logo
'Say It, Scott': CNN Panel Turns Testy After Scott Jennings Resorts To Name-Calling

'Say It, Scott': CNN Panel Turns Testy After Scott Jennings Resorts To Name-Calling

Yahoo4 days ago
A segment from CNN's 'NewsNight with Abby Phillip' on Wednesday evening seemed to get tense after conservative commentator Scott Jennings threw an insult at fellow panelist Keith Boykin, a former White House aide to President Bill Clinton.
During a discussion about Columbia University's announcement that it had reached a deal with the Trump administration on Wednesday to pay more than $220 million to restore federal research money, Boykin called out Jennings for interrupting Republican commentator Ana Navarro, who was commenting on the agreement.
'Do you have to interrupt every conversation? Do you have to be a part of every conversation?' Boykin asked.
'You're such a whiny [inaudible],' Jennings replied.
'A whiny what, Scott? Say it, Scott ... say it, Scott, ' Boykin responded. (Watch the moment here.)
Boykin had also called out Jennings for interrupting him earlier in the conversation: 'You talk about people interrupting you, but you do it all the time.'
People on X, formerly Twitter, slammed the polarizing CNN pundit for calling Boykin 'whiny' after the segment aired on TV.
'Why would Abby not allow Boykin to adequately address Jennings?,' one X user wrote, calling Jennings' behavior an example of a microaggression.
'Accusing someone else of being a whiny ass in the midst of your own whining is peak irony,' wrote another.
Alexandra Cromer, a licensed therapist with Thriveworks, said that the moment on-air said a lot about the tense attitudes that exist in our current political climate — and Jennings' insult was a 'complete communication interrupter.'
'Clinically, if you want to communicate effectively, be clear, objective and direct as possible,' she said, adding, 'At that point, calling someone 'whiny' takes away meaning from their statements and does not promote further conversations or civil discourse.'
By calling Boykin 'whiny,' Jennings may have been seeking to reduce his power, Cromer explained.
'In this situation, calling someone 'whiny' can communicate a dismissive and condescending tone,' Cromer said. 'By using an insult in any circumstance, you aim to reduce the other person's power and to obtain more perceived control over the situation.'
Cromer explained that using the word 'whiny' specifically could have been an attempt by Jennings to imply that what Boykin was thinking and feeling is 'not good enough.'
″[It] promotes the concept of a power hierarchy and structure within the conversation when the panel is displayed as being as equitable as possible in panelist input opportunities,' she said.
And Cromer said that Boykin's direct response to Jennings can be an example of 'a useful solution to a disagreement and/or miscommunication problem.'
She cautioned, however, that when someone is addressing someone who insulted them, they should ensure that they are using 'clear, direct and objective communication.'
'The way that Boykin responded to Jenkins can also be seen as a personalized insult or weaponized conversation,' she said.
Generally speaking, Cromer recommends that people take time to organize their thoughts when on the receiving end of an insult to 'be the most effective version of yourself.'
And as it relates to Jennings calling Boykin 'whiny' during a panel discussion on network TV, Cromer emphasized that resorting to name-calling in any kind of professional environment can especially be viewed as being 'dismissive and disrespectful.'
It can communicate a 'blatant lack of respect,' as well as perhaps a 'willful intolerance of views, opinions and emotional reactions that are different than your own and are outside of your own emotional experience.'
Related...
Scott Jennings Announces Why 'Liberal Tears Will Flow' In Next Move
Scott Jennings Scorched For Calling Questions About Historic Racist Incidents A 'Gotcha'
Columbia University Agrees To Pay More Than $220 Million In Deal With Trump
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NYC mayoral candidates respond to shooting in Midtown Manhattan
NYC mayoral candidates respond to shooting in Midtown Manhattan

The Hill

time41 minutes ago

  • The Hill

NYC mayoral candidates respond to shooting in Midtown Manhattan

Zohran Mamdani, Curtis Sliwa and Andrew Cuomo all moved to comment law enforcement after at least two people, including an off-duty New York City police officer, were shot and killed in the lobby of a major Manhattan office building. The three New York City mayoral candidates all condemned the shooting, which took place Monday night in a building that houses the offices of Blackstone, Deutsche Bank and JP Morgan. The shooter, who is believed to have acted alone, also fatally shot himself. 'I'm heartbroken to learn of the horrific shooting in midtown and I am holding the victims, their families, and the NYPD officer in critical condition in my thoughts,' Mamdani, the Democratic frontrunner, wrote on X. 'Grateful for all of our first responders on the ground.' Mayor Eric Adams, who is running for re-election, said he had been briefed on the situation and appeared on the scene in a video posted to social media, telling occupants of the building to remain inside as law enforcement conducted a search. He also said multiple people had been injured. Cuomo, who is running on a third-party ballot line, said he was 'horrified' by the shooting.' 'I'm grateful for the courage of our NYPD and first responders, and my prayers are with the victims and their families,' he wrote on X. Sliwa, the Republican nominee for a second cycle in a row, said he was 'disturbed' by the shootings. 'Grateful to our first responders who run toward danger to keep us safe,' he wrote on X.

