&w=3840&q=100)
Explained: Is a genocide unfolding in Gaza?
Palestinians gather to receive food cooked by a charity kitchen, amid a hunger crisis, as the Israel-Gaza conflict continues, in Khan Younis in the southern Gaza Strip, December 4, 2024. File image/Reuters
Rights groups, lawyers and some governments are describing the Gaza war as 'genocide' and calling for a ceasefire but Israel, created in the aftermath of the Nazi Holocaust of Jews, vehemently rejects the explosive term.
Israel says it is seeking to wipe out Gaza's Islamist rulers and free its hostages still held in the occupied Palestinian coastal strip since the Hamas militant attack in Israel on October 7, 2023.
But Israel's devastating war on Gaza – largely populated by descendants of Palestinian refugees who were expelled from or fled what became Israeli land in 1948 – has killed tens of thousands of civilians and sparked growing global outrage.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The accusation against Israel of genocide has been made with increasing force from quarters ranging from 'Schindler's List' star Ralph Fiennes to Amnesty International and some Israeli historians.
What does the legal term really mean and who can decide whether it applies?
What is 'genocide'?
The word genocide – derived from the Greek word 'genos', for race or tribe, and 'cide', from the Latin for 'to kill' – was coined in 1944 by Raphael Lemkin.
Lemkin, a Polish Jew who had fled to the United States, used it to describe the crimes committed by Nazi Germany during the Holocaust.
It was used for the first time within a legal framework by an international military tribunal at Nuremberg to try Nazi leaders for their crimes in 1945.
However, those accused were eventually convicted on charges of crimes against humanity.
Jewish children were kept alive in Germany's Auschwitz for use in medical experiments. Image courtesy:
It has been recognised within international law since 1948 and the advent of the UN Genocide Convention.
That text defines genocide as any of five 'acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group'.
These five acts include killing members of the group, causing them serious bodily or mental harm, imposing living conditions intended to destroy the group, preventing births and forcibly transferring children out of the group.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Regardless of the definition, the qualification of 'genocide' has been hugely sensitive over the decades.
What is happening in Gaza?
Israel's military offensive on Gaza since October 2023 has killed 54,510 people, mostly civilians, according to the health ministry in the occupied Palestinian territory.
The United Nations said on May 30 that the territory's entire population of more than two million people was at risk of famine, even if Israel said earlier that month it was partially easing the complete blockade on aid it imposed on Gaza on March 2.
Palestinian people with empty bowls wait for food at a donation point in Rafah. The widespread hunger and malnutrition in Gaza is catastrophic, UN has said. (Photo: NPR)
Despite international calls for an end to the war, a ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas remains elusive.
The latest war started after Hamas fighters attacked Israel on October 7, 2023.
The attack resulted in the deaths of 1,218 people, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official Israeli figures.
Of the 251 hostages seized, 57 remain in Gaza, including 34 the Israeli military says, are dead.
Who speaks of 'genocide' in Gaza?
In December 2023, South Africa brought a case to the International Court of Justice (ICJ), the United Nations' highest judicial organ, alleging that Israel's Gaza offensive breached the 1948 UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.
Israel denies the accusation.
In rulings in January, March and May 2024, the ICJ told Israel to do everything possible to 'prevent' acts of genocide during its military operations in Gaza, including urgently to facilitate humanitarian aid to prevent famine.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
While no court has so far ruled that the ongoing conflict is a genocide, human rights groups and international law experts – including several who are Israeli – have used the term to describe it.
Amnesty International has accused Israel of carrying out a 'live-streamed genocide' in Gaza, while Human Rights Watch has alleged it is responsible for 'acts of genocide'.
Palestinians mourn their relatives who were killed in Israeli airstrikes on a medical center in Jabalia, northern Gaza Strip, on Thursday, May 15, 2025. AP
A UN committee in November found Israel's warfare in Gaza was 'consistent with the characteristics of genocide'.
And a UN investigation concluded in March that Israel carried out 'genocidal acts' in Gaza through the destruction of the strip's main IVF clinic and other reproductive healthcare facilities.
Omer Bartov, an Israeli scholar of the Holocaust, wrote in August last year that 'Israel was engaged in systematic war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocidal actions'.
Fellow Israeli historians Amos Goldberg and Daniel Blatman, in January, co-wrote an article in which they said: 'Israel is indeed committing genocide in Gaza.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Western governments have largely refrained from using the word, with France's President Emmanuel Macron saying it was not up to a 'political leader to use to term but up to historians to do so when the time comes'.
But Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has used it, as has Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva.
What does Israel say?
Israel alleges it is exercising its right to security and 'self defence', an argument echoed by its staunch ally, the United States.
Israel has dismissed accusations of genocide as 'blatant lies' and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has accused the UN Human Rights Council of being 'an antisemitic, corrupt, terror-supporting and irrelevant body'.
He has said UN experts should instead focus on 'crimes against humanity and the war crimes committed by the Hamas terrorist organisation in the worst massacre against the Jewish people since the Holocaust', referring to October 7.
The International Criminal Court (ICC) in November issued arrest warrants for Netanyahu and former Israeli defence minister Yoav Gallant over allegations of crimes against humanity and war crimes in Israel's war in Gaza – including starvation as a method of warfare.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. File image/ Reuters
It also issued an arrest warrant for Hamas military chief Mohammed Deif over allegations of crimes against humanity and war crimes in the October 7 attack, but the case against him was dropped in February after confirmation of his death.
ICC prosecutor Karim Khan also initially sought warrants against Hamas leaders Yahya Sinwar and Ismail Haniyeh but dropped those applications because they had been killed in Israeli attacks.
Who decides and when?
Thijs Bouwknegt, a genocide expert based in the Netherlands, said the Israeli policy in Gaza seemed to be 'designed to make a civilian population either perish or leave' but a court would have to decide if it was genocide.
'It bears the hallmarks of it, but we still have to wait and see whether it actually was,' he said.
In the case of Rwanda, in which the United Nations said extremist Hutus killed some 800,000 Tutsis and moderate Hutus in 1994, it took a decade for an international tribunal to conclude genocide had happened.
It was not until 2007 that the ICJ recognised as genocide the murder by Bosnian Serb forces of almost 8,000 Muslim men and boys in Srebrenica in 1995 during the Bosnian war.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'The threshold for genocide is nearly impossible to meet,' Bouwknegt explained.
'You have to prove that there was an intent and that there was the only possible explanation for what happened.'
Has there been an intent?
French-Israeli lawyer Omer Shatz said, 'there is no doubt that war crimes, crimes against humanity are being committed' in Gaza.
But he agreed intent was more difficult to prove.
Israeli military patrols near the Al Shifa Hospital compound in Gaza City during ground operation against Hamas in the northern Gaza Strip on November 22, 2023. File Photo/ Reuters
That is why, after the ICC issued an arrest warrant against Netanyahu and Gallant, he filed a report with the court in December arguing they were among eight Israeli officials responsible for 'incitement to genocide in Gaza'.
'If incitement is established, that establishes intent,' he told AFP.
His 170-page report lists such alleged incitements, including Gallant at the start of the war saying Israel was fighting 'human animals' in Gaza and far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich urging 'total extermination' in the Palestinian territory.
It cites President Isaac Herzog failing to differentiate between Palestinian militants and civilians when he spoke of 'an entire nation out there that is responsible' for the October 7 attack.
Mathilde Philip-Gay, an international law expert, said it was ultimately up to a judge to decide on whether the genocide label applied.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
But, she warned: 'International law cannot stop a war.'
'The judiciary will intervene after the war. The qualification (of genocide) is very important for victims but it will come later,' she said.
What now?
The 1948 Genocide Convention says signatories can call on UN organs 'to take such action… for the prevention and suppression of acts of genocide'.
But while it implies they should act to stop any such crime from occurring, it does not detail how.
Activists have called for an arms embargo and sanctions against Israel.
The European Union last month ordered a review of its cooperation deal with Israel and Britain halted trade talks with the government.
But the United States and Germany, two major weapons suppliers, are not likely to want to review their relationship with Israel.
With inputs from AFP
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
14 minutes ago
- First Post
UK to recognise Palestine in September unless Israel takes 'substantive steps' in Gaza: Starmer
UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer informed his ministers that recognition of Palestinian statehood would proceed in September if the Israeli government fails to act on the key conditions set by London, according to a report read more British Prime Minister Keir Starmer speaks during a welcome reception at the Britain's ambassador's residence in Washington, DC on Wednesday. AP File Prime Minister Keir Starmer on Tuesday announced that the United Kingdom will formally recognise the State of Palestine in September unless Israel takes a series of 'substantive steps' in Gaza, including agreeing to a ceasefire. The potentially historic decision, which Starmer described as part of a broader plan for 'lasting peace,' follows his recall of the UK Cabinet from recess for emergency discussions on the escalating crisis in the besieged enclave. According to an AFP report, citing Downing Street, Starmer informed his ministers that recognition of Palestinian statehood would proceed in September if the Israeli government fails to act on the key conditions set by London. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD They include ending 'the appalling situation in Gaza', reaching a ceasefire, making 'clear there will be no annexation in the West Bank', and committing 'to a long-term peace process that delivers a two-state solution,' it added. 'I have always said that we will recognise a Palestinian state as a contribution to a proper peace process at the moment of maximum impact for the two-state solution,' AFP quoted Starmer as saying in a Downing Street address. 'With that solution now under threat, this is the moment to act.' UK, France may lead G7 on Palestine French President Emmanuel Macron announced last week that France would formally recognise a Palestinian state during the UN General Assembly in September. Echoing that stance, Starmer said Britain would follow suit unless Israel takes 'substantive steps' to end the worsening humanitarian crisis in Gaza. If carried out, the UK and France would become the first G7 nations to formally endorse Palestinian statehood — a move that has already drawn sharp criticism from both Israel and the United States. However, reports suggested Starmer is believed to have presented his plan for the long-running conflict in the Middle East to US President Donald Trump when the pair met in Scotland on Monday. Trump appeared to give his blessing for the recognition move, saying during a wide-ranging press conference lasting more than an hour that 'I don't mind him (Starmer) taking a position.' Trump on Tuesday, however, dismissed the reports and said that he and Starmer did not discuss London's plan to recognise a Palestinian state. 'We never did discuss it,' Reuters quoted Trump as telling reporters on board Air Force One while travelling back to the US after meeting Starmer in Scotland. Trump said recognising a Palestinian state would reward Palestinian militant group Hamas. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'You're rewarding Hamas if you do that. I don't think they should be rewarded,' he said. Trump said the US had sent money for food aid for Palestinians in Gaza, and that he wanted to make sure it's properly spent. 'I want to make sure the money is spent wisely and is spent judiciously, and that food is distributed in a proper manner,' he said. Speaking Tuesday, Starmer also detailed several demands for the Palestinian militant group Hamas, which is holding Israeli hostages seized in its attacks on October 7, 2023. 'They must immediately release all of the hostages, sign up to a ceasefire, disarm and accept that they will play no part in the government of Gaza,' he said. The UK leader added that London 'will make an assessment in September on how far the parties have met these steps', adding: 'No one should have a veto over our decision.' 'Two-state solution' Starmer has been under growing domestic and international pressure to formally recognise a Palestinian state, as the humanitarian situation in Gaza dramatically worsens. Macron publicly pressed for joint recognition of Palestine during his UK state visit earlier this month, while an increasing number of MPs in Starmer's ruling Labour party have been demanding action. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD More than 220 British lawmakers from nine parties including Starmer's Labour published a letter last Friday urging him to formally recognise a Palestinian state. The commitment was included in Labour's election-winning manifesto last year, as part of 'a two-state solution with a safe and secure Israel alongside a viable and sovereign Palestinian state'. Starmer's office also said that the UK had dropped its first aid by air into the Gaza Strip, as UN aid agencies warned that the Palestinian territory of more than two million people was slipping into famine. It said 'the first airdrops of British aid' were landing Tuesday, 'containing around half a million pounds' worth of lifesaving supplies'. 'The Palestinian people have endured terrible suffering now in Gaza because of a catastrophic failure of aid. We see starving babies, children too weak to stand,' the UK leader said in a televised address. 'The suffering must end,' he added. With inputs from agencies


News18
14 minutes ago
- News18
UK to Recognise Palestinian State Unless Israel Ends Gaza War, Khamenei Flaunts 'Power' of Strikes
Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu held a meeting with top advisers amid mounting international pressure to declare a ceasefire in GazaThe UK will recognise the state of Palestine in September unless Israel takes "substantive steps" in Gaza, including agreeing to a ceasefire, PM Keir Starmer said 0:00 INTRO 3:20 'GAZA SLIPPING INTO FAMINE'...4:31 IRAN SAYS WESTERN NUCLEAR DEMANDS ARE 'JUST EXCUSES'6:14 IRAQ THWARTED 29 ATTEMPTS TO FIRE AT ISRAEL OR US TROOPS 7:00 PHILIPPINES SEEKS HELP TO SECURE RELEASE OF SAILORSn18oc_world n18oc_crux


Indian Express
14 minutes ago
- Indian Express
US-China trade talks end without deal as tariff deadline nears
Trade talks between the United States and China ended on Tuesday without a deal to extend a temporary pause on steep tariffs, raising concerns that high duties could return from 12 August. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Trade Ambassador Jamieson Greer met Chinese officials in Stockholm over two days to discuss the way forward, but no agreement was reached. The talks were described as 'constructive' by both sides, and officials said discussions would continue. Speaking to reporters after the meeting, Bessent said: 'We just haven't been given that signoff.' He added that President Donald Trump would have to make the final decision on whether to extend the current truce. 'The meetings were very productive,' Bessent said, according to CNN. Greer echoed that view, saying: 'With respect to a potential pause, we're going to head back to Washington, DC, and we're going to talk to the president about whether that's something that he wants to do. It's certainly something that's under discussion.' Without a deal, the United States and China could reinstate heavy tariffs that were previously in place before the current 90-day pause. Greer told CNN that tariffs on Chinese goods could rise by around 34 percent, although still below the peak rate of 145 percent seen earlier. In May, China had lowered tariffs on American goods from 125 percent to 10 percent, while the US reduced its tariffs on Chinese goods from 145 percent to 30 percent. China's International Trade Representative, Li Chenggang, said both countries would 'continue to push for the scheduled extension,' according to Chinese state broadcaster CCTV. However, Bessent disputed the suggestion that anything had been finalised. 'The Chinese deputy minister did say that we had agreed on a pause. We have not. Nothing is agreed until we speak with President Trump,' he said, as quoted by CNN. Greer also clarified that 'the president has discretion to change the rate depending on the circumstances that we have.' Speaking separately aboard Air Force One, President Trump told reporters he had just spoken with Bessent, who reported 'a very good meeting with China.' Trump added, 'He felt very good about the meeting, better than he felt yesterday,' according to Reuters. Trump also said he expects to be briefed on the talks on Wednesday and would then decide whether to extend the tariff pause. He said he hoped to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping before the end of the year. When asked about a possible trade deal with India, Trump said no agreement had been reached. He added, 'India has higher tariffs than almost any country,' Reuters reported. As of now, no breakthrough has been made, and both sides remain under pressure to find a solution before the mid-August deadline.