Volatus Aerospace: Top 10 Undervalued Aerospace & Defense Industry Stocks (FLT)
A stock is considered undervalued if it trades at a discount to its valuation – a calculation used to determine the intrinsic (true) worth of a company
Valuation methodology provided by Stockcalc (see below)
Aerospace & Defense: Companies that manufacture aerospace and defense products, including aircraft and aircraft parts, tanks, guided missiles, space vehicles, ships and marine equipment, and other aerospace and defense components and systems, as well as companies supporting these products through repair and maintenance services.
Stocks in this category are held primarily for capital appreciation.
Symbol Name Close Price ($) Valuation ($) Difference Average Vol (30D) Market Cap ($M) Yield (%) P/E Ratio
FLT Volatus Aerospace 0.14 0.15 0.01 (3.8%) 323159 42.4 0.0 0.0
All data provided as of June 26, 2025.
The list is sorted by stocks with the greatest percentage difference between valuation and price.
Volatus Aerospace
Volatus Aerospace Inc is a leader in innovative global aerial solutions for intelligence and cargo. With deep technological and subject matter expertise and over 100 years of combined institutional knowledge in aviation, Volatus provides meaningful aerial solutions for end users across various industries using piloted and remotely piloted aircraft systems (RPAS or drones).
Volatus Aerospace is listed under FLT on the TSX Venture Exchange.
Stockcalc
StockCalc is a Canadian fintech company specializing in fundamental valuations for North American stocks and ETFs.
Stockcalc valuations (https://www.stockcalc.com/Resources) can help determine if a stock is undervalued. Stockcalc's Weighted Average Valuation (WAV) is based on a proprietary calculation using model and analyst inputs, including:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Market Online
13 minutes ago
- The Market Online
Market Open: U.S. Job Data Silences Futures
US Job data data due out later today has stilled futures of Canada's main stock index today Market Numbers (Futures) TSX : Up ( 0.05%) 26,869.66TSXV: Up (2.52%) 751.85DOW: Up (0.13%) 44,832.00NASDAQ: Up (0.10%) 22,866.50 FTSE: Up(0.51%) 8,819.69 In the Headlines: Bombardier shares jumped after landing a blockbuster deal to sell 50 jets worth US$1.7 billion, marking a major boost for the Canadian aerospace giant And Tesla sales sank 13% in Q2 as the anti-Musk boycott persisted and rivals capitalized on the fallout. Currencies Update: (Futures) The loonie is flat this morning at 0.01% to $0.7357 U.S., inched up against the Euro by 0.10% to $0.6249 and Bitcoin lifted by another 2.18% to CDN$148,933.73 Commodities: (Futures) Natural Gas: Up (0.82%), 3.52WTI: Down (0.16%), 67.34Gold: Down (0.82%), 3,329.78 Copper: Down (0.05%) 6.23 To stay up-to-date on all of your market news head to Join the discussion: Find out what everybody's saying check out the rest of Stockhouse's stock forums and message boards. The material provided in this article is for information only and should not be treated as investment advice. For full disclaimer information, please click here
CTV News
16 minutes ago
- CTV News
Factoring in the hidden costs of buy now pay later
A Sezzle logo is shown in a person's online shopping cart on a laptop in Vernon, B.C. on Wednesday, November 18, 2020. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jesse Johnston. TORONTO — When any service is offered for free, it's good to know why. In the booming market of buy now pay later financing, those opting in generally get to spread payments over a number of weeks at no cost, because it's the merchants that pay for the service in the hopes it will convince consumers to spend more. That's certainly the promise providers like Affirm and Klarna advertise to businesses, touting 20-something per cent boosts to order totals, while Shopify says its instalment program can lead to up to a 50 per cent boost in average order value, plus up to 28 per cent fewer abandoned carts. While the option can add convenience at possibly no direct cost to consumers, financial experts warn it's far from risk free. 'The temptation is very great to overspend,' said insolvency trustee Doug Hoyes. With the option popping up during online checkout, or being offered by a cashier, consumers are also not necessarily fully thinking through the decision, and the implications of what they're agreeing to, said Hoyes. 'For the vast majority of people, you are taking on debt without really realizing it. You're not making a conscious decision that yes, I will borrow that money. And that's dangerous, obviously.' While the vast majority of buyers pay off those debts — which tend to run in the hundreds of dollars rather than the thousands — there's also a rising push to have the data shared with credit-reporting agencies, creating new areas of risk. Just last week in the U.S., reporting giant FICO said it was launching its first credit scores that incorporate BNPL data. And in April, Affirm said it would start sharing data with TransUnion in the U.S., with a goal to do so in Canada as well, said spokesman Brian Levin. 'We believe that reporting to credit agencies supports responsible lending and promotes positive credit outcomes.' In Canada, Equifax said its credit reports have started to include data from some BNPL lenders, which may be used in the calculation of credit scores. TransUnion said it's still in the development stage of figuring out how to integrate BNPL data, including creating a separate section on credit reports to reflect the unique nature of these products, said spokeswoman Hyunjoo Kim. While work progresses to add BNPL to credit reporting, some providers have raised concerns. Klarna said in March last year that it wasn't sharing data with U.S. credit-reporting agencies because BNPL doesn't fit in well with other types of loans. The company, which confirmed it doesn't share data with Canadian agencies either, said adding BNPL to existing credit-reporting models could leave consumers worse off. 'As there is little clarity on the potential long-term impacts to the consumer, we believe this approach is too risky,' it said. Other providers, like AfterPay, also say they don't provide any data to credit-reporting agencies. Sezzle said sharing data with ratings agencies is an option for those who choose its Sezzle Up program to built their credit. The varying approaches on credit reporting are also a reminder of the variety of other subtle policy differences between providers that consumers should consider before signing up. Some, like Klarna, charge a small late fee and send unpaid debts to collection agencies, while others like Affirm and AfterPay lean more on halting any further purchases until older bills are paid. Most providers are also increasingly offering longer-term loans, with rates ranging anywhere from zero interest into the 30 per cent range. Some are also striking partnerships for bigger-ticket items like exercise equipment and flights, making for a potentially risky transition to higher debt loads. Just the fact that there are so many providers also raises the risk of stacking them, and having to keep track of multiple accounts of debt, said Natasha Macmillan, head of everyday banking. 'Because of the zero-interest appeal, it almost gives people a false sense of affordability,' she said. 'The real caution I would provide is ensuring that, if you do have one, or multiple, you're looking at the total cost of all of the Buy Now, Pay Later programs that you have ongoing, to ensure that you can actually cover the cost of each of them.' The strain of those cheap loans is starting to show for some providers. Klarna's most recent quarterly results showed a 17 per cent increase in consumer credit losses, and its overall losses doubled, raising concerns it could be the start of wider industry trouble. But the company's credit loss rate was still only 0.54 per cent, showing the vast majority of borrowers are still repaying their debts. The bigger question is whether consumers are spending more than they meant to, and if money they had planned to put elsewhere is now going toward paying back those purchases. To avoid a pile of unexpected bills, Hoyes said the key when shopping is to think ahead. 'There's nothing wrong with using a credit card or Buy Now, Pay Later or a car loan or a mortgage or anything like that. It's when you don't have a plan, when it becomes an impulse purchase when you're standing at the store, that's when you can get into a bit of trouble.' --- Ian Bickis, The Canadian Press This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 3, 2025.
CTV News
25 minutes ago
- CTV News
Quebec restaurants will soon be allowed to charge $10 no-show fee
As of July 17, Quebec restaurants will be able to charge a maximum penalty of $10 per person for no-show reservations. Justice Minister Simon Jolin-Barrette and Economy Minister Christopher Skeete made the announcement in a news release on Thursday morning. Quebec had announced in March that it wanted to address the issue of customers who do not show up after reserving a table at a restaurant. Restaurateurs will be able to charge the new fee under certain conditions. The establishment must inform the customer that a fee may apply if they do not show up, the reservation must be for at least two people, and the restaurateur must contact the customer within six to 48 hours before the reservation time to confirm it. The customer must also be able to cancel their reservation easily and at any time. The fee applies if no member of the group shows up at the scheduled reservation time, and no fee can be charged to the customer if they cancel the reservation at least three hours before the agreed-upon time. 'The phenomenon of no-shows has increased significantly in recent years, and some restaurant owners were charging customers who did not show up. It had become essential to establish clear guidelines to prevent customers from being charged unreasonable fees. This new framework is an opportunity to remind people that if you are unable to honour your reservation, the least you can do is cancel it,' Jolin-Barrette said. According to the Quebec Restauration Association, the phenomenon of ghost reservations results in average financial losses of $49,000 per establishment each year. This report by The Canadian Press was first published in French July 3, 2025.
