Trump asks for swift deposition of Murdoch in Epstein defamation case
The case relates to a July 17 article in the Journal asserting Mr Trump's name was on a 2003 birthday greeting for the late financier and sex offender.
The day after it appeared, the Republican president sued the Journal, its owners, including Mr Murdoch, and the reporters who wrote the story, which said Mr Trump's letter included a sexually suggestive drawing and a reference to secrets they shared.
Mr Trump's lawsuit called the alleged birthday greeting "fake" and said the Journal published its article to harm the president's reputation.
In a court filing on Monday, Mr Trump's lawyers said the president told Mr Murdoch before the article was published that the letter referenced in the story was fake, and Mr Murdoch told Mr Trump he would "take care of it."
"Murdoch's direct involvement further underscores defendants' actual malice," Mr Trump's lawyers wrote, referring to the legal standard the president must clear to prevail in his lawsuit.
His lawyers asked US District Judge Darrin Gayles in Miami to compel Mr Murdoch, 94, to testify within 15 days. Judge Gayles ordered Mr Murdoch to respond by August 4.
Dow Jones, the Journal's publisher, declined to comment. Dow Jones has said the Journal stood by its reporting and would vigorously defend against the lawsuit.
Neither Dow Jones owner News Corp nor a spokesperson for Mr Murdoch immediately responded to requests for comment.
The article was published amid growing criticism from Mr Trump's conservative supporters and congressional Democrats over the administration's decision not to release additional documents from the Justice Department's investigation into Epstein, who died by suicide in jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges.
Mr Trump and Epstein were friends for years before what Mr Trump has called a falling out.
Legal experts say Mr Trump faces a high bar in proving the Journal defamed him, let alone collecting the $US10 billion ($15.3 billion) in damages he is seeking.
The "actual malice" standard means Mr Trump must prove not only that the article was false, but also that the Journal knew or should have known it was false.
Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
SBS Australia
an hour ago
- SBS Australia
Scientists are dressing pigs in clothes and burying them in Mexico. Why?
For the past four years, Maribel Cedeño has been looking for her brother. He's one of an estimated 130,000 people who are missing in Mexico, part of a wave of disappearances that families say is systemic and authorities are unwilling to confront or recognise. Al Jazeera reported the case of Elba Rivas in 2024, whose husband had gone missing, prompting her to join organised protests with others whose loved ones had vanished. "That's why I'm here, demanding that the president tells us where all these people are who have supposedly been found - because my husband never returned." If the missing people are found - dead or alive - it is usually by their loved ones, who - guided by information from witnesses, parents and siblings - search for graves by walking through drug cartel territory, plunging a metal rod into the earth. Around 6,000 clandestine graves have been found since 2007, but tens of thousands of remains have yet to be identified. Now, science has come along to help. Part of the solution has been to introduce high tech tools in the search - like drones. Maribel says using a drone helps her and her family cover more ground. "Flying over, say, a hillside makes it quicker and easier to survey than doing it all on foot - which could take us a couple of days. With a drone, it's easier because it flags points of interest you can then go check."] But they've also turned to a surprising source in their quest: pigs, which resemble humans in size, fat distribution and the structure and thickness of skin. Luis Silvan is a scientist at CentroGeo, a federal research institute focused on geospatial information. He's coordinating a mapping project with Guadalajara University, Mexico's National Autonomous University, and the University of Oxford in England, alongside the Jalisco [[hu-lisk-oh]] Search Commission, using pigs to find the graves of the missing. "We conducted an experiment using animals as stand-ins for human bodies, which we buried in the field behind me. The burial techniques replicate those observed in the region." He says that to simulate real cases, they have buried pigs using the same techniques cartels do to dispose of human bodies—wrapping, burning, dismembering, and burying them in isolated areas. They then use satellite imagery, hyperspectral drone cameras, thermal sensors, and ground-scanning equipment to detect changes in soil, vegetation, and underground structures caused by decomposition. Tunuari Chávez is a researcher at the Jalisco Search Commission. "We're searching for those children alive—just not in the form of life their families last saw them, but in the form of life they might exist in now." Search collectives have long observed that certain flowers or soil patterns often indicate graves. Silvan says the scientists are also tracking chemical shifts, insect activity, and electrical currents to understand how graves evolve. One set of pig graves is even encased behind a pane of transparent acrylic, providing a window for scientists to observe the pigs' decomposition in real time. "Here, we're working on a project to understand how graves evolve and how they can be detected using technology... We can't see the buried bodies directly with this technology. What we see are the effects those bodies have on the soil and vegetation." While Silván and his colleagues have contributed knowledge about grave mapping techniques, Chávez's team has worked to combine the science with what they know about how the cartels operate. They discovered that disappearances in Jalisco commonly happened along cartel routes between Pacific ports, drug manufacturing facilities and the U.S. border, and that most of the missing are found in the same municipality where they disappeared. Chavez says that this insight - combined with the science - tells a story. "A grave is like a micro-ecosystem that evolves over time." The state of Jalisco, home to the Jalisco New Generation Cartel, has the largest number of people reported missing in Mexico: 15,500. Silvan says they may not know how well the technology works, where and when it can be used, or under what conditions, for at least three years. Whether such tools will even be adopted more widely remains uncertain too, limited by high costs and lack of institutional support at the higher levels of government. But he says understanding how to detect graves here could inform searches across the country, supplementing family efforts and witness testimony. "We interpret the data to understand how different types of graves look, and that information is useful for people who are searching." The knowledge flow goes both ways. Silvan says some family members have been able to identify pig burial sites on sight alone, because of the plants, soil placement, and the fact that graves are often found under trees whose roots grow vertically, so those digging the graves can remain in the shade. Maribel says she is glad to be helping with the research - which she hopes will help to find her brother. "After death, there is life. That's what happens in these cases—when bodies go unfound and remain buried for a long time, they give life."
