logo
How free agency has impacted Edmonton Oilers' roster construction for 2025-26

How free agency has impacted Edmonton Oilers' roster construction for 2025-26

New York Times6 hours ago
The early days of free agency this summer were fascinating because of what the Edmonton Oilers did and didn't do on July 1.
Edmonton general manager Stan Bowman did not secure the best goalie on the market (Jake Allen). Multiple skill forwards were signed by other teams in the first hours of free agency.
Advertisement
The Oilers were quiet. Bowman freed up cap space when he dealt Viktor Arvidsson, but the first addition didn't arrive until late Tuesday night when left winger Andrew Mangiapane was added. On July 2, right-handed centre Curtis Lazar was signed.
For a fan base used to loud noises on July 1 and 2, the Bowman pace was met with all manner of reactions. Some are disappointed there's no new goalie, others are wondering where the goals are going to come from on the wing, and still others are upset that no obvious replacement for Evander Kane's physical play was added on Day 1 of the free-agent frenzy.
What does all of this mean for the 2025-26 roster? Making room for some, adding competition for others and finding a better fit on left wing for the second line.
The Oilers were overstocked on right wingers, so trading Arvidsson plus walking Connor Brown and Corey Perry in free agency means a new look at the position in 2025-26. Zach Hyman will be back to play on the No. 1 line with Connor McDavid, but the rest of the current depth chart suggests a younger, faster group.
Matt Savoie is coming off a strong rookie pro season with the AHL Bakersfield Condors and looked good alongside Leon Draisaitl during a three-game audition during the 2024-25 season. In 32 minutes at five-on-five with the big centre, Savoie delivered a nice assist to set up Draisaitl, and the line had a 50 percent goal share. No guarantees for Savoie, but the opening has been created by management.
David Tomasek is a wild card at right wing (and at centre) for next season. He signed as a free agent at 29 after an exceptional season in the SweHL, where he led the league in points. He scored well at even strength (11-23-34 in 57 games, 2.9 points per 60) and helped outscore opponents in the discipline (41-35). Tomasek also played extensively on the power play (8-10-18 averaging almost three minutes per game) and may give the Oilers a different look on the second power-play unit. The even-strength totals are most impressive, but training camp will show his foot speed and ability to play without the puck against NHL opponents.
Advertisement
If Savoie and Tomasek both fail in efforts to make second- or third-line right wing, expect coach Kris Knoblauch to look for veteran left wingers Mangiapane, Trent Frederic or Vasily Podkolzin to move over to their off-side.
Lazar is a right-handed centre with plus speed and penalty-killing experience. He had a poor year in five-on-five scoring (0.67 points per 60, down from 1.61 in 2023-24), and that could be a sign that the 30-year-old has hit the wall in this area and won't bring enough offence to hold a roster spot. His contract is a minimal investment and gives Noah Philp (and others) competition for the No. 4 centre job.
There are other areas of the roster that have strong competition (wings, No. 7 defence) but the Oilers' penalty kill could use a boost, and it's in this area that Lazar may have his best chance to win a job out of camp.
Last summer, the Oilers made free-agent bets on Arvidsson and Jeff Skinner. The verbal at the time surrounded finally having the opportunity to secure quality linemates for Draisaitl on the second line. To say it didn't work is an understatement.
Draisaitl rolled merrily along (as he always does) with other linemates (mostly Podkolzin and Perry) and delivered another exceptional season. The big man scored 1.62 goals per 60 at five-on-five when playing with Connor McDavid, and 0.93 goals away from the captain (1.17 overall), so the damage to Draisaitl from the failed Skinner-Arvidsson experiment should be considered minimal.
Bowman adding Mangiapane gives the Oilers a goal scorer (0.71 goals per 60 at five-on-five last season) and a good style fit (Mangiapane is aggressive on the forecheck and will go to tough areas).
Mangiapane's 2024-25 season with the Washington Capitals featured a wide range of five-on-five scoring results. He scored just 0.15 goals per 60 in heavy minutes (403) with Lars Eller as his centre, while hammering at a 1.4 goals per 60 clip with Nic Dowd in 214 minutes.
Advertisement
Taking out the Eller minutes, Mangiapane scored 1.16 goals per 60 at five-on-five for the Capitals in 2024-25. That total would have ranked second to Draisaitl on the Oilers last season. Mangiapane with Draisaitl should work well. It's a better bet than Skinner or Arvidsson based on age and playing style.
Fans will be upset about goaltending in Edmonton until management finds a solution. Did Bowman cast about this offseason and come to the same conclusion as Ken Holland? It's unlikely. Bowman may well want to find an upgrade, but found free-agent and trade prices too dear. No team is going to give the Oilers a helping hand, and that means waiting for an opportunity.
Edmonton may hire a 'goalie whisperer' to improve Stuart Skinner's performance to the point the organization is confident in running the big man for a fourth straight playoff run. Or a trade happens before training camp. Either way, if it's an issue, Edmonton must make a bold move at the deadline.
Bowman made room for Savoie (and Tomasek) while also finding Draisaitl's possible ideal winger. NHL teams run forward lines in pairs and then add a third based on complementary players who fill a specific need.
If Draisaitl and Mangiapane can find some magic together, the Oilers will have accomplished much in the early hours of free agency in 2025.
Lazar is a solid small bet.
If there's another loud noise this summer, it's a goalie.
(Photo of Andrew Mangiapane: Bruce Bennett / Getty Images)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

