No intelligence Iran moved uranium: US defense chief
US military bombers carried out strikes against three Iranian nuclear facilities early Sunday local time using huge 'bunker-buster' bombs.
The results of the strikes are being closely watched to see how far they may have set back Iran's nuclear program.
The conference was aimed at disputing a leaked preliminary assessment from the US Defense Intelligence Agency suggesting the strikes may have only hampered Iran by months, counter to President Donald Trump's claim of 'total obliteration'.
It also gave Hegseth an opportunity to blast media that had reported the assessment.
Several experts have cautioned that Iran likely moved a stockpile of near weapons-grade highly enriched uranium out of the deeply buried Fordow site before the strikes, and could be hiding it in locations unknown to Israel, the US and UN nuclear inspectors.
They noted satellite imagery from Maxar Technologies showing "unusual activity" at Fordow on Thursday and Friday, with a long line of vehicles waiting outside an entrance to the facility.
A senior Iranian source told Reuters on Sunday most of the 60 per cent highly enriched uranium had been moved to an undisclosed location before the attack.
But Trump maintains it would have taken too long to remove anything.
"The cars and small trucks at the site were those of concrete workers trying to cover up the top of the shafts. Nothing was taken out of (the) facility," Trump wrote on his social media platform, without providing evidence.
The Financial Times, citing European intelligence assessments, reported that Iran's highly enriched uranium stockpile remains largely intact since it was not concentrated at Fordow.
Hegseth's said the Defense Intelligence Agency assessment was 'low confidence', and, citing comments from CIA Director John Ratcliffe, said it had been overtaken by intelligence showing Iran's nuclear program was severely damaged and would take years to rebuild.
Ratcliffe, Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and General Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, held a classified briefing on the strikes on Thursday for all 100 members of the US Senate.
Senators are expected to vote this week on a resolution that would require congressional approval for strikes against Iran, although the measure is not expected to be enacted.
At the Pentagon news conference, Hegseth described the strikes as "historically successful."
His comments came after Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei claimed victory in the 12 day war launched by Israel and vowed Iran would not surrender.
During the news conference, Hegseth criticised the media for having an anti-Trump bias.
"It's in your DNA and in your blood to cheer against Trump because you want him not to be successful so bad," Hegseth said.
"There are so many aspects of what our brave men and women did that ... because of the hatred of this press corps, are undermined," he said.
Trump praised Hegseth's news conference as: "One of the greatest, most professional, and most 'confirming' News Conferences I have ever seen!"
During the press conference, Caine, the top US general largely stuck to technical details, outlining the history of the bunker-busting bombs used. Caine showed a video testing the bombs on a bunker like the ones struck on Sunday.
Caine declined to provide his own assessment of the strike and deferred to the intelligence community. He denied being under any pressure to change his assessment to present a more optimistic view of the US strikes.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Advertiser
2 hours ago
- The Advertiser
Final push for global plastics treaty begins in Geneva
Representatives from more than 160 countries have begun a final attempt to create a legally binding international treaty to combat plastic pollution. The UN talks in Geneva aim to secure a deal that regulates plastic production, design and waste management. According to estimates from the UN Environment Programme (UNEP), around 500 million tonnes of plastic were produced globally in 2024, nearly 400 million of which ended up as waste. Without an agreement, UNEP warns that waste volume could triple by 2060. "Every hour counts," said the chairman of the conference, Ecuadorian Ambassador Luis Vayas Valdivieso. "We are setting the foundations for a global tool that could change the future of environmental history," he added. The negotiations are scheduled to run until August 14. The UN Environment Assembly agreed in March 2022 to negotiate a treaty to combat plastic pollution. No agreement was reached at the last round of negotiations held in South Korea in late 2024. The treaty is to cover the production, design and disposal of plastic. Less plastic is to be produced, products are to be reused and recycled as many times as possible, and what remains is to be disposed of in an environmentally friendly manner. How this is to be achieved is controversial. "It's time for courage, not compromise,' says Florian Titze from WWF. "An agreement based on the lowest common denominator will not solve the plastic crisis." The WWF environmental foundation notes that "plastic waste destroys habitats, endangers animals and humans and poisons ecosystems." According to estimates by the UNEP, people around the world used 500 million tonnes of plastic last year, almost