
‘Crazy idea': Ontario councillors push back as strong mayor powers reach small towns
As of May 1, another 169 mayors in the province can now veto bylaws, pass new ones with just one-third of council in favour and hire or fire municipal department heads unilaterally.
Municipal Affairs and Housing Minister Rob Flack said last month that the province decided to more than triple the number of mayors who can access the powers in an effort to build housing faster and streamline local governance.
The measures were first introduced in 2022 and initially only applied to the mayors of Toronto and Ottawa, Ontario's two most populous cities.
Several municipalities are taking active steps to reject the powers now that they have been granted more widely.
Mark Hunter, one of 10 city councillors in Stratford, recently got unanimous support for his motion to reject the new powers. Hunter said it was symbolic and designed to show that municipal democracy shouldn't be 'subject to provincial whim.'
'What it effectively does is get rid of majority rule in our council,' he said.
'It's the expectation of the residents in our community that their representatives are able to fully represent them and this change puts some level of diminishment on that.'
Hunter said his fellow councillors can have strong disagreements at council, but lively discussions result in better decisions for the community. Anything that diminishes that discussion is worse for residents, he said.
Councillors aren't concerned about Stratford's current mayor abusing his power, said Hunter, but they are worried about what could happen in the future.
'It's another example of concentrating power in fewer hands. Unfortunately in human history, that doesn't always work out so well,' he said.
David O'Neil, a councillor in Quinte West, said he is also concerned about strong mayor powers, adding they represent 'a real misdirection' by the province.
'I think this decision is on par with the crazy idea of building a tunnel under the 401,' O'Neil said, referring to Premier Doug Ford's promise to add a tunnel under the major Ontario highway.
He added he is skeptical that strong mayor powers would lead to new housing being built in his community, and thinks the province should waive development fees if it wants to see more housing built.
Zack Card, another councillor for Quinte West, said he believes the expansion of the strong mayor powers will 'erode the democratic traditions of municipal councils in Ontario.'
'I believe effective councils work collaboratively and with an understanding that all voices carry equal weight. Tipping that balance could potentially hinder governance and make solving issues within our communities more difficult,' Card wrote in an email.
Neither O'Neil nor Card would speak to the recent dismissal of the municipality's chief administration officer, which was described on the municipality's website as a 'mayoral decision' pursuant to the legislation, made on the first day the powers were available.
Quinte West Mayor Jim Harrison said in an email to The Canadian Press that 'the decision was made in close collaboration and consensus with council, utilizing strong mayor powers to move forward.'
Less than a week after the decision, he told a council meeting that he wasn't planning to make use of the strong mayor powers.
O'Neil suggested his concern is more future-oriented: it's unclear what could a different sort of mayor do with these powers five, 10 or 20 years down the road.
David Arbuckle, executive director of the Association of Municipal Managers, Clerks and Treasurers of Ontario, said unilateral power threatens a local government's administrative authority and staffers' ability to give non-partisan, evidence-based advice.
'It's changed the dynamic where (a city staffer) now has to be mindful of the fact that they could be hired or fired by the mayor at any point in time,' Arbuckle said in a recent interview.
'The advice they're bringing forward may not be as neutral as possible because ultimately they are now responding to one individual.'
Corey Engelsdorfer, a councillor from Prince Edward County, said he's worried the powers will exacerbate existing divisions on his council and, should they be used, could 'sideline' constituents even as the community experiences a boom in development.
The traditional model of majority rule is already divisive, Engelsdorfer said — especially when it comes to housing decisions — so decisions being made with even less support could lead to even more public cynicism.
'The way we build homes is by working together as a council and not by one person or a third of council pushing through what they want to push through,' he said.
'I always hear Premier Ford say that these changes cut red tape, but democracy to me is not red tape. I don't think it's something that needs to be in place at all.'
Mayor Steve Ferguson said in an interview that he was working to defer several of the strong mayor powers, including personnel decisions, back to council.