ABC News
3 hours ago
- ABC News
Did Donald Trump just give China a major advantage on AI?
Last month, the Trump administration quietly reversed one of its own policies by lifting a ban on US tech giant Nvidia's H20 microchip exports to China. For anyone who has followed Donald Trump's erratic record on trade, another U-turn might not sound like a notable development. But this time, the stakes are much higher because these microchips are critical to powering the next generation of artificial intelligence. Whichever country dominates microchip production will likely lead the global AI race, with massive implications for military strategy and economic output. For nearly three years, the US has tried to keep these powerful chips out of China's hands. Now, by reopening the door, has Mr Trump handed Beijing a major advantage on AI? We spoke to three experts to explain how we got here. Back in April, the Trump administration banned H20 microchip exports to China, toughening restrictions put in place by the Biden administration. It has since reversed that decision. According to Jason Van Der Schyff, a fellow at Australian Strategic Policy Institute's technology and security program, this backflip may be in response to the booming black market demand for high-powered US chips in China. "Over a billion dollars worth of restricted chips were smuggled into China in just a few months," he said. "The reversal may be a pivot by the administration, recognising if you don't offer a legal channel for the slightly degraded chips, buyers will simply go around you." Professor Shahriar Akter, who specialises in the study of advanced analytics and AI at the University of Wollongong said this move seems to follow "a philosophy in Silicon Valley that if you sell more" it will pour more back into "your research and development". Associate Professor in Information Systems at Curtin University, Mohammad Hossain, suggested the Trump administration is trying to kill two birds with one stone. The US is trying to maintain leverage in a broader geopolitical trade-off involving China's critical exports, rare earth elements, while "keeping China dependent on US technology", he said. Nvidia is the tech giant behind these highly sought after microchips and it is led by CEO Jensen Huang who is the ninth-richest man in the world. The H20 is a step-down from Nvidia's top-tier chips (H100 and B200) and was specifically designed to comply with US export restrictions while catering to the Chinese market. "Basically, [H100 and B200 chips] can do things much faster than the H20," Mr Van Der Schyff said. "If we consider how quickly AI is moving any impediment that could be brought to time more than anything is going to maintain that US strategic advantage." While the H20 is less powerful, Mr Van Der Schyff warns that "these aren't toys … even slightly downgraded chips still enable model training at scale". "If you're concerned about national security, letting an adversary access chips that are only one rung down the ladder still poses a strategic risk." While the US hopes to stall China's progress in artificial intelligence, experts warn this strategy may have the opposite effect. China's push to dominate AI is already underway and restricting exports to only H20 chips incentivises them to accelerate domestic developments. "At present in the world, 50 per cent of AI researchers are being produced by China alone," Dr Akter said. Chinese tech giants like Huawei and Biren Technology have been ramping up their own AI accelerators. "Huawei's chips are already being deployed in major training clusters," Mr Van Der Schyff said. Still, China's domestic developments trail behind industry leaders like Taiwan's TSMC and South Korea's Samsung when it comes to cutting-edge manufacturing. "There isn't necessarily a danger that China catches up overnight but these restrictions do however give Beijing a clear incentive to sort of go all in on industrial policy for their own semiconductors to accelerate domestic progress," Mr Van Der Schyff said. "We've seen this play out previously with 5G and also with aviation." All three experts cautioned that it's difficult to gauge China's true AI capabilities. "Given the closed nature of China's systems and their propensity to not always tell us the truth", it's unclear how much China's artificial intelligence has developed, Mr Van Der Schyff said. Dr Akter used an analogy to explain the uncertainty: "There are two types of AI technologies", one is called glass box and the other is called black box. "Glass box technology is basically explainable AI, which is open source and we can explain where data is coming from and how it is being used to develop AI models and what would be the outcome." Whereas, black box technology is the opposite, we cannot trace back to the source of the data and we cannot tell what models have been used. That opacity makes it difficult for the rest of the world to assess whether Beijing is playing catch-up or quietly pulling ahead. The country that has the upper hand in microchip production will likely lead the global AI race and that has significant repercussions, experts said. "The country that dominates compute will dominate AI, and AI will shape everything from military planning to economic productivity."
Sydney Morning Herald
4 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
How much does it cost to become Lachlan Murdoch's neighbour? $14.2m
Prestige property hunters could rub shoulders with one of the world's most powerful media figures as a grand deceased estate, neighbouring Lachlan Murdoch 's Bellevue Hill compound, has hit the market with a price guide of $14.2 million. Unless the heir apparent to Rupert Murdoch 's media empire snaps the property up himself. The 53-year-old has some form in shoring up homes close to his Georgian-style mansion over the years. The tightly held home in question has been offered for the first time since 1990, which was when Hong Kong doctors Robert and Katherine Yiu bought the three-level house for $2.3 million. Located in a dress circle position in one of Bellevue Hill's most prestigious addresses, the circa 1930s-built home, known as Fernlee, is set on an elevated 930 square metres with spectacular panoramic views from the harbour to Manly. It features soaring ceilings and generous gardens on either side. It is within walking distance to local schools, including Scots College and Cranbrook. The five-bedroom, three-bathroom house is ripe for renovation, although its original features have been kept in good condition. It is selling through Steven Zoellner of Laing + Simmons Double Bay. He declined to comment when contacted. It is scheduled to go under the hammer on August 13. It's not a bad opportunity for any interested parties, given Murdoch and his wife Sarah paid $23 million for their trophy home they bought from the French government in 2009. The couple have since gone on to pick up another two homes surrounding it to the tune of $7.03 million to protect their views, adding another some 1600 square metres to their landholding in the area and totalling $30 million.
