How Labour heralded the end of single sex education
But a combination of Labour's imposition of VAT on school fees, its hike in National Insurance contributions and declining pupil numbers has left its plans in tatters. In the face of these 'unsustainable' conditions, the owners of the small school, in Keir Starmer's Camden constituency, in north London, announced it will close this summer.
It is one of a growing number of casualties linked to Labour's flagship policy to remove the VAT exemption, adding an extra 20 per cent on top of already hefty fees, pricing some families out of the market.
The policy has been described as 'devastating' by the Independent Schools Council (ISC). As its shock waves are felt across the sector, it appears that single sex schools in particular, which can only market themselves to half of a shrinking pool of pupils, are under threat.
Among the dozen or so schools that have announced their closure since the start of the year, five are single sex. Even more apparent across private schools is an accelerated rush to co-educational provision. At least 16 single sex schools are currently in the process of making the switch to a mixed intake.
These instances whittle away at the number of fully single-sex independent schools, which currently stands at 231 out of a total of 1,441 ISC members in the UK (just 16 per cent). In England, about 378 single sex state schools remain. In Scotland, news that Stewart's Melville College for boys and The Mary Erskine School for girls, in Edinburgh, are merging leaves only three single sex private schools north of the border.
The latest fee-paying school in England to make the move to co-ed is the £28,000 a year St Albans School for boys, in Hertfordshire, which was established in 948 and received its charter in 1553 from Edward VI. From September 2026, it will welcome both girls and boys into Year 7.
Other big-name schools that have announced they will fully open their doors to female pupils include £44,000 a year Westminster School, in central London, which has to date just had a co-ed sixth form, and Abingdon School, in Oxfordshire, which dates back to the 13th century.
These schools insist the move to co-ed is driven by their desire to be 'reflective of modern society'. The headmaster of Westminster Dr Gary Savage explicitly denies that the school is 'reforming to preserve' and says it is accepting girls because its ethos is to 'offer the best possible liberal education to any bright child who would flourish here'.
While the steady demise of boys-only schools does predate the VAT imposition, more recently the traffic is not only one way. A number of schools that have been evangelical about 'girls' education' are now going co-ed, including Malvern St James Girls', in Worcestershire, and Godolphin School, in Salisbury, where boarding fees are more than £45,000 a year.
According to Melanie Sanderson, managing editor of the Good Schools Guide, independent schools are doing all they can to 'secure their pipeline'.
'A school is a business now and they are increasingly focused on giving parents fewer reasons to rule them out,' she says. 'If you are a dual income family, it can be more convenient to have both of your children in the same school. Did the parents with boys at St Albans ask for the school to go co-ed? I strongly doubt it. But in the landscape of a very competitive marketplace, schools are shoring up their future.'
For some, the move is more about the here and now. 'Schools are taking various measures in the fight for survival, including single sex schools going co-ed to widen the potential pool of pupils,' says Irena Barker, digital editor at School Management Plus.
She points to an increasing number of schools joining or being bought out by a larger group, which then transition to co-ed. Beyond that, one in five schools is making redundancies to try and balance the books, according to one survey of teachers.
'There is a lot of pain behind the scenes,' says Barker. 'Individual heads are obviously not always trumpeting their difficulties, but they are real and pressing.'
Fears have been raised that this threat to single sex provision could undermine advances in girls' education.
Alex Hutchinson, headteacher at James Allen's Girls' School in London, and president of the Girls Schools Association, has warned the VAT imposition could have a 'seismic impact' on girls' life chances.
The evidence is clear that while boys do as well or better in co-ed settings as in single sex ones, female pupils thrive in girls-only environments.
Girls who attend all-girls schools get better exam results than girls with similar records and backgrounds at mixed schools, and outdo boys at all-boys schools, an analysis by FFT Datalab reveals.
Single-sex settings also boost the number of girls taking 'masculine' subjects – like maths, physics and engineering at A-level and degree level. Research indicates that girls in all-girls schools are more likely to participate in sport, especially traditionally male-dominated endeavours like cricket and football, with all its attendant benefits.
Daniel Sayers, the head of St Hilda's girls' school, in Harpenden, says single-sex education gives his pupils an inner confidence and self-belief.
'I've seen time and time again, pupils thriving in STEM subjects because the 'boy' 'girl' thing is just removed,' he says. 'And that works the other way as well. I've been around lots of boys' schools and seen boys keenly participating in drama and singing, for instance. There is no sense of 'this is not a cool thing to do'; they are just living the dream, and doing what they enjoy and are really good at.'
