Japan launches first missile test on home soil as it looks to bolster defence capabilities to deter China
Japan's army confirmed the test-firing of the Type 88 surface-to-ship, short-range missile on Tuesday at the Shizunai Anti-Air Firing Range on Japan's northern-most main island of Hokkaido.
About 300 soldiers participated in Tuesday's exercise by the Ground Self-Defense Force's (GSDF) 1st Artillery Brigade, using a training missile targeting an unmanned boat about 40 off the island's southern coast.
Officials were still examining the results of the test, the GSDF said.
Due to space limitations and safety concerns, Japan has previously conducted missile tests in countries where vast training grounds are available, including in Australia and the United States.
The first domestic missile test underscores Japan's push toward a more self-sufficient military and its acquisition of strike-back capabilities as a deterrence to China's increasingly assertive naval activity in regional seas.
Japan is also concerned about growing joint military exercises around Japanese coasts between China and Russia.
Japan and Russia, a northern neighbour to Hokkaido, have territorial disputes.
Japan, under its pacifist Constitution, used to limit the use of force for self-defence only, but has taken a major break from that policy in 2022 when it adopted the ongoing five-year security strategy that names China as the biggest strategic challenge and calls for a closer Japan-US alliance.
Japan is currently working to deploy long-range cruise missiles, including Tomahawks purchased from the US, beginning later this year.
Japan is also developing Type 12 surface-to-ship missiles with a range of about 1,000 kilometres, 10 times that of a Type 88.
The truck-mounted Type 88 guided missile, developed by Japan's Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, have a range of about 100 kilometres.
Japan is also preparing to build a missile-firing range on uninhabited Minamitorishima, the country's eastern-most island in the western Pacific, an area where two Chinese aircraft carriers were seen operating together for the first time earlier this month.
AP/ABC
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
Witnesses to 1998 riots in Indonesia speak out after minister questions mass rape history
Read in Bahasa Indonesia Witnesses to the 1998 riots in Indonesia have spoken out after a prominent minister questioned the accuracy of historical records of the event, including on mass rape. Warning: This story contains details of sexual assault that may distress some readers. In May 1998, riots in Indonesia's capital Jakarta and massive student protests across the country culminated in the end of Suharto's 32-year dictatorship. Anger at the government over corruption, food shortages and mass unemployment led to the targeting of ethnic Chinese communities who were stereotyped as rich. At least 52 women — most of whom were ethnic Chinese — were raped during the riots, a government-appointed fact finding team later found. But in an interview last month about the government of President Prabowo Subianto's broader plan to rewrite national history, Culture Minister Fadli Zon cast doubt on records of mass rape. "Are there any hard facts? We can have a debate about that," he said. However, a fact-finding team created by former President BJ Habibie in 1998 concluded that mass rapes occurred during the riots. The team — which included the National Human Rights Commission, not-for-profit organisations, the military, and police — documented dozens of rape cases and said the real number of these sexual assaults was likely higher. Still, Mr Zon claimed the rapes were simply "rumours". "That's just a story. If there are facts, show them. Is it in Indonesian history books? Never," he said. But the National History of Indonesia, an official history book, does discuss the rapes in its chapter about the 1998 riots. "There were also rapes of a large number of women of Chinese descent," it says. The comments from Mr Zon have prompted many, including activist Sandyawan Sumardi, to revisit memories of the riots of 1998. Mr Sumardi was a priest at the time and vividly remembers the chaos at a major hospital in Jakarta which had called on him for help. "Even now, when I remember those times, I still feel dizzy. It was traumatic," said Mr Sumardi, who coordinated a group of volunteers at the hospital. One of the most harrowing stories Mr Sumardi recalled involved a Chinese-Indonesian university student from Tarumanegara University. "This student was raped in her boarding house during the day by two people," he said. "Because she resisted, the perpetrator pulled out the curtain rod and stabbed her in the stomach and, tragically, in her vagina, causing profuse bleeding. "Her face was destroyed, her mouth could barely move … then I approached her and was shocked because she recognised me," he recalled. "She told me she had begged for mercy and prayed 'Our Father' and 'Hail Mary'… but they still raped her," he said, pausing with tears in his eyes. "I didn't expect this feeling. I'm still angry." Women's activist Ita Fatia Nadia, who also volunteered in 1998 helping riot victims, confirmed the scale of the violence to local media. "There were 15 people I handled directly, and almost all of them had their genitals damaged," she told Tempo. "For me, the mass rape is not a rumour. It really happened." The 1998 fact-finding team found that rapes were systematic, racially targeted and occurred at looted homes across greater Jakarta. The report singled out the current president, Mr Subianto, who was then a special forces commander, for his alleged role in the disappearance of political activists and contributing to the unrest. It recommended he be court-martialled, though Mr Subianto was only dismissed from active service and never formally tried. In 1998, the ABC covered the fact-finding team's report. ABC Indonesia spoke with two people interviewed in the 1998 ABC report for this story, including Mayling Oey, a representative of the Chinese-Indonesian community. Now an emeritus professor at the University of Indonesia, Dr Oey said the minister's comments questioning the mass rapes had hurt people. "What the minister of culture did was very painful," she said. "There was a lot of violence … if he says it wasn't 'mass', perhaps because he didn't experience it himself." Dr Oey, now 84, became emotional as she watched the 1998 ABC report. "I didn't expect to feel this way," she said. She paused, tears falling, before adding: "It hurts." Marzuki Darusman, who spoke to the ABC in 1998 as head of the fact-finding team, pointed out this week that the fact-finding report was an official government document. Mr Darusman said revisiting the 1998 riots would only emphasise Mr Subianto's role in the unrest. "If [the report's findings] have to be proven as requested by the minister of culture, there must be an official accountability process," he said. "And thus, it will highlight the role of President Prabowo Subianto in the incident." Mr Zon has since attempted to clarify his comments about gendered violence in 1998. He said he was "certain" sexual violence occurred but questioned whether there was any legal or academic evidence the incidents qualified as "mass rape". "So, is there any evidence of that now? There never has been," he said. Legal expert and women's activist Nursyahbani Katjasungkana — who was also a member of the 1998 fact-finding team — rejected Mr Zon's comments. Ms Katjasungkana said the evidence of mass rapes set out in the fact-finding teams report was, in fact, legal evidence that met two international legal thresholds. The 1998 team found the rapes met the definition of "mass" because the assaults were widespread, occurring both within greater Jakarta and in other cities. The fact-finding team also found the sexual assaults were systematic, she said. Ms Katjasungkana said that just because an Indonesian court had not ruled on the crimes "that doesn't mean the incident didn't happen".