CA CAW! Hawks title odds jump up significantly
CA CAW! Hawks title odds jump up significantly

New York Times

timean hour ago

  • New York Times

CA CAW! Hawks title odds jump up significantly

The market for the Warriors' restricted free agent is beginning to take shape. Meanwhile, teams are discussing a potential seven-team trade. Jacob Kupferman / Getty Images After an active offseason, the Atlanta Hawks' championship odds have jumped from +25000 to +2500 on BetMGM. Trae Young remains the cornerstone, but the supporting cast looks deeper and much more talented with those three additions. Atlanta's regular starting five figures to be Trae Young, Kristaps Porziņģis, Most Improved Player Dyson Daniels, last year's No. 1 pick Zaccharie Risacher and Jalen Johnson, who was averaging 18.9 points, 10 rebounds and five assists before missing the second half of last season due to injury. Add Nickeil Alexander-Walker and Luke Kennard to a bench unit in a depleted Eastern Conference, and it's easy to see why Atlanta surged up the odds. GO FURTHER 2026 NBA title odds: How the contenders rank after free agency and trade frenzy The Milwaukee Bucks have waived Chris Livingston. The Bucks selected Livingston, 21, with the final pick of the 2023 NBA Draft, but he never found his footing in the NBA. Livingston appeared in 42 games across the last two seasons with the Bucks and played just 196 minutes. He was on a non-guaranteed contract for the 2025-26 season with a guarantee date of July 15. I'm hearing that the Rockets, who are acquiring Dorian Finney-Smith and Clint Capela in free agency, will be expanding one of those into an expansive sign-and-trade that involves multiple teams. Houston can officially finalize those moves beginning July 6. Purely from a standpoint of matching salaries, the Knicks could construct various types of potential trade offers for LeBron James. The most chaotic deal would be flipping All-NBA big man Karl-Anthony Towns for James, straight up — two teams betting on the other's star. Of course, this could leave the Knicks center-less, given Mitchell Robinson's injury struggles. They could pair a couple of wings, OG Anunoby and either Josh Hart or Mikal Bridges, in a trade for James. They could piece together a trio to offer for James: Anunoby, Robinson and point guard Miles 'Deuce' McBride. But Anunoby will make $45 million in 2027-28 and has a player option for the following season, which would eat into the Lakers' possible cap space two summers from now. Meanwhile, the Knicks — or any other team — may not want to part with three key rotation pieces (and three of their four best defenders) for a 40-year-old. James could double as a basketball fit, as well as a giant expiring contract to avoid the second apron in 2026-27 and maybe beyond. In Los Angeles, Towns and Luka Dončić could destroy any defense they face. But the Knicks are also made up of prime-aged contributors. This would make them older. Like in the other hypotheticals, a James trade to the Knicks, even in a world where both he and the Lakers agree it's best for the two to part ways after seven years, isn't likely. The Knicks didn't get in on the hunt for Kevin Durant. Like so many others, they could be saving up salary and assets for a guy in Milwaukee. They may not handle this hypothetical much differently. Read on for more LeBron James trade hypotheticals. GO FURTHER LeBron James trade fits: Cavs, Warriors, Mavericks and more possibilities Mike Ehrmann / USA Today Sports The Mavericks are hiring Frank Vogel to be Jason Kidd's top assistant coach, a league source confirmed to The Athletic . Vogel spent time around the Mavericks last season as a coaching adviser. He'll replace Sean Sweeney, who left Dallas this offseason for San Antonio, as Kidd's primary lieutenant. Vogel was the Lakers' head coach in 2020 when they won the championship in the NBA bubble. Kidd was an assistant on that staff. Their roles are reversed now. Dallas bringing back Dante Exum does not augur well for the future of guard Brandon Williams. His non-guaranteed contract is Dallas' 16th, and his continued presence on the roster would push Dallas into the second apron, where they are hard-capped by virtue of using the taxpayer midlevel exception on D'Angelo Russell. If Jake LaRavia gets a flat $6 million over two years from the Lakers, as it seems he might, there is $8,104,000 left over for Ayton with