The $6tn bank tweak that risks triggering the next crisis
She says: 'Banks will likely find a way to distribute some of it to shareholders, or otherwise deploy it into their market operations which are riskier and more vulnerable to crisis conditions than insured banks.'
Covid buffer
Those who back removing Treasuries from the calculations highlight that it was done during the pandemic without much fanfare as banks ploughed more money into bonds.
However, analysts at Morgan Stanley have highlighted that this was in part a function of a 21pc jump in bank deposits as workers had nowhere to spend their cash during lockdowns.
It recently noted: 'The Covid-related surge in deposits means that 2020-21 is not comparable with today's environment, as deposit growth is tepid at 1pc year-on-year. Deposit growth, combined with loan demand, are key drivers of bank demand for securities as banks will prefer to use deposits to support client lending activity and build client relationships.'
Bair says capital buffers were put there for a reason. 'If there should be a future crisis, regulators have the authority to provide emergency temporary relief.
'Reduce capital requirements now, they don't know how banks may deploy it. Better to maintain strong requirements in good times so capital cushions will be there when bad times hit.'
Regulators are also keeping a close eye on this side of the Atlantic amid concerns we are moving towards a world where sovereign risk is completely removed from the leverage ratio. While the UK has already taken steps to remove central bank reserves from its calculations, officials here believe removing government bonds would be a step too far.
Rogoff, now a Harvard professor, agrees that capital buffers have served their purpose during times of crisis.
'It is notable how well the banking system held up during the pandemic, and later from the sharp rise in global interest rates. It is precisely when the system hits peak stress moments – especially when the economy is hit by completely out of the box shocks – that the SLR suddenly does not seem quite so crazy,' he says.
The rules tweaks may look benign, but bond sell-offs are often quick and violent. And it's usually the taxpayer left picking up the pieces.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
33 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Europe's trade deal with the US was dead on arrival – it needs to be buried. Here's how to do it
Ursula von der Leyen's Turnberry golf course deal has been rightly called a capitulation and a humiliation for Europe. Assuming such an accord would put an end to Donald Trump's coercion and bullying was either naive or the result of a miserable delusion. The EU should now steel itself and reject the terms imposed by Trump. Is this deal really as bad as it sounds? Unfortunately, it is, for at least three reasons. The blow to Europe's international credibility is incalculable in a world that expects the EU to stand up for reciprocity and rules-based trade, to resist Washington's coercion as Canada, China and Brazil have, rather than condoning it. Economically, it's a damaging one-way street: EU exporters lose market access in the US while the EU market is hit by more favoured US competition. Core European industrial sectors such as pharma and steel and aluminium are left by the wayside. The balance also tilts in the US's favour in important sectors such as consumer goods, food and drink, and agriculture. Tariffs tend to stick, so this is long-term damage. The EU even gives up its right to respond to future US pressures through duties on digital services or network fees. To top it off, von der Leyen's defence and investment pledges (for which she had no mandate) go against Europe's interest. The EU's competitiveness predicament is precisely one of net investment outflows. As international capital now reallocates under the pressures of Trumponomics and a weakening dollar, the case for Europe to become a strategic investment power was strengthening. Von der Leyen's promise of $600bn in EU investment in the US is therefore disastrous messaging. How could this happen? All EU member states wanted to avoid Trump's 30% tariff threat and a trade war, but none perhaps as much as Germany and Ireland, supported by German carmakers and US big tech firms. Yet Irish sweetheart digital tax deals, as well as BMW and Mercedes's plans to move production hubs to the US (also to serve the EU market), cannot be Europe's future. EU governments were distinctly unhelpful in building the EU's negotiating position. But in the end, it was von der Leyen who blinked and she has to take responsibility. Her close team took control in the closing weeks and went into the final meeting manifestly prepared only to say yes, which made Trump's steamrolling inevitable. Let's think of the counterfactual: if von der Leyen had stepped into the room and rejected these terms, Trump's wrath and some market turmoil may have ensued. But ultimately it would very likely have come to a postponement, a new negotiation and, at some point, a different deal that would not be so lopsided or unilaterally trade away deep and long-term European interests and principles. Instead, von der Leyen became a supplicant to a triumphant Trump. The situation is reminiscent of the final rounds of the Brexit negotiations five years ago when von der Leyen similarly was giving in to unacceptable demands from Boris Johnson, only