The time The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints donated 7,000 Qurans to Muslims
Elder Ahmad S. Corbitt is a Black American with a Muslim first name who worked as a trial attorney and led corporate and government communications for a company on the Eastern Seaboard before he became a General Authority Seventy for The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
The two men found themselves on stage together Tuesday for a dialogue at IRF Summit 2025, a major international religious freedom conference.
'If we can start off with why we agreed to do this?' Elder Corbitt said with a smile, prompting laughter from Shaykh Yusuf and hundreds in the Washington Hilton ballroom near the national capital's famous Embassy Row.
The two religious leaders swiftly found common ground.
'I think getting to know one another is very important,' Shaykh Yusuf said to answer Elder Corbitt's question. 'I think America is uniquely positioned to teach a lot of places about civic society and religious freedom. We obviously have our failures, but we do have something extraordinary here.'
The hallmark of the possibility embodied by America is education, he said. 'I think the more educated people are, the easier it is to get along with people' because the more they know, the more they realize they know less.
'The Quran says, 'As of knowledge, you've been given a very small amount.' There's kind of a certitude that too many people have that creates a very ugly world,' he said.
They firmly agreed that conviction in faith in God is vital, but also offered moderating ideas.
Shaykh Yusuf suggested it is a mistake for believers to be certain about their understanding of their faiths and that it is problematic to not 'allow for the possibility that somebody else might have a more valid opinion.'
Elder Corbitt said there is something important 'about a humility in our conviction that affords someone else the same right. One of the Articles of Faith of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is that, 'We claim the privilege of worshiping Almighty God according to the dictates of our conscience and afford all people the same privilege, let them worship, how, where and what they may.' That's a fundamental tenet to us and to Islam.'
Shaykh Yusuf expressed concern that American education is in decline, in part because of digital devices and digital addictions.
'I think religious faith, more than anything, is going to be the most important element in being able to survive what's coming because things are getting really difficult for people out there,' he said.
Shaykh Yusuf also said it his belief that the light of God is refracted through the prism of the intellect.
'If it's not refracted through that prism, it blinds, it doesn't guide,' he said.
'That refraction,' Elder Corbitt said, 'is facilitated, in my opinion and experience, most powerfully and clearly and effectively through service, through actions.'
He said he was inspired to learn that after the 2004 tsunamis devastated South Asia before he was a church leader, the Church of Jesus Christ went into Aceh Province in Indonesia and asked what the people needed. The first, grim answer, he said, was thousands of body bags. The church also provided new fishing boats and mosques.
'But the thing that most moved me is that The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints donated 7,000 copies of the holy Quran to our Muslim brothers and sisters in the Aceh Province. That had nothing to do with proselytizing,' he said. 'It had to do with ...'
'An act of good will,' Shaykh Yusuf said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Chicago Tribune
2 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
Letters: What July Fourth means to me as an Ahmadi Muslim American
As an Ahmadi Muslim American, the Fourth of July is a heartfelt reminder of the profound freedoms I am blessed to enjoy in this country. Among these, the freedom to practice my faith without fear is one I deeply cherish. In many parts of the world, including some Muslim-majority countries, I would not have the same rights or protections as an Ahmadi Muslim. Many other countries around the world do not offer the freedoms of speech, religion, press and assembly that the USA does. That contrast only deepens my gratitude for the principles enshrined in our Constitution and my loyalty to America for defending these rights. The vision of the Founding Fathers created a nation where individuals of all faiths can live with dignity and worship freely. This is a gift I do not take for granted. My faith teaches me to love my country; the Holy Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) said, 'Love for one's country is a part of faith.' Inspired by this teaching, I see it as my duty to contribute positively to society and uphold the values of justice, peace and unity. The Holy Quran instructs for lawful loyalty to our institutions and to strive for absolute justice for our fellow citizens: 'Verily, Allah commands you to make over the trusts to those entitled to them, and that, when you judge between men, you judge with justice' (4:59). At a time when our country faces division and uncertainty, I respectfully