their nontaxpayer midlevel exception. If that is the case, Ayton's 2026-27 salary would be $8,509,200 if he doesn't choose to hit free agency. Portland is likely to end up with a $25.55 million cap charge on its books after buying out Ayton. If so, the Blazers are $17 million below the tax line, and Ayton would make a total of $33.7 million in 2025-26 between the two contracts. Lakers second-round draft pick Adou Thiero won't play this summer for the Lakers as he continues with the recovery process from the left knee injury he suffered this past season at Arkansas. He's expected to be fully cleared for training camp. Jalen Bridges has been added to the Celtics summer league roster, I've been told, and will be going to camp with the team in the fall with a chance to make the roster. The 24-year-old wing played for Phoenix on a two-way contract as a rookie. John Hefti / Imagn The Mavericks are bringing back Dante Exum on a one-year minimum contract, a source with knowledge of the negotiations confirmed to The Athletic. The 29-year-old Exum gives the Mavericks another trusted ballhandler. He only played 20 games last season due to right wrist and left hand injuries. When Exum was healthy, it was clear Mavericks coach Jason Kidd could on him. Exum averaged 8.7 points and 2.8 assists in 18.6 minutes per game. In the opening hours of free agency, Dallas agreed to sign D'Angelo Russell using the taxpayer midlevel exception. With Kyrie Irving on the mend from left knee surgery, Russell slides into the starting lineup, while Exum is a leading candidate to get the backup point guard minutes. Signing Exum means the Mavericks will have 16 players on standard contracts. That's fine for now, but they'll need to shed a player before the regular season starts. Sergio Estrada / Imagn Mike Brown was the only candidate the Knicks ended up bringing back for a second interview, per league sources. It was a patient search that featured multiple twists and turns. New York's front office led by Leon Rose reached out to employed head coaches (like Houstons' Ime Udoka and Dallas' Jason Kidd), assistant coaches (like Minnesota's Micah Nori, Dallas' Sean Sweeney and New Orleans' James Borrego), recently fired head coaches (like Brown and Taylor Jenkins) and even held a conversation with South Carolina women's basketball coach Dawn Staley. Rose and Co., per league sources, didn't feel rushed to make a hire since the Knicks were the only team in the NBA with a vacancy. New York went into the initial stages of the hiring process with Brown's name circled. Per league sources, the Knicks liked Brown's extensive résumé and the fact that he's worn many hats in the NBA. Brown's willingness to collaborate and the leadership qualities the franchise examined were also big selling points, league sources said. New York, led by stars Jalen Brunson and Karl-Anthony Towns, liked that Brown has worked with LeBron James, Kobe Bryant and Steph Curry. The Knicks liked that Brown came up under Gregg Popovich, worked alongside Steve Kerr and won championships with both. New York was impressed at how Brown turned the Sacramento Kings around and helped them win 45-plus games in back-to-back seasons for the first time in the lowly franchise's history since 2006. Before he was fired by Sacramento after 31 games last season, Brown helped turn De'Aaron Fox into an All-Star. In 2022-23, Brown and the Kings had the best offensive efficiency since tracking began in 1996. Now, Brown is tasked with pushing the Knicks to the next level, into a tier of champions. Read my column on the impending hire here. GO FURTHER Mike Brown has faced pressure before, but this time might be different. Welcome to the Knicks Jerome Miron / Imagn Images The Hornets are adding Spencer Dinwiddie on a one-year deal, a league source tells our Christian Clark. That tells you a couple things about Charlotte: First, that the Hornets don't really view Collin Sexton as a point guard off the bench, and second, that a few guys on the fringes a year ago are probably not long for this roster. Josh Okogie has a non-guaranteed deal for $7.5 million; with the Hornets already having 15 guaranteed contracts plus the non-guaranteed deal of energizer Moussa Diabate and a likely roster deal for second-rounder Ryan Kalkbrenner, he would seem to be an easy choice to move on from. Additionally, Pat Connaughton, whom the Hornets are acquiring from