logo
Why is Trinity Rodman at Wimbledon? USWNT star in relationship with Ben Shelton

Why is Trinity Rodman at Wimbledon? USWNT star in relationship with Ben Shelton

USA Today3 days ago
American Ben Shelton secured a top in the final 16 at Wimbledon on Sunday, June 5 — and he made some headlines in the process.
Shelton, 22, became the youngest American man to make the final 16 at three majors in one season, dating back to Andy Roddick achieving the same feat in 2004. He has also won each of his three matches so far by straight sets.
REQUIRED READING: Ben Shelton, Trinity Rodman make relationship Instagram official
The Florida native also shouted out his friends and family after his third-round win, which included another sports star in United States women's soccer star Trinity Rodman.
Now, the No. 10-ranked player in the world is looking for his first grand slam victory, with his furthest finish being the semifinals at the U.S. Open in 2023 and Australian Open in 2025.
Here's what to know of Shelton and Rodman's relationship, and why the U.S. soccer star is at Wimbledon cheering on Shelton:
Why is Trinity Rodman at Wimbledon?
Rodman, a forward for the Washington Spirit of the NWSL, has been at each of Shelton's Wimbledon matches. The two make quite the sports power couple.
The dynamic athletes went public with their relationship on March 18 after Shelton posted pictures to Instagram. Shelton even shouted out Rodman after his third-round win on July 5 over Marton Fucsovics.
"It's not just been me here, I have a great team. My parents are here, my girlfriend's here," Shelton said as the ESPN broadcast panned to Shelton's parents and Rodman in the stands.
Shelton also spoke with USA TODAY in April on his relationship with Rodman.
"She's great," he said. "I think we're both very happy. And yeah, it's been cool getting to know her and spend time with her."
Who is Trinity Rodman?
Rodman is a 23-year-old soccer player who's one of the best scorers for the U.S. Women's National Team.
Rodman, the daughter of Basketball Hall of Famer Dennis Rodman, scored three goals at the 2024 Paris Olympics to help lead the United States to a gold medal. She was also the youngest person ever drafted to the NWSL (18 years old) after going No. 2 overall to the Washington Spirit in 2021.
The Guardian ranked Rodman the No. 5 player in the world in 2024, with fellow American forward Sophia Wilson at No. 3 on the list.
Rodman's signature moment of her young USWNT career came in the knockout round against Japan, when she sent the U.S. to the semifinals of the 2024 Paris Olympics after scoring an extra-time goal to win 1-0.
Rodman was initially enrolled to play soccer at Washington State but opted to forgo her college career to play professionally in the NWSL. Her brother, DJ Rodman, played basketball at Washington State and USC.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why Is Reality TV Obsessed With Going 'Back to the Frontier?'
Why Is Reality TV Obsessed With Going 'Back to the Frontier?'

Time​ Magazine

time13 minutes ago

  • Time​ Magazine

Why Is Reality TV Obsessed With Going 'Back to the Frontier?'

