Fuel shortages in Gaza at ‘critical levels', UN warns
Seven UN agencies said in a joint statement that 'fuel is the backbone of survival in Gaza'.
Fuel was needed to 'power hospitals, water systems, sanitation networks, ambulances, and every aspect of humanitarian operations', they said, highlighting that bakeries also needed fuel to operate.
The besieged Palestinian territory has been facing dire fuel shortages since the beginning of the devastating war that erupted after Hamas's deadly attack inside Israel on October 7, 2023.
But now 'fuel shortage in Gaza has reached critical levels', warned the agencies, including the World Health Organization, the World Food Programme and the humanitarian agency OCHA. 'After almost two years of war, people in Gaza are facing extreme hardships, including widespread food insecurity,' they pointed out.
'When fuel runs out, it places an unbearable new burden on a population teetering on the edge of starvation.'
The UN said that without adequate fuel, the agencies that have been responding to the deep humanitarian crisis in a territory swathes of which have been flattened by Israeli bombing and facing famine warnings, 'will likely be forced to stop their operations entirely'. 'This means no health services, no clean water, and no capacity to deliver aid,' the statement said.
'Without adequate fuel, Gaza faces a collapse of humanitarian efforts,' it warned.
'Without fuel, bakeries and community kitchens cannot operate. Water production and sanitation systems will shut down, leaving families without safe drinking water, while solid waste and sewage pile up in the streets,' it added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
3 hours ago
- Express Tribune
The 12-day Iran-Israel war
Listen to article The 12-day war between Iran and Israel must have convinced the Iranian regime that only in the possession of a nuclear bomb lies the security and deterrence of their country. Had it possessed a bomb it is most unlikely that Israel would have launched an attack on it on the 13th of June 2025. In an interview with Karan Thapar, the internationally renowned award winning columnist Gideon Levy stated that in case Iran possessed a bomb just as in the case of North Korea and Pakistan it would've provided a guarantee and deterrence against a nuclear attack by an adversary. Although the ceasefire between Iran and Israel may last for a short while, a permanent peace is inconceivable in the absence of a lasting solution to the Palestinian issue. Resolution of the Gaza, Lebanon and Western Bank problems may bring some respite yet complete peace in the middle east will be fraught unless a two-state solution is not implemented. The killing of 100 innocent Gazans every day by the Israelis cannot be called anything like self-defence or security but clear genocide. The best one can say about the 12-day war is that it was short and did not deteriorate into a war of attrition like the brutal war in Gaza. This raises the question whether the war was necessary. The staying power of Iran would've been far greater than that of Israel in a protracted standoff considering that Iran withstood a war for eight years with Iraq. In the 12-day war, Israel and its population had begun to feel the brunt and dismay. The US must've realised that Israel couldn't withstand a long war due to economic pressure and the great drain on its arms and ammunition. The ceasefire is likely to last and hold not because of the goodwill of any party but because it is in the interest of the two sides. The far more important question that arises is whether the war was necessary at all. After the ceasefire the status quo ante is most likely to revive with the same nuclear deal as existed between Obama and Iran. Both the sides suffered militarily, Iran more than Israel, yet the question arises is: for what outcome was the war fought? The ceasefire is likely to hold on since both sides were eager to end the war. After the ceasefire Benjamin Netanyahu claimed that Israel had achieved two of its goals: undoing the nuclear capability and removing the Iranian ICBM threat. A US Intelligence Agency report leaked by CNN just one day after the ceasefire informed that the Iranian nuclear capability had only been set back by a few months and not completely obliterated. There were also reports that some nuclear facilities and materials had been removed from the three sites – Ferdow, Natanz and Isfahan – and the bunker busters GBU-57A, carried by US B2 bombers, could not completely exterminate nuclear facilities nor were any radioactive signs traceable over the sites. Some scholars of the middle east argue that if Iran does obtain a nuclear bomb, it may add to stability in the region in the sense that everyone will be deterred from using the bomb due to the horrible consequences of such a conflagration which will be suicidal for all sides. Possession of a nuclear bomb by Iran may lead it to change its mind from extermination of Israel and diversion of its resources towards socio-economic development. Prof John Miershiemer has averred that the long-term policy and goal of Israel, with the support of the US, is to break up and fracture the Middle Eastern countries like Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Yemen and Iran. That is why Israel is hell bent on depriving Iran from becoming a nuclear power and thus depriving it of its nuclear monopoly. For similar reasons Iran wants to establish a Kurdish state so that Turkey, Syria, Iraq and Iran are fragmented. The US and Israel also hold countries like Egypt and Jordan by the gullet so that they are dependent upon America for their economies. Any threat to Israel will lead to economic strangulation of these countries. The Israel-US goal of regime change in Iran has proved a failure. Regime change without boots on the ground and merely through air power is impossible as was seen in Iraq. In fact, the Iranian regime has gained in strength and popularity due to rallying of the population around the flag. Even if a regime change was possible the consequences would be disastrous as is clear from the examples of Syria and Iraq which led to a power vacuum and acute social dissensions within the country and conditions of civil war. If Iran had a nuclear bomb, it is unlikely that it would use it as at the end of it all, Iran is not a suicidal country and its leadership is no less rational than that of the US and Israel despite some of the illegitimate policies it pursues like repression of opposition and attitude towards women freedoms. Avi Shlaim, the leading Israeli historian, states that: 1) Iran has never attacked any of its neighbours, while Israel has; 2) Iran doesn't possess a nuclear bomb and Israel does; 3) Iran is a signatory of the NYPT whereas Israel is not; and 4) Iran allows IAEA inspections and Israel doesn't. Israel is treated differently from other countries in so many ways which are morally illegitimate. Some people justify this special treatment of Israel on account of the Holocaust but the latter provides no justification for any country to treat other nation as in the holocaust. Trump and Israel spoke of eliminating Ayatullah Khamenei and hunting nuclear scientists which can only be regarded as morally and legally repugnant. If there was a justification for assassinating Khamenei, what prevents the same treatment not being meted out to Natanyahu not the least for the vicious and amoral genocide in Gaza.