Milwaukee, is on the books for $9.4 million but could be headed for a buyout if his contract can't be used in another trade, and 2023 first-rounder Nick Smith Jr. seems to be in a tenuous position; the team acquired three other guards in the offseason (Dinwiddie, Sexton and lottery pick Kon Knueppel) and is bringing back Tre Mann. Charlotte is also in a position to make more additions; the Hornets will be roughly $17 million from the tax line if they move on from Okogie and the non-guaranteed DaQuan Jeffries, and they still have access to their entire $14.1 million nontaxpayer midlevel exception. Given that the NTMLE can also operate as a trade exception, Charlotte may utilize this to take on a Connaughton-esque salary dump in return for more draft capital. Mike Brown has some Tom Thibodeauian tendencies — and I mean that in the positive sense. His teams play disciplined. He cares about stops and doesn't like defensive gamblers. He was hard on the group in Sacramento after a slow start last season. But he's also got some differences from the former Knicks coach schematically. With the Kings, Brown's teams played at a super pace. He'll play smalls together. He'll play around with lineups. The Knicks have made sure the pressure is on, clearly stating their goal is to win a title. And they believe Brown, to whom they've offered their head coaching job, is the guy to take them there. Michael Owens / Getty Images The mathematics for completing a potential LeBron James trade in northern California are not nearly as strenuous as other potential spots. James is close with two-time MVP Stephen Curry, with whom he finally played last summer, when the couple paired up at the Olympics. He and former Defensive Player of the Year Draymond Green share an agent. He played for head coach Steve Kerr with Team USA. And the Warriors have the lure of … well, the Warriors. Golden State has one obvious offer for James: Jimmy Butler for the quadragenarian. Butler makes a tad more than James does, marking the trade legal, though if it were constructed this way, it would hard cap the Lakers at the first apron, since they'd be absorbing more money than they send out in a deal. If the Lakers were fine with that, they could execute the one-for-one trade. However, they may want to maintain flexibility, which they could do somewhat easily. Golden State and Los Angeles could find a third team willing to take on one of the Lakers' minimum salaries (say, Jordan Goodwin's) without giving any salary back. This way, the total money leaving the purple and gold is above Butler's incoming salary. Beyond Butler, Golden State wouldn't have many options in a trade for James. Read more here. GO FURTHER LeBron James trade fits: Cavs, Warriors, Mavericks and more possibilities Jeff Gross / Getty Images Once he finalizes an agreement with the Knicks, Mike Brown will look to take over a franchise that has made it clear a championship is the expectation, providing pressure for a head coach who has experience in those situations, having coached both LeBron James and Kobe Bryant. Brown was the coach of the 2006-07 Cavaliers team that lost in the NBA Finals. With LeBron James by his side, Brown and Cleveland never lost more than 45 games during the regular season. Brown had one successful season in Los Angeles before getting fired five games into his second season. He then returned to the Cavaliers in 2013-14 to be the head coach but was let go after just one year. Brown spent time on Steve Kerr's staff with the Golden State Warriors in between his final stop in Cleveland and becoming the head coach in Sacramento. Brown played a big part in bringing the Kings back to relevancy, as the franchise posted back-to-back 45-plus-win seasons under his watch for the first time since 2005. Sacramento ended a 16-year playoff drought in Brown's first season. The New York Knicks have offered Mike Brown their head coaching job, and the two sides are expected to finalize a deal soon, league sources tell The Athletic. Brown would be the 32nd coach in the franchise's history. After a lengthy public process, New York views Brown as the coach to help the Knicks build on this season's trip to the Eastern Conference finals. New York fired Tom Thibodeau just days after making the Eastern Conference finals for the first time in 25 years. More here. GO FURTHER Knicks offer Mike Brown head coach role: Sources Page 2

