China's AI expansion adds to existing employment crisis
New York
China's rapid AI adoption is reshaping its labour market, with analysts debating whether it will alleviate workforce shortages or deepen deflationary pressures. Morgan Stanley's latest report warns that AI-driven automation could exacerbate China's employment challenges, particularly given its high youth unemployment rate (over 15 percent) and prolonged deflationary trends.
AI's ability to replace junior-level cognitive tasks may encourage companies to invest more in technology while reducing hiring, potentially leading to slower wage growth and economic stagnation. However, Ding Shuang, chief Greater China economist at Standard Chartered, argues that AI is not the primary driver of deflation. Instead, overcapacity in key industries and weak domestic demand are the main culprits.
Despite concerns, AI's economic potential remains significant. The International Monetary Fund estimates that 40 percent of jobs in emerging markets are exposed to AI, with 16 percent complemented by automation and 24 percent fully replaced. To mitigate disruptions, policymakers should enhance social protections, expand AI-focused education, and encourage job creation in sectors less susceptible to automation. Ultimately, AI's impact on China's economy will depend on balanced policy measures and strategic workforce adaptation.
China's rapid AI adoption is reshaping its labour market, sparking debate over whether it will alleviate workforce shortages or deepen deflationary pressures. While AI-driven automation offers long-term productivity gains, concerns persist about its immediate impact on employment and wage growth.
China has been battling prolonged deflationary risks, with its producer price index contracting for 30 consecutive months, including a 2.7 percent drop in April. The employment market remains sluggish, with urban youth unemployment exceeding 15 percent. AI could generate a labour equivalent value of 6.7 trillion yuan ($931 billion)—approximately 5 percent of China's nominal GDP.
To mitigate disruptions, policymakers should enhance social protections, expand AI-focused education, and encourage job creation in sectors less susceptible to automation. While AI may eliminate some roles, it also fosters new employment opportunities. The future of China's labour market will depend on balanced policy measures and strategic workforce adaptation.
Despite optimism surrounding AI's potential, its widespread adoption may not significantly enhance China's productivity. While automation can streamline operations, it does not directly address deeper structural issues such as declining birth rates, shrinking workforce, and weak domestic demand. In 2023, China recorded only 9 million births, the lowest since 1949, with the population dropping for the second consecutive year to 1.4 billion, a decline of over 2 million.
AI's displacement of junior-level cognitive jobs could worsen China's employment crisis, particularly as urban youth unemployment exceeds 15 percent. While AI may create new roles, the transition requires extensive reskilling, which China's current education system struggles to accommodate. Additionally, over investment in AI could exacerbate economic stagnation, as companies prioritize automation over workforce expansion.
To mitigate these risks, policymakers must strengthen social protections, invest in AI-focused education, and promote job creation in sectors less vulnerable to automation. Without balanced policy measures, AI's rapid integration may deepen economic instability rather than drive sustainable growth.
China's deflationary pressures stem from multiple economic factors, with AI playing only a minor role in the broader downturn. The country's weak property market and sluggish domestic demand have been the primary drivers of deflation, overshadowing the impact of AI adoption. Despite concerns about automation displacing workers, recent data suggests that AI's effect on employment remains limited.
A UBS survey conducted between March 18 and April 17 among 404 senior executives in China revealed that 73 percent of respondents had integrated AI technologies into their businesses, primarily to enhance efficiency and improve product quality. While 15 percent reported workforce reductions, 22 percent stated they had created new positions due to AI adoption. Additionally, 46 percent of executives noted salary increases linked to productivity gains, whereas 18 percent reported wage cuts for certain employees.
These findings indicate that AI has not yet caused widespread disruption in China's labour market or household income. However, as AI adoption accelerates, policymakers must ensure balanced economic strategies that address employment shifts, wage stability, and broader economic challenges. The future of AI's role in China's economy will depend on how businesses and regulators navigate technological advancements alongside existing structural issues.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
12 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Why is drought-hit Brazil saying yes to AI data centers?
