Falling home prices are raising the risk of a deeper correction as the housing market cracks under high mortgage rates
Recent housing market indicators show persistent weakness in home prices, including consecutive month-over-month declines. That's as housing supply has increased while demand has stayed tepid amid still-high mortgage rates hovering around 7%. The slump in prices raises the risk of a prolonged downturn, according to Capital Economics.
The housing market has largely been frozen since mortgage rates shot up a few years ago, but recent indicators have pointed to the possibility of an extended slump in prices.
The latest Case-Shiller home price report showed a 0.3% monthly fall in the 20-city index in April, steeper than March's downwardly revised 0.2% dip.
In a note on Tuesday, Thomas Ryan, North America economist at Capital Economics, warned that the back-to-back declines could signal a 'deeper correction' ahead.
'After falling in March, the further 0.3% m/m decline in house prices in April raises the risk that prices are entering a sustained downturn, as the market finally buckles under the weight of near-7% mortgage rates,' he added.
On a three-month annualized basis, house prices fell by 0.4%, Ryan noted. And while prices are up on a year-over-year basis, it's still the slowest pace since August 2023
The Case-Shiller data isn't the only red flag, as the FHFA price index showed a 0.4% monthly drop.
'Clearly, the existing homes market is losing momentum as demand remains anemic due to sky-high borrowing costs, while more people put their home up for sale, forcing sellers to adjust their price expectations,' Ryan wrote.
Previous data also line up with a downtrend. The median sale price of an existing home has dropped for five consecutive months on a seasonally adjusted basis. That's as the number of homes available for sale is back around pre-pandemic levels.
To be sure, lower prices also make homes more attractive, potentially spurring more demand and representing some relief for younger Americans who are looking to buy but have been priced out of the market.
But economists at Citi Research flagged ongoing headwinds, attributing the price declines to high mortgage rates, elevated uncertainty, softening consumer demand, and a weakening labor market.
In addition, slowing activity in the housing sector overall is an early sign that underlying demand is weakening this year, Citi said in recent note.
'While prices could still fluctuate month-to-month, consistent softening in median sale prices suggests the trend is likely to continue in more stable measures of new home prices like the Case Shiller index,' economists predicted.
Capital Economics said there are still some reasons to believe a prolonged downturn can be avoided. Ryan pointed out at that supply remains relatively tight overall, despite some expansion lately.
Meanwhile, the mortgage market is also healthy, reinforced by more than a decade of stricter lending standards instituted after the Great Financial Crash. Plus, continued resilience in the labor market should prevent forced selling in the housing market, he added.
'All that being said, the weakness of the recent price data mean that we have to start taking the prospect of an extended period of house price declines more seriously, which is something we will be considering for our upcoming US Housing Outlook,' Ryan said.
This story was originally featured on Fortune.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump says he wants interest rate cut to 1%, would 'love' if Powell resigned
By Trevor Hunnicutt and Kanishka Singh WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump said on Friday he would "love" if Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell were to resign, and the president also said he wanted interest rates cut to 1%. KEY QUOTES "I'd love him to resign if he wanted to, he's done a lousy job," Trump said, also labeling the Fed chair as "stupid." "I think we should be paying 1% right now, and we're paying more because we have a guy who suffers from, I think, Trump Derangement Syndrome," Trump added. WHY IT'S IMPORTANT Trump has long attacked the Federal Reserve chair over interest rates that the U.S. president wants lowered. Fed chairs have long been seen as insulated from presidential dismissal for reasons other than malfeasance or misconduct, but Trump has threatened to test that legal premise with frequent threats to fire Powell. Powell's term ends in May 2026, and Trump is expected to nominate a successor in the coming months. CONTEXT Trump said he will name as successor to Powell someone who will lower rates. Last week, the Fed decided to leave short-term borrowing costs in the 4.25%-4.50% range.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Senate's ‘big, beautiful bill' faces serious headwinds in the House
The Senate's version of the 'big, beautiful bill' is facing serious headwinds in the House with The Hill learning that at least six House Republicans are currently a 'no' on the framework, a daunting sign for GOP leadership as the Senate races towards a vote. Those six House Republicans, some of whom requested anonymity, are enough opposition to tank the package, as GOP leaders grapple with a razor-thin majority. Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), who was one of two GOP lawmakers to oppose the House version of the bill last month, is also likely to oppose the Senate's edition, deepening the pocket of resistance in the lower chamber. Republicans can only afford to lose three votes and still clear the legislation, assuming full attendance and united Democratic opposition. 'I support the reasonable provisions in H.R. 1 that protect Medicaid's long-term viability and ensure the program continues to serve our most vulnerable, but I will not support a final bill that eliminates vital funding streams our hospitals rely on, including provider taxes and state directed payments, or any provisions that punish expansion states,' Rep. David Valadao (R-Calif.) wrote in a statement on Saturday. 'President Trump was clear when he said to root out our waste, fraud, and abuse without cutting Medicaid and I wholeheartedly agree,' he continued. 'I urge my Senate colleagues to stick to the Medicaid provisions in H.R. 1 — otherwise I will vote no.' Rep. Jeff Van Drew (R-N.J.) told The Hill that he is also opposed to the bill because of the Medicaid provider tax provision. Rep. Young Kim (R-Calif.) is currently a 'no' on the measure because of the Medicaid language, rollback of solar energy credits and public lands provisions, a source familiar with the matter told The Hill. Rep. Nick LaLota (R-N.Y.), meanwhile, told The Hill that he is against the current version of the package because of the state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap proposal. The legislation would increase the currently $10,000 SALT cap to $40,000 for individuals making $500,000 or less for five years, then snap back to the original number. 