logo
Senate panel passes bills on Bible studies and a school of ‘intellectual freedom'

Senate panel passes bills on Bible studies and a school of ‘intellectual freedom'

Yahoo05-03-2025
Bills passed out of the Iowa Senate Education Committee Tuesday would set guidelines for academic programs and change how child abuse in schools is investigated. (Photo via Getty Images)
The Iowa Senate Education Committee passed a number of bills aimed at both primary and higher education during its Tuesday meeting, only a couple of days out from the first funnel deadline of the session.
A few bills focused on child abuse in schools will move ahead with unanimous support from lawmakers, while perspectives clashed on proposed education programs on intellectual diversity and the study of the Christian Bible.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Senate File 127 would require the University of Iowa to establish a 'school of intellectual freedom' in its College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, which would focus on 'the historical ideas, traditions and texts that have shaped the American constitutional order and society,' according to the bill, as well as free speech, civil discourse and intellectual diversity.
Sen. Herman Quirmbach, D-Ames, had a number of issues with the legislation, including its potential to restrict intellectual freedom rather than promote it and the fact that it is an unfunded mandate that would have universities incur large annual costs.
Its companion bill passed out of the House Higher Education Committee in February, with a fiscal note added March 4 detailing costs of forming and maintaining the school. Staffing costs, including a dean, five tenure-eligible faculty members and two administrative staff members, are expected to amount to about $1.45 million annually, according to the analysis from nonpartisan legislative staff, with an additional $50,000 needed each year for programming expenses.
Quirmbach pointed out that the legislation states appropriated or donated funds cannot be used for indirect costs, like cleaning services and other expenses, which could drive that annual $1.5 million up even more.
'I think that we're seeing here a proposal for a school of intellectual freedom, which, in its authorization here, defeats intellectual freedom …,' Quirmbach said. 'It seems to be unnecessary because of these already existing statutory guarantees of intellectual freedom, it's an unfunded mandate, the personnel reviews for tenure are not consistent with standard practice. And aside from that, it's a great idea — not.'
The bill was moved onto the debate calendar with an 11-5 vote.
Senate File 138 would establish guidelines for school districts to offer an elective course on the Bible for grades 9-12, with approval from a district's school board required for such a course to be established. According to the bill, these courses 'shall not endorse, favor, promote, or disfavor, or be hostile toward, any particular religion, faith, or nonreligious perspective.'
Sen. Sandy Salmon, R-Janesville, said when introducing the bill that all religious views of participating students must be respected in class.
Echoing comments she made during the bill's subcommittee meeting, Sen. Sarah Trone Garriott, D-West Des Moines, said schools are already allowed to have elective courses on different religions and making this bill a law would be unnecessary and unconstitutional, as it promotes the teaching of one religion over another.
Though he said he supports the teaching of the Bible as it has had an enormous impact on history and culture, Quirmbach said other religions like Islam and Hinduism have also made significant influences on American life.
When he asked whether Salmon would be amenable to adding amendments to give guidelines on the teaching of the Quran and Hindu texts, she replied that schools already have the ability to offer classes on these subjects, but other religious texts haven't had the 'deep impact on our society, on our nation, that the Bible has had.'
'So to have a bill here that promotes reading of the Bible, which I support, but where there would be resistance to providing similar recognition to Islam, to Hinduism, to all of the other great world religions, all of which add to the knowledge and wisdom of humanity, that then is going to be a violation of the First Amendment,' Quirmbach said.
The bill passed 11-5 in the committee.
Senate Study Bill 1075 would change data reporting requirements for Iowa community colleges to have them report information directly to the Iowa Department of Education rather than the state community colleges bureau. It would also have colleges provide individual-level data to the department, and the Department of Education would need to include information on 'program level educational and employment outcomes' in its annual Condition of Community Colleges report, according to the legislation.
The legislation would also direct the Iowa Department of Administrative Services to work with the Department of Education and form an annual compensation schedule and set employee benefits for all employees of the Iowa Educational Services for the Blind and Visually Impaired and Iowa School for the Deaf.
Sen. Jeff Taylor, R-Sioux Center, introduced an amendment to exempt non-credit and continuing education instructors from code defining how community college teachers are subject to teacher contract continuation, termination, and discharge laws. These policies are also not applicable to adjunct instructors, he said.
Both the amendment and bill passed unanimously and without discussion.