'I'm living history right now,' Stacey Loper proclaims in the premiere episode of Magnolia Network's Back to the Frontier. That's not to say she's thrilled about it. A career woman who cherishes the comforts of her 4.5-bathroom home, Stacey has already teared up several times during her first day on a 1880s-style homestead, over such indignities as having to use a decrepit outhouse and feed her family cold canned ham. The assumption underlying this reality series, which transports three families to swaths of farmland near the Rocky Mountains for a summer-long simulation of life on the American frontier, is that such suffering builds character. Does it, though? Executive produced by Magnolia co-owners and lifestyle gurus Chip and Joanna Gaines, Back to the Frontier (which airs on Thursdays will also stream on HBO Max) is the latest in a long line of historical-living challenges that date back to the Y2K-era reality boom. The series bears a particular resemblance to 2002's Frontier House, a quasi-educational program that marked PBS's if-you-can't-beat-'em-join-'em foray into the genre. But whether it's the gamified, mid-aughts MTV's The '70s House or one of the BBC's many hyperspecific period throwbacks (Edwardian Farm! Victorian Farm! Victorian Pharmacy!), the implication always seems to be that it's inherently noble, enriching, and authentic to adopt the ways of our ancestors. It's as though 'real life' ended with the advent of refrigeration or indoor plumbing or, well, TV. Magnolia's version isn't the most persuasive of these shows. Even if it were, though, I'm not sure I would buy the fundamentally conservative message it's selling. To its credit, and although it could easily have chosen to pander to the reactionary tradwife crowd that embraces all things rural and homespun, Back to the Frontier resists going fully retrograde. The show's casting is, in many ways, diverse. The Lopers are a multigenerational Black family; Stacey and her husband Joaquin have two boys, ages 12 and 14, and are joined on this adventure by Joaquin's mom, Shirley. (Contrary to the nagging-mother-in-law trope, Shirley, who spent much of her life on a farm, seems sweet, and Stacey is grateful for her help.) Like Stacey, Hall family matriarch Lina runs a business. She and her husband, Jereme, have two teenage girls and an 11-year-old boy. The sisters are shocked to discover they have to share a bed with their squirmy kid brother. Rounding out the cast is a two-dad crew: Jason Hanna, Joe Riggs, and their twin 10-year-old sons. Hardcore tech enthusiasts, the Hanna-Riggs men are soon in withdrawal from their video games, smartwatches, and robot vacuums. As different as they are, these families have a few things in common. They're all, for some or perhaps no reason, from the South. They also all appear to be middle- or upper-middle class; while Stacey calls the Lopers' lifestyle 'lavish' and the Hanna-Riggs are homesick for their housekeeper, there's footage of the Halls splashing around in a lushly landscaped private pool. In the three episodes I was able to screen, each family comes across as close and caring. Magnolia did not, it seems, cast the show to maximize intra-household drama. Most of the parents have trouble getting their kids to work hard on the farm, but beyond that, the only real friction that emerges early in the season is between stubbornly independent Jereme and the more community-minded Lopers. (The harmony-loving Hall daughters are mortified by their dad's prickliness, which culminates in a ridiculous bidding war at a mock livestock auction.) As artificial as its setup might have been, Frontier House packed in lots of information about rarely discussed aspects of pioneer life. Participants—and, by extension, viewers—got genuinely illuminating crash courses in, for instance, 19th century contraception and how frontier women handled menstruation. Back to the Frontier has a few experts, historian Dr. Jacob K. Friefeld and 'modern homestead' influencer Melissa K. Norris, on hand to dispense occasional tidbits of relevant info. But, to its detriment, the show isn't as frank or curious as its predecessor. When you consider how much mileage it gets out of cast members' disgust at human and animal waste, its avoidance of reproductive-health issues in particular suggests a post-Roe squeamishness about birth control and women's bodies. Magnolia may not be openly courting the trad contingent, but it's certainly taken measures to avoid alienating that audience. Back to the Frontier comes alive in the moments when pioneer problems are met with contemporary flexibility and open-mindedness. While the moms of the cohort often fret about women's limited autonomy in the era, we observe Jason and Joe constantly negotiating, based on skillsets rather than prescribed roles, which of them will take on each traditionally gendered task. More often, though, the focus is on reenacting the past as faithfully as possible. We're frequently reminded, sometimes by folksy-voiced narrator William Hope, that children as young as the Hanna-Riggs boys would do farm chores from sunrise to sunset; that men bore the burden of construction, agriculture, and defense; that a mother who hadn't cooked a delicious meal on her finicky cast-iron stove by the time everyone returned from the fields was a failure. Each new challenge is framed as a test of whether the participants could hack it in what we're supposed to believe is a harder but somehow truer, more rewarding, and—in an assumption about the division of labor that veers disconcertingly close to essentialism—more natural world. It's easy for a show to make this sort of case when, like Back to the Frontier and many of its antecedents, it is transporting cast members not just back in time, but also several rungs down the economic ladder. Class-wise, the 1880s equivalents of the Halls, the Lopers, and the Hanna-Riggs would have been merchants or professionals or, at the very least, yeoman farmers, who owned land and employed laborers and maybe servants. They would not have needed to make the arduous journey west to claim the 160 acres of land guaranteed to them (if they proved they could cultivate it) by the Homestead Act of 1862. Their homes would not have been drafty, one-room shacks. They might even have enjoyed indoor plumbing. It makes you suspect the pioneers' lawyer or shopkeeper contemporaries would have been just as frustrated on the homestead as these present-day families. To look at the situation from a different angle, a person struggling to pay bills in a 21st century United States plagued by soaring prices, stagnant wages, and a death of manufacturing jobs might rejoice at the chance to become a subsistence farmer on land they would eventually own. Which is to say that, while it's always easier to be rich than poor, I'm not convinced that people in the past had inherently tougher—and thus more virtuous—lives than people in the present. Problems change over time. New technology is a curse as often as it's a blessing. Since the 19th century, progress has brought us cures for once-fatal diseases; it has also facilitated new pandemics. Workers have faced a litany of 'labor-saving' innovations that threaten their livelihoods. Teens on the homestead might've harvested corn and mucked out chicken coops, but they didn't lose sleep over the threat of climate apocalypse in their lifetimes. By papering over class divisions and presenting modern life as a breeze, historical reality shows create the illusion of a purer, more honest past, as though it's performing old-fashioned physical labor and traditional gender roles that makes us better people. Watching Back to the Frontier, it occurred to me that the specific tasks these dads, moms, and children were charged with completing, by virtue of their age or sex, were kind of immaterial. What mattered was how much they were required to stretch themselves, as individuals and as families, in order to do them. Because what really builds character is the expanded perspective that comes from inhabiting real (or real-enough) experiences that differ greatly from our own. Plunk down Little House on the Prairie's Ingalls family in New York City ca. 2025 with a studio apartment, an iPhone, and less than $1000 in the bank, and the transformation you'd observe might be just as inspiring.