twice as much as 25 years previously. According to UNEP, 400 million tonnes of this is likely to quickly end up as waste. Our World in Data says a quarter of the plastic waste in rivers and oceans comes from plastic bags and bottles. China, the country with the largest plastic production, has already planned national production restrictions. Most plastics are made from oil, which is why the oil states in particular are preventing an ambitious treaty, including Iran, Saudi Arabia, the Gulf states and Russia. They only want to talk about waste and recycling. The US government under Donald Trump is currently abolishing regulations of all kinds. "This has not exactly simplified the situation in the negotiations, conference sources said. Representatives from more than 160 countries have begun a final attempt to create a legally binding international treaty to combat plastic pollution. The UN talks in Geneva aim to secure a deal that regulates plastic production, design and waste management. According to estimates from the UN Environment Programme (UNEP), around 500 million tonnes of plastic were produced globally in 2024, nearly 400 million of which ended up as waste. Without an agreement, UNEP warns that waste volume could triple by 2060. "Every hour counts," said the chairman of the conference, Ecuadorian Ambassador Luis Vayas Valdivieso. "We are setting the foundations for a global tool that could change the future of environmental history," he added. The negotiations are scheduled to run until August 14. The UN Environment Assembly agreed in March 2022 to negotiate a treaty to combat plastic pollution. No agreement was reached at the last round of negotiations held in South Korea in late 2024. The treaty is to cover the production, design and disposal of plastic. Less plastic is to be produced, products are to be reused and recycled as many times as possible, and what remains is to be disposed of in an environmentally friendly manner. How this is to be achieved is controversial. "It's time for courage, not compromise,' says Florian Titze from WWF. "An agreement based on the lowest common denominator will not solve the plastic crisis." The WWF environmental foundation notes that "plastic waste destroys habitats, endangers animals and humans and poisons ecosystems." According to estimates by the UNEP, people around the world used 500 million tonnes of plastic last year, almost twice as much as 25 years previously. According to UNEP, 400 million tonnes of this is likely to quickly end up as waste. Our World in Data says a quarter of the plastic waste in rivers and oceans comes from plastic bags and bottles. China, the country with the largest plastic production, has already planned national production restrictions. Most plastics are made from oil, which is why the oil states in particular are preventing an ambitious treaty, including Iran, Saudi Arabia, the Gulf states and Russia. They only want to talk about waste and recycling. The US government under Donald Trump is currently abolishing regulations of all kinds. "This has not exactly simplified the situation in the negotiations, conference sources said. Representatives from more than 160 countries have begun a final attempt to create a legally binding international treaty to combat plastic pollution. The UN talks in Geneva aim to secure a deal that regulates plastic production, design and waste management. According to estimates from the UN Environment Programme (UNEP), around 500 million tonnes of plastic were produced globally in 2024, nearly 400 million of which ended up as waste. Without an agreement, UNEP warns that waste volume could triple by 2060. "Every hour counts," said the chairman of the conference, Ecuadorian Ambassador Luis Vayas Valdivieso. "We are setting the foundations for a global tool that could change the future of environmental history," he added. The negotiations are scheduled to run until August 14. The UN Environment Assembly agreed in March 2022 to negotiate a treaty to combat plastic pollution. No agreement was reached at the last round of negotiations held in South Korea in late 2024. The treaty is to cover the production, design and disposal of plastic. Less plastic is to be produced, products are to be reused and recycled as many times as possible, and what remains is to be disposed of in an environmentally friendly manner. How this is to be achieved is controversial. "It's time for courage, not compromise,' says Florian Titze from WWF. "An agreement based on the lowest common denominator will not solve the plastic crisis." The WWF environmental foundation notes that "plastic waste destroys habitats, endangers animals and humans and poisons ecosystems." According to estimates by the UNEP, people around the world used 500 million tonnes of plastic last year, almost twice as much as 25 years previously. According to UNEP, 400 million tonnes of this is likely to quickly end up as waste. Our World in Data says a quarter of the plastic waste in rivers and oceans comes from plastic bags and bottles. China, the country with the largest plastic production, has already planned national production restrictions. Most plastics are made from oil, which is why the oil states in particular are preventing an ambitious treaty, including Iran, Saudi Arabia, the Gulf states and Russia. They only want to talk about waste and recycling. The