
Immigration and deprivation reasons UK public losing faith in politicians, says Rayner
According to an official summary of Tuesday's meeting of the cabinet, Rayner, who is leading a wider government project on improving social cohesion, also highlighted the increasing amount of people spending time alone and online as a driver of disturbances.
Asked if Rayner specifically saw increased migration as a particular reason for both the riots which took place across England last summer and recent disturbances at hotels which house asylum seekers, Downing Street said it was among 'concerns that people have about whether government is acting on their behalf and acting in their interests'.
Ministers are concerned about a potential renewed wave of migration and race-based disturbances, as the anniversary approaches of the murder of three children at a dance class in Southport that led to riots last summer, with many encouraged by false far-right claims about the attack.
Rayner told ministerial colleagues that 'economic insecurity, the rapid pace of de-industrialisation, immigration and the impacts on local communities and public services, technological change and the amount of time people were spending alone online, and declining trust in institutions was having a profound impact on society', according to a No 10 readout of the cabinet meeting on Tuesday morning.
Emphasising the role of deprivation and poverty, Rayner said 17 of the 18 places around England which had the worst trouble last summer were among the country's most-deprived areas.
'While Britain was a successful multi-ethnic, multi-faith country, the government had to show it had a plan to address people's concerns and provide opportunities for everyone to flourish,' Rayner added.
Asked about the role of immigration, Keir Starmer's official spokesperson said 'high levels of immigration over the last 10 years, including illegal immigration' was among a series of factors, including the cost of living and the pace of technological change that 'have had an impact on our social fabric and social cohesion'.
Questioned about Rayner's comments on people spending more time online and alone, the spokesperson said adults now averaged four hours of online time a day, 'and that has changed the way in which people interact with other people'.
While Rayner's project on social cohesion is aimed at the longer term, with no date set as to when it will present any conclusions, ministers are very mindful of the more immediate worry of a repeat of last summer's disorder, after which there were more than 1,800 arrests and nearly 1,100 charges, with hundreds of people jailed.
One potential flashpoint could be an asylum hotel in Epping, Essex, which has been the target for a series of protests in recent days, and where police were attacked.
The far-right agitator Tommy Robinson has promised on social media to bring 'thousands' of people to join a mass protest at the hotel on Sunday. Similar demonstrations have also taken place at a hotel in Diss, Norfolk.
There is an additional political impetus for ministers to take seriously the possibility of wider disorder given the likelihood it would be exploited by Nigel Farage, who used a speech about crime on Monday to say much of the UK was experiencing 'nothing short of societal collapse'.
He told an event: 'I don't think anybody in London can understand just how close we are to civil disobedience on a vast scale in this country.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
7 minutes ago
- The Independent
Hundreds ready to be arrested at mass protest against Palestine Action terror ban
At least 500 people are expected to take part in a pro-Palestine protest on Saturday that could see them arrested under terrorism laws for holding up signs. The action, which is planned for Westminster, will force police to confront the impact of a new order proscribing protest group Palestine Action as a terror organisation. Activists who oppose the group's ban will hold up signs on Saturday expressing support for the organisation, an act which is now an offence under section 13 of the Terrorism Act. Organisers from Defend our Juries, who are co-ordinating the action, told The Independent that they were 'very confident' it would go ahead with at least 500 people involved. Protesters plan to sit together and hold up signs saying: 'I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action'. But the prime minister's spokesperson warned those planning to take part that they may 'yet not know the true nature of this organisation', telling reporters: 'This is not a peaceful or non-violent protest group.' A police source also told The Guardian that anyone demonstrating in support of Palestine Action would be arrested at the weekend. They said: 'However we have to do it, they will be arrested for breaking terrorism laws' Organisers will make a final decision on whether the protest will go ahead tomorrow. The government's proscription of Palestine Action as a terror group is currently being challenged in the High Court, with a court case expected later in the autumn. In a judgement allowing the court case to go ahead, Mr Justice Chamberlain said it was 'reasonably arguable' that the proscription 'amounts to a disproportionate interference' of Huda Ammori, the co-founder of the group's, rights to freedom of expression and freedom of assembly. Home secretary Yvette Cooper decided to proscribe the group after activists allegedly broke into RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire and sprayed two military planes with red paint. Court papers said she was hesistant to proscribe the group, but that the CPS advised acting early to minimise the risk of prejudice in the upcoming trial of Palestine Action protesters in November. Describing their planned action on Saturday, Tim Crosland, from Defend Our Juries, said: 'We're just exercising our democratic rights to freedom of assembly. Our plans are online, this is an open transparent campaign against an order that the UN has said is unnecessary. There isn't any secret plot. 'We think at least 500 people will be involved although there is no fool proof way of knowing. Some people are travelling into London from around the country and some people are saying they might come from Holland for it'. He added: 'Holding a sign is in some ways a much more gentle ask than getting onto gantries, or breaking into a base, or anything like that. But because of the [proscription] order that simple act of peaceful protest is an offence under the terror act. We are letting people know that the risks are very very substantial, but if enough of us do it then there is safety in numbers'. In a briefing for protesters, Defend Our Juries advises people that there is a substantial risk of arrest and that the Met Police has arrested people under section 13 of the Terrorism Act. This makes it an offence to wear an item of clothing or display an article that arouses 'reasonable suspicion that [the wearer] is a member or supporter of a proscribed organisation'. The document advises people that 'if enough of us take a stand, then it is unlikely any charges will be brought'. Outside of London, some protesters have had their homes raided and technology seized. One 80-year-old woman was arrested at a rally in Cardiff and had her home searched. She said officers removed iPads, a Palestine flag, books on Palestine, and material related to Extinction Rebellion. In the brief, Defend Our Juries warn participants that if they are taking action outside London they should warn any housemates that their homes could be searched. Recommendations also include removing tech from the house, having a decoy phone, laptop or Ipad, and if they are vulnerable to put a note on the front door stating 'I am elderly and will take longer to answer the door'. The prime minister's spokesperson told reporters on Monday that 'those who seek to support this group [Palestine Action] may yet not know the true nature of this organisation, but people should be under no illusions: this is not a peaceful or non-violent protest group. 'We're also clear that their activities do not reflect or represent the thousands of people across this country who continue to exercise their fundamental right to protest on difficult, different issues'.