Parents who favour single-sex schools are voicing their unhappiness at the rush to co-ed. In a recent discussion on Mumsnet, one mother cited two local girls' schools with plans to take boys.
'I'm angry that the girls' welfare is being sacrificed for financial or strategic reasons, or because girls are supposed to have a 'moderating' effect on boys' behaviour,' she says.
Her point is echoed by Melanie Sanderson, from the Good Schools Guide: 'Lots of parents actively want a single-sex education for their daughters, and you can see why. We have the narrative of 'toxic masculinity' thrust down our throats every day of the week. If you haven't got a daughter that you are very confident can handle herself if she's made to feel uncomfortable by a boy, then maybe you would want to choose single-sex schools.'
There is also a question mark over whether traditional boys' schools that open their doors to girls can adapt quickly enough: 'These schools can take decades to truly feel like a co-ed and not just a boys school that has let in some girls,' warns the head of one girls school.
According to Sanderson, there remains a group of highly aspirational parents who want what a traditional boys-only education can offer.
'These big brands – such as Harrow, Eton and Radley – deliver academically, on the sports field and socially,' she says. 'And parents are assured that in this day and age, boys all know girls from other schools. Very few are living on an island where they don't know any girls. My son goes to a boys' school but has a mixed friendship group.'
While remaining resolutely single sex, some schools are forging closer ties to make them stronger. Sherborne Girls, Sherborne Boys, and two local preps, in Dorset, have formed Sherborne Schools Group, to allow for pupils and staff to work together, share facilities and resources and leverage economies of scale.
'We fundamentally believe in the advantages of single sex but think it needs an innovative approach to get the best of both worlds,' said Dr Ruth Sullivan, the head of Sherborne Girls. 'We are exploring opportunities for sharing resources, for example our teaching expertise. While some schools are having to cut back on niche subjects, we have a teacher coming in who is going to take Arabic studies, for instance, and that will be available across the schools.'Sullivan is acutely aware, though, that not all schools have this kind of arrangement as an option.
'There are a lot of smaller schools, and many of them tend to be single sex girls' schools, that are being impacted by VAT on fees,' she says. 'These schools don't have the economies of scale and don't have some of the big endowments that some of the boys schools enjoy because they have not been around for as long. It's really tough for many schools in the sector.'
For these smaller single sex schools, where every enrolment counts, the future has never been more uncertain.
'As well as the VAT, there's the drop in the birth rate, the high cost of living that families are experiencing, stagnating wages and the energy price cap is coming off,' said Sanderson. 'The overall picture is not favourable, particularly when schools are small and living hand to mouth off the fees. In some ways, it's a perfect storm.'
The Old Palace of John Whitgift School, girls school in Croydon, south London, closing in August 2025, 136 years after opening
The Village School for girls, in Hampstead, part of Chatsworth Schools, proposed closure end of summer term 2025
Highfield Prep for Girls, Maidenhead, part of Chatsworth Schools, proposed closure end of summer term 2025
St Hilda's Bushey, girls school in Hertfordshire, part of the Aldenham Foundation, consulting on closure in August 2025
Kilgraston School, girls senior school in Bridge of Earn, Scotland, closed August 2024
St Albans School for boys, Hertfordshire
Aldwickbury Prep for boys, Hertfordshire, will welcome girls from sept 2025
King's House School for boys, is gradually moving to co-education with girls joining Reception and Year 1 in September 2024 and Years 3, 4, 5 and 7 in September 2025.
Moulsford Prep, boys school in Oxfordshire. From September 2026, it will take girls into Year 3. By September 2031, the School will have girls in every year group
Cothill, boys school in Oxfordshire; girls will be admitted in Years 3-5 in September 2025
Abingdon School and Prep School, Oxfordshire, announced its decision to move to co-education in May 2024
Abbot's Hill, girls school in Hemel Hempstead, will begin to take boys in the pre-prep and prep in September 2025
Aysgarth Prep, a boys school in North Yorkshire for nearly 150 years, welcomed girls in Years 4–8 from September 2024
Lochinver House, in Potters Bar, will be welcoming girls from September 2025 with the school becoming fully coeducational by 2031
Malvern St James Girls' School, in Worcestershire, will be accepting boys from September 2025
Cobham Hall, a girls school in Kent, will be fully co-educational from September 2025
Sir William Perkins's, a girls school in Chertsey, will open its doors to boys from September 2026, becoming fully co-educational by 2030.