US government under Donald Trump is currently abolishing regulations of all kinds. "This has not exactly simplified the situation in the negotiations, conference sources said. Representatives from more than 160 countries have begun a final attempt to create a legally binding international treaty to combat plastic pollution. The UN talks in Geneva aim to secure a deal that regulates plastic production, design and waste management. According to estimates from the UN Environment Programme (UNEP), around 500 million tonnes of plastic were produced globally in 2024, nearly 400 million of which ended up as waste. Without an agreement, UNEP warns that waste volume could triple by 2060. "Every hour counts," said the chairman of the conference, Ecuadorian Ambassador Luis Vayas Valdivieso. "We are setting the foundations for a global tool that could change the future of environmental history," he added. The negotiations are scheduled to run until August 14. The UN Environment Assembly agreed in March 2022 to negotiate a treaty to combat plastic pollution. No agreement was reached at the last round of negotiations held in South Korea in late 2024. The treaty is to cover the production, design and disposal of plastic. Less plastic is to be produced, products are to be reused and recycled as many times as possible, and what remains is to be disposed of in an environmentally friendly manner. How this is to be achieved is controversial. "It's time for courage, not compromise,' says Florian Titze from WWF. "An agreement based on the lowest common denominator will not solve the plastic crisis." The WWF environmental foundation notes that "plastic waste destroys habitats, endangers animals and humans and poisons ecosystems." According to estimates by the UNEP, people around the world used 500 million tonnes of plastic last year, almost twice as much as 25 years previously. According to UNEP, 400 million tonnes of this is likely to quickly end up as waste. Our World in Data says a quarter of the plastic waste in rivers and oceans comes from plastic bags and bottles. China, the country with the largest plastic production, has already planned national production restrictions. Most plastics are made from oil, which is why the oil states in particular are preventing an ambitious treaty, including Iran, Saudi Arabia, the Gulf states and Russia. They only want to talk about waste and recycling. The US government under Donald Trump is currently abolishing regulations of all kinds. "This has not exactly simplified the situation in the negotiations, conference sources said.
Perth Now
3 hours ago
- Perth Now
Zelenskiy chats with Trump ahead of Putin deadline
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy has had a "productive" conversation with his US counterpart Donald Trump about ending the war, sanctions on Russia and the finalisation of a US-Ukraine drone deal. Trump, who has signalled frustration with Vladimir Putin in recent weeks, has given the Russian president until Friday to make peace in Ukraine or face tougher sanctions. "President Trump is fully informed about Russian strikes on Kyiv and other cities and communities," Zelenskiy wrote on X, referring to intensifying drone and missile attacks. Trump has threatened to hit Russia with new sanctions and impose 100 per cent tariffs on countries that buy its oil, but sources close to the Kremlin told Reuters that Putin was unlikely to bow to the ultimatum. Putin retains the goal of capturing four regions of Ukraine in their entirety, sources close to the Kremlin told Reuters. His determination to keep going is prompted by his belief that Russia is winning and by scepticism that yet more US sanctions will have much of an impact after successive waves of economic penalties during 3.5 years of war, according to three sources familiar with discussions in the Kremlin. The Russian leader does not want to anger Trump, and he realises that he may be spurning a chance to improve relations with Washington and the West, but his war goals take precedence, two of the sources said. Putin's goal is to fully capture the Ukrainian regions of Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson, which Russia has claimed as its own, and then to talk about a peace agreement, one of the sources said. "If Putin were able to fully occupy those four regions, which he has claimed for Russia, he could claim that his war in Ukraine had reached his objectives," said James Rodgers, author of the forthcoming book The Return of Russia. Zelenskiy said Ukraine was also ready to conclude a deal with the US on the purchase of Ukrainian drones that would amount to "one of the strongest agreements". He had earlier said the deal was worth around $US30 billion ($A46 billion). Ukraine is increasingly seeking financing and investment from its foreign partners to bolster its burgeoning domestic arms industry. Zelenskiy said Kyiv's European partners had so far pledged to buy more than $US1 billion ($A1.5 billion) in US weapons for Ukraine as part of a new scheme. Sweden, Norway and Denmark will contribute around $US500 million ($A774 million) the three countries said on Tuesday. Danish Defence Minister Troels Lund Poulsen said the money would be available immediately and that Denmark would be willing to consider additional funding later. "Speed is absolutely critical," he said in a statement.