The council also unanimously passed a resolution asking the province to rescind strong mayor legislation, Engelsdorfer said.
Despite the concerns, Matti Siemiatycki, director of the University of Toronto's Infrastructure Institute and a professor of geography and planning, said the uptake of the powers has been 'fairly underwhelming.'
Before last month, there were only 46 so-called strong mayors in Ontario. Only a few made use of their powers.
High-profile examples include Hamilton Mayor Andrea Horwath advancing affordable housing development on two municipal parking lots in April 2024, and Mississauga's former mayor Bonnie Crombie passing bylaws to build fourplexes in October 2023.
But Siemiatycki said he fears there's greater risk for strong mayor powers to go unchecked in smaller municipalities, where there is less oversight and, often, less journalistic scrutiny.
'We've seen an erosion and a decline of the local presses across Canada, and it's no more visible than in small communities,' he said.
'If you're concentrating powers, what's really needed is external oversight bodies. And the media is one of those, so smaller communities might struggle to have that accountability and people being aware of what's happening.'
Siemiatycki said while he sympathizes with the province's desire to tackle a housing and infrastructure crisis, he agrees with the councillors who have raised concerns.
'It doesn't necessarily mean you'll go further just because you're aiming to go faster,' he said.
'The thing that's more sustainable over the long term is acceleration through processes that have very clear accountabilities and timelines to them.'
This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 1, 2025.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
The No Kings Playbook to Confront Trump's ‘Authoritarian Breakthrough'
The 'No Kings' movement is shifting gears to counter what they're calling the 'authoritarian breakthrough' of Donald Trump's second Wednesday evening, the No Kings movement hosted a video conference call for more than 130,000 pro-democracy activists. The call seeks to build off the success of mass anti-Trump street protests — which also continued Thursday evening with more than 1,600 nationwide 'Good Trouble Lives On' demonstrations, inspired by Civil Rights icon John Lewis. The 90-minute video conference was organized to train activists in principles of 'strategic non-cooperation,' which aims to gum up the works of the increasingly dark and dictatorial Trump administration. The call was organized by the progressive grassroots organization Indivisible, and featured a trainer from Choose Democracy, Daniel Hunter, whose bio touts past work with pro-democracy activists living under authoritarian regimes, such as in Myanmar. The tone of the conference was significantly more somber than similar recent webinars organized by Indivisible. It painted United States' democracy as confronting an existential crisis — and pegged the odds of overcoming Trump's ambition at not much better than a 'coin-flip.' 'We're in a moment of authoritarian breakthrough,' said Hunter, who defined that term as a 'window in which a would-be authoritarian is attempting to rapidly consolidate power' in an effort to 'eliminate checks' that prevent them from operating with impunity. Hunter ticked through six characteristics of authoritarian breakthrough, all of which are currently in play. This dictatorial to-do list includes 'directing investigations against critics'; 'giving license to lawbreaking'; 'regulatory retaliation'; 'deploying [the] military domestically'; 'federal law enforcement overreach'; and holding tight to power, i.e. 'the autocrat won't leave.' Trump is hewing to this well-worn playbook, Hunter said, by pardoning violent Jan. 6 felons, sending masked Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents to round up law-abiding immigrants, deploying the National Guard and Marines into Los Angeles, making 'capricious threats' to deport U.S. citizens like Rosie O'Donnell, and openly plotting an unconstitutional third pro-democracy trainer offered the encouragement that 'Trump didn't write this playbook. This is a global phenomena … the growth of autocracies.' He added that the experiences of allies across the globe offer strategies that have succeeded in turning back Trumpian figures in their own the odds of success are sobering. The training included a study of 35 countries that experienced 'democratic backsliding' in the last 30 years, and their track records for overcoming the authoritarian assault. Without a movement of mass 'civil resistance,' less than eight percent of countries were successful at righting the democratic ship of state. Active civil resistance — such as the movement that No Kings is building in the U.S. — has historically increased the odds to 52 percent. 