Bee alert: US cops send out warning after 250 million insects escape
LOS ANGELES : A truck crash that set 250 million bees free has sparked warnings in the western US, with police telling people to avoid swarms of the stinging insects.
The accident happened in Washington state in the far northwest of the country, when a semi-trailer carrying a load of hives overturned.
'250 million bees are now loose,' wrote Whatcom County Sheriff on its social media page.
'AVOID THE AREA due to the potential of bee escaping and swarming'.
Roads in the region, which nestles the border with Canada and is just 30 miles from Vancouver, have been closed as bee experts help with the clean-up.
While some beekeepers aim only to produce honey, many others rent out their hives to farmers who need the insects to pollinate their crops.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
7 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Boeing, DOJ seek judge's approval for deal opposed by crash victims' families
Boeing argued that the executive branch solely has the power to decide whether to bring or maintain a prosecution. (EPA Images pic) WASHINGTON : Boeing and the US department of justice (DOJ) today asked a judge to approve an agreement that allows the company to avoid prosecution despite objections from relatives of some of the 346 people killed in two 737 MAX crashes in 2018 and 2019. The deal enables Boeing to avoid being branded a convicted felon and to escape oversight from an independent monitor for three years that was part of a plea deal struck in 2024 to a criminal fraud charge that it misled US regulators about a crucial flight control system on the 737 MAX, its best-selling jet. Boeing argued that the executive branch solely has the power to decide whether to bring or maintain a prosecution. 'Because it is entirely within the government's discretion whether to pursue a criminal prosecution, an agreement not-to-prosecute does not require court approval,' Boeing said, asking a judge to reject objections filed by the families and grant the government's motion to dismiss the charge. 'Disputing the government's considered assessment of litigation risk, the calculation of the maximum fine, or the appropriate mechanism for compliance oversight, do not demonstrate – even remotely – that the government was clearly motivated by considerations contrary to the public interest.' DOJ said in a court filing it acted in good faith and in accordance with the law, agreeing to dismiss the case for an agreement 'that secures a significant fine, compliance improvements, and a substantial victim compensation fund.' The families cited Judge Reed O'Connor's statement in 2023 that 'Boeing's crime may properly be considered the deadliest corporate crime in US history.' They argue dismissal is not in the public interest and obligations imposed on Boeing are not enforceable. 'If the government declined to move forward with the prosecution even if the court rejected the deal, O'Connor should appoint a special prosecutor,' the families said. Boeing and DOJ both asked O'Connor to reject appointing a special prosecutor. Under the deal, Boeing agreed to pay an additional US$444.5 million into a crash victims fund to be divided evenly per crash victim, on top of a new US$243.6 million fine. Boeing in July 2024 agreed to plead guilty to a criminal fraud conspiracy charge after the two fatal 737 MAX crashes in Indonesia and Ethiopia. Under the non-prosecution agreement, Boeing will pay US$1.1 billion in total, including the fine, compensation to families and more than US$455 million to strengthen the company's compliance, safety and quality programmes. 'The vast majority of the families have settled civil suits with Boeing and collectively have been 'paid several billion dollars',' DOJ said.
Malay Mail
13 hours ago
- Malay Mail
What's next for Diddy? Combs remains jailed, faces sentencing and wave of civil lawsuits
Hip-hop mogul convicted of prostitution-related offenses Judge denies defence request for bail Potential appeal could take years to resolve NEW YORK, July 3 — Sean 'Diddy' Combs was found guilty yesterday of prostitution-related offenses but cleared of more serious charges of racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking. Combs, 55, had pleaded not guilty to all five felony counts he faced. Here's what's expected to come next in the case: Combs remains jailed for now US District Judge Arun Subramanian denied Combs' request to be released from federal lockup in Brooklyn until sentencing, given the evidence presented at trial of violent acts Combs had committed. 'It is impossible for the defendant to demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that he poses no danger,' Subramanian said. Sentencing Subramanian suggested sentencing Combs on October 3, but said he would entertain a defence request for an earlier date. Combs faces a maximum 10-year prison sentence on each of the two prostitution counts. Prosecutors acknowledged in a court filing that federal sentencing guidelines appeared to recommend a sentence of at most 5-1/4 years total, well below the statutory maximum. Combs' lawyers argued that two years would be the outer limit. Appeal After Combs' sentencing, his lawyers may file an appeal of both his conviction and his sentence. To succeed on appeal, the defence faces the high burden of convincing the 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals that Subramanian made legal errors that impacted the jury's verdict. Any appeal may take years to play out. For example, the 2nd Circuit upheld the sex trafficking conviction and 20-year prison sentence of British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell on September 17, 2024, nearly three years after her conviction. Civil lawsuits Rhythm and blues singer Casandra 'Cassie' Ventura, a star prosecution witness, sued Combs in November 2023 for sex trafficking, the first of dozens of civil lawsuits accusing him of abuse. Combs settled with Ventura for US$20 million (RM84.4 million), but many others are unresolved. Combs has denied all wrongdoing. — Reuters