Senate File 237 would have the Iowa Department of Education form a working group focused on the impacts of school-provided technology, including computers, class slideshow presentations and online learning management systems, on students' cognitive function and academic performances. The Iowa Department of Health and Human Services will work with the Department of Education for this working group, according to the bill.
If passed, the group would submit a report to the General Assembly by Dec. 31 on their findings and recommendations for best practices in mitigating negative effects of school provided technology on 'social and behavioral development, attention span, mental concentration and learning ability of students,' according to the bill.
Sen. Cindy Winckler, D-Davenport, voiced her support for the bill, saying parents could potentially learn from the work group as well as educators and bring some new practices into the home.
'I think that we are only touching the tip of the iceberg as we talk about our schools and the use of technology,' Winckler said. 'Certainly, there is a lot of technology used outside of school, but we really don't have control of that.'
An amendment brought forward by Taylor would require that the working group include parents of school-aged children, mental health professionals and educators. It, as well as the full bill, passed unanimously.
Taylor said he introduced this legislation in part in response to a bill proposed by Gov. Kim Reynolds that would set a statewide cellphone policy in schools.
'Student-used laptops and online learning platforms and PowerPoint presentations in the classroom, those can be wonderful in many ways, and there's lots of benefits and advantages to using those, but there are also some drawbacks to that as well, and I think it would be useful to know what those are,' Taylor said.
Salmon said Senate File 221 would move the responsibility of investigating alleged child abuse cases at school from the school where it occurred to the Department of Health and Human Services. When a report of child abuse is brought forward, the school would need to notify the department and place the employee who allegedly committed the abuse on administrative leave.
If found to have committed child abuse, the employee would have their license revoked by the Iowa Board of Educational Examiners and be fired by the school.
Lawmakers expressed concerns that the Department of Health and Human Services does not have the capacity to handle alleged child abuse cases for school districts across the state. Sen. Mike Zimmer, D-DeWitt, said he would like to see an amendment where a level one investigator is brought in from another school district to handle the case in order to remove the appearance of a conflict of interest while avoiding putting undue burden on the department. He said level two investigators, or those from an outside agency hired by the school, could also be utilized.
Salmon said Iowa would be following a number of other states by enacting this policy, and it would also serve to provide more transparency and objectivity to the investigation.
Winckler said during discussion of another bill relating to child abuse in schools that the two pieces of legislation contradict one another, and both cannot be passed.
Senate File 366 would require all Iowa schools to immediately place employees on administrative leave if they are involved in a Iowa Board of Educational Examiners case involving the abuse of a child with probable cause, or if they were 'involved in any criminal or civil action in which a court found that the employee was negligent' while employed by the school, according to the bill.
'It is important that administrative leaves occur. It is important that abuse is taken seriously and actions are taken immediately,' Winckler said. 'But it seems like we have two different ideas in regard to how things would progress, and we just need to work those out before they come to the floor. We can't pass both of them.'
With unanimous votes, both bills will move to the Senate floor for debate.
Called 'Erin's Law' by Taylor, Senate File 172 would require the head of the Iowa Department of Education to develop guidelines on how schools can teach students in kindergarten through sixth grade about child sexual abuse with the goal of prevention and increasing awareness. Schools would be required to offer instruction based on these guidelines, according to the legislation.
Students would be educated on how to identify safe-versus-unsafe touches and secrets, Taylor said, and how to escape an abuser and report what occurred. Iowa is one of 12 states that have not passed a version of Erin's Law, Taylor said, and he hopes that the state will stop lagging behind in providing students with necessary and important education that could keep them safe.
Trone Garriott said it is 'incredibly important' to help students understand sexual abuse and teach them how to ask for help, as child sexual abuse is a prevalent problem that is often done by people they know. There is a lot of misinformation out there about child sexual abuse and its perpetrators, something she said the Legislature contributes to, with 'the idea that it's some certain group or some certain population that's doing this.'
'Knowledge is power, and knowledge protects our children, and so having accurate information, correct terms for body parts, understanding of what's appropriate and healthy and what is not safe, is incredibly powerful for these young people,' Trone Garriott said.
An amendment introduced by Taylor and passed by the committee would include an opt-out option for parents who don't wish for their child to participate in these lessons. The bill will move to Senate debate after a unanimous vote from the committee.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