'While I support the President's broader agenda, how could I support the same unfair $10k SALT cap I've spent years criticizing?' LaLota said. 'A permanent $40k deduction cap with income thresholds of $225k for single filers and $450k for joint filers would earn my vote.' It is not, however, just moderates who are signaling issues with the Senate bill: Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas), a member of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, posted an ominous message on X that suggested he was not pleased with the package. 'I will not negotiate via X. But it's important to know that jamming us with a bill before we've had any chance to review the implications of major changes & re-writes, fluid scores, a high likelihood of violating the house framework (deficits) , & tons of swamp buy-offs is bad,' he wrote. The opposition is rising to the surface as Senate Republicans inch closer to holding an initial vote on the 'big, beautiful bill,' which would officially kick off the consideration process and eventually tee up a final vote in the House. It remains unclear, however, if Senate GOP leaders have the votes to move forward. If the motion to proceed passes by a simple majority, the chamber would hold a series of unlimited amendment votes called a vote-a-rama, which could result in changes to the measure. Senate GOP leaders are also still talking to holdouts and could make changes to the bill as written. In the meantime, House Republicans — beginning to review the revised Senate text unveiled overnight — are expressing resistance to the measure, prompting serious questions about whether top GOP lawmakers will be able to enact the legislation by their self-imposed July 4 deadline. Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) convened a call with the House Republican Conference Saturday afternoon and urged lawmakers to keep their concerns with the Senate bill private, and instead speak directly with their senators and the White House, two sources told The Hill. Senate Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) told members that it is unlikely they will have to return to Washington on Monday, the sources said. Tuesday or Wednesday is more realistic, he told lawmakers. One source told The Hill that the call was brief and leadership did not take questions. The main qualm among House Republicans appears to be the Medicaid language in the bill. The Senate's legislation includes a proposal that would effectively cap provider taxes at 3.5 percent by 2031, down from the current 6 percent, but only for the states that expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act. The decrease was initially supposed to begin in 2027, with a 0.5 percent phase down annually, but Senate Republicans overnight changed the text to delay the implementation to 2028. The upper chamber also inserted a provision to create a $25 billion rural hospital relief fund that would be distributed over five years to assuage those concerns. The changes, however, do not seem to be solving all of the GOP's problems, with House Republicans still voicing opposition to the language. Aside from Medicaid, the Senate bill's rollback of green-energy tax credits is an issue for some House Republicans. The revised legislation for the upper chamber slashes tax incentives for wind and solar energy and adds a new tax on future wind and solar projects. Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.) would not say how he plans to vote on the bill, but signaled that he is not happy with the Medicaid provisions and green-energy tax credit language. 'Instead of improving the Medicaid and energy portions of [the] House bill it appears the Senate went backwards,' he told The Hill. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why QuantumScape Stock Is Plummeting Today
QuantumScape stock is falling today as investors sell shares to take profits. The stock rocketed higher earlier this week after the company announced a major manufacturing breakthrough. QuantumScape could post huge gains if the company's solid-state battery tech is adopted by auto companies, but it's still a high-risk stock. 10 stocks we like better than QuantumScape › On the heels of explosive gains this week, QuantumScape (NYSE: QS) stock is seeing a big sell-off on Friday. The company's share price was down 15.7% as of 3 p.m. ET. QuantumScape's valuation is falling today as investors move to take profits following big gains kicked off by the announcement of major manufacturing progress earlier this week. Even with today's pullback, the stock is up roughly 50% over the last week of trading as of this writing. QuantumScape announced on Tuesday that it had made big progress with its manufacturing process. The company's Cobra separator process has now entered early production stages. The technology is designed to allow for faster and more energy-efficient production and is said to be roughly 25 times better when it comes to heat-treatment speed. The setup is also much smaller than previous technologies, and the smaller footprint should help the company improve its production capabilities. The Cobra news kicked off huge gains for the stock this week, but shares are taking a breather. Investors and analysts are seeing some valuation concerns following the recent rally and are selling shares to take profits. Despite explosive gains this week, QuantumScape stock is still down roughly 95% from the lifetime high it hit after going public through a merger with a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) in November 2020. While the stock has posted an impressive rally this week thanks to news about its Cobra separator technology, long-term investors are likely still looking at a binary outcome. If the company's solid-state battery technologies deliver on their promise and wind up seeing meaningful adoption in the automotive market, the stock is poised to skyrocket. If the technology comes up short and fails to find a place in the market, shareholders will likely lose most of their investment. Before you buy stock in QuantumScape, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and QuantumScape wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $704,676!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $950,198!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,048% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 175% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025 Keith Noonan has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why QuantumScape Stock Is Plummeting Today was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