Brazil is turning to AI data centers to boost its economy, but critics say they put our ecological future at risk. When AI data centers come to town, companies promise jobs and opportunities. In one drought-stricken community in Brazil, residents are weighing the choices. How do communities balance the economic boost and environmental cost of hosting water-reliant data centers?
Qatar Tribune
a day ago
- Qatar Tribune
How a GOP rift over tech regulation doomed a ban on state AI laws in Trump's tax bill
Agencies A controversial bid to deter states from regulating artificial intelligence for a decade seemed on its way to passing as the Republican tax cut and spending bill championed by President Donald Trump worked its way through the U.S. Senate. But as the bill neared a final vote, a relentless campaign against it by a constellation of conservatives — including Republican governors, lawmakers, think tanks and social groups — had been eroding support. One, conservative activist Mike Davis, appeared on the show of right-wing podcaster Steve Bannon, urging viewers to call their senators to reject this 'AI amnesty' for 'trillion-dollar Big Tech monopolists.' He said he also texted with Trump directly, advising the president to stay neutral on the issue despite what Davis characterized as significant pressure from White House AI czar David Sacks, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, Texas Sen. Ted Cruz and others. Conservatives passionate about getting rid of the provision had spent weeks fighting others in the party who favored the legislative moratorium because they saw it as essential for the country to compete against China in the race for AI dominance. The schism marked the latest and perhaps most noticeable split within the GOP about whether to let states continue to put guardrails on emerging technologies or minimize such the end, the advocates for guardrails won, revealing the enormous influence of a segment of the Republican Party that has come to distrust Big Tech. They believe states must remain free to protect their citizens against potential harms of the industry, whether from AI, social media or emerging technologies. 'Tension in the conservative movement is palpable,' said Adam Thierer of the R Street Institute, a conservative-leaning think tank. Thierer first proposed the idea of the AI moratorium last year. He noted 'the animus surrounding Big Tech' among many Republicans. 'That was the differentiating factor.'The Heritage Foundation, children's safety groups and Republican state lawmakers, governors and attorneys general all weighed in against the AI moratorium. Democrats, tech watchdogs and some tech companies opposed it, too. Sensing the moment was right on Monday night, Republican Sen. Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee, who opposed the AI provision and had attempted to water it down, teamed up with Democratic Sen. Maria Cantwell of Washington to suggest striking the entire proposal. By morning, the provision was removed in a 99-1 whirlwind demise of a provision that initially had the backing of House and Senate leadership and the White House disappointed other conservatives who felt it gave China, a main AI competitor, an advantage. Ryan Fournier, chairman of Students for Trump and chief marketing officer of the startup Uncensored AI, had supported the moratorium, writing on X that it 'stops blue states like California and New York from handing our future to Communist China.' 'Republicans are that way ... I get it,' he said in an interview, but added there needs to be 'one set of rules, not 50' for AI innovation to be companies, tech trade groups, venture capitalists and multiple Trump administration figures had voiced their support for the provision that would have blocked states from passing their own AI regulations for years. They argued that in the absence of federal standards, letting the states take the lead would leave tech innovators mired in a confusing patchwork of rules. Lutnick, the commerce secretary, posted that the provision 'makes sure American companies can develop cutting-edge tech for our military, infrastructure, and critical industries — without interference from anti-innovation politicians.' AI czar Sacks had also publicly supported the measure. After the Senate passed the bill without the AI provision, the White House responded to an inquiry for Sacks with the president's position, saying Trump 'is fully supportive of the Senate-passed version of the One, Big, Beautiful Bill.'Acknowledging defeat of his provision on the Senate floor, Cruz noted how pleased China, liberal politicians and 'radical left-wing groups' would be to hear the news. But Blackburn pointed out that the federal government has failed to pass laws that address major concerns about AI, such as keeping children safe and securing copyright protections. 'But you know who has passed it?' she said. 'The states.'Conservatives distrusting Big Tech for what they see as social media companies stifling speech during the COVID-19 pandemic and surrounding elections said that tech companies shouldn't get a free pass, especially on something that carries as much risk as AI. Many who opposed the moratorium also brought up preserving states' rights, though proponents countered that AI issues transcend state borders and Congress has the power to regulate interstate commerce. Eric Lucero, a Republican state lawmaker in Minnesota, noted that many other industries already navigate different regulations established by both state and local jurisdictions. 'I think everyone in the conservative movement agrees we need to beat China,' said Daniel Cochrane from the Heritage Foundation. 'I just think we have different prescriptions for doing so.' Many argued that in the absence of federal legislation, states were best positioned to protect citizens from the potential harms of AI technology. 'We have no idea what AI will be capable of in the next 10 years and giving it free rein and tying states hands is potentially dangerous,' Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene wrote on Republican, Texas state Sen. Angela Paxton, wrote to Cruz and his counterpart, Sen. John Cornyn, urging them to remove the moratorium. She and other conservatives said some sort of federal standard could help clarify the landscape around AI and resolve some of the party's disagreements.