CNBC Daily Open: Trump welcomes the weekend with tariffs
CNBC Daily Open: Trump welcomes the weekend with tariffs

CNBC

time32 minutes ago

  • CNBC

CNBC Daily Open: Trump welcomes the weekend with tariffs

No one likes working over the weekend. Unless you are the leader of the free world firing off social media posts — that is, after all, what counts as work for many politicians nowadays —announcing barriers to the free movement of goods. It's anyone's guess why U.S. President Donald Trump posted tariff letters to the European Union and Mexico — a steep 30% on goods imported from both — on Saturday. The first batch of letters was released Monday, and the second Wednesday. Going by that cadence, the latest letters should have been sent Friday. Nope. Here are two possibilities (that are pure speculation on my part). Perhaps Trump wanted to save off his most devastating salvos — the EU and Mexico were, in 2024, the top-two largest trade partners of the U.S. — for when the markets were closed, hence avoiding any immediate backlash from traders. But that seems unlikely, given that Trump told NBC News on Thursday that he thinks "the tariffs have been very well-received" because "the stock market hit a new high" then. And, as JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon pointed out on the same day, there is "complacency in the markets" because investors are a "little desensitized" to tariff news. Perhaps Trump just wanted to annoy his counterparts, especially those on the continent. Working on a weekend might be exasperating to an American, but it's basically sacrilegious for Europeans. The combination of unexpectedly high tariffs — comments last week from Trump and U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick gave the impression a favorable deal was in the books — and violating the right to disconnect would be sure to rile up Ursula von der Leyen, president of the European Commission, and her ilk. Perhaps there's no point in trying to make sense of the announcements' timing, let alone the tariffs. The only thing that's certain is that, for many, there was no dancing on a Saturday night. The U.S. imposes 30% tariffs on the EU and Mexico. Trump on Saturday revealed those tariffs in letters posted on Truth Social. The EU suspended its retaliatory tariffs, which were scheduled to take effect Monday, in hopes of reaching a deal. U.S. stock futures slip Sunday evening stateside. All three major U.S. indexes fell on Friday, putting them in the red for the week. Asia-Pacific markets mostly rose Monday, while Bitcoin hit a fresh high, breaking the $120,000 level. China's exports growth in June beats expectations. In U.S. dollar terms, exports jumped 5.8% from a year earlier, customs data showed Monday, exceeding Reuters' poll estimates of a 5% rise. They were boosted by a surge in shipments to non-U.S. countries. Nvidia chips won't be used by Chinese military, says CEO Jensen Huang. In an interview with CNN that aired Sunday, Huang said "we don't have to worry about" China's military using U.S.-made technology because "they simply can't rely on it." [PRO] Tariffs are expected to hit European firms hard. Earnings per share for companies in Europe's Stoxx 600 will drop in the second quarter, according to research by LSEG. Here are the sectors that investors should pay attention to this earnings season. Chinese car brands are rapidly making inroads in Europe's EV utopia Since the first delivery of an MG car to Norway in January 2020, Chinese electric vehicle brands have gone on to capture a combined market share of roughly 10%. The explosive growth is particularly notable, given Norway's decision not to impose tariffs on Chinese EV imports. Norway's tariff policy sets it apart from both the U.S. and European Union, which have both slapped duties on Chinese-made EVs to protect traditionally dominant American and European brands. —

Biden defends controversial autopen use for mass clemency decisions in NYT interview: ‘A whole lot of people'
Biden defends controversial autopen use for mass clemency decisions in NYT interview: ‘A whole lot of people'

New York Post

time2 hours ago

  • New York Post

Biden defends controversial autopen use for mass clemency decisions in NYT interview: ‘A whole lot of people'

