HMRC set to close Bradford office in 2027 - with staff offered jobs in Leeds
Back in 2015, HMRC announced its Centenary Court site would shut in 2020-21 - but then a U-turn was made, with officials saying the base would close in 2027.
The Telegraph & Argus has now learned HMRC plans to go ahead and shut its Bradford office in January 2027. Approximately 1,100 people work there.
The news was revealed this week to Bradford East Labour MP Imran Hussain in a letter from HMRC chief executive John-Paul Marks, who said: "Colleagues currently based in Bradford will be offered a job in Leeds regional centre and we expect the vast majority of colleagues to continue their career with HMRC."
He added: "In addition to financial savings, HMRC's locations strategy is enabling HMRC to operate from a cost-effective estate to better meet the needs of the public."
A spokesperson for HMRC added: "We're moving staff to our modern regional centre in Leeds, in line with previously announced plans, so they can work in an environment that enables them to better meet the needs of the public.
"It will also save taxpayers' money.
"We remain committed to the region, with all 1,100 roles remaining in West Yorkshire."
It is understood workers at Bradford's HMRC site were notified of the news on Wednesday.
'We need a serious rethink'
Mr Hussain told the T&A: "Bradford is one of the UK's largest cities and should not be treated as a secondary location within West Yorkshire.
"Assuming that staff can simply relocate to Leeds ignores the very real challenges many - especially long-serving, highly-skilled employees - will face.
"While HMRC has indicated that jobs will remain in the region via relocation to Leeds, this plan misses the opportunity to invest in Bradford's potential and disregards the significant public investment already committed to regenerating the city.
Imran Hussain, Bradford East Labour MP (Image: Parliament) "This decision risks draining talent from HMRC, damaging local employment, and undermining confidence in the public sector's commitment to Bradford.
"We need a serious rethink - one that puts Bradford's people and future first.
"While I understand that the decision to close the Bradford office was made under the previous Government, it doesn't align with the Government's 'opportunities for all' agenda.
"Bradford is precisely the kind of city that 'opportunities for all' was meant to support - and withdrawing a major public sector employer undermines that objective."
Mr Hussain has now written to James Murray, Exchequer Secretary to the Treasury, to express his "deep concern" - criticising the move as "disappointing and highly disruptive".
He said he wanted to "make a last plea to pause the decision and to reconsider this approach".
"I hope you can engage meaningfully with local stakeholders to explore alternative options that would retain HMRC's presence in Bradford," he added.
"I would be happy to meet with you to discuss the Government's wider plans on locating Government offices in Bradford."
'Bradford has a lot to offer'
Councillor Susan Hinchcliffe, leader of Bradford Council, told the T&A she had also written to the minister - saying the Bradford district has "a lot to offer".
She said: "We campaigned against the last Government's decision to take good, valuable jobs out of the district and consolidate HMRC staff into fewer offices elsewhere.
Councillor Susan Hinchcliffe, leader of Bradford Council (Image: Newsquest) "But the last Government still said no.
"So it's very disappointing to see HMRC finally close their doors and go. "Many private sector organisations and businesses have chosen to locate in Bradford district and there's no reason why we, as one of the biggest cities in the country, can't host other Government initiatives, programmes or departments. "Given the strongly stated intention from this new Government to put more in the regions outside London, I've written to the minister requesting a discussion on which opportunities might be available for Bradford in the future.
"We have a lot to offer."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
On GPS: Kemi Badenoch on British immigration policy
Kemi Badenoch, British Conservative Party leader (and herself from an immigrant background), tells Fareed why she supports policies making it tougher for immigrants to get British citizenship, and why people coming to Britain must plan to assimilate.
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
On GPS: British Conservative leader on the future of her party
Fareed speaks with Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch about how the party of Margaret Thatcher is faring in the face of its historic defeat last year, and what it will need to do to win again.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
High Court to hear bid to challenge Palestine Action ban
The co-founder of the proscribed group Palestine Action is set to ask the High Court for the green light to challenge the Home Secretary's decision to ban the organisation at a hearing on Monday. Huda Ammori is seeking to challenge Yvette Cooper's decision to proscribe Palestine Action under anti-terror laws, after the group claimed an action which saw two Voyager planes damaged at RAF Brize Norton on June 20. On July 4, Ms Ammori failed in a High Court bid to temporarily block the ban coming into effect, with the Court of Appeal dismissing a challenge to that decision less than two hours before the proscription came into force on July 5. The ban means that membership of, or support for, the direct action group is now a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison, under the Terrorism Act 2000. The Government is opposing the bid for the legal challenge to be allowed to proceed, with the hearing before Mr Justice Chamberlain due to begin at 10.30am on Monday at the Royal Courts of Justice. Ms Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action on June 23, stating that the vandalism of the two planes, which police said caused an estimated £7 million of damage, was 'disgraceful'. Four people – Amy Gardiner-Gibson, 29, Jony Cink, 24, Daniel Jeronymides-Norie, 36, and Lewis Chiaramello, 22 – have all been charged in connection with the incident, and are due to face trial in early 2027. Since the ban came into force, dozens of people have been arrested at protests in cities including London, Manchester and Cardiff, including an 83-year-old reverend. At the hearing earlier this month, Raza Husain KC, for Ms Ammori, said the proscription was an 'ill-considered, discriminatory and authoritarian abuse of statutory power'. He also said that the Home Office 'has still not sufficiently articulated or evidenced a national security reason that proscription should be brought into effect now'. Blinne Ni Ghralaigh KC, also representing Ms Ammori, told the court that the harm caused by the ban would be 'far-reaching' and could cause 'irreparable harm to large numbers of members of the public', including causing some to 'self-censor'. Ben Watson KC, for the Home Office, said Palestine Action could challenge the Home Secretary's decision at the Proscribed Organisations Appeal Commission (POAC), a specialist tribunal, rather than at the High Court. Mr Justice Chamberlain said that an assessment on whether to ban the group had been made as early as March, and 'preceded' the incident at RAF Brize Norton. Dismissing the bid for a temporary block, the judge said that the 'harm which would ensue' if a block was not ordered was 'insufficient to outweigh the strong public interest in maintaining the order in force'. He added that some of the 'consequences feared by the claimant' were 'overstated'. At a late-night Court of Appeal hearing, the Lady Chief Justice Baroness Carr, Lord Justice Lewis and Lord Justice Edis threw out a bid to challenge the High Court's decision, finding that there was 'no real prospect of a successful appeal'.