Qatar Tribune
2 days ago
- Qatar Tribune
Investors keep eye on tariff deadline as US stocks rally
Agencies New York Investors will be keeping a close eye on tariff headlines out of Washington next week, as a temporary suspension of punitive import levies is set to expire. If that Wednesday deadline passes without an increase in trade tensions, it could prove positive for the markets. Negotiators from more than a dozen major US trading partners are rushing to reach agreements with US President Donald Trump's administration by July 9 to avoid even higher tariffs, and Trump and his team have kept up the pressure in recent days. On Wednesday, Trump announced a deal with Vietnam that he says will impose a lower-than-promised 20 percent tariff on many Vietnamese exports. While the administration has teased a forthcoming deal with India, talks with Japan, the sixth-largest US trading partner and closest ally in Asia, appeared to hit roadblocks. Investors have shifted from panicking about tariffs to relief buying, recently lifting the US stock market back to record highs, with corporate earnings and the US economy holding up better than many had expected through a period of dramatic policy change. The S&P 500 has risen about 26 percent from April 8, when stocks bottomed following Trump's draconian April 2 tariff announcement. But much of the rally has been driven by retail market participants and corporate share buybacks, even as institutional investors have been more reticent. Despite the S&P 500 making new highs, equity positioning is far below February levels as investors remain underweight stocks, according to Deutsche Bank estimates. 'This has definitely been a junkier rally, a more speculative rally,' Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management. 'In the last week or so, it's been driven a lot more, I think, by retail than it has been by institutions. Institutional positioning is really just average,' she said. While many factors are keeping investors cautious, including worries about US economic growth and lofty stock market valuations, getting past the tariff deadline without a major escalation in tensions would be one less thing to worry about in the near term, analysts said. 'I think that there may be some threats and saber-rattling, but I don't really think that any of that now poses a major danger to the market,' said Irene Tunkel, chief US equities strategist, BCA Research. Still, investors don't expect the tariff deadline to put an end to trade tensions for good. 'I don't view it necessarily as a hard deadline,' said Julian McManus, portfolio manager at Janus Henderson Investors. 'The 90-day pause itself was instituted because the markets were falling apart, and I think policymakers needed breathing room and time to try and negotiate these deals or find some kind of off ramp,' he said. Investors' cautious approach to boosting equity exposure now is reminiscent of their behavior immediately after the pandemic market drop of March 2020, when allocations to stocks recovered more slowly than major market indexes, Deutsche Bank strategist Parag Thatte, said. 'It does mean that there is room for exposures to keep rising, which is a positive for equities all else equal,' Thatte said. After a roller-coaster first half, the S&P 500 is entering a historically strong period. Over the past 20 years, July has been the strongest month for the benchmark index with an average return of 2.5 percent, according to a Reuters analysis of LSEG data. Investors will also be keeping an eye on economic data - especially inflation numbers - and second quarter results in coming weeks for clues to the health of the US economy, and the Federal Reserve interest rate outlook. 'We're right at the point where institutions are going to have to decide one way or the other, do they believe the rally or not,' Morgan Stanley'sShalett said.