Former President Joe Biden defended his use of an autopen during a recent interview, shedding light on his administration's rationale for the controversial use of the technology. The interview with the New York Times was centered around his use of an autopen during the last pardons that he made during the end of his administration. In his final weeks in office, Biden granted clemency and pardoned more than 1,500 individuals, in what the White House described at the time as the largest single-day act of clemency by a US president. Speaking to the Times on Thursday, Biden said that he 'made every decision' on his own. 'We're talking about [granting clemency to] a whole lot of people,' the Democrat said. However, the Times reported that Biden 'did not individually approve each name for the categorical pardons that applied to large numbers of people,' according to the former president and his aides. 3 Biden signs an executive order related to government services in the Oval Office of the White House Dec. 13, 2021. Getty Images 'Rather, after extensive discussion of different possible criteria, [Biden] signed off on the standards he wanted to be used to determine which convicts would qualify for a reduction in sentence,' the Times's report read. Instead of repeatedly asking the president to resign updated versions of official documents, his staff used an autopen to put Biden's signature on the final version. Biden's comments came as Republicans attacked him for his autopen use on a massive number of official documents. 3 Former President Joe Biden signs an executive order at the White House in Washington, DC, on Oct. 30, 2023. Xinhua News Agency via Getty Images In June, President Donald Trump sent a memo to the Department of Justice directing Attorney General Pam Bondi to investigate the autopen use and to determine whether it was related to a decline in Biden's mental state. 'In recent months, it has become increasingly apparent that former President Biden's aides abused the power of Presidential signatures through the use of an autopen to conceal Biden's cognitive decline and assert Article II authority,' Trump wrote. 'This conspiracy marks one of the most dangerous and concerning scandals in American history. The American public was purposefully shielded from discovering who wielded the executive power, all while Biden's signature was deployed across thousands of documents to effect radical policy shifts.' 3 Former President Joe Biden defended his use of an autopen during a recent interview, shedding light on his administration's rationale for the controversial use of the technology. Also in June, Trump told reporters that he thought it was 'inappropriate' to use an autopen at all, though past presidents have used them. 'Usually, when they put documents in front of you, they're important,' Trump said. 'Even if you're signing ambassadorships or – and I consider that important, I think it's inappropriate.' 'You have somebody that's devoting four years of their life or more to being an ambassador. I think you really deserve that person deserves to get a real signature… not an autopen signature.' Fox News Digital's Breanne Deppisch contributed to this report.

Nvidia CEO downplays U.S. fears that China's military will use his firm's chips
Nvidia CEO downplays U.S. fears that China's military will use his firm's chips

CNBC

time2 hours ago

  • CNBC

Nvidia CEO downplays U.S. fears that China's military will use his firm's chips

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has downplayed U.S. fears that his firm's chips will aid the Chinese military, days ahead of another trip to the country as he attempts to walk a tightrope between Washington and Beijing. In an interview with CNN aired Sunday, Huang said "we don't have to worry about" China's military using U.S.-made technology because "they simply can't rely on it." "It could be limited at any time; not to mention, there's plenty of computing capacity in China already," Huang said. "They don't need Nvidia's chips, certainly, or American tech stacks in order to build their military," he added. The comments were made in reference to years of bipartisan U.S. policy that placed restrictions on semiconductor companies, prohibiting them from selling their most advanced artificial intelligence chips to clients in China. Huang also repeated past criticisms of the policies, arguing that the tactic of export controls has been counterproductive to the ultimate goal of U.S. tech leadership. "We want the American tech stack to be the global standard ... in order for us to do that, we have to be in search of all the AI developers in the world," Huang said, adding that half of the world's AI developers are in China. That means for America to be an AI leader, U.S. technology has to be available to all markets, including China, he added. Washington's latest restrictions on Nvidia's sales to China were implemented in April and are expected to result in billions in losses for the company. In May, Huang said chip restrictions had already cut Nvidia's China market share nearly in half. Huang's CNN interview came just days before he travels to China for his second trip to the country this year, and as Nvidia is reportedly working on another chip that is compliant with the latest export controls. Last week, the Nvidia CEO met with U.S. President Donald Trump, and was warned by U.S. lawmakers not to meet with companies connected to China's military or intelligence bodies, or entities named on America's restricted export list. According to Daniel Newman, CEO of tech advisory firm The Futurum Group, Huang's CNN interview exemplifies how Huang has been threading a needle between Washington and Beijing as it tries to maintain maximum market access. "He needs to walk a proverbial tightrope to make sure that he doesn't rattle the Trump administration," Newman said, adding that he also wants to be in a position for China to invest in Nvidia technology if and when the policy provides a better climate to do so. But that's not to say that his downplaying of Washington's concerns is valid, according to Newman. "I think it's hard to completely accept the idea that China couldn't use Nvidia's most advanced technologies for military use." He added that he would expect Nvidia's technology to be at the core of any country's AI training, including for use in the development of advanced weaponry. A U.S. official told Reuters last month that China's large language model startup DeepSeek — which says it used Nvidia chips to train its models — was supporting China's military and intelligence operations. On Sunday, Huang acknowledged there were concerns about DeepSeek's open-source R1 reasoning model being trained in China but said that there was no evidence that it presents dangers for that reason alone. Huang complimented the R1 reasoning model, calling it "revolutionary," and said its open-source nature has empowered startup companies, new industries, and countries to be able to engage in AI. "The fact of the matter is, [China and the U.S.] are competitors, but we are highly interdependent, and to the extent that we can compete and both aspire to win, it is fine to respect our competitors," he concluded.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store