logo
Mandatory sentencing reinstated for some DVO breaches in NT after bill passes parliament

Mandatory sentencing reinstated for some DVO breaches in NT after bill passes parliament

Perpetrators who threaten or cause harm while breaching a domestic violence order (DVO) will receive a mandatory minimum sentence, under new laws brought forward by the Northern Territory government.
The Country Liberal Party (CLP) used its majority in the NT's only parliamentary chamber to legislate the changes on Tuesday, despite widespread disapproval from the domestic, family and sexual violence (DFSV) sector.
The legislation restores a mandatory minimum sentence provision repealed by the former Labor government in 2022.
A CLP government spokesperson said under the new laws, mandatory sentencing would apply where an offender "breaches their DVO for the first time and threatens or causes harm".
"However, it may not apply in circumstances where a person has breached a DVO for the first time and has not caused or threatened to cause harm," they said.
Attorney-General Marie-Clare Boothby said mandatory sentencing would also apply for repeat DVO breaches where harm was not threatened or caused.
She said prison sentences for the breaches would be determined by the judiciary.
"It's set for the courts as a minimum of a term of imprisonment," Ms Boothby said of the changes.
"That will be up to the courts to decide what [the term of imprisonment] is."
The legislation also expands the maximum sentence for a DVO breach from two to five years, and enhances victims' access to information about offenders.
It is likely to see an increase to the NT's record prison population, which has risen by more than 500 since the CLP was elected last August.
The bill was introduced to parliament in March amid criticism from several women's legal services, and subsequently referred to the NT's Legislative Scrutiny Committee.
The committee received 21 submissions, all of which opposed the reintroduction of mandatory sentencing and claimed there was no evidence to suggest it prevented domestic violence-related offences.
Another concern highlighted was the misidentification of Indigenous women as perpetrators in violent relationships.
Domestic violence survivor Holly Supple-Gurruwiwi said Aboriginal women who were not "the perfect victim" often received reciprocal DVOs along with their partners.
"That then allows the victim of domestic violence to become further victimised, and even criminalised," she said.
"The mandatory sentencing [for DVO breaches] is going to see the victim, the person most in need of protection, in jail, which seems to be the opposite of what we're trying to achieve."
The NT has the highest rates of domestic, sexual and family violence in Australia, with a rate of intimate partner homicide seven times that of the national average.
On Tuesday, Labor Opposition Leader Selena Uibo announced she had begun drafting a private member's bill to legalise voluntary assisted dying (VAD) in the NT.
The NT was the first jurisdiction in the world to legalise VAD in 1995, but the law was overruled by the federal government one year later.
The territory's right to legislate its own VAD laws was reinstated by the federal government in 2022.
In July 2024, an expert advisory panel provided the former NT Labor government with a VAD framework report after undertaking months of community consultation.
It made 22 recommendations, including that the NT should implement legislation "broadly consistent" with laws in other Australian states and territories.
Despite that, the CLP last week referred the VAD issue to a parliamentary committee for further consultation.
The referral followed pressure from independent MLA Justine Davis, who urged the government to take progressive action on VAD.
Ms Uibo said enough consultation had already taken place on VAD and the CLP was kicking "the can down the road".
"We're ... starting the process to draft a bill that will provide dignity and choice for people who are suffering in the NT," she said of her private member's bill.
VAD is legal in all Australian jurisdictions except the NT.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Defence lawyer accuses retired police officer of 'playing cop' before alleged Geraldton axe attack
Defence lawyer accuses retired police officer of 'playing cop' before alleged Geraldton axe attack

ABC News

time32 minutes ago

  • ABC News

Defence lawyer accuses retired police officer of 'playing cop' before alleged Geraldton axe attack