Westminster School, in London. Its sixth-form is already co-ed: girls will join Year 9 for the first time in 2028 and the school will be fully co-ed by 2030
Kingsley School, in Leamington Spa, an all-through girls' school that takes boys to 11, announced that it will start becoming fully co-educational from 2025
Godolphin School, in Salisbury, will be taken over by United Learning group and go co-educational. Starting in September 2024, the prep school welcomed both boys and girls. Godolphin Senior will take boys from September 2025.
Bickley Park School for boys, in Bromley, will welcome girls from Year 1 in September 2025
*For financial or other reasons
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
6 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Labour Has 'Disappointed' People While In Government, Reeves Admits
Save Rachel Reeves admits Labour has "disappointed" people while in government. The politician said she understood that being Chancellor meant making unpopular decisions.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Voices: This hollowing out of politics could see the death of the centre
Voting in the Green Party leadership election opened on Friday, with the result to be declared on 2 September. The contest between Ellie Chowns and Adrian Ramsay, running on a joint ticket, and Zack Polanski has focused to an unusual extent on electoral tactics and the hopes of winning a large number of Commons seats from Labour. Meanwhile, the Corbyn-Sultana party is still taxiing towards the runway for take-off, its passengers talking excitedly about replacing Labour as the main party of the left, either on its own or in alliance with the Greens. There are plenty of reasons for being sceptical of both parties' ambitions, which I will come to in a moment. But there is also a real possibility that Labour support will collapse. I wrote last week about Keir Starmer's 'Macron strategy', by which he presents himself as the alternative to Nigel Farage as prime minister. Thus he would seek to rally disaffected Labour voters tempted to stay at home or defect to other parties, plus Greens, Corbynites, Liberal Democrats and soft Conservatives, by presenting them with a binary choice. But what if that isn't the choice by the time of the next election? What if, just as Reform has overtaken the Tories in the opinion polls, a Green-Corbynite combination overtakes Labour? Peter Kellner, the polling guru, has commissioned research from YouGov into party loyalty. He says the figures 'should terrify both Labour and the Conservatives'. He found that people who intend to vote Reform and Green are much more likely to give a positive reason for their support, such as 'it has the best policy on the issue I feel most strongly about', whereas Labour and Tory voters are more likely to give a negative reason, such as 'it isn't great but it's better than the alternatives'. He concludes: 'The two pillars of the old Labour-Conservative duopoly, family influence and social class, have crumbled, and nothing has replaced them. Stalled living standards add to their plight.' Every day provides more evidence of the gap between the old duopoly and the new parties in enthusiasm and commitment. The trickle of former Tory MPs defecting to Reform could become a flood if Farage, who caught the Ming vase that Starmer dropped, can carry it over the slippery floor for another couple of years. Defections to the Corbyn-Sultana party are not on quite the same scale yet. Six former Labour councillors in Hastings and one Labour councillor in Coventry said on Friday that they will join the new party. But more will follow if the party can gain credibility. As I said, there are reasons to doubt that this will happen. The party's launch has been chaotic. The temporary name, Your Party, does not work at all. Any discussion of the party begins in confusion. 'Your Party…' 'It's not my party…' The 600,000 sign-ups expressing interest make up a relatively small number compared to, say, the six million who signed the 2019 petition to revoke Article 50 and stay in the EU. There are doubts about the wisdom of re-running Jeremy Corbyn's Labour leadership campaign outside the Labour Party. James Matthewson, who was a Labour spokesperson under Corbyn, wrote for the i paper on Friday: 'My warning to the left, especially those young lefties who are still unjaded and have the energy we need to change the world, is: don't be lured into another vanity project.' He thought the idea of Zarah Sultana as a fresh face that would mean a fresh approach was 'far from the truth'. As for the Greens, there is an air of unreality that hangs over the leadership election debate, which has become bitter and personal, at least between Ramsay and Polanski. (Ramsay refused to say he 'liked' Polanski in a radio debate between the two.) Ramsay and Chowns claim to be focused on electoral success, having delivered the quadrupling of seats from one to four last year, while Polanski claims to be more ambitious, calling his approach eco-populism and being willing to do pre-election deals with the Corbyn-Sultana outfit. It may be that climate change – 'the issue I feel most strongly about' – and idealistic disillusionment with a Labour Party governing in bleak times will be enough to break through, but the red-green alliance has nothing yet to match the power of the issue of immigration combined with the charisma of Farage. Of course, Reform's success may not last. Farage may drop the Ming vase. He was forced today to deny speculation about his health, telling The Times that his Tory and Labour rivals were 'spreading these rumours' because 'it's the last card they've got'. But the untrue rumours nevertheless draw attention to the extent to which Reform's advance depends on a single individual. It may be, even if Farage is the leader of the real opposition by the time of the next election, that Starmer's Macron strategy will work. Or it could be, if the Labour vote does collapse, that the Lib Dems prove to be the saviours of pragmatic moderation. Ed Davey's inoffensive army, rather than the Green Corbynites, could fill more of the gap left by Labour's retreat. But I think a Labour collapse is an underestimated possibility.
