‘Maybe he has a knife:' Yulia Putintseva asks for ‘crazy' Wimbledon spectator to be ejected over safety fears
Putintseva went on to lose 6-0, 6-0 to the USA's Amanda Anisimova in just 43 minutes and was visibly emotional while sitting down ahead of the final game.
Trailing 0-3 in the first set on court 15, Putintseva reported the fan to the umpire at the change of ends.
'Can you take him out? I'm not going to continue playing until he leaves,' she was heard telling the umpire on the BBC broadcast. 'These people are dangerous, they're crazy.'
After being asked by the umpire which fan it was, Putintseva gestured to the stand behind where she was serving and said it was a spectator wearing green.
The umpire then said he would phone security before getting down from his chair to speak to two members of security staff who were courtside.
'Maybe he has a knife and he will attack after, I don't know,' Putintseva, who didn't speak to the media after the match, said.
In a statement to TNT Sports, the organizers said: 'Following a complaint about the behaviour of a spectator at the match on court 15, the chair umpire informed security and the matter was dealt with.'
CNN Sports has reached out to the All England Lawn Tennis Club for comment.
The incident comes after a man was ejected from the Dubai Tennis Championships after displaying 'fixated behavior' towards British player Emma Raducanu in February.
The man followed Raducanu to at least four competitions earlier this year, and on noticing him in Dubai, the British star previously said she 'couldn't see the ball through tears' due to her distress.
British media reported that the man had tried to obtain tickets to Wimbledon, but was flagged and blocked by the All England Club's security system. Raducanu praised Wimbledon for doing an 'amazing job' at preventing the man accused of stalking her from buying tickets to the tournament.
'Wimbledon and everyone did an amazing job. I got a notification, the police contacted me and told me everything was OK,' Raducanu told BBC Sport.
'I know that I am not the first athlete to go through this, and I probably won't be the last – not just as an athlete, but females in general.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC Sports
6 hours ago
- NBC Sports
LIV player explains DQ from Open qualifying: 'I felt completely dizzy'
After carding a 7-over 43 on his opening nine Tuesday morning at West Lancashire, Sam Horsfield decided his chances of qualifying for The Open were wrecked. So, Horsfield, a member of LIV Golf's Majesticks GC, did what players have often done in his situation and walked off the course. The only issue is Horsfield, per the R&A, didn't notify an official of his withdrawal and was subsequently handed a disqualification. Semantics, sure, though the 28-year-old Englishman certainly earned himself quite a few headlines, including one from a British outlet that read, 'LIV golfer walks out of Open final qualifying after horror show.' Horsfield took issue with the coverage and posted an explanation of his premature exit to his Instagram account. As the former University of Florida standout from Manchester wrote, he didn't land at London's Heathrow airport from last weekend's LIV Dallas event until around 4 p.m. local time and didn't get to bed at his accommodations near the course until nearly 11 p.m. Then a fire alarm forced him outside at 1 a.m., and from there, he struggled to fall back asleep until about a half-hour before his 6 a.m. alarm, which he slept through. 'Fortunately, my caddie woke me up,' Horsfield added. 'I felt completely dizzy and out of it all day. Don't listen to the propaganda out there against LIV players by some of these pages. Hope this clears things up.' Horsfield, who has just one top-10 finish in nine LIV starts this year, will compete in LIV Andalucia next week in Spain.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trans swimmer Lia Thomas stripped of medals after Trump crackdown
A transgender swimmer's medals are to be stripped, the University of Pennsylvania has agreed. The university will also have to issue formal apologies to every biological female competitor who lost out to a biological male, marking the end to a landmark legal battle. The US Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights (OCR) found UPenn violated Title IX by 'allowing a male to compete in female athletic programs and occupy female-only intimate facilities'. The case focused on Lia Thomas, who last competed for the Ivy League school in Philadelphia in 2022, as the first transgender winner of an American collegiate title. The move comes as part of the Trump administration's broader attempt to remove transgender athletes from girls' and women's sports. Under the agreement, UPenn agreed to restore all individual Division I swimming records and titles to female athletes who lost out to Thomas, the Education Department said. The University of Pennsylvania also agreed to send a personalised apology letter to each of those swimmers. 'The department commends UPenn for rectifying its past harms against women and girls, and we will continue to fight relentlessly to restore Title IX's proper application and enforce it to the fullest extent of the law,' Linda McMahon, the education secretary, said. The Education Department opened its investigation in February and concluded in April that Penn had violated Title IX, a 1972 law forbidding sex discrimination in education. Such findings have almost always been resolved through voluntary agreements. If Penn had fought the finding, the department could have moved to refer the case to the Justice Department or pursued a separate process to cut the school's federal funding. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
3 new arrests in case of U.K. nurse convicted of murdering 7 infants
London — Three former senior leaders at the British hospital where nurse Lucy Letby was convicted of murdering seven babies have been arrested on suspicion of gross negligence manslaughter, police said Tuesday. All three were part of the senior leadership team at the Countess of Chester Hospital in the northwest of England between 2015 and 2016, when Letby was found to have killed the babies and attempted to kill seven others. Letby, 35, is serving 15 consecutive life sentences with no chance of parole, but there have been questions raised about the evidence used in her trial, and her lawyer has filed for a formal review of the case. In October 2023, following Letby's conviction, the Cheshire Constabulary police force launched an investigation into potential corporate manslaughter at the hospital, focusing on the decision-making of senior bosses, "to determine whether any criminality has taken place concerning the response to the increased levels of fatalities," according to a Tuesday statement by Detective Superintendent Paul Hughes. That investigation was widened to include the charge of gross negligence manslaughter, leading to the arrest of the three former leaders. All three have been released on bail pending further investigation, the police said. "Both the corporate manslaughter and gross negligence manslaughter elements of the investigation are continuing and there are no set timescales for these," Hughes said. "It is important to note that this does not impact on the convictions of Lucy Letby for multiple offenses of murder and attempted murder," he added. The Cheshire police are also investigating deaths and non-fatal collapses of babies at the neonatal units of the Countess of Chester Hospital and the Liverpool Women's Hospital between 2012 and 2016, where Letby did her training. Lucy Letby's controversial murder conviction Since her conviction, there have been significant concerns voiced over the evidence used to secure Letby's conviction, with The New Yorker, The Guardian, Private Eye and other outlets reporting on possible alleged flaws in the trial proceedings. In February, a group of experts held a news conference to dispute the medical evidence used to convict Letby. Dr. Shoo Lee, a retired Canadian neonatologist, said the group of 14 doctors had concluded that the newborns died either of natural causes or from insufficient medical care. "In summary then, ladies and gentlemen, we did not find murders," Lee said at the time Letby has maintained her innocence. Her defense attorney Mark McDonald said in April that the experts' findings had "completely demolished" the case against Letby, whom he argues was wrongly convicted. McDonald said he had submitted an application to the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), which has the power to send cases back to the Court of Appeal. The CCRC has given no date for when a decision might be reached. In a statement sent to CBS News on Tuesday, McDonald said that despite the news of the three new arrests, "the concerns many have raised will not go away, and we will continue to publicly discuss them." "What is needed is a proper and full public inquiry into the failings of the neonatal and paediatric medical care unit at the Countess of Chester hospital," McDonald said, repeating his assertion that Letby was wrongfully convicted. Jury has more questions in Sean "Diddy" Combs trial Details on the "Alligator Alcatraz" immigration detention center Last-minute rural health care change helped Senate pass Trump budget bill, lawmakers react