NHL 2024-25 prediction contest results, where playing it safe finally paid off
NHL 2024-25 prediction contest results, where playing it safe finally paid off

New York Times

timean hour ago

  • New York Times

NHL 2024-25 prediction contest results, where playing it safe finally paid off

July 1 has come and gone, marking one of the most important dates on the entire NHL calendar. Free agency? Extensions? The start of the new league year? Yeah, I guess that all matters a bit. But I'm talking about the truly big stuff: The end of the annual prediction contest. Yes, with the first day of free agency over with, we can officially close the book on the 2024-25 contest. It was the fourth time we've run this thing, and scores have been increasing every year. In theory, you guys are getting better at this. In reality … well, we'll get to that. Advertisement As usual, the gimmick here is that the questions are easy, but you take a zero if you offer even one wrong answer, so the risk-reward can get tricky. If you missed out on the contest or could use a refresher on how it all works, you can find the original post here. An initial summary came a week later, in which we learned that nobody believed in Sam Reinhart. Correctly, as it turns out. I'm sure he'll be crushed once he and the rest of his teammates sober up. If they ever do. The good news is that, unlike last year, there was no tie at the top this time. There was one winner. Was it you? Maybe! (No.) Let's go through the questions and see how this played out for the 1,200 or so entrants. Question 1. Name up to five teams that will make the playoffs. Right off the bat, you ran into a major problem with what, in theory, was one of the easier questions. Roughly three-quarters of you, 913 in all, had the Rangers on your list of postseason sure-things. It's hard to blame you, given they were coming off a 114-point season that saw them win the Presidents' Trophy, but their unexpected collapse meant that the vast majority of you started with a zero. All told, only 241 of you banked any points at all on Question 1, with Vancouver, Boston and Nashville also taking out dozens of entries. Question 2. Name up to five teams that will not make the playoffs. This one went a little better, with the top four responses (San Jose, Columbus, Chicago and Anaheim) all being correct, although the Blue Jackets sure made 1,106 of you sweat. The problem came with the fifth team, and the 680 of you who knew there was no way that the Canadiens would see the postseason. They did, taking out more than half of you. The Blues, Senators and Capitals also did some damage here. In past years, banking the maximum 30 points across the first two questions was close to mandatory if you wanted to compete for the top spot. Needless to say, it was a rough start this time around, and we have two Original Six surprises to thank for that. Advertisement Question 3. Name up to five teams that will finish in the middle 16 of the regular-season standings (i.e., between 9th and 24th). This is meant to be a low-key tricky one, but you mostly did well this year. Your four most common answers — the Wild, Islanders, Red Wings and Penguins — were all correct, although Pittsburgh needed the second tiebreaker to sneak into 24th place. The most common wrong answers were a pair of overachievers, with the Kings (534 entries) and Capitals (314) both finishing in the top eight. Other wrong answers on the good side included the Jets (232 entries) and Lightning (175), while the other side of the ledger saw some of you punished for believing in the Sabres (233), Kraken (191) and Predators (150). Man, the Sabres being bad, who could have ever seen that coming? Shout out to Jeff P. and John B., both of whom managed to go 0-for-5 on this question. I'm not sure how the math works, but I feel like that's probably harder than going 5-for-5. Nice work, gentlemen. Question 4. Name up to five coaches who will not be fired or otherwise leave their job before July 1, 2025, NOT including any of the 12 coaches who were hired after October 1, 2023. Question 5. Name up to five GMs who will not be fired or otherwise leave their job before July 1, 2025, NOT including any of the 11 GMs who were hired after October 1, 2022. As always, the coaches and GMs had to make it through not just the regular season, but the start of the offseason, too. That turned out to be important for the most common wrong answer on the coaching side, who was still employed into June. That would be Pete DeBoer, who cost 487 of you here. Other common misses included