Yahoo
16 hours ago
- Yahoo
Voices: Could this be the way Starmer placates his revolting MPs?
Keir cannot afford another fiasco like welfare,' one Starmer loyalist told me, recalling the government's humiliating climbdown on proposed cuts to disability benefits after a revolt by Labour MPs. The prime minister knows the episode showed that his way of governing is unsustainable. He is consulting people widely this summer about how to turn things round. There's a fierce internal debate taking place. In Keir Starmer's right ear, Morgan McSweeney, his influential chief of staff, tells him to focus on wooing back voters in the red wall from Nigel Farage. In his left ear, soft-left cabinet ministers urge a more progressive approach to woo centre-left voters who have deserted Labour for the Liberal Democrats and the Greens. They argue that these lost voters outnumber defectors to Reform by a margin of three to one. The soft left's allies in Downing Street want Starmer to emulate Bill Clinton, who fought back against a right-wing populist – Newt Gingrich, the Republican speaker of the House of Representatives – after a rocky start to his first term in 1993. One minister admitted: 'There is a battle over the direction of the government. There is only one person who can resolve it. Keir has got to decide for himself – based on his values, who he is, who he wants to be.' The left-ear whisperers want the PM to trust the instincts that are serving him well on foreign affairs and apply them to the domestic agenda, too. Starmer appeared to be tacking leftwards when he told Tom Baldwin for the paperback version of his biography, published on Thursday: 'We have to be the progressives fighting against the populists of Reform – yes, Labour has to be a progressive party.' He has hinted that he wants to tackle child poverty by scrapping the two-child benefit limit. The PM has nodded to Labour critics who argue – persuasively – that his government has sometimes acted left but talked right, and that it's no wonder, therefore, that it gets little credit from progressive voters. He said that issues such as clean energy, nationalising the railways and increasing the national minimum wage should be shouted louder from the rooftops. 'We should show we're proud of all that,' he told Baldwin. Starmer views this as part of 'telling a better story'. But you can only tell one if you know the direction in which you are heading. The battle isn't over yet; I'm told McSweeney is not convinced about a shift to the left. His critics say the shortcomings of attacking Reform head-on were illustrated when the science secretary Peter Kyle claimed Farage was on the paedophile Jimmy Savile's side in the heated debate over internet regulation. The attack line was reportedly approved by No 10, but it backfired. It was the sort of smear we might expect from Reform. The lesson for Starmer: Labour can't 'out-Farage Farage', and the public will vote for the real thing if Labour tries to look like Reform-lite. Allies of McSweeney believe the red wall will decide the next general election, so Labour's primary pitch must be to the white working class. His internal opponents insist that trying to re-run the 2024 election triumph, McSweeney's greatest hit, will not work next time. They dispute the idea that Labour 'won' the north and the Midlands last year, saying that it reaped the benefit of a split on the right between the Conservatives and Reform, and that Labour regained seats seized by the Tories in 2019 mainly because Tory voters switched to Reform. At the next election, Farage will likely hoover up the right-wing vote. Crucially, the left vote will be split this time – inflicting deep damage to Labour unless Starmer can appeal to left-of-centre voters. He won't do that by tacking right, cutting benefits for the disabled and pensioners or aping Farage. For Starmer to win a presidential contest against the Reform leader, being the anti-Farage candidate will not be enough: he will have to offer progressive voters more than he has offered them so far. Another reason why Starmer should listen to the buzz in his left ear is that the new socialist party launched by Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana will present another alternative to disenchanted Labour voters. It already has 600,000 registered supporters. Starmer won't lurch to the Corbyn hard left – and rightly so. But the sensible decision he should make this summer is that it's time for Labour to live up to its name and its values, and stop pretending to be something it is not.
