logo
Japan's Semiconductor Renaissance – Is it for Real?

Japan's Semiconductor Renaissance – Is it for Real?

Japan Forward01-05-2025
Back in the 1980s, Japan produced more than 50 percent of the world's semiconductors. But today, Japanese semiconductors account for less than 10% of the global semiconductor market. What happened? And can Japan regain its semiconductor mojo?
In an article recently published by the National Bureau of Asian Research (NBR) titled "The Japanese Semiconductor Renaissance – Will It Be Successful?" Kazuto Suzuki confidently asserts, "Japan is in the midst of a semiconductor renaissance."
Evidence of that seems to be everywhere these days. Take, for example, the February 2024 start of operations at the first Japan Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing (JASM) plant in Kumamoto and the start of trial production of 2-nanometer logic semiconductors at a new Rapidus Corporation foundry in Chitose City, Hokkaido, in April.
Suzuki, a professor of Science and Technology Policy at the University of Tokyo's Graduate School of Public Policy and director of the Institute of Geoeconomics, offers a word of caution. He says Japan will need to learn from past mistakes and overcome significant challenges if it hopes to become a major semiconductor powerhouse again.
Many observers point to the 1986 US-Japan Semiconductor Agreement as the prime reason for the rapid decline of Japan's semiconductor sector. That agreement came about because of accusations that Japan had engaged in unfair trade practices, which allegedly devastated United States competitors. There was no denying that in the postwar years, the Ministry of International Trade and Industry (MITI) had fostered Japan's semiconductor sector through various incentives.
For example, starting in 1978, the MITI led the very-large-scale integration (VLSI) project. Working with major tech firms like NEC, Toshiba, Hitachi, and Fujitsu, Japan surged ahead in developing cutting-edge technologies, particularly dynamic random-access memory (DRAM) chips. By 1983, Japan had surpassed the US in terms of DRAM production, and Japanese companies were not stinting on investment to boost production yields and reduce costs.
Indeed, the semiconductor agreement certainly drained much of Japan's momentum. Contributing further to the decline in the 1990s was something more internal: the very corporate culture that had once powered Japan to become the world's second-largest economy by 1968 had begun to hold it back. Toshimitsu Motegi, the former Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry (second from right), visits the planned site for Rapidus' factory in Chitose, Hokkaido, on June 18, 2023. (© Kyodo)
Dr Suzuki points out that one of the biggest reasons Japan's semiconductor strategy failed was its attachment to the integrated device manufacturer (IDM) model. Under this vertical system, each of the country's giant electronics makers handled everything — from design to manufacturing and packaging — within its own keiretsu group.
Manufacturing semiconductors is a capital-intensive business that requires huge investments on an ongoing basis. In the 1990s, independent, dedicated fabrication plants (fabs) emerged, including foundries that supplied semiconductor companies that designed but did not produce their own chips.
In fact, the "fabless" model pioneered by Taiwan's TSMC (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company), established by Morris Chang in 1987, revolutionized the semiconductor industry. (TSMC held a roughly 65% share of the global semiconductor foundry market in 2024.) This new model wreaked havoc on Japanese firms that stuck to the IDM approach. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) headquarters
Suzuki adds that competing Japanese semiconductor makers only half-heartedly took part in a government-backed "all Japan" consolidation effort. As a result, none were left with the resources to make the massive, ongoing investments needed to stay competitive in cutting-edge chip production. In other words, the Japanese semiconductor industry fell victim to structural problems largely of its own making.
Only belatedly did Japanese companies finally abandon their fixation on IDM and opt to become part of an international division of labor based on cooperation. Increasingly, having access to the most advanced semiconductors seems a national priority, especially with the enormous and ever-growing demands of artificial intelligence (AI). But the absence of a strong semiconductor manufacturing base leaves Japan vulnerable to supply disruption.
Suzuki writes that the Japanese government now views its new semiconductor strategy as an effort to ensure "strategic autonomy" as part of its economic security policy. The government has provided ¥1.2 trillion JPY (approximately $7.74 billion USD) to JASM for its first and second factories in Kumamoto and ¥920 billion ($5.94 billion) to Rapidus.
JASM is a majority-owned subsidiary of TSMC and Sony Semiconductor Solutions Corporation, from which it receives much of its funding. Rapidus, however, finds itself in a more precarious financial position. Eight companies have invested in it, but the total amount of investment to date is only ¥7.3 billion ($47.1 million).
The Development Bank of Japan and three major banks intend to invest ¥25 billion ($161.29 million) into Rapidus. However, the question is whether that investment will be sufficient, considering the enormous amount of money needed to keep a foundry going even before it begins mass production.
Much may depend on the amount of support the Japanese government is willing to offer. Mass production of 2-nanometer chips may require up to ¥5 trillion ($32.26 billion). Former Prime Minister Fumio Kishida's administration was eager to provide guarantees for investment in Rapidus with an eye to attracting more private investment as well as skilled labor.
Legislation to enable the provision of such guarantees through revision of the Act on Facilitation of Information on Information Processing and other rules is now pending in the Diet. Suzuki warns, "The (Shigeru) Ishiba cabinet will need to commit with the same level of passion as the previous administration."
Then, too, there is the question of how to recruit the human capital needed if Japan's semiconductor sector is to prosper once again. There is, in fact, a global shortage of qualified people with the necessary skills. The weak yen and relatively low salaries in Japan complicate efforts to recruit foreign talent.
Meanwhile, there are already indications of softening demand for older chips, leading to underutilization of existing factories. And no one knows what effect tariffs, trade wars, and a possible recession might have on this already complicated situation.
Author: John Carroll
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Canada Goose grows revenue and gross profits in Q1 2026
Canada Goose grows revenue and gross profits in Q1 2026