call on all Americans — especially our leaders — to protect the First Amendment rights that make our democracy strong. These rights must be used not just for ourselves, but also to support those who seek refuge and hope under the promise of American freedom. While it is critical that these rights must be protected, I also implore my fellow citizens and elected officials to use them wisely. Using the right of free speech to sow hatred and division does no benefit to our country and will not make domestic security any easier. May this Independence Day be a celebration for all — regardless of background or belief — and may we continue working toward a more inclusive and united the arrival of our country's birthday, what better time to reflect on its humble beginnings? And while the political speeches this Fourth of July are guaranteed to glorify the genius of our Founding Fathers, nothing is perfect, including their considerable lack of foresight when finalizing the paperwork that made us a nation. Granted, it's not all their fault; it is simply unimaginable that George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson and the rest of the gang could've ever possibly predicted a world in which air travel, Wi-Fi and trips to space would be commonplace. But is it really too much to expect them to anticipate the limitations of human nature? Couldn't anyone have imagined that one day, we might elect an arrogant leader who would put his own self-interest and moneymaking schemes ahead of what's best for the entire population? And what's with the Electoral College? It's hard to imagine it even made sense back then, much less 2025. And why was it assumed that lifetime appointments to the highest court in the land freed those individuals from politicizing their positions? Were the boys sipping something stronger than Boston tea? As we approach the highlight of the summer when fireworks light up the evening sky and nonmilitary parades fill the streets of hometown America, we should rejoice in the greatest democracy on earth while at the same time questioning why it couldn't be even better.I'll fly my flag on July Fourth and continue to celebrate 249 years of democracy in a nearby park. That's where our local Optimist Club, of which I'm a member, will sponsor two face painters. The joy in the kids' eyes will be a stark contrast to the gut-wrenching stares of less-privileged children on the nightly news. I'll think about my uncle who said he had a 'happy family in Frankfurt' until an executive action destroyed his life. He left Germany with a tattoo on his wrist and a tattered yellow star to start a new life in Chicago. He was resilient but plagued by nightmares in which swarms of armed attackers gathered up friends and family. He passed in 2010 and never had to experience similar scenes in his adopted home. I now have a better appreciation of how he must have felt as the methodical encroachment of civil liberties changed his life forever. I'm proud of my country, although I don't feel as optimistic about the future as prior years, waiting for the next executive action to event are we actually celebrating this year on the Fourth of July? Our independence from England? I suppose that is true, but then what happened? We lived in 13 Colonies that suddenly became states. They were joined loosely by a system that was governed by a document called the Articles of Confederation. We were not really united at all. We were more like people living together but doing their own thing. Maybe it is time to go back to that era. Each state has laws that differ on income taxes (some have none), education, criminal justice, civil justice, environmental requirements, driver's licenses, professional licenses, the right to abortion, health insurance, other types of insurance, the death penalty, real estate issues, etc. More importantly, we differ on our definitions of law and order, human rights, due process and the importance of adhering to our federal Constitution. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that an injunction in one federal district does not apply nationwide. Maybe that was the signal to call it quits. Pregnant women who have problem pregnancies are already flooding Illinois to receive the health care they deserve. Now, more will come here when it is time to deliver their babies in order to be sure of their 14th Amendment rights to citizenship. No one in the Republican Party seems to follow the Constitution anyway, so maybe we should go back to the time when we were a loose confederation of states. I do not see Americans, as a nation, uniting anytime we mark 249 years since the signing of the Declaration of Independence, take time to reflect upon the values in that document — these revolutionary ideas that power is derived from the 'consent of the governed' and that we are all 'created equal' and what is most equitable about us is our 'unalienable rights.' Furthermore, the sole purpose of the government is to 'secure these rights.' These are the values upon which our whole society rests; however, they are too often taken for granted by too many. In these instances, tyranny and corruption seep into the very fiber of our