Hamas agrees to release 10 hostages as part of Gaza ceasefire talks, says negotiations are tough
Hamas says it is ready to release all remaining hostages for an end to Gaza war
The Palestinian group said the ongoing ceasefire talks have several sticking points, including the flow of aid, withdrawal of Israeli forces from the Gaza Strip, and 'genuine guarantees' for a permanent ceasefire.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
an hour ago
- Business Recorder
Israel says missile launched from Yemen was intercepted
The Israeli military said on Thursday that a missile launched from Yemen was intercepted after air raid sirens sounded in several areas across the country. The Iran-aligned Houthis, who control the most populous parts of Yemen, have been firing at Israel and attacking shipping lanes. Israeli military says intercepted missile launched from Yemen Houthis have repeatedly said that their attacks are an act of solidarity with Palestinians in Gaza, where Israel's military assault since late 2023 has killed more than 57,000 people, Gaza authorities say. Most of the dozens of missiles and drones they have launched have been intercepted or fallen short. Israel has carried out a series of retaliatory strikes.
Express Tribune
2 hours ago
- Express Tribune
22 dead in relentless Israeli strikes in Gaza
Gaza's civil defence agency said 22 people, including at least six children, were killed in Israeli strikes in the Palestinian territory on Wednesday. Agency spokesman Mahmud Bassal said one strike killed 10 members of the same family sheltering in the Al-Mawasi area west of Khan Yunis, while another on the Al-Shati camp near Gaza City left 10 dead and more than 30 wounded. The victims in Al-Shati were from two families, he added. Asked for comment, the Israeli military said it was looking into the reports. "The explosion was massive, like an earthquake," said Zuhair Judeh, 40, who saw the Al-Shati air strike. "The bodies and remains of the martyrs were scattered." The bombings came as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met US President Donald Trump in Washington to discuss the ongoing campaign to defeat Hamas in Gaza. "You can't predict when or why they'll bomb you," 36-year-old Abeer al-Sharbasi said after the Al-Shati strike. "We have nothing left but to surrender ourselves to God." Sobbing crowds of mourners gathered at Gaza City's Al-Shifa Hospital. The director of the medical complex, Mohammad Abu Salmiya, told journalists on Wednesday that it would "be completely out of service due to the fuel shortage" within hours. Israel's offensive and restrictions on supplies entering Gaza have taken a heavy toll on its medical system. AFP footage from Al-Mawasi showed makeshift tents torn to shreds by the strike there, with a child's stuffed toy lying among the wreckage. "We are extremely tired. Every day they say there is a ceasefire, but there are massacres," said displaced Palestinian Umm Ahmed. In Khan Yunis, mourners gave a final embrace to loved ones whose bodies were laid out on the floor. Bassal later reported two other people killed in separate strikes in central Gaza and in Gaza City. Due to restrictions imposed on media in the Gaza Strip and difficulties accessing the area, AFP is unable to independently verify the death tolls and details shared by the parties involved. Israel has killed at least 57,680 people in Gaza, also mostly civilians, according to the Hamas-run territory's health ministry. The UN considers the figures reliable. The medical charity Doctors Without Borders (MSF) said on Wednesday that a recent mortality survey conducted among its staff and their families in Gaza corroborated figures provided by the territory's health ministry.
Business Recorder
3 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Punching above our weight — on an IV drip
Diplomatic optics don't usually favour countries still dancing around the possibility of sovereign default. And yet here we are — on an IMF lifeline, with next to no foreign exchange cover and a political setup too timid to lead — watching Pakistan make a sustained play on the global stage with more success than many would care to admit. Just this week, the Chief of Staff of the People's Liberation Army Air Force, Lieutenant General Wang Gang, visited Air Headquarters in Islamabad and praised the Pakistan Air Force's performance in the recent war with India as 'a textbook example of precision, discipline, and courage' in the face of unprovoked aggression. This came within days of Army Chief Field Marshal Syed Asim Munir meeting US President Donald Trump at the White House — an unusually high-profile one-on-one between a Pakistani military leader and an American president. Trump praised Pakistan's efforts to de-escalate the recent war with India and said progress was also being made on the trade front. The meeting stood in sharp contrast to India's heavily publicised diplomatic visit a little earlier which climaxed with a photo op with Vice President JD Vance – no White House invite. And the balancing act didn't end there. China's warmth and America's unexpected openness followed the widely reported, if not officially confirmed, suggestion that Pakistan played a quiet but effective part in brokering a ceasefire in the Iran-Israel war. The claim — originating in Middle Eastern press — gained traction after both sides stood down with minimal external mediation, and with Islamabad condemning Israeli actions while carefully steering clear of antagonising Washington. Even if indirect, the timing raised eyebrows. This is not how struggling economies typically behave. And yet, Pakistan has managed to follow a tactical military victory — against a rival more than five times its size — with a flurry of effective diplomacy. Its post-war outreach, particularly with multilateral groups, has also delivered. India's push to include its version of the Pahalgam attack in final communiqués at SCO, BRICS, and QUAD summits was unsuccessful, which in diplomatic terms is a win for Pakistan — especially since silence, in such venues, rarely comes without consensus. Some might call it luck. Others, opportunism. But for anyone paying attention, a more plausible explanation lies in the state's real command structure. If — as everybody knows — the fountainhead of Pakistani policymaking in this Islamic Republic remains its military high command, then it is worth analysing how it has played its cards in one of the most delicate moments in the country's modern history. Because there is no elected civilian consensus on foreign policy. There is barely a functioning civilian apparatus at all. No parliamentarian spoke of recalibrating alliances after the Iran-Israel war. No elected representative gave a vision for how to manage the US-China rivalry. Yet the Pakistan army has somehow positioned the country in a rare space where both Washington and Beijing are listening. It may not follow any diplomatic playbook, but it is delivering the strangest results. And in power politics, showing up — consistently, visibly — often matters more than protocol. Make what you will of that. Of course, there is something unnerving about all this. A country with no money, weak institutions, and a paralysed political structure has no business threading needles between competing superpowers. And yet, it is doing just that — with surprising nerve. To be fair, some of this is circumstantial. The global environment is fractured. The US-China trade war is escalating again, disrupting supply chains, rattling financial markets, and inching toward a phase where countries may be forced to take sides. The Middle East remains unsettled. And many capitals are searching for stable diplomatic anchors in an increasingly unpredictable order. Pakistan, for all its internal contradictions, is at least projecting coherence on the world stage — even if that coherence wears military uniform. But hedging is not a long-term strategy. At some point, someone will demand clarity. A pledge. A pivot. And when that moment comes, it will test not just Pakistan's strategic balance, but its internal stability as well. Because hedging between powers is a luxury when you are solvent. When you're not, it becomes a risk you cannot afford to miscalculate. And we need both Chinese and American money to stay afloat. Until then, this is where we are: punching above our weight while still hooked up to the financial equivalent of a ventilator. And whatever else one might say about the structure that has enabled it — from shadow policymaking to absent civilian leadership — there is something undeniably impressive about the sheer audacity of it all. After all, in a year when even major powers are floundering to maintain their alliances, Pakistan has somehow emerged as a case study in diplomatic over-achievement. Whether it's sustainable, sensible, or simply absurd, depends on where — and when — you're standing. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