Rick Tocchet (415), Peter Laviolette (271) and Jim Montgomery (249) All told, 971 of you tried for max points by listing five coaches, but only 84 pulled it off successfully. A further 86 managed to pick up at least a few points by going the cowardly conservative route with fewer answers. The good news is that the GM question was basically free money, given that only three teams made changes. None of those were surprises, at least according to your entries — the most common wrong answer was Seattle's Ron Francis, whose firing took out a relatively meagre 82 entries. The Kings' Rob Blake was only mentioned 29 times, and the Islanders' Lou Lamoriello only caught 22 of you. All told, an impressive 817 of you maxed out this question, and 153 more got at least something. Advertisement And of course, as always, way too many of you did not bother reading the full question and tried to list recent hires. That included Dianne P. and Nik S., who both listed 10 total names across these two questions, every one of which was hired too recently to be eligible. Hey, if you're going to miss, miss big. Question 6. Name up to five goaltenders who will start at least 50 games this season. This is another question that's traditionally been a source of 5-for-5 points for eventual winners. This year's answers featured a clear big three of Connor Hellebuyck, Juuse Saros and Igor Shesterkin, who all appeared on at least 900 entries and were indeed correct answers. The most common misses were relatively painless, with Jacob Markstrom, Linus Ullmark and Alexandar Georgiev(!) all getting at least 150 mentions. Also, congratulations to Mike P. and Matthew B., the only two entries out of 1,200+ to list Vezina finalist Darcy Kuemper for the goaltending question. He barely made it, recording 50 starts (and not a single relief appearance), but he counted. Question 7. Name up to five rookies who will finish in the top 10 of Calder balloting. This one has been an entry-wrecker for the last few years, which scared most of you off — only 335 of you listed the maximum five players here. But that turned out to be a mistake this year, as the most common answers were all the correct ones. We didn't get to any wrong answers until Rutger McGroarty and Josh Doan, who appeared on just 51 and 46 entries, respectively. In fact, not only did each of the seven most common entries qualify as right answers, they made up the actual top seven in Calder balloting. Nicely done by everyone, but especially the 203 of you who went 5-for-5. Question 8. Name up to five defensemen who will finish in the top 10 of Norris balloting. After the relatively easy points from the Calder question, this one was a bloodbath. Eventual winner Cale Makar appeared on almost every entry, and Quinn Hughes was also safe despite missing time. But those were the only two names from your collective top seven to deliver. Adam Fox took out 977 of you on his own, and if you dodged him, then you probably fell victim to Roman Josi (808 entries), Miro Heiskanen (553), Evan Bouchard (427) or Charlie McAvoy (110). I'll pause here to applaud Alan F. and Jonathan B., the only two entries to include Norris runner-up Zach Werenski, as well as Karl Eric S., who was the only entry in the entire contest to have Thomas Harley. Advertisement All told, not a single entry managed a 5-for-5 on this question. In fact, nobody even managed a 4-for-4, and only 21 of you managed to get any points at all. That's a new record for futility. Let's never speak of this again. Question 9. Name up to five players who will finish in the top 15 of Hart Trophy voting. Welcome to life as a Leafs fan in the playoffs, because you should all be really mad at Auston Matthews. He was named on 1,106 entries, making him this year's record-holder for the most common wrong answer. Combined with the support for Jack Hughes (273 entries), Sidney Crosby (123) and Artemi Panarin (99), this was another tough one. How tough? Of the 808 of you who listed five names on this question, a measly three escaped with max points. (Nice work Jason J., Asher S. and Logan F.) And only 43 of you got any points at all. And that brings us to the obvious question: Did anyone manage to get points on both the Norris and Hart questions? Yes … two of you. Congratulations to Francis G., who listed Quinn Hughes for the Norris and Connor McDavid for the Hart to earn a combined total of two whole points. That's pathetic, but only one entry could beat him — Dylan B., who had Makar for the Norris and McDavid and Nathan Mackinnon for the Hart. Credit where