Gulf states are playing the long game between the US and China
tour of the Persian Gulf – his first official foreign visit – the geopolitical chessboard of the Middle East is being redrawn. For China, a key player in the region's economic and strategic landscape, the implications are impossible to ignore.
Trump's extraordinary reception in Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates underscores a stark reality: Gulf leaders, who dealt with former US president Joe Biden's relatively arms-length approach, likely view Trump's transnationalism as a safer bet.
The multitrillion-dollar deals signed during his visit – spanning
artificial intelligence , technology and finance – signal more than just lucrative contracts for American firms. They mark a deliberate pivot by Gulf states to deepen ties with a potentially resurgent US economy.
This realignment carries risks for Beijing. China has spent years cultivating the Gulf as a
critical partner for energy imports, infrastructure projects and its Belt and Road Initiative. Yet Trump's laser focus on redirecting Gulf capital into US markets, bolstered by dozens of corporate leaders, threatens to squeeze China's access to the petrodollar pipeline that Beijing hopes will help fuel its economic revival.
Trump's most audacious move, however, came not only for Riyadh, Abu Dhabi and Doha but Damascus. The
lifting of sanctions on Syria , advocated by its recent regional allies Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey, signals a strategic realignment.
People celebrate in Homs, Syria, after US President Donald Trump announced plans during his visit to Saudi Arabia to ease sanctions on Syria and normalise relations with its new government, on May 13. Photo: AP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
9 minutes ago
- South China Morning Post
How the EU has marginalised itself on the global stage
The summit between the European Union and China has turned out to be a non-event, the worst so far. The reason for this is not too difficult to understand. After US President Donald Trump returned to the White House, the EU has found itself falling between two stools, torn between Washington and Beijing. Europeans were surprised when Trump won the US presidential election in 2016 but viewed it as a one-off aberration. Without the challenge posed by Trump, though, EU leaders might not see the need to make any fundamental changes. European leaders have made three miscalculations. First, they cannot grasp the sea change brought about by Trump's anti-elite revolution . Their much-cherished rules-based international order is moribund, but European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and her colleagues cling to the idea of its resurrection. For the last four years, the EU has pursued a misguided policy towards China based on transatlantic solidarity. This strategy began under Trump's predecessor, Joe Biden, but has been jettisoned entirely by the current administration despite the efforts of von der Leyen and others to accommodate Trump. The foundation of transatlantic solidarity between the EU and the United States has shifted, and not just because of Trump's global trade war that has not spared Europe Second, the EU is persisting with its old playbook in dealing with China. This approach is one of 'systemic rivalry', with ideological confrontation and economic de-risking intended to provide a base for transatlantic policy towards China. However, Trump and his administration have fundamentally undermined the basis for any foreign policy. Many of the accusations levelled against China and Chinese President Xi Jinping – such as disrupting the global economy, supporting Russia's aggression in Ukraine, pushing expansionist territorial claims and engaging in a variety of repressive domestic policies – can now easily be turned back towards Trump and the US. Any previous ideological similarities between the US and EU have turned out to be irrelevant.
South China Morning Post
4 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Trump says Hamas doesn't want Gaza deal: ‘I think they want to die'
US President Donald Trump said on Friday that Hamas did not want a ceasefire deal in Gaza, after Israel and the United States quit indirect negotiations with the Palestinian militant group. Advertisement 'It was too bad. Hamas didn't really want to make a deal. I think they want to die,' Trump said. In Qatar, mediators had been shuttling between Israeli and Hamas delegations for more than two weeks in a bid to secure a ceasefire and the release of Israeli hostages after nearly two years of fighting. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said his government was still seeking a deal despite recalling its negotiators from Doha. Trump blamed Hamas, saying 'now we're down to the final hostages, and they know what happens after you get the final hostages'. Advertisement The US president's special envoy Steve Witkoff accused Hamas of not 'acting in good faith' in the negotiations that ended on Thursday.
South China Morning Post
6 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Police slap HK$200,000 bounties on 15 members of subversive ‘Hong Kong Parliament'
The city's national security police have placed a new round of bounties on 15 overseas activists wanted for their involvement in a group called 'Hong Kong Parliament', which the force has deemed subversive and has accused it of violating the Beijing-imposed security law. The HK$200,000 (US$25,640) reward offered for each fugitive was supported by the Office for Safeguarding National Security in Hong Kong, which said the group's actions, including holding an unlawful election 'posed a serious threat to national sovereignty, security and developmental interests of the country'. The activists included members of a Taiwan-based outfit that advocates Hong Kong independence. New arrest warrants were announced on Friday for Chan Lai-chun, Feng Chongyi, Sasha Gong, Ng Man-yan and Tsang Wai-fan, who were accused of establishing a so-called parliament-in-exile in 2022 That year, the group, mainly founded and run by self-exiled activists, formed an 'electoral committee' in Canada to hold elections that it said 'represents, solidifies and revives Hong Kong people's rights of self-determination'. The vote planned in 2022 was postponed to May this year. The group said 15,702 votes were cast to elect 15 members from 18 candidates for its first 'parliament' and a 'virtual swearing-in ceremony' was held on July 14. But five winners refused to be sworn in or announced their departure from the group after winning. Another 10 people were accused by Hong Kong national security police of taking part in the election and swearing in as so-called parliament members – Chin Po-fun, Ha Hoi-chun, Hau Chung-yu, Ho Wing-yau, Alan Keung Ka-wai, Tony Lam, Agnes Ng, Wong Chun-wah, Wong Sau-wo, and Zhang Xinyan.