to U-turn under pressure from a steelier EU chief negotiator and a quartet of member states. Today, von der Leyen runs Brussels with a strong presidential hand and has largely done away with internal checks and balances inside the commission. That is her prerogative and her style, but the upshot should not be weak, ineffective and unprincipled dealings on Europe's major geopolitical challenges, from Trump to Gaza. The 'deal' in Scotland is in reality an unstable interim accord. Nothing is yet inked or signed; Washington and Brussels are already locking horns on its interpretation and negotiations on the finer (and broader) points are ongoing. The 27 EU governments will inevitably get involved as the final deal needs to be translated into an international agreement and EU law. Some big powers – Germany and Italy seemingly – are on board, reluctant or not. However, internal political dynamics may change their calculations. Opposition parties and rightwing contenders who are a real political threat to leaders in Germany and France are already lambasting the deal. Unless von der Leyen strikes a dirty bargain with the member states, the European parliament will also have a say. The longtime chair of its trade committee, Bernd Lange, has set the tone for how the deal would be viewed there, calling it 'asymmetry set in stone' and even 'a misery'. As details seep out on what von der Leyen has really agreed to and what the US expects from the EU, and all the consequences become clear, an already unpalatable deal may become even more so. Weakening US economic data and returning stock market jitters show that Trump's negotiation footing is fragile. His new tariff threats come with new extensions, up to 90 days in the case of Mexico, as his position is overstretched. For Europe, the lesson from the Brexit negotiations – one that von der Leyen ought to have grasped before now – is that nothing is agreed until everything is agreed. There is now an opportunity for EU governments and the European parliament to course correct and salvage something from this train wreck. Georg Riekeles is the associate director of the European Policy Centre, and Varg Folkman is policy analyst at the European Policy Centre
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
India will buy Russian oil despite Trump's threats, NYT reports
Aug 2 (Reuters) - Indian officials have said they would keep purchasing oil from Russia despite the threat of penalties that U.S. President Donald Trump said he would impose, the New York Times reported on Saturday. Reuters could not immediately verify the report.
Metro
3 hours ago
- Metro
What I Own: I sluethed on Rightmove to get a £36,000 discount on my Bristol home
Welcome back to What I Own – Metro's property series where we speak to homeowners about getting on the ladder. When Orima Kamalu, 36, and her husband first moved into their Bristol three-bed, they started on a high. The pair managed to secure their property for £629,000 – which was £36,000 less than the asking price. How did they do it? Simply by doing some detective work on Rightmove, and taking the risk. Now, they've just marked one year in their new home, which creative Orima has certainly put a colourful stamp on. Here's what Orima had to say about her property journey… You can access completely fee-free mortgage advice with London & Country (L&C) Mortgages, a partner of Metro. Customers benefit from: – Award winning service from the UK's leading mortgage broker – Expert advisors on hand 7 days a week – Access to 1000s of mortgage deals from across the market Unlike many mortgage brokers, L&C won't charge you a fee for their advice. Find out how much you could borrow online Mortgage service provided by London & Country Mortgages (L&C), which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (registered number: 143002). The FCA does not regulate most Buy to Let mortgages. Your home or property may be repossessed if you do not keep up repayments on your mortgage. I'm a consultant psychiatrist in the NHS, and my hobbies include DIY, arts and crafts, and watching far too much TV. My husband and I were studying, working and renting in London until 2019, when we moved back to Bristol, my hometown, to be closer to my mum. We have a three-year-old son and a seven-year-old cocker spaniel. Our property is in Westbury-On-Trym, just north of Bristol. It's known for being quite a traditional 'village' and less trendy than other parts of the city, but we love it. My favourite thing is how close we are to so many beautiful outdoor spaces, such as Blaise Estate, Baddocks Woods and The Downs. I'm also obsessed with FED, a delightful local café which recently opened a new branch. That said, the local high street has clearly suffered in recent years, with lots of long-standing independent stores closing. We hope that our community will continue to support the retailers we love. June 2024. Our property was listed for £665,000 and we purchased it for £629,000. Around £127,000. Our mortgage is £2,400 per month. Our bills come to approximately £1,200, including gas, electricity, water, broadband, and council tax. This is our second home, so we used the net proceeds from the sale of our first home as a deposit for this property. We bought our first property in 2021 for £395,000 with a 10% deposit, which came from savings gradually built over several years. We sold it for £463,000. Being NHS workers during COVID, we