Express Tribune
4 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Mahmoud Khalil claims Trump administration used ICE detention to silence activism on Gaza
Palestinian activist and former Columbia University student Mahmoud Khalil has spoken out about his prolonged detention by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), alleging it was politically motivated due to his activism in support of Gaza. In an interview with CNN's Christiane Amanpour, Khalil said he believes the Trump administration targeted him as part of a broader effort to intimidate those advocating for Palestinian rights. 'They want to conflate any speech for the right of Palestinians with speech that supports terrorism, which is totally wrong,' Khalil told CNN, asserting that his 100-plus days in detention were an attempt to make an example of him and discourage similar activism. A legal permanent resident, Khalil was arrested in March without any criminal charges filed against him. He described harsh treatment during his transfer to a Louisiana detention facility, including being shackled and arriving with a severely swollen leg that made it difficult to walk. While in custody, Khalil was denied temporary release to attend the birth of his child. 'It was the most difficult moment in my life,' he said, calling the situation avoidable and unnecessarily punitive. Khalil was involved in campus demonstrations urging Columbia University to divest from companies allegedly complicit in violence in Gaza. He emphasized the peaceful nature of the protests and suggested his detention sends a chilling message: 'Even if you are a legal resident, even if you are a citizen, actually, we will find a way to come after you.' His legal team has filed a $20 million claim, accusing the government of political retaliation. A White House spokesperson told Axios that Khalil had 'consistently engaged in conduct detrimental to American foreign policy interests.' The case continues to raise concerns about free speech and the potential use of immigration enforcement as a political tool.
Express Tribune
9 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Three separatist leaders killed in Indian drone strike on Myanmar camps
Freedom fighters from ULFA group in disclosed location at the Upper Assam. PHOTO: FILE Listen to article Gaza's civil defence agency said Israeli air strikes on Sunday killed more than 40 Palestinians, including at a market and a water distribution point, as talks for a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas stalled. Delegations from Israel and the Palestinian group have now spent a week trying to agree on a temporary truce to halt 21 months of bitter fighting in the Gaza Strip. But on Saturday, each side accused the other of blocking attempts to secure an agreement at the indirect talks in the Qatari capital, Doha. There has meanwhile been no let-up in Israeli strikes on Gaza, where most of the population of more than two million have been displaced at least once during the war. Seven UN agencies on Saturday warned that a fuel shortage had reached 'critical levels', threatening aid operations, hospital care and already chronic food insecurity. Civil defence agency spokesman Mahmud Bassal said at least 43 people were killed in the latest Israeli strikes, including 11 when a market in Gaza City was hit. Eight children were among 10 victims of a drone strike at a water point in the Nuseirat refugee camp, in central Gaza, Bassal said. Gaza civil defence says 52 killed by Israeli forces 'We woke up to the sound of two large explosions,' Khaled Rayyan told AFP after a house was flattened also in Nuseirat. 'Our neighbour and his children were under the rubble.' Another resident, Mahmud al-Shami, called on the negotiators to secure an end to the war. 'What happened to us has never happened in the entire history of humanity,' he said. 'Enough.' In southern Gaza, three people were killed when Israeli jets hit a tent sheltering displaced Palestinians in the coastal Al-Mawasi area, the civil defence spokesman said. 150 targets in 24 hours There was no comment from the Israeli military, which has recently intensified its operations across Gaza. But it said in a statement Sunday that in the past 24 hours fighter jets 'struck more than 150 terror targets throughout the Gaza Strip'. The targets included Hamas, weapons storage sites, and anti-tank and sniper positions, the military statement said. Media restrictions in Gaza and difficulties accessing many areas mean AFP is unable to independently verify tolls and details provided by the civil defence agency and other parties. Out of 251 people taken hostage that day, 49 are still held in Gaza, including 27 that the Israeli military says are dead. Hamas-run Gaza's health ministry says that at least 58,026 Palestinians, most of them civilians, have been killed in Israel's military reprisals. The UN considers the figures reliable. Forced displacement fears Talks to agree a 60-day ceasefire in the fighting and hostage release were in the balance on Saturday after Israel and Hamas accused each other of trying to block a deal. Hamas wants the complete withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza, but a Palestinian source with knowledge of the talks said Israel had presented plans to maintain troops in more than 40 percent of the territory. The source said Israel wanted to force hundreds of thousands of Palestinians into the south of Gaza 'in preparation for forcibly displacing them to Egypt or other countries'. A senior Israeli official said Israel had demonstrated 'a willingness to flexibility in the negotiations, while Hamas remains intransigent, clinging to positions that prevent the mediators from advancing an agreement'. Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said he is prepared to enter talks for a more lasting end to hostilities once a temporary truce is agreed, but only if Hamas disarms. Thousands of people gathered in Israel's coastal hub of Tel Aviv on Saturday calling for the release of the hostages. 'The window of opportunity… is open now and it won't be for long,' said former captive Eli Sharabi.
