
U.S. airlines reap rewards from premium travel strategy amid demand slump
The strategy is paying off as the margins of carriers selling premium seats have held up despite a slump in overall travel demand. Strong demand from affluent travelers is helping airlines offset a pullback in spending by price-sensitive customers.
Delta Air Lines last week reported a 5% year-on-year jump in its second-quarter premium ticket revenue, compared to a 5% decline in main cabin revenue. The 10-percentage-point gap was the widest since the pandemic, helping it post a double-digit margin in the April-June quarter. Similarly, premium cabin revenue helped United Airlines mitigate the financial hit from operational constraints at Newark airport near New York City — one of its largest hubs — and increase its earnings in the latest quarter. United's premium revenue rose 5.6% in the June quarter from a year ago. Its overall passenger revenue grew just 1.1%. The industry saw a similar trend in the first quarter when President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs raised the specter of an economic recession, hammering airline bookings.
"Premium capacity remains resilient," said United's Chief Commercial Officer Andrew Nocella.
Airline executives have attributed the resilient demand for premium travel to the healthy financial conditions of U.S. households with earnings of $100,000, which account for 75% of air travel spending.
While an April selloff in financial markets after Trump announced tariffs raised the risk of undermining that demand, a sharp rebound in U.S. stocks since then has eased those concerns.
"Our core consumer is in good shape and continues to prioritize travel," Delta CEO Ed Bastian said last week.
Trouble in the main cabin
In contrast, lingering uncertainty about the broader economy and rising living costs have taken a toll on demand from less-affluent customers.
Bank of America data shows, while spending by middle- and higher-income households held up in June, lower-income household spending turned negative. Low-fare carrier JetBlue Airways last month told staff that it was planning new cost-cutting measures as soft demand made achieving a breakeven operating margin in 2025 "unlikely," according to an internal memo.
Summer travel season tends to be the most profitable for carriers. But weak demand for main cabin seats has forced airlines to offer sales to fill planes.
Discount carriers such as Frontier and Spirit Airlines are aggressively slashing flights to prevent more discounting pressure.
Airline executives say premium cabins have become "the profit differentiator" in the industry. Since premium travelers tend to be less price-sensitive, carriers expect them to be less affected by economic shifts, making their spending more stable and offering a buffer in a downturn.
At Delta, premium revenue accounted for 43% of passenger revenue in the June quarter, up from 35% in 2019. It has helped the Atlanta-based carrier become a pre-tax margin leader post-pandemic. The company expects its revenue from premium cabins to surpass that from main cabins in 2027.
Diversified revenues, including from premium cabins, have helped shares of Delta and United outperform the broader industry in the past two years.
Encouraged by the payoff, carriers are further ramping up investments to make their premium offerings more attractive.
United has unveiled new premium suites with privacy doors on its new Boeing 787-9 planes. The suites will have 27-inch screens, luxury skincare amenities, and caviar and wine pairings.
Alaska Airlines is on track to increase the share of premium seats on its flights to 29% by next summer from 26% currently.
Risk of supply glut
Faced with weak margins, budget airlines are now also trying to tap into the high-end market.
JetBlue, which has reported a profit in just two of its last nine quarters, is putting first-class seats on domestic flights and opening its first airport lounges in New York and Boston.
Frontier is retrofitting the first two rows of its aircraft with first-class seats. Spirit, long known for its no-frills service, is seeking to rebrand itself as a premium airline to turn around its business.
The number of premium seats in the U.S. domestic market has increased by 14% since 2019, more than three times the growth in main cabin seats, according to data from Visual Approach Analytics. The rush to add premium seats is hampering aircraft deliveries. It also risks causing a supply glut, hurting pricing power.
But Alaska CEO Ben Minicucci downplayed those concerns, saying premium travel is more about an experience than a seat.