Canadian men reach record high, climbing two places to No. 28 in FIFA world rankings
Canadian men reach record high, climbing two places to No. 28 in FIFA world rankings

Hamilton Spectator

time14 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Canadian men reach record high, climbing two places to No. 28 in FIFA world rankings

The Canadian men continue to reach new heights under coach Jesse Marsch, climbing two places to a career-high No. 28 in the latest FIFA world rankings. Canada was ranked 49th when the American coach took over in May 2024. The Canadians have climbed steadily since to No. 48, 40, 38 and 35, surpassing its previous high of No. 33 (set in February 2022 under former coach John Herdman after an impressive World Cup qualifying run) when it reached No. 31 in November. Canada closed out the year unchanged at No. 31 before setting a new mark in April at No. 30. Since then, the Canadians beat Ukraine 4-2 and lost to Ivory Coast in a penalty shootout in the Canadian Shield Tournament and defeated Honduras 6-0 and El Salvador 2-0, drawn Curaçao 1-1, and lost a penalty shootout to Guatemala at the CONCACAF Gold Cup. Canada's lowest ranking was No. 122 in October 2014. The top five teams in the new rankings are unchanged with Argentina No. 1 followed by Spain, France, England and Brazil. Portugal jumps one place to No. 6, dropping the Netherlands to No. 7. Belgium is unchanged at No. 8 with Germany and Croatia each climbing one spot to No. 9 and No. 10, respectively. Italy drops two places to No. 11. Gold Cup winner Mexico jumps four spots to No. 13, behind unchanged Morocco, to leapfrog the U.S. and take over top spot in CONCACAF. The Americans, beaten 2-1 by Mexico in Sunday's Gold Cup final, moved up one place to No. 15. Canada ranks third in CONCACAF, which covers North and Central America and the Caribbean. Canada's next matches are against No. 48 Romania in Bucharest and No. 31 Wales in Swansea during the September FIFA window, followed by home and away friendlies in October against No. 24 Australia in Montréal and No. 14 Colombia in Harrison, N.J. Co-host Canada opens World Cup play on June 12, 2026, in Toronto. Costa Rica is the biggest climber in the new rankings, up 14 places to No. 40 after making the Gold Cup quarterfinals, where it lost to the U.S. in a penalty shootout. No. 66 Honduras, up nine places, and No. 100 Guatemala, up six places, also jump thanks to making the Gold Cup semifinals. No. 70 Jamaica, No. 90 Haiti, No. 132 Congo and No. 171 Maldives each fell seven places. FIFA says 202 matches were played since the last rankings. —- This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 10

George Harrison's Beatles-era photos to be released in new book
George Harrison's Beatles-era photos to be released in new book

Hamilton Spectator

time14 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

George Harrison's Beatles-era photos to be released in new book

NEW YORK (AP) — A book of Beatles -era photographs taken by George Harrison, many of them never published, will be released next year. Random House announced Thursday that 'The Third Eye,' which includes more than 250 black and white and color images, is scheduled for Fall 2026. Harrison's widow, Olivia Harrison , compiled and curated the book, which covers the years 1963-69 and includes photos of the Beatles everywhere from their native Liverpool to India to Shea Stadium. 'I want to show people, from George's unique photographic perspective during the Beatles' early years, the moments when the whole of your life is ahead of you with unknowable possibilities,' Olivia Harrison said of her late husband, who died in 2001, in a statement released by Random House. 'His images in 'The Third Eye' capture that spirit.' The Harrison book features essays by Olivia Harrison and by two celebrated literary authors: Irish novelist Colm Tóibín (a former chancellor of the University of Liverpool) wrote the introduction, and American short story writer George Saunders contributed an epilogue. 'The Third Eye' also includes George Harrison's words alongside his pictures. Fellow Beatles Paul McCartney and Ringo Starr also have released photo books. Starr's 'Photograph,' also the title of a hit song written by Starr and Harrison, came out in 2015. In 2023, McCartney published '1964: Eyes of the Storm.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store