The Australian
8 hours ago
- The Australian
Labor urges Israel to end Gaza war before hostage release
Labor is urging Israel to end the war in Gaza before the remaining hostages held by Hamas are returned, in a significant move away from its previous calls for the release of the Israelis to be the priority before a deal was struck to end the conflict and recognise Palestine. In her strongest language on the conflict and the urgency of achieving Palestinian recognition, Foreign Minister Penny Wong said there would 'be no Palestine left to recognise' should the global community wait much longer to do so. The comments are part of growing momentum within Labor to recognise Palestine in the near future, with Anthony Albanese revealing on Tuesday he had spoken to the leader of the Palestinian Authority, Mahmoud Abbas, overnight and committed to meeting him on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly next month. 'Prime Minister Albanese reiterated Australia's call for the immediate entry of aid to meet needs of people of Gaza, a permanent ceasefire, and the release of all hostages,' a readout of the call stated. 'Prime Minister Albanese also reinforced Australia's commitment to a two-state solution because a just and lasting peace depends upon it.' While Senator Wong has previously listed the return of hostages as being among the most-pressing priorities since the Hamas terror attack on October 7, 2023, the senior Labor senator said Israel needed to end the war before that outcome was achieved, not after. Senator Wong declared Australians were 'all horrified to watch the depraved spectacle' of Israeli hostages Evyatar David and Rom Braslavski 'paraded' around by Hamas, but said the onus lay with Israel now to end the war. 'What I would say is the government's view is the same as the 600 former Israeli security officials, who have written publicly, urging Prime Minister (Benjamin) Netanyahu to end the war and making the very important point that the end of the war is the only way to save the hostages,' Senator Wong told the ABC. She added that the Albanese government was clear in its view that it was a breach of international law to stop food being delivered, which she said 'was the decision Israel made in March'. Senator Wong did not rule out further sanctions on Israeli officials, but said her government would 'prefer to move with other (countries)' in taking such action in order for the move to have 'more effect'. The Foreign Minister's comments add to speculation that Australia will likely recognise Palestine in September, given other countries such as France and Canada have already committed to doing so. 'There is a risk there will be no Palestine left to recognise if the international community don't move to create that pathway to a two-state solution,' Senator Wong said. Opposition foreign affairs spokeswoman Michaelia Cash accused Senator Wong of using 'hyperbole to justify the Albanese government's premature rush to recognise a Palestinian state before there is a pathway for it to be viable'. 'Hyperbole is not foreign policy, and this is not a solution,' Senator Cash said. 'It's reactionary symbolism without substance. That may suit Labor politically but it is a deviation from Australia's longstanding foreign policy of a two-state solution. 'Australian foreign policy should not be being used to advance the domestic political priorities of the Labor Party.' The comments come amid some disquiet in Coalition ranks over the language used by the opposition foreign affairs spokeswoman, with concerns that the messaging was not palatable in some electorates. Ahead of his call with Mr Abbas this week, Mr Albanese submitted a request to speak directly with Mr Netanyahu. The request was made before Sunday's court-approved protest on the Sydney Harbour Bridge by pro-Palestinian supporters, which forced the closure of Sydney's largest road crossing for about five hours. Senator Wong said she had 'anticipated' would attract as many as it did, given 'the distress of Australians on what we are seeing unfolding in Gaza'. Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive Alex Ryvchin took a swipe at Senator Wong's calls for the war to end before hostages were released and said Israel had 'a moral obligation' to bring its people home no matter the cost. 'Israel has a moral obligation to do everything it can, diplomatically and militarily, to bring its starved and tortured people home,' Mr Ryvchin said. 'We would demand no less of our own government. 'We agree with the Foreign Minister that a permanent end to the war offers the best hope of saving the remaining hostages. 'But Israel accepted the internationally-brokered ceasefire that would have seen the unfettered flow of aid, the phased return of hostages and a pathway to a permanent end to the war. 'Hamas has rejected it since May. It is unsatisfactory for this material fact to be omitted, giving the false impression that Israel is the barrier to the ceasefire and not Hamas.' Read related topics: Israel Nation As Tim Gurner and Graham Turner blast the policy, smaller employers from the NSW-Victorian border say it's just another example of why it's easier to run a business 'across the river'. Politics Mining giant Fortescue's abandoned clean energy projects have left taxpayers exposed to millions in grants amid mounting scrutiny of government renewable subsidies.