"We see it as an end-to-end premium experience that people will pay for and people expect," Minicucci said in an interview.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NHK
an hour ago
- NHK
Japan's top negotiator for US tariff talks leaves for Washington
Japan's top negotiator for trade talks with the United States has left for Washington as the US is poised to impose a 25-percent tariff on imports from Japan starting August 1. Economic Revitalization Minister Akazawa Ryosei departed from Tokyo's Haneda Airport on Monday morning. It is his eighth trip to the US capital for tariff negotiations. Speaking to reporters before his departure, Akazawa said that negotiations would not be easy as both Japan and the US need to protect their national interests. He said he wants to hold sincere and robust discussions to find common ground between the two sides. Arrangements are under way for a meeting with US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on Monday or later, local time. Akazawa is also seeking meetings with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer. Japanese government officials say that Washington is now reviewing Tokyo's proposal to make massive investments and import more American goods to reduce the US trade deficit with Japan. Akazawa says he wants to confirm how the US side is proceeding with its review. Akazawa aims to reach an agreement that can benefit both countries as the August 1 deadline for what US President Donald Trump calls "reciprocal" tariffs approaches.


Japan Times
6 hours ago
- Japan Times
Akazawa jets to Washington for tariff talks after historic election
Japan's chief tariff negotiator flew to Washington on Monday for an eighth round of trade talks, just a day after the ruling coalition suffered a dramatic defeat in an Upper House election and less than two weeks ahead of a key tariff deadline. While the political landscape was upended by Sunday's vote, Ryosei Akazawa stuck to the script and offered no indication that anything has changed in terms of Japan's stance, or that the United States is willing to back down in its demands. 'While protecting our national interests, I want to quickly find common ground where both Japan and the United States can agree,' he told reporters at Haneda Airport on Monday morning before his departure. The U.S. is set to impose a 25% "reciprocal" tariff on most goods from Japan on Aug. 1 — up from the current 10% — unless a deal is struck. On multiple occasions in recent weeks, U.S. President Donald Trump has openly complained about the lack of progress in negotiations with Japan. No tangible results have been achieved after months of talks. Trump has said he might just end negotiations and let the 25% rate go into effect, as outlined in a letter sent to Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba on July 7. Separate sector-specific Trump tariffs are already in effect, including 25% on vehicles and auto parts and 50% on steel and aluminum. The U.S. president has said he will start imposing tariffs on pharmaceutical products as early as the end of July. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who was appointed by Trump to lead negotiations with Japan in early April, visited Tokyo and Osaka before Sunday's vote. 'A good deal is more important than a rushed deal, and a mutually beneficial trade agreement between the United States and Japan remains within the realm of possibility,' Bessent wrote in a post on social media platform X after a brief meeting with Ishiba on Friday. "I look forward to continuing formal talks in the future,' he added. The election could change the calculus of negotiations as the Liberal Democratic Party-Komeito coalition, with less than a majority in both houses, is now greatly weakened. The prime minister could step down despite his insistence that he intends to stay on, while the coalition will have to incorporate another party or seek the cooperation of opposition parties on a case-by-case basis to effectively govern. In his first comments since the Sunday's vote, Ishiba shed no light on the implications of the historic loss on tariff talks, but he remained guardedly upbeat and said that he hopes to speak with Trump about the tariffs. "I also plan to talk with President Trump and present a visible outcome as early as possible," Ishiba said.