it's due, that's five points that Dylan banked and you didn't. Question 10. Name up to five players who are currently on an NHL roster who will change teams between October 9 and the end of the first day of 2025 free agency (scheduled to be July 1). This means they must be on a new roster via trade, free agency, waivers or whatever else, but does not include retirement, leaving the league entirely or being an unsigned free agent. The dreaded roster move question, which takes us right up to 11:59 p.m. on July 1. That was bad news for the 167 of you who had Nikolaj Ehlers finding a new team by then, but he was only the fourth most common miss. The top spot actually went to Frank Vatrano, who was named on 407 entries before deciding to re-up with the Ducks. All told, only four of you went 5-for-5 here; nice job by Corey B., Sean F., Chris B. and Holden M. (Also, our friend Dylan B. listed only Timothy Liljegren here, earning him yet another point. If the contest only had another 60 or so questions, his conservative strategy would have had him in the running for top spot.) Optional bonus question: For 15 bonus points, name one and only one player who will finish this season with at least 50 goals, but who is not Auston Matthews. Once again, you had the option to risk your entire entry on the bonus. Once again, most of you did — 794 of you chose to answer here, while 445 decided not to chance it. That latter group may have had the right idea, as this season only served up a single 50-goal scorer in Edmonton's Leon Draisaitl. Advertisement The good news is that Draisaitl was the second most common answer. The bad news is that only 158 of you had him, meaning 636 of you flushed your entry away on picks such as David Pastrnak (300 entries), Connor McDavid (92), Nathan MacKinnon (73) and Kirill Kaprizov (65). The list of entry-wiping answers also included both of you who believed in Sam Reinhart. By the way, the league's second-place goal-scorer with 45 in the year, William Nylander, was not named on a single entry. Not you. But you know that by now. It was a tough year, with nobody cracking the 100-point mark for the first time since 2022 (when there were fewer questions). Only seven entries even managed to get to the 80-point mark, a list that included Brian W.'s 80 on the nose, as well as 81 points for Samuel F. and Daniel B. Close, but not close enough. The silver medal will be split three ways, with Vladic K., Hugo T. and Samuel P. all finishing with 85 points. Each of them maxed out four questions for 15 points each, added a 10-spot somewhere else, and then nailed Draisaitl for the bonus. And each fell just short. All three will have plenty to think about over the offseason — Vladic can blame the Kings for missing the mushy middle by a few points, Hugo can curse Georgiev for falling three starts short of 50, and Samuel had an agonizing four different questions with just one miss: Montreal for question 2, Seattle for question 3, Matthews for question 9 and Vatrano for question 10. Not only would he have won the contest if any of those had come through, he'd also have won if he'd only left any of those answers off his entry entirely. Safe is death, as John Tortorella once said, but Samuel would be our champion if he'd only played it just a bit safer. But he didn't, and that's good news for our winner: Congratulations to Matt A., whose 88 points were enough to top our leaderboard in a 'Jamie Benn wins the Art Ross' level performance. Matt banked the max points on each of the first three questions before getting tripped up by DeBoer and Tocchet on the coaches. He recovered with max scores on the GMs and the goalies, dodged the Calder bullet by listing only Macklin Celebrini and Lane Hutson; his fans probably booed him for playing it safe, but those three points made the difference. He banked 10 more points on the Hart question to get to 88, which was enough to overcome misses on the Norris and the transactions. And yes, you're reading that right — for the first time, our winner is an entrant who bypassed the bonus question. I wasn't sure it could be done, but the NHL is full of surprises. Congratulations to Matt. Thank you to everyone who played along, even if you were one of the many entries to get a zero for the year. And a huge thanks to Mike, whose work in scraping the data and maintaining the entry database is invaluable. We'll plan to do it all again in September. Until then, take the summer to strategize. Most of you have nowhere to go but up. (Top photo of Auston Matthews: Dan Hamilton / Imagn Images)

Penguins GM Highlights 'Major Focus' for Evgeni Malkin Amid Uncertain Future
Penguins GM Highlights 'Major Focus' for Evgeni Malkin Amid Uncertain Future

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Penguins GM Highlights 'Major Focus' for Evgeni Malkin Amid Uncertain Future

Penguins GM Highlights 'Major Focus' for Evgeni Malkin Amid Uncertain Future originally appeared on Athlon Sports. Evgeni Malkin's future with the Pittsburgh Penguins was widely assumed to be heading toward a conclusion in 2025–26, the final season of his current deal. Advertisement Malkin, who will turn 39 at the end of July, is entering the final season of his four-year, $24.4 million contract. The Russian center signed his deal back in 2022 and has spent all of his 19 NHL seasons in Pittsburgh. On Monday, general manager Kyle Dubas made it clear that the veteran's retirement is far from a sure thing. 'No,' Dubas said when asked if Malkin would be done after this year. 'I talked to Geno at the end of the year, after the year. I get it, it's the last year of his contract, and it's been a topic of discussion. We'll meet at the Olympic break this year and see where Geno's at, and meet at the end of the year.' Advertisement Despite Malkin's age and contract situation, Dubas said the Russian star continues to produce and might merit a new deal to extend his career. That contract extension, however, will have to wait. 'It's strange," Dubas said. "He's going to be 39 at the end of July. He's still playing at a very high level for a player of that age. He means a great deal to the community. "Our major focus is on treating him right, pushing him to continue to be at his best this year, and do right by him by continuing to communicate with him where he stands.' Pittsburgh Penguins forward Evgeni Malkin still plays at a high level, defying LeClaire-Imagn Images Malkin and fellow superstar teammate Sidney Crosby are set to enter their 20th season together. Advertisement New head coach Dan Muse brushed off the idea of trading any of the Penguins' veterans, emphasizing the importance of keeping them engaged and leading the team as Pittsburgh tries to maximize the last years of the current Penguins' core. 'In regards to the veteran players, you're always working with the leaders," Muse said. "Guys that have been in this organization for such a long time. You're going to be leaning on them.' Related: Penguins Coach Reveals Plans for Sidney Crosby, Pittsburgh's Aging Core Related: Penguins GM Breaks Silence on Sidney Crosby Trade Rumors This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jul 1, 2025, where it first appeared.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store