'I don't love those numbers,' said Hunter, but he added that the payoff for victory can be profound. Successful resistance movements typically forge societies that are 'more democratic' on the other side — offering 'an advancement' rather than a return to the status quo ante. 'Our task right now is to build and activate a powerful opposition' based on 'mass defiance in a lot of places,' Hunter said, with the goal of 'interrupting the regime' by 'getting into the gears through nonviolent tactics.' He insisted that organizers and activists need to commit themselves to resistance now: 'We're in a bit of a race against time,' he said, adding more hopefully: 'We have window.'A fellow pro-democracy organizer, Maria Stephan of the Horizons Project, assured the assembled crowd that there's a rich history of successful resistance movements to take inspiration from. These include not only foreign examples, like Chile overcoming the brutal regime of the fascist dictator Augusto Pinochet, but also the all-American struggle that ended legal segregation. Stephan pointed to America's 'own civil rights activists who dismantled racial authoritarianism in the Jim Crow South using legal and legislative strategies, but also boycotts, strikes, sit-ins, freedom rides, and other campaigns of non-violent resistance.' The 'Achilles heel' of authoritarians, Stephan said, is their dependence on popular passivity — on normal people, who feel isolated, fearful, and disempowered, who choose to go along rather than taking risks and rocking the challenge for pro-democracy activists is to forge connection, solidarity, and build truly popular resistance that can offer safety in numbers and embolden other Americans to fight the democratic backslide — seeking to regain momentum for a government that serves the people's interests, not those of Trump and his cronies. For Stephan that means activating broad-based resistance across the different 'pillars' of society — from labor and faith communities; to business interests and educational institutions; to the nation's civil service workers and members of the efforts to cow big-business CEOs, oust university leaders, mass-fire civil servants, and deploy the military against the people of Los Angeles, demonstrate how each of the pillars is vulnerable to being co-opted into the administration's authoritarian project. But Stephan underscored the power of popular resistance to 'shift the incentives' and create a popular counterweight to presidential pressure. 'We need to get the institutional enablers of authoritarianism to withdraw their support from the authoritarian system and to get behind a democracy based on the will of the people.' For everyday people, Stephan highlighted three main avenues for resistance: First are strategies of 'protest and persuasion' (think: street demonstrations or T-shirt ready slogans like 'Melt ICE') that communicate popular resistance. Second, is building up positive local infrastructure, whether that means supporting immigrant-friendly local businesses or providing mutual aid to neighbors in need. The third is the broad category of 'non-cooperation.' This can come from outside of institutions, as with boycotts, or from inside, as when civil servants or even soldiers refuse to carry out illegal or immoral orders. As a small-scale proof of concept, Stephan pointed to the successful pressure campaign by Annapolis alumni and retired military commanders that beat back Trump's efforts to strip the Naval Academy's library of books by black authors like Maya Angelou (while leaving, e.g. Hitler's treatise Mein Kampf on the shelves). The way that Harvard University's powerful alumni network has spurred the university administration to fight Trump's assault on academic freedom, rather than capitulate like Columbia, is another example. Stephan also pointed to ongoing consumer boycotts of Tesla (over Elon Musk's traumatizing tenure in the Trump administration) and Target (for its rollback of diversity initiatives) as 'acts of non-cooperation that are making a difference in this country' as they cost those companies webinar was not just a conceptual orientation, but a call to action. Leaders asked participants to commit to taking the evening's online organizing and make it physical by hosting a gathering with like-minded activists in their own communities. The organizers hoped to get 1,000 house-party pledges. The evening's tally soared past 5, meeting closed with an energizing message from a longtime activist Ash-Lee Woodard Henderson, who encouraged new participants not to get flummoxed by the lingo or overwhelmed by the opposition. 'It's not complex, my friends,' she said. 'Don't let these evil people make you feel like it's rocket science to get to democracy — when it's actually just fingerpainting,' 'It's actually our culture,' she added. 'And the majority of the people in this country agree with us.' More from Rolling Stone Trump Claims He 'Never Wrote a Picture in My Life.' He Actually Drew Plenty of Them Team Trump Was on 'F-cking Warpath' to Kill Story About Salacious Letter to Epstein The White House's Epstein 'Hoax' Explanation Makes Zero Sense Best of Rolling Stone The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence


New York Post
04-07-2025
- New York Post
Hunter Biden begged DNC to pay his legal fees for tax, gun cases: new tome
WASHINGTON — Then-first son Hunter Biden begged the Democratic National Committee to foot his mounting legal bills for the federal tax and gun charges he faced last year, according to an explosive new tell-all. The DNC was paying the legal fees for dad Joe Biden, who was still president at the time, over a separate federal probe into whether the commander in chief hoarded classified documents — but scoffed at also covering Hunter's extra legal costs, says the book '2024: How Trump Retook the White House and the Democrats Lost America.' By June 2024, Hunter's 'sugar brother' Kevin Morris had already paid off more than $2 million in tax delinquency related to one of then-first son's criminal cases and had been shelling out even more for his related legal bills. Advertisement 3 Then-first son Hunter Biden begged the Democratic National Committee to foot his mounting legal bills for federal tax and gun charges he faced last year. CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images Those bills included ongoing alimony payments to Hunter's ex-wife, Kathleen Buhle, and child-support checks to Lunden Roberts, the mother of his love-child Navy Joan, as set out in a June 2023 settlement. Hunter's legal tab as the presidential contest ramped up in January 2024 stood at around $5 million, Morris testified to House Republican investigators. Advertisement Morris' daughter later accused the troubled first son of 'taking advantage' of her father's largesse. 3 The seamy first son was convicted of three felony gun charges June 11, 2024. Last month, the law firm that represented Hunter also sued him for reneging on more than $50,000 in legal fees. Hunter was convicted of three felony gun charges June 11, 2024, and pleaded guilty to multiple tax felonies for evading $1.4 million in payments to the IRS in September. Advertisement His father months later pardoned him of all those charges as well as any related to potential crimes he may have committed between Jan. 1, 2014, and Dec. 1, 2024. 3 Former President Joe Biden handed his son a controversial sweeping pardon before leaving office. WireImage 'The only thing I care about is that my son is not convicted,' Biden told a close friend before Hunter's first conviction, according to journalists Josh Dawsey, Tyler Pager and Isaac Arnsdorf in their forthcoming book, which was excerpted Thursday in the Wall Street Journal. The president at one point considered forming a legal defense fund for his son to push back on the federal probe as well as the parallel congressional investigation into Hunter's foreign influence peddling that could potentially implicate him. Advertisement '2024: How Trump Retook the White House and the Democrats Lost America,' is being published by Penguin Press on July 8. Reps for the DNC and Hunter's former lawyer, Abbe Lowell, did not respond to Post requests for comment.


New York Post
04-07-2025
- New York Post
Biden struggles to set up beach chair in Malibu during first Fourth of July weekend since leaving office
What a difference a year makes. Former President Joe Biden was snapped struggling to set up a beach chair Thursday before catching some rays with family near his son Hunter's home in Malibu, Calif., to kick off his first Independence Day weekend since leaving office. 3 Former President Biden was snapped struggling to set up a beach chair in Malibu, California on July 3, 2025. BACKGRID 3 Biden was seen with Jill Biden, granddaughter Finnegan and grandson Beau Biden Jr. on July 3, 2025. BACKGRID 3 Biden took more vacation days than any modern US president. BACKGRID The ex-commander-in-chief — who took more vacation days than any modern US president while in office — lounged under a red umbrella with former first lady Jill Biden, while granddaughter Finnegan and grandson Beau Biden Jr. frolicked in the sand. Photos show the 82-year-old former Delaware senator and vice president shaking sand from his towel while wearing his signature aviator sunglasses and presidential baseball cap before packing up. Onlookers later spotted the elder Biden dining with Hunter at his favorite sushi joint Nobu later on Thursday.