This Elderly Trump Supporter's Analysis Of What Trump Did To America Is Going Viral
This Elderly Trump Supporter's Analysis Of What Trump Did To America Is Going Viral

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

This Elderly Trump Supporter's Analysis Of What Trump Did To America Is Going Viral

An elderly voter called in to C‑SPAN and delivered a *heartfelt* speech about what Trump has done to America. Related: That call is going viral: CSPAN/RpsAgainstTrump/Twitter: @RpsAgainstTrump "Mr. Trump, I am so very disappointed in you. I voted for you, and you have just turned us into a bunch of hateful, mean, horrible people. You know, I know we've got too many immigrants in this country, but my goodness, we don't have to be mean to them. That's not what this country is built on," she said. "I probably won't be here for the next election, but my goodness, I'll never, ever vote Republican, and I've been voting for 80 years. I don't know, this country is just going in the wrong direction, and it just saddens my heart." Now, let's look at reactions... Related: You have a bunch of people in agreement: "100% AGREED! I feel the same exact way!" "It hurts to see what Trump is doing to America," another person said. Related: And this person commented: "Welcome to the light." Other people are asking, "This is who Trump has been. How did you miss that?" "She knew what Trump was, and if she didn't, that's on her," another person tweeted. Related: This person replied: "It's almost like we warned them?" And this person said, "She is getting exactly what she voted for." Thoughts, feelings, etc.? Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News:

Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' 'A Gift' for Democrats, James Carville Says
Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' 'A Gift' for Democrats, James Carville Says

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' 'A Gift' for Democrats, James Carville Says

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Veteran Democratic strategist James Carville on Monday said that the Donald Trump-backed "big, beautiful bill" is "a gift" for the Democratic Party. Why It Matters The One Big Beautiful Bill Act passed Congress earlier this month and aims to deliver on Trump's biggest legislative priorities: cementing the sweeping tax cuts, which disproportionately benefit wealthy Americans, enacted during his first term, and substantially increasing funds for border security and immigration enforcement. The Republican-passed bill pays for the tax cuts and increased border security with deep spending reductions in critical social safety net programs like Medicaid and food assistance. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the bill could result in 11.8 million more uninsured Americans by 2034 and add nearly $3.4 trillion to the federal deficit over the next decade. James Carville is pictured at Politicon in Pasadena, California, on June 25, 2016. James Carville is pictured at Politicon in Pasadena, California, on June 25, 2016. Colin Young-Wolff/Invision/AP What To Know Carville made his remarks during an appearance on Fox News, telling host Martha MacCallum that the massive spending package should be the Democratic Party's main messaging focus. "James, you've talked about, you know, them wasting time on some of these issues around trans sports and all this stuff," MacCallum said. "What substantive thing would you like to see them focus on? Because perhaps immigration is the one, and in what way?" "The 'big, beautiful bill,'" Carville responded. "Cutting veterans' benefits, closing rural hospitals, raising $3.4 trillion on our national debt. I mean, when you have something simple in a gift like this to contrast yourself, you would be stupid to talk about immigration, or talk about bathrooms, or track meets or anything else." He added: "Just define yourself that we don't think this is going in the right direction for the United States and the numbers overwhelmingly would support that! But if we keep talking about this other nonsense, we're going to lose our focus." House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries gave a marathon speech railing against the bill, which lasted eight hours and 44 minutes. "Republicans are trying to jam this one, big, ugly bill down the throats of the American people," Jeffries said during his "magic minute" speech. "Leadership requires courage, conviction, compassion—and yet what we have seen from this administration and co-conspirators on the Republican side of the aisle is cruelty, chaos and corruption," he said, adding that the bill was "an extraordinary assault on the health care of the American people." Other Democratic lawmakers also made headlines for their stinging rebukes of the megabill. "This bill will kill good, blue-collar manufacturing jobs that we need to rebuild the economy in this country," Democratic Representative Josh Riley of New York said during a floor debate. "It closes rural hospitals. It defunds health care. All to give trillions of dollars in tax cuts to your cronies." "Don't tell me you give a s*** about the middle class when all you are doing is s******* on the middle class," Riley added. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, another Democrat from New York and one of the most progressive members of Congress, described the bill as a "deal with the devil" in an impassioned speech on the House floor. Democratic Massachusetts Representative Jim McGovern mocked Republicans for behaving like they were in a "cult" because of their support for the Trump-backed bill, despite recent polling data showing that it's broadly opposed by Americans. Several Republican senators have also faced scrutiny over comments they delivered regarding the cuts to Medicaid. Senator Joni Ernst of Iowa made headlines in May when she responded to people protesting Medicaid cuts by saying, "Well, we are all going to die." Kentucky Senator Mitch McConnell, former Senate majority leader, also told Republicans during a closed-door lunch in June: "I know a lot of us are hearing from people back home about Medicaid. But they'll get over it." What Happens Next Trump administration officials have continued touting the law since Trump signed it earlier this month as part of an effort to sell it to voters. "It is time for you to have a government that works for you instead of against you for the next 3 1/2 years," Vice President JD Vance told voters in his home state of Ohio on Monday. "The Trump administration promises that is exactly what we're going to do."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store