Telegraph
7 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Reform council leader risks contempt of court over comment about asylum seeker rape case
A teenage Reform council leader has risked being found in contempt of court following the alleged rape of a 12-year-old girl. George Finch, 19, the Warwickshire county council leader, risked falling foul of the law with a comment about the case at a Reform UK press conference in central London on Monday. Ahmad Mulakhil, 23, was charged last week with the rape of the girl in Nuneaton, while Mohammad Kabir, 23, was charged with kidnap and strangulation. Mr Finch appeared to acknowledge the legal risks of commenting on the case, saying he was told that 'if I released this I would be in contempt of court'. Warwickshire Police reportedly advised local councillors and officials not to reveal the asylum-seeker background of the two suspects, for fear of 'inflaming community tensions'. Warwickshire Police has not denied reports that Mr Mulakhil and Mr Kabir are asylum seekers. The pair have appeared at Coventry magistrates' court and were both remanded in custody until an appearance at Warwick Crown Court on Aug 26. In a statement, the force said that once someone is charged with an offence, it follows national guidance which 'does not include sharing ethnicity or immigration status'. Farage: We need to care about protecting children Nigel Farage, the leader of Reform UK, was asked during the press conference if he was concerned that Mr Finch's comments might put a trial and potential conviction at risk. He replied: 'I can imagine if I was leader of Warwickshire county council and I was getting the level of distress from voters and residents that George is feeling, if that means that he was slightly emotional, well, do you know what, good. 'Perhaps we really do need to start actually really thinking and caring about protecting children.' Contempt of court laws are in place to stop people from sharing information which could prejudice active legal proceedings. The Telegraph is unable to repeat Mr Finch's claims because it would risk putting this newspaper in contempt of court. The attorney general, an office currently occupied by Lord Hermer, has the power to deal with incidents of contempt by instituting proceedings against people in the High Court. However, this power is 'reserved for rare circumstances where the wider public interest requires it', according to official guidance.


Telegraph
7 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Palestine Action activist remanded in custody after RAF Brize Norton break-in
An alleged Palestine Action activist accused of vandalising two aircraft at RAF Brize Norton in a £7m attack has been remanded in custody on Monday. Muhammad Umer Khalid, 22, was charged by anti-terror police after two Voyager aircraft were damaged at the Oxfordshire base on June 20. Palestine Action, which has since been proscribed by the Government, said it was behind the incident. Mr Khalid, of Stockport, appeared at Westminster magistrates' court charged with conspiracy to commit criminal damage and conspiracy to enter a prohibited place knowingly for the purposes prejudicial to the safety or interests of the UK, between June 1 and June 21. Wearing a black hooded sweatshirt, he spoke only to confirm his name, date of birth and family address. Prosecutor Peter Ratliff said: 'At approximately 1.40am on June 20, activists travelled to a RAF base at Brize Norton in two vehicles which were bearing false number plates.' He said the protesters used 'two e-scooters to travel to two RAF Voyager aircraft' before spraying a 'significant quantity of red paint into the engine of each aircraft'. Mr Ratliff said the activists had put 'metal crowbars' into 'engine rotors' of the aircraft. 'The full cost of repairs is not yet known, but is estimated to be in the region of £7m, which will be paid for in all likelihood by the taxpayer,' he said. The prosecutor added: 'Palestine Action group formed in 2020 and have since been responsible for multiple criminal offences in the course of purported direct action protests. 'Protests typically involve the damaging of property and premises they consider to be linked to or supportive of Israel in respect of Israel's approach to Palestinian people and territory, and more recently the active conflict in Gaza.' Mr Khalid was remanded in custody ahead of a preliminary hearing at the Old Bailey on Aug 22. District Judge John Zani said: 'These are serious allegations and in the event of conviction, as the law stands, a lengthy prison sentence cannot be ruled out.' Mr Khalid waved and saluted towards his friends and family in the public gallery before being led from the dock. Last month, Amy Gardiner-Gibson, 29, Jony Cink, 24, Daniel Jeronymides-Norie, 35, and Lewie Chiaramello, 22, appeared in court charged with the same offences. They were remanded in custody ahead of a plea and trial preparation hearing at the Old Bailey on Jan 16 2026. Their eight-week trial was fixed for Jan 18 2027. The Ministry of Defence had said at the time of the incident: 'The UK's defence estate is vital to our national security and this government will not tolerate those who put that security at risk. 'This Government is taking the strong step of proscribing Palestine Action due to its activities, which are a threat to our national security.'