ABC News
2 days ago
- ABC News
Could there be two Dalai Lamas?
The Dalai Lama turns ninety this weekend, and the question of who will succeed him has taken on extra urgency. Tibetan Buddhists believe he is the reincarnation of previous Dalai Lamas after he was identified when he was just two-years-old. It has now been confirmed that he will have a successor, which has some wondering if we could have two Dalai Lamas? ABC NewsRadio's Sarah Morice spoke with Dr Ruth Gamble, who specialises in Tibetan culture and history at Latrobe University.

ABC News
2 days ago
- ABC News
Hong Kong has proposed limited legal recognition for same-sex couples
Hong Kong's government has proposed a new system to give same-sex couples a limited set of healthcare-related rights as long as their marriages are registered abroad. The government is seeking to comply with a landmark court ruling from September 2023 where the city's top judges ruled a framework for recognising same-sex couples' legal rights must be made within two years. The ruling did not grant full marriage rights to same-sex couples but was a partial victory for prominent pro-democracy and LGBTIQ+ activist Jimmy Sham, who fought a five-year legal battle for the recognition of same-sex marriages registered overseas. The new laws proposed on Wednesday would allow registration for same-sex adult couples to allow rights around medical decisions, provided consent is given. These would include rights for hospital visits, sharing medical information, organ donation and dealing with a person's remains. To be eligible, adult couples must have a valid overseas marriage, civil partnership or civil union, with at least one person a Hong Kong resident. Mr Sham said the proposal offered a minimal level of protection, especially the stipulation that couples needed to be married abroad. "I doubt it fully complies with what the judge required," Mr Sham said. Mr Sham said heterosexual couples were not required to register their marriages overseas to get the recognition locally and questioned why same-sex couples had to do so. He also suggested that the government allow same-sex couples to enjoy equal prison visiting rights as heterosexual couples. "I hope the government will listen to opinions from society and the community, and try to develop a solution that doesn't exceed society's acceptance level, while meeting the expectations of same-sex couples and avoiding legal challenges," Mr Sham said. Same-sex couples cannot get married or register for civil partnerships in Hong Kong, but authorities recognise same-sex marriages registered abroad for taxation, civil service benefits and issues like dependent visas. Jerome Yau, co-founder of Hong Kong Marriage Equality, said the government document was "very conservative" and "far from acceptable." "We believe that will create an obvious inequality in the sense of local same-sex couples who are not married overseas won't be eligible to register the relationships. I think that's unfair, and potentially that will lead to further litigation," he said. The government said its proposals were made after considering the city's actual situation, adding there are different views over the recognition of same sex partnerships and it would have to strike a balance to avoid dividing society. Lawmakers will discuss the issue on Thursday and there is yet to be a target date for the bill passing. Hong Kong reformed its legislation in 2021 so that only those loyal to Beijing can hold office, ousting pro-democracy lawmakers. Members of the pro-Beijing camp have spoken out against legal recognition of same-sex couples' rights, insisting Hong Kong society only tolerates marriage between a man and a woman. However last year, LGBTQI+ rights activists notched another legal victory with the top court affirming housing and inheritance rights for same-sex couples. The policy document released on Wednesday does not mention the topics addressed in the legal cases like rights related to housing, inheritance or taxes. Support for same-sex marriage in Hong Kong has grown over the past decade and hit 60 per cent in 2023, according to a survey conducted jointly by three universities. More than 30 countries around the world have legalised marriage equality since the Netherlands became the first to do so in 2001. In Asia, only a few places including Taiwan, Nepal and Thailand currently allow same-sex unions. China is not among them, nor does it have specific laws prohibiting discrimination against LGBTQ people. -ABC with wires