were lucky that we were still employed during this time, so we could continue saving. We also benefited from the stamp duty hiatus. Orima was keen to channel her creativity into her new house, with bold colour choices and chic furnishings. Now, the standout feature is the ceiling in her three-year-old's bedroom: hand-painted fluffy white clouds on a bright blue sky. The quirky choice got her son's seal of approval, and it even got her norminated for a Best Showstopping Home Feature in the Home Awards. Celebrating talent across 20 categories, including interiors, gardens, furniture innovation and home accessories, the awards highlight the best in the home renovations game. We were probably saving for our initial deposit since we both left university, but in earnest for about two years since moving to Bristol in 2019. The most complex part of securing a mortgage for uswas figuring out how to 'port' our existing mortgage debt from the first property to the second. A ported mortgage is what happens when you buy a new home and you want to take your existing mortgage rate with you. It's usually used when you have a deal that you want to keep, and while you'll still need to apply for a new mortgage, your current rate will still apply if you're successful in 'porting' it. If you want to borrow more than the value of your previous home, you can apply for additional borrowing. This will mean you'll end up with two elements to your mortgage, one part being the ported rate and the second being to cover the extra borrowing (usually on a different rate). Again, our broker oversaw the whole process with ease and clarity, so we were very fortunate that this went smoothly. We have a two-part mortgage with HSBC. Part 1: (ported mortgage) 3.29% fixed until 2027, 30-year term. Part 2: (new/additional mortgage) 4.38% fixed until 2029, 30-year term. We crunched some numbers with our mortgage advisor to determine what we could actually afford, and this kicked off our house search. I saw this property come on the market in September 2023 and immediately fell in love with it, even though it was quite out of our budget. I loved the location, the size and the potential to be refurbished without much need for anything structural. I did a bit of research on the property itself and found the buying history on Rightmove, which showed what the current owners had bought it for, versus the price it was actually listed for at the time. They offered below asking, so we took a chance and did the same. It was actually the same amount below asking that the current owners had bought for, which I think was part of the reason they didn't dismiss it. We were also the only potential buyers, which helped. We were so lucky it was accepted. Before we moved in, I had used a home visualiser app, which virtually redecorates the entire house, so I had a clear vision of how I wanted it to look in time. I get a lot of inspiration from Instagram home accounts. I'm drawn to homes which combine traditional features (like panelling and coving) with bold but earthy colours, prints and statement pieces like funky lighting. Sort of like a 'muted maximalism'. My favourite room is probably the kitchen, as even though I detest cooking, it's the transformation I'm most proud of. The kitchen was very different before, with white gloss units, turquoise walls, and a black floor and counter. It took quite a bit of figuring out and learning new skills but now I love the Victorian dresser and the drinks cabinet we sourced from Facebook marketplace, and I'm proud of our DIY tiling. We were keen to ensure that anywhere we bought had a reasonably-sized garden (a must with a dog), off-street parking and a downstairs toilet. In future, I'll be adding the following to the list: utility room and a garage (we lost one in the move, and it's such a wrench storage-wise). Yes and no. We do have more than enough space however, we've just started making enquiries about expanding the property with a small extension at the back, which we would use as an office and gym space. It would free up an extra bedroom in case we have a second child. The DIY renovations are endless and constantly ongoing. We had solar panels installed recently, which has been a really great addition in terms of bills and sustainability in general. We will likely do some landscaping of the front of the property and the rear garden to make them more enjoyable outdoor spaces. Fortunately (touch wood) nothing major so far. The odd thing is plumbing and heating, but we've been lucky not to need any big issues addressed. We count ourselves as extremely privileged to have been able to take this step, and I think fellow homeowners would do well to remember that. More Trending It's also been a big exercise in patience, as for a quite straightforward purchases, it took a surprisingly long time to get to completion. We think we'll probably stay here for at least 10 years or so, as the location suits our little family very well. View More » In the longer term, I think our desire for more space and privacy may take us further out of Bristol, but we shall see. Do you have a story to share? Get in touch by emailing MetroLifestyleTeam@ MORE: London's 'quaint' borough is the cheapest to rent at £1,485 — but it might not be for long MORE: 'Fantastic' market town named the UK's cheapest for first-time buyers MORE: My husband paid our entire £45,250 house deposit — it makes me so uncomfortable
