey Mouse Protection Act,' Jenkins added. 'That's oversimplified because it wasn't just Disney that was pushing for term extension. It was a whole group of copyright holders whose works were set to go into the public domain soon, who benefited greatly from the 20 years of extra protection.' The widely publicized moment Mickey Mouse entered the public domain was considered a landmark in iconography going public. Other famous animal characters like A.A. Milne's Winnie the Pooh and Tigger recently joined the public domain. This resulted in several horror films like the gouge-your-eyes-out-terrible Winnie The Pooh: Blood and Honey. Predictably, Mickey Mouse was also turned into a cheaply made slasher, Mickey Mouse's Trap. It was released last August, and it turned out to be just as dreadful as the bloodthirsty ursine's movie. As of this year, two other pop culture figures entered the public domain: Popeye the Sailor can punch without permission and intrepid kid reporter Tintin can investigate freely. The two classic comic characters who first appeared in 1929 are among the intellectual properties in the public domain in the US as of 1 January 2025 - meaning they too can be used and repurposed without permission or payment to copyright holders. Certain noteworthy books also became public, including William Faulkner's 'The Sound and the Fury,' Ernest Hemingway's 'A Farewell to Arms' and John Steinbeck's first novel, 'A Cup of Gold,' from 1929. There's also British novelist Virginia Woolf's 'A Room of One's Own,' an extended essay that became a landmark text in feminism from the modernist literary luminary. Elsewhere, early works by major figures from the early sound era of moviemaking made their debut in the public domain in 2025, including Alfred Hitchcock's Blackmail – a film shown at last year's Festival Lumière in Lyon, France.
LeMonde
a day ago
- LeMonde
With 'Eddington,' Ari Aster has crafted a dark, cynical fable about an America on the verge of collapse
Le Monde's Verdict – Must See Just as American cinema seemed to have lost its critical edge, Ari Aster has dived straight into the heart of the divide threatening the fabric of the nation – the specter of secession again looming over the bald eagle, the symbol of the United States. As part of a new wave of horror filmmakers (Hereditary in 2018, followed by Midsommar in 2019), the gifted 39-year-old protégé of the independent studio A24 has, with his fourth feature, revived the kind of skepticism that characterized New Hollywood in the 1970s/ With Eddington, Aster has continued the rejection of genre conventions that he began with Beau Is Afraid (2023), now moving toward a psychiatric fable of deep darkness conceived at the height of the Covid-19 pandemic. Through a satire that spares no one, he channels a sense of contemporary nihilism, where grotesque excesses and enormity now bite into the horrifying Trump-era circus. Eddington is a small town in New Mexico, introduced with a lingering shot of its municipal sign. In May 2020, public health measures deliver the final blow to a social contract and civil harmony already badly eroded. The main fault line runs between the sheriff, Joe Cross (Joaquin Phoenix) – a lackluster guardian of order, asthmatic and resistant to mask-wearing – and the mayor, Ted Garcia (Pedro Pascal), a classic liberal adept at public relations and political networking. As the elections approach, the sheriff launches a campaign against the mayor and his plan to build a predatory data center – a clash between patriotic common sense and a disconnected political elite.
LeMonde
2 days ago
- LeMonde
Kendrick Lamar and SZA deliver three-hour tour de force at Paris concert
The recent programming at Paris La Défense Arena suggests that American rap had reached gender parity. On Sunday, July 13, Mary J. Blige, the "queen of hip-hop soul" of the 1990s, shared the bill with gangsta rapper 50 Cent. Two days later, current heavyweights of rap and R&B, Kendrick Lamar and SZA, were taking to the stage together in a nearly three-hour concert. While the two New York artists performed separately before a half-filled Arena on Sunday, it was a different story for Lamar and SZA, who designed a joint show. The two stars, whose debut albums were produced by the label Top Dawg Entertainment, had already collaborated on several tracks, including the hit "Luther," which has surpassed one billion streams. For the Grand National Tour, the artists each rap or sing for 20 to 30 minutes at a time, going back and forth and delivering a total of more than 50 songs from their repertoires. The tour, which includes 23 shows across the US and Europe, is on track to become the most profitable in hip-hop history, with over one million tickets sold. The 80,000 spots for the two Paris dates were snapped up almost instantly.