The lawyer for two men accused of attacking a retired police officer with an axe in country Western Australia has questioned the former officer's credibility and accused him of "playing cop". Jack Seelander and Justin Troy Ernest Little allegedly assaulted former WA police sergeant Adrian Barker during a confrontation in Geraldton in March 2024. The pair faced trial over three days in the Geraldton Magistrates Court this week. The court heard Mr Barker was returning to his home in Wandina around 3am on March 17, 2024 when he passed a group of eight Aboriginal boys and men. Under cross-examination by defence lawyer Lauren Roycroft, Mr Barker admitted he thought the group would "be trouble". Mr Barker said once in his Wandina home, he sat near his front door, which was slightly ajar behind a locked flyscreen. He initially said it was left open for the breeze, but later Mr Barker admitted it was because he thought the group would attempt to break into nearby houses. Ms Roycroft put it to Mr Barker that he heard "a barely audible click", saw figures running away, then followed and confronted them. However, Mr Barker said he confronted members of the group, including Mr Seelander and Mr Little, after they attempted to break into his house. The confrontation saw Mr Barker allegedly hit Mr Little in the back of the head, knocking him to the ground. After initially running away, the court heard members of the group attacked Mr Barker, with Mr Little allegedly hitting him in the side of the face with an axe before fleeing the scene. In his closing statement on Wednesday, police prosecutor Sergeant Thomas Potts said the group had "fairly laid into Barker with a pick to the back" without being provoked. Sergeant Potts said Mr Barker "pre-emptively" struck Mr Little due to his path to flee being blocked by other members of the group. He said Mr Barker's decision to confront the group was honed by his 15 years of experience as a WA police officer. But the defence questioned Mr Barker's conduct, arguing he had pre-emptively formed "a negative view" of the group without cause. "There is a wealth of evidence that Mr Barker was the aggressor," Ms Roycroft told the court. She pointed to Mr Barker's inconsistent accounts of the incident, and his conduct immediately after the attack, as detrimental to his credibility as a witness. The court was told that after the incident, Mr Barker got into his car, pursued a car carrying a group of Aboriginal people unconnected to the attack at speed, flashed his headlights, pulled them over, and interrogated them at the side of the road. When the car's occupants asked if he was a police officer, Mr Barker answered "yep". Magistrate Matthew Walton reserved his decision, telling the court the matters were difficult, with "complexities often forgotten" in closing statements. He agreed that Mr Barker was "getting brutalised" by people in the group. The matter will return to court next month for the verdict.

New $800m payment for AUKUS was scheduled, Prime Minister says
New $800m payment for AUKUS was scheduled, Prime Minister says

News.com.au

timean hour ago

  • News.com.au

New $800m payment for AUKUS was scheduled, Prime Minister says

Australia has sent another $800m to the US as part of the AUKUS deal, which the Trump administration has under review, but the Prime Minister says it was simply a part of the 'schedule'. Anthony Albanese was asked about the new payment that took the total to $1.6bn, which was reported in Nine newspapers on Wednesday. 'There is a schedule of payments to be made, we have an agreement with the United States as well as with the United Kingdom,' Mr Albanese told ABC's Afternoon Briefing. 'It is about increasing the capacity, their industrial capacity, and as part of that, we have Australians on the ground, learning the skills so that when it comes to the SSN-AUKUS, the submarines being built here in Australia, we have those skills.' Defence Minister Richard Marles earlier confirmed the report saying 'the payments are occurring in line with Australia's commitment to contribute US$2bn by the end of 2025, which underscores our commitment to the successful delivery of AUKUS Pillar I outcomes'. The US' review was announced in June and is being headed up by Elbridge Colby, the US undersecretary of defence. Mr Colby recently made headlines when it was revealed he was pressuring the Australian and Japanese governments to reveal what they would do if China invaded Taiwan. The AUKUS deal is a long-term arrangement that will cost upwards of $268bn, and as much as $368bn, over the next 30 years. Australia would buy nuclear submarines from the US, while developing our own capacity to build submarines in Adelaide. The new payment came as Opposition defence spokesman Angus Taylor said he was 'worried' about the government's position on defence. 'I worry that the government – I think it's not just me worried, I think every expert looking at this is making these comments – they're deeply worried that we're not on our way to having the defence force we need in such an uncertain time,' Mr Taylor said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store