collective governance. Unfortunately, particularly at the federal level, we live in such an instance. Remember that power comes from you and that those elected to represent you do not have authority over you. They have a responsibility to you. We can be grateful to have Mayor Brandon Johnson and Gov. JB Pritzker committed to resisting such tyranny while overseeing billions of dollars of investment into our neighborhoods, addressing real concerns in a manner that improves and even saves lives, and responsibly managing the public purse with the needs of working families at the forefront of their minds. But we cannot take their leadership for granted. Even their commitment to public service must be emboldened by both our consent and our action. The best thing we can do to preserve our democracy in the face of 21st century tyranny is to civically engage. We must uplift and support our democratic institutions at every level of governance. This is how we connect. This is how our voices are heard. This is how we build strong communities guided by excellent policy. In these trying times, it is up to you to engage your Local School Councils, neighborhood organizations, ward organizations, City Council, County Board and state legislature. They need to be emboldened by your voice. It is up to all of us to ensure that our democratic institutions at every level are the envy of the world. If members of the federal government needs us to show them the way, let us show we celebrate the Fourth of July with friends, festivities and flags, basking in life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, let's pause to consider those denied even the most basic freedoms — not just people but animals. Whether hunted in the wild, confined in laboratories, imprisoned in zoos or circuses, caught in traps or caged, raised and killed for their fur, skin. feathers, flesh or byproducts, animals have no freedom. Consider farmed animals: Billions live in confinement, deprived of autonomy, dignity and joy. Chickens never spread their wings, pigs never root in the soil and cows never feel the sun on their bodies. They're bred solely for exploitation — caged, mutilated and killed, with no say in their fate. If freedom is a value we truly cherish, shouldn't it extend beyond our own species? Choosing a plant-based lifestyle is one powerful way to put our values into action. On this Independence Day, let's widen our circle of compassion. Liberation shouldn't stop with humans — it should include every living being. If the roles were reversed, wouldn't we want the same? Think about is the state of Illinois going to get real when it comes to fireworks? Every year, it's the same story: Illinois municipalities remind people that fireworks are illegal and people shouldn't buy or use them. And then every Fourth of July, virtually every neighborhood in every town across the state is lit up till all hours of the night with individuals putting on their own personal fireworks display. Fireworks are easily available, and people are going to buy them. Why not accept the obvious and legalize them, allow merchants to sell them, and have the city and state collect the tax money that we all know they need? Stop this ridiculous charade once and for all.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Sudan war: A simple guide to what is happening
Sudan plunged into a civil war in April 2023 after a vicious struggle for power broke out between its army and a powerful paramilitary group, the Rapid Support Forces (RSF). It has led to a famine and claims of a genocide in the western Darfur region. More than 150,000 people have died in the conflict across the country, and about 12 million have fled their homes in what the United Nations has called the world's largest humanitarian crisis. Here is what you need to know. Sudan is in north-east Africa and is one of the largest countries on the continent, covering 1.9 million sq km (734,000 sq miles). It borders seven countries and the Red Sea. The River Nile also flows through it, making it a strategically important for foreign powers. The population of Sudan is predominantly Muslim and the country's official languages are Arabic and English. Even before the war started, Sudan was one of the poorest countries in the world - despite the fact that it is a gold-producing nation. Its 46 million people were living on an average annual income of $750 (£600) a head in 2022. The conflict has made things much worse. Last year, Sudan's finance minister said state revenues had shrunk by 80%. The civil war is the latest episode in bouts of tension that followed the 2019 ousting of long-serving President Omar al-Bashir, who came to power in a coup in 1989. There were huge street protests calling for an end to his near-three decade rule and the army mounted a coup to get rid of him. But civilians continued to campaign for the introduction of democracy. A joint military-civilian government was then established but that was overthrown in another coup in October 2021. The coup was staged by the two men at the centre of the current conflict: Gen Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, the head of the armed forces and in effect the