The Market Online

timean hour ago

  • The Market Online

Canada Goose grows revenue and gross profits in Q1 2026

Canada Goose (TSX:GOOS) announced financial results for Q1 fiscal 2026 ending June 29, 2025, highlighted by a 22.4 per cent year-over-year increase in revenue, supported by a 25.9 per cent jump in gross profits and substantially lower net debt While management isn't issuing yearly guidance, the team remains optimistic about the company's growth plan moving forward Canada Goose is a high-performance outerwear, apparel, footwear and accessories brand Canada Goose stock has added 4.02 per cent year-over-year but has given back 44.41 per cent since 2020 Canada Goose (TSX:GOOS) announced financial results for Q1 fiscal 2026 ending June 29, 2025, highlighted by a 22.4 per cent year-over-year increase in revenue to C$107.8 million, driven by the launch of the brand's Spring-Summer 2025 collection, its second Snow Goose capsule, adding two stores to its permanent store count – now standing at 76 – as well as a concerted marketing effort featuring influencers and celebrity guests. This content has been prepared as part of a partnership with Canada Goose Holdings Inc., and is intended for informational purposes only. Here are the year-over-year highlights: Direct-to-consumer revenue added 23.8 per cent to C$78.1 million thanks to comparable sales growth of 14.8 per cent and revenue from non-comparable stores. added 23.8 per cent to C$78.1 million thanks to comparable sales growth of 14.8 per cent and revenue from non-comparable stores. Wholesale revenue rose by 11.9 per cent to C$17.9 million driven by shipment timing and increasing demand. rose by 11.9 per cent to C$17.9 million driven by shipment timing and increasing demand. Other revenue grew by 31.1 per cent to C$11.8 million supported by a higher number of Friends & Family events. grew by 31.1 per cent to C$11.8 million supported by a higher number of Friends & Family events. Gross profits soared by 25.9 per cent to C$66.2 million, with gross margin increasing from 59.7 per cent to 61.4 per cent, thanks to a higher margin contribution from Canada Goose's European knitwear facility. soared by 25.9 per cent to C$66.2 million, with gross margin increasing from 59.7 per cent to 61.4 per cent, thanks to a higher margin contribution from Canada Goose's European knitwear facility. Selling, general and administrative expenses came in at C$224.9 million, up from C$149.5 million year-over-year, because of a C$43.8 million (US$32 million) reward following arbitration with a former supplier, as well as increased spending on global expansion, marketing, product design and merchandising. came in at C$224.9 million, up from C$149.5 million year-over-year, because of a C$43.8 million (US$32 million) reward following arbitration with a former supplier, as well as increased spending on global expansion, marketing, product design and merchandising. Adjusted EBIT registered a loss of C$106.4 million, up from C$96 million year-over-year. registered a loss of C$106.4 million, up from C$96 million year-over-year. Operating loss amounted to C$158.7 million, up from C$96.9 million year-over-year. amounted to C$158.7 million, up from C$96.9 million year-over-year. Net loss attributable to shareholders was C$125.2 million, up from C$77.4 million year-over-year. was C$125.2 million, up from C$77.4 million year-over-year. Adjusted net loss attributable to shareholders was C$88.2 million, up from C$76.1 million year-over-year. was C$88.2 million, up from C$76.1 million year-over-year. Net debt of C$541.7 million, down from C$765.9 million year-over-year, facilitated by higher cash balances and lower credit facility borrowing. The company ended Q1 with C$439.5 million in inventory, representing a reduction of 9 per cent year-over-year, which Thursday's news release describes as 'reflecting higher demand and our continued proactive approach to managing inventory.' As discussed in Wednesday's profile, while Canada Goose will not issue 2026 guidance because of potential fallout from US tariff renegotiations with global partners, the company remains a resilient and proven option to weather tough economic times into the next global growth cycle. Leadership insights 'We're off to a strong start, brand heat is rising and our direct-to-consumer (DTC) performance is delivering,' Dani Reiss, Canada Goose's chairman and chief executive officer, said in a statement. 'We're executing with precision, from bold storytelling to smarter retail moves, and it's showing up in results. I'm optimistic about the momentum we continue to see as we deliver more relevant product and run a tighter, more focused business.' About Canada Goose Canada Goose is a high-performance outerwear, apparel, footwear and accessories brand on a mission to help explorers thrive in all environments while preserving the planet they roam. Canada Goose stock (TSX:GOOS) is down by 6.28 per cent on the news trading at C$16.57 as of 10:27 am ET. The stock has added 4.02 per cent year-over-year but has given back 44.41 per cent since 2020. Join the discussion: Find out what investors are saying about this luxury fashion brand on the Canada Goose Holdings Inc. Bullboard, and make sure to explore the rest of Stockhouse's stock forums and message boards. Stockhouse does not provide investment advice or recommendations. All investment decisions should be made based on your own research and consultation with a registered investment professional. The issuer is solely responsible for the accuracy of the information contained herein. For full disclaimer information, please click here.

S&P/TSX composite index dips while U.S. markets mixed
S&P/TSX composite index dips while U.S. markets mixed

Winnipeg Free Press

time2 hours ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

S&P/TSX composite index dips while U.S. markets mixed

TORONTO – Canada's main stock index was down in late-morning trading Thursday amid a flurry of earnings and economic data while U.S. markets were mixed. The S&P/TSX composite index was down 61.75 points at 27,308.21 as energy, telecom and financials trended lower. In New York, the Dow Jones industrial average was down 105.08 points at 44,356.20. The S&P 500 index was up 15.47 points at 6,378.37, while the Nasdaq composite was up 119.72 points at 21,249.40. The Canadian dollar traded for 72.24 cents US compared with 72.41 cents US on Wednesday as Statistics Canada data showed the economy shrank in May but growth could hold flat for the quarter overall. The September crude oil contract was down US$1.18 at US$68.82 per barrel. The December gold contract was down US$5.30 at US$3,347.50 an ounce. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 31, 2025. Companies in this story: (TSX:GSPTSE, TSX:CADUSD)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store