Malay Mail
14 hours ago
- Malay Mail
‘Owned bad facts' to sway jury: Sean Combs' lawyers concedes abuse in trial strategy but secure acquittal on most serious charges
Combs acquitted of sex trafficking, convicted on lesser charges Defence argued relationships were consensual despite abuse Prosecutors said threats, financial control indicated trafficking NEW YORK, July 3 — With their client caught on tape beating one of his former girlfriends, Sean 'Diddy' Combs' lawyers at his sex trafficking trial never sought to deny that he was physically abusive. Instead, their trial strategy focused on convincing jurors that there was no direct link between what they called domestic violence and two of Combs' ex-girlfriends' decisions to take part in drug-fuelled sex marathons with paid male escorts. Legal experts said the argument appeared to have been successful, with jurors voting on Wednesday to acquit Combs, 55, on the most serious charges of racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking. Combs was convicted on two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution, a lesser offense. 'His attorneys were smart and they owned the bad facts,' said Anna Cominsky, a professor at New York Law School. 'They fought on the things that mattered and it paid off.' The verdict spared Combs, who founded Bad Boy Records and is credited with popularising hip-hop in American culture, a potential life sentence. He faces up to 10 years in prison on each prostitution count. Prosecutors acknowledged in a court filing that federal sentencing guidelines appeared to recommend a maximum sentence of about 5-1/4 years. Combs' lawyers argued that two years would be the outer limit. Still, the argument appeared to have been a double-edged sword when it came to Combs' bid for bail. US District Judge Arun Subramanian on Wednesday denied Combs' request to be released from jail ahead of his sentencing later this year, citing defence lawyer Marc Agnifilo's concession in his June 27 closing argument that Combs had committed abuse. 'Domestic violence is violence, and you said that this is a case that did involve violence,' Subramanian said in court. The jury's deliberations took place behind closed doors, and the reasoning of their decision is not known. But legal experts said the defence put forth a strong case that Combs' romantic relationships may have been combustible and at times violent, but that his conduct did not meet the definition of sex trafficking. Defence lawyers argued that both of his former girlfriends who testified, the rhythm and blues singer Casandra Ventura and a woman known in court by the pseudonym Jane, loved Combs and consensually took part in the sexual performances to make him happy. Lawyer Teny Geragos speaks to the media next to lawyers Marc Agnifilo outside the US federal court, following a bail hearing, after the jury reached verdicts in the Sean 'Diddy' Combs sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy trial, in Manhattan, New York City, US, July 2, 2025. — Reuters pic 'A different scenario' To convict Combs of sex trafficking, prosecutors would have had to show that Combs used force, fraud or coercion to compel Ventura and Jane to take part in ecstasy-fuelled, days-long sexual performances with male sex workers sometimes known as 'Freak Offs.' Both women testified that during the encounters, Combs would watch, masturbate, and occasionally film. The case differed from recent high-profile sex trafficking convictions, including those of British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell and rhythm and blues singer R. Kelly. Those cases involved underage victims, meaning prosecutors did not have to prove a lack of consent to secure a conviction. At Combs' trial, prosecutors had the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that adult women, who said they loved Combs and had consensual sex with him many times, did not consent to the 'Freak Offs' on certain occasions. 'This was a very different scenario than what we usually see with sex trafficking cases,' said Sarah Krissoff, a former federal prosecutor in Manhattan and current partner at law firm Cozen O'Connor. 'These were messy, toxic, violent relationships with lots of drama.' During cross-examination of the government's witnesses, the defence brought jurors' attention to sexually explicit text messages in which the women expressed affection for Combs. 'She was always free to leave,' Agnifilo said in closing, referring to Ventura. 'She chose to stay because she was in love with him.' The Manhattan US Attorney's office, which brought the case, said in a statement after the verdict: 'Sex crimes are all too present in many aspects of our society.' 'They didn't want to leave' Prosecutors pointed to testimony from both Ventura and Jane that Combs threatened to cut off financial support and release sex tapes. They showed jurors a hotel surveillance video of Combs attacking Ventura. 'No was never an option for Cassie,' prosecutor Maurene Comey told jurors in her final argument last month. To undermine the defence argument that Ventura and Jane took part in the 'Freak Offs' consensually, prosecutors called forensic psychologist Dawn Hughes as an expert witness. She said victims sometimes form a 'trauma bond' with perpetrators that can make it difficult to leave an abusive relationship. Agnifilo urged jurors to rely on their own intuitions about relationships rather than expert testimony. 'They didn't always like him, but they loved him,' Agnifilo said. 'They didn't want to leave him.' — Reuters