country's president And his deputy, RSF leader Gen Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo, better known as "Hemedti". But then Gen Burhan and Gen Dagalo disagreed on the direction the country was going in and the proposed move towards civilian rule. The main sticking points were plans to incorporate the 100,000-strong RSF into the army, and who would then lead the new force. The suspicions were that both generals wanted to hang on to their positions of power, unwilling to lose wealth and influence. Shooting between the two sides began on 15 April 2023 following days of tension as members of the RSF were redeployed around the country in a move that the army saw as a threat. It is disputed who fired the first shot but the fighting swiftly escalated, with the RSF seizing much of Khartoum until the army regained control of it almost two years later in March 2025. The two generals fighting over Sudan's future The RSF was formed in 2013 and has its origins in the notorious Janjaweed militia that brutally fought rebels in Darfur, where they were accused of genocide and ethnic cleansing against the region's non-Arab population. Since then, Gen Dagalo has built a powerful force that has intervened in conflicts in Yemen and Libya. He also controls some of Sudan's gold mines, and allegedly smuggles the metal to the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The army accuses the UAE of backing the RSF, and carrying out drone strikes in Sudan. The oil-rich Gulf state denies the allegation. The army also accuses eastern Libyan strongman Gen Khalifa Haftar of supporting the RSF by helping it to smuggle weapons into Sudan, and sending fighters to bolster the RSF. In early June 2025, the RSF achieved a major victory when it took control of territory along Sudan's border with Libya and Egypt. The RSF also controls almost all of Darfur and much of neighbouring Kordofan. It has declared plans to form a rival government, raising fears that Sudan could split for a second time - South Sudan seceded in 2011, taking with it most of the country's oil fields. The military controls most of the north and the east. Its main backer is said to be Egypt, whose fortunes are intertwined with those of Sudan because they share a border and the waters of the River Nile. Gen Burhan has turned Port Sudan - which is on the Red Sea - into his headquarters, and that of his UN-recognised government. However, the city is not safe - the RSF launched a devastating drone strike there in March. This was retaliation after the RSF suffered one of its biggest setbacks, when it lost control of much of Khartoum - including the Republican Palace - to the army in March. "Khartoum is free, it's done," Gun Burhan declared, as he triumphantly returned to the city, though not permanently. Some analysts say the conflict is in a strategic stalemate and the army still does not have total control of Khartoum, despite deploying newly acquired weapons from Egypt, Turkey, Qatar and Iran. The city is a burnt-out shell: government ministries, banks and towering office blocks stand blackened and burned. The tarmac at the international airport is a graveyard of smashed planes, its passport and check-in counters covered in ash. Hospitals and clinics have also been destroyed, hit by air strikes and artillery fire, sometimes with patients still inside. The army has also managed to win back near total control of the crucial state of Gezira. Losing it to the RSF in late 2023 had been a huge blow, forcing hundreds of thousands of civilians to flee its main city of Wad Madani, which had become a refuge for those who had escaped conflict in other parts of the country. El-Fasher is the last major urban centre in Darfur still held by the army and its allies. The RSF has laid siege to the city, causing hundreds of casualties, overwhelming hospitals and blocking food supplies. Month after month of blockade, bombardment and ground attacks have created famine among the residents, with the people of the displaced camp of Zamzam worst-hit. Many Darfuris believe the RSF and allied militias have waged a war aimed at transforming the ethnically mixed region into an Arab-ruled domain. In March 2024, the UN children's agency, Unicef, gave harrowing accounts of armed men raping and sexually assaulting children as young as one. Some children have tried to end their own lives as a result. In the same month, campaign group Human Rights Watch (HRW) said it was possible that the RSF and allied militias were carrying out a genocide in Darfur against the Massalit people and other non-Arab communities. Thousands had been killed in el-Geneina city in a campaign of ethnic cleansing with the "apparent objective of at least having them permanently leave the region", it said. HRW added that the widespread killings raised the possibility that the RSF and their allies had "the intent to destroy in whole or in part" the Massalit people. As this could constitute a genocide, it appealed to international bodies and governments to carry out an investigation. A subsequent investigation by a UN team fell short of concluding that a genocide was taking place. Instead, it found that that both the RSF and army had