Japan Times
9 hours ago
- Japan Times
EU to prepare retaliation plan as U.S. trade stance hardens
European Union envoys are set to meet as early as this week to formulate a plan for measures to respond to a possible no-deal scenario with U.S. President Donald Trump, whose tariff negotiating position is seen to have stiffened ahead of an Aug. 1 deadline. The overwhelming preference is to keep negotiations with Washington on track in a bid for an outcome to the impasse ahead of next month's deadline. Still, efforts have yet to yield sustained progress following talks in Washington last week, according to people familiar with the matter. Negotiations will continue over the next two weeks. The U.S. is now seen to want a near-universal tariff on EU goods higher than 10%, with increasingly fewer exemptions limited to aviation, some medical devices and generic medicines, several spirits, and a specific set of manufacturing equipment that the U.S. needs, said the people, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss private deliberations. A spokesperson for the European Commission, which handles trade matters for the bloc, said they had no comment to make on the ongoing negotiations. The two sides have also discussed a potential ceiling for some sectors, as well as quotas for steel and aluminum and a way to ring-fence supply chains from sources that oversupply the metals, the people said. The people cautioned that even if an agreement were reached it would need Trump's sign off — and his position isn't clear. "I am confident we'll get a deal done,' U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on CBS's Face the Nation on Sunday. "I think all these key countries will figure out it is better to open their markets to the United States of America than to pay a significant tariff.' Lutnick added that he had spoken to European trade negotiators early Sunday. Trump's letter The U.S. president wrote to the EU earlier in the month, warning that the bloc would face a 30% tariff on most of its exports from Aug. 1. Alongside a universal levy, Trump has hit cars and auto parts with a 25% levy, and steel and aluminum with double that. He's also threatened to target pharmaceuticals and semiconductors with new duties as early as next month, and recently announced a 50% levy on copper. In all, the EU estimates that U.S. duties already cover €380 billion ($442 billion), or about 70% of its exports to the U.S.. Before Trump's letter, the EU had been hopeful it was edging toward an initial framework that would allow detailed discussions to continue on the basis of a universal rate of 10% on many of the bloc's exports. Shipping containers at the Greenland Terminal in Brevik, Norway, on June 18 | Bloomberg The EU has been seeking wider exemptions than the U.S. is offering, as well as looking to shield the bloc from future sectoral tariffs. While it's long accepted that any agreement would be asymmetrical in favor of the U.S., the EU will assess the overall imbalance of any deal before deciding whether to pull the trigger on any re-balancing measures. The level of pain that member states are prepared to accept varies, and some are open to higher tariff rates if enough exemptions are secured, the people said. Any agreement would also address non-tariff barriers, cooperation on economic security matters, digital trade consultations, and strategic purchases. Move quickly With the prospects of a positive outcome dimming and the deadline looming, the EU is expected to start preparing a plan to move quickly if it can't reach a deal, said the people. Any decision to retaliate would likely need political sign-off from the bloc's leaders because the stakes are so high, the people added. Countermeasures of any substance would likely provoke an even wider transatlantic trade rift, given Trump's warnings that retaliation against American interests will only invite tougher tactics from his administration. The bloc has already approved potential tariffs on €21 billion of U.S. goods that could be quickly implemented in response to Trump's metals levies. They target politically-sensitive American states and include products such as soybeans from Louisiana, home to House Speaker Mike Johnson, other agricultural products, poultry, and motorcycles. The EU has also prepared a list of tariffs on an additional €72 billion of American products in response to Trump's so-called reciprocal levies and automotive duties. They would target industrial goods, including Boeing aircraft, U.S.-made cars, and bourbon whiskey. It's also working on potential measures that go beyond tariffs, such as export controls and restrictions on public procurement contracts. Anti-coercion tool A growing number of EU member states want the bloc to activate its most powerful trade tool, the so-called anti-coercion instrument (ACI), against the U.S. should the two sides fail to reach an acceptable agreement and Trump carries through with his tariff threats. The ACI would give officials broad powers to take retaliatory action. Those measures could include new taxes on U.S. tech giants, or targeted curbs on U.S. investments in the EU. They could also involve limiting access to certain parts of the EU market or restricting U.S. firms from bidding for public contracts in Europe. The anti-coercion tool was designed primarily as a deterrent, and if needed, a way to respond to deliberate coercive actions from third countries that use trade measures as a means to pressure the sovereign policy choices of the 27-nation bloc or individual member states. The commission can propose the use of the ACI, but it's up to member states to determine whether there's a coercion case and if it should be deployed. Throughout the process, the EU would seek to consult with the coercing party to find a resolution. Member states were briefed on the status of trade talks with the U.S. on Friday.