Spending review latest: Fears ‘staggering' cuts may be required by Rachel Reeves
The chancellor is set to unveil plans for all department funding until the next election in 2029 during her review on Wednesday.
Experts have warned the chancellor will have to make £5 billion worth of cuts to ensure the spending plans are fulfilled - with areas such as housing, policing and border control expected to be affected.
The analysis, carried out by researchers at the House of Commons library commissioned by the Lib Dems, found that unprotected departments — which excludes NHS England, the core schools budget and defence — could see the real-terms cuts by 2028/29.
The Lib Dems said the scale of the expected cuts was 'staggering'. Spokesperson Daisy Cooper said: 'After years of shameful Conservative neglect, it is household budgets and people relying on these services for vital support who are bearing the brunt.
'From social care to neighborhood policing, this Labour government is at risk of failing to deliver the change that people were promised.'
'We are really going to suffer': Residents' dismay over nuclear plant investment
Residents, campaigners and organisations have expressed outrage after the Government allocated more than £14 billion towards building a nuclear plant on the Suffolk coast.
The plant is expected to provide 10,000 jobs but residents and campaign groups say it will damage wildlife and impact the community.
Jenny Kirtley, a resident from nearby Sibton who chairs the campaign group Together Against Sizewell C, arranged a demonstration against the development at the site last Saturday, which was attended by around 300 people.
'I have lived in this area on and off most of my life and have never seen anything like it,' she said.
'The devastation going on in this area is unbelievable.
'Net zero is supposed to happen by 2030 – there is no way this is going to be completed by then.
'Leiston has a population of fewer than 6,000: where are all these people going to stay?
'Rent is going sky-high at the moment – it's absolutely ridiculous.
'We are really going to suffer.'
Athena Stavrou10 June 2025 15:00
Fears 'staggering' cuts may be required by Rachel Reeves
Concerns have been raised that Rachel Reeves may have to make 'staggering' cuts as a result of her spending review plans.
Experts have warned the chancellor will have to make £5 billion worth of cuts to ensure the spending plans are fulfilled - with areas such as housing, policing and border control expected to be affected.
The analysis, carried out by researchers at the House of Commons