committed war crimes. However, the US determined in January this year that the RSF and allied militias have committed a genocide. "The RSF and allied militias have systematically murdered men and boys - even infants - on an ethnic basis, and deliberately targeted women and girls from certain ethnic groups for rape and other forms of brutal sexual violence," then-Secretary of State Anthony Blinken said. "Those same militias have targeted fleeing civilians, murdering innocent people escaping conflict, and prevented remaining civilians from accessing lifesaving supplies. Based on this information, I have now concluded that members of the RSF and allied militias have committed genocide in Sudan," he added. This led to the US imposing sanctions on Gen Dagalo, followed by similar measures against Gen Burhan. Sudan's government filed a case against the UAE in the International Court of Justice (ICJ), accusing it of being complicit in the genocide by funding and arming the RSF. However, the ICJ refused to hear the case, saying that it had no jurisdiction over it. The UAE welcomed its ruling, with an official saying that the Gulf state "bears no responsibility for the conflict". The RSF also denies committing genocide, saying it was not involved in what it describes as a "tribal conflict" in Darfur. But the UN investigators said they had received testimony that RSF fighters taunted non-Arab women during sex attacks with racist slurs and saying they will force them to have "Arab babies". How do you define genocide? There have been several rounds of peace talks in Saudi Arabia and Bahrain - but they have failed. BBC deputy Africa editor Anne Soy says that both sides, especially the army, have shown an unwillingness to agree to a ceasefire. UN health chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus has also lamented that there is less global interest in the conflict in Sudan, and other recent conflicts in Africa, compared to crises elsewhere in the world. "I think race is in the play here," he told the BBC in September 2024. The International Crisis Group (ICG) think-tank has called diplomatic efforts to end the war "lacklustre", while Amnesty International has labelled the world's response "woefully inadequate". Humanitarian work has also been badly affected by the decision of the Trump administration to cut aid. Aid volunteers told the BBC that more than 1,100 - or almost 80% - of the emergency food kitchens have been forced to shut, fuelling the perception that Sudan's conflict is the "forgotten war" of the world. 'I lost a baby and then rescued a child dodging air strikes' Sudan in danger of self-destructing as conflict and famine reign From prized artworks to bullet shells: how war devastated Sudan's museums Go to for more news from the African continent. Follow us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica Focus on Africa This Is Africa


Hamilton Spectator
5 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
A bill setting new limits on asylum-seekers passes in the Dutch parliament
THE HAGUE, Netherlands (AP) — A pair of bills cracking down on asylum-seekers wishing to settle in the Netherlands has passed in the Dutch parliament after wrangling and soul-searching by some lawmakers who feared the law would criminalize offering compassionate help to undocumented migrants. The legislation cuts temporary asylum residency from five to three years, indefinitely suspends the issuance of new asylum residency permits and reins in family reunions for people who have been granted asylum. It passed in the lower house late Thursday evening but could still be rejected in the upper house. The Dutch Red Cross has estimated 23,000 to 58,000 people live in the Netherlands without an official right to residence. Taking tough measures to rein in migration was a policy cornerstone for the four-party coalition led by the Party for Freedom of anti-Islam lawmaker Geert Wilders. The coalition collapsed last month after just 11 months in office, and migration is expected to be a key issue ahead of the snap election Oct. 29. Wilders pulled the plug on the coalition saying it was taking too long to enact moves to rein in migration. His coalition partners rejected the criticism, saying they all backed the crackdown. His party currently holds a narrow lead in opinion polls over a center-left two-party bloc that recently agreed to a formal merger. The opposition Christian Democrats withdrew their support for the legislation put to the vote Thursday over a late amendment that would criminalize people living in the Netherlands without a valid visa or asylum ruling — and would also criminalize people and organizations that help such undocumented migrants. The amendment was introduced by a member of Wilders' party and passed narrowly because a small number of opposition lawmakers were not present for the vote. The vote took place in the final session of parliament before lawmakers broke for the summer. The upper house will consider the legislation after it returns from the recess. If Christian Democrats in the upper chamber reject it, the legislation will be returned to the lower house. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .