Karnataka High Court asks BMRCL to consider residents' plea for metro station at Bettahalasur cross on airport line
A division bench comprising Chief Justice Vibhu Bakhru and Justice C.M. Joshi issued the direction while disposing of a PIL petition, filed by B.G. Nanjundappa and four others from Bettahalasur area.
Not domain of court
However, the bench made it clear that it cannot issue any specific direction on the issue of construction of the station as the issue does not come under the domain of the court.
The petitioners had complained that the BMRCL in 2019 had planned a metro station at Bettahalasur cross, had acquired land for this purpose, and paid compensation to the land owners. However, the BMRCL dropped the plan of constructing station at Bettahalasur cross.
On enquiry made through RTI, the petitioner came to know that the plan of station at Bettahalasur cross was dropped as a private company, Embassy Group, had backed out from sponsoring the station as was agreed earlier.
In public interest
However, the petitioners have said that withdrawal of the private company from sponsoring the station should not result in construction of a station as it would be responsibility of the BMRCL to construction the station in public interest.
The petitioners have also pointed out that a station at Bettahalasur cross is essential as it is situated between Bagalur and Doddajala stations, which are situated around 4 km away from Bettahalasur cross on either side, as the BMRCL's proposal is to have a station for every 4 km.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
Telangana BJP questions inflated estimates for Metro Phase-II
Hyderabad: alleged that the Congress govt, which has been blaming the Centre for not providing adequate financial support to Telangana, has failed to utilise funds allocated under centrally sponsored schemes (CCS) and has not implemented necessary reforms to secure additional funding. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The party further stated that the Phase-II was not cleared due to its high cost estimates compared to similar Metro projects in other cities. Addressing a press conference at the BJP headquarters, the party's state official spokesperson, Sarangula Amarnath, said that the state govt is plagued by inefficiency and poor financial mismanagement. "The CAG report released on Friday clearly indicates that the state had already borrowed 37% of this year's budgeted estimates. Chief minister A Revanth Reddy is totally oblivious of the public finance system that governs various CCS and grants," he said. "Despite generous allocations under the Finance Commission devolution, CSS and one-off grants, large sums remain unutilised in single nodal agency (SNA) bank accounts. These funds often lapse due to the state's failure to provide matching shares or are withheld because mandatory conditions are not met. Between 2020-21 and 2024-25 (till Feb 2, 2025), the Centre released ₹78,859.87 crore to Telangana under various Central sponsored schemes. Yet the state reported significant unspent balances in SNA accounts," Amarnath said. Citing examples, he pointed out that ₹1,812 crore remained idle in SNA accounts at the end of last financial year, according to CAG findings. "Telangana is suffering significant losses in Central funding due to its failure to implement key reforms mandated by the Union govt, with the state forgoing an estimated ₹25,000 crore over five years and risking additional losses of ₹5,000 crore annually due to incomplete reform compliance in sectors such as the power sector, holding local bodies elections, matching share, not providing utilisation certificates and FRMB violations," the spokesperson said. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now On Metro Phase-II, Amarnath alleged that the Revanth Reddy govt had abnormally increased estimations for the project. "For instance, the estimated cost per km for the Hyderabad Metro Phase-II is Rs 318 crore, whereas the AP govt's estimation for Vijayawada city metro is just Rs 260 crore and for Visakhapatnam it is just Rs 248 crore per km," the BJP leader said. "For whose benefit are these inflated Metro Phase-II estimates? Who will pocket the 30% excess per km," he asked.
New Indian Express
2 days ago
- New Indian Express
Rs 22 crore parking lot comes up at Gandhi Bazaar in Bengaluru
BENGALURU: Finding parking space in the city is an irritating exercise for Bengalureans. Now, the BBMP is offering a bit of breathing space for motorists with its Rs 22-crore multi-level car parking complex in Gandhi Bazaar. The complex, which will be opened for public use soon by Deputy Chief Minister DK Shivakumar, will also have 50 shops on the ground floor. Car parking is arranged from the first floor to the fourth floor (31 vehicles per floor), and a total of 124 vehicles can be parked. One lift and 6 toilets have been constructed. On Friday, BBMP Chief Commissioner Maheshwar Rao inspected the facility. He also inspected the work of granite cobble stone, bollards and white topping on the footpath at the entrance of Gandhi Bazaar Main Road and lauded for the comprehensive development of the road and footpath and directed to that no hawkers or encroachers should take away public space. He also visited the Garbage-Sludge separator unit at Koramangala and said it should be made a model site. Proper arrangements should be made for those who come to study/train at this place. Garbage separator unit has a collection unit for recyclable materials, dry waste collection unit, biogas unit and mini transfer station, which should be properly maintained and sprayed from time to time to prevent odour, he said. As trash like commodes, beds, and furniture end up on the streets and become a black spot eventually, Rao suggested finding a dedicated space in the zone to store equipment like commodes, beds, and furniture. Recyclable material can be brought there, he said. He inspected the parking lot of Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Limited (BMRCL) in front of the bus stand at Banashankari Circle and the space in the same location, and suggested that steps be taken to utilize the space to accommodate nearby street-side traders. Zonal commissioner Digvijay Bodke, Joint Commissioner Dr. Madhu, Deputy Commissioner Lakshmi Devi, Chief Engineer Basavaraj Kabade, Lokesh, Superintendent Engineer Hemalatha and other officials were present during the inspection rounds.
The Hindu
4 days ago
- The Hindu
DNA Networks moves Karnataka HC against report of Commission of Inquiry on stampede
DNA Entertainment Networks Pvt. Ltd., an event management company, on Thursday moved the High Court of Karnataka challenging the report submitted by the one-man Commission of Inquiry on the incident of stampede outside M. Chinnaswamy stadium in Bengaluru during the victory celebrations of Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB) team on June 4. John Michael Cunha, a retired judge of the High Court of Karnataka, had conducted the inquiry under the provisions of the Commissions of Inquiry (CoI) Act, 1952, on the terms and reference notified by the State government, and submitted the report to the government on July 11. 'Biased manner' 'The commission seems to have proceeded in a biased manner as if it is a fault-finding commission rather than a fact-finding commission, and thus report is vitiated,' it has been alleged in the petition while pointing out that a copy of the report was not given to the petitioner even though it was leaked to the media. Finding several flaws in the 'hastily' conducted inquiry proceedings, the DNA has alleged that the entire inquiry process would be violative of the principles of natural justice and contrary to the provisions of the CoI Act, 1952, as no opportunity to cross-examine the witnesses was given to it. '...the haste with which the respondents conducted the inquiry gives the impression that the government wanted to save its skin and that the Commission of Inquiry was a mere eyewash in order to pacify the general public and to deflect the blame from itself by making innocent persons such as the petitioner and its officials a scapegoat,' it has been alleged in the petition. DNA, which participated in the inquiry proceedings before the commission, has also contended that it was not given a copy of the depositions of its witnesses and the other witnesses as well as the documents marked in spite of the making written request in this regard. It has also been claimed in the petition that the commission failed to give a personal hearing as per the provisions of the Act before making any adverse remarks that could prejudicially affect reputation of any person, despite the request in this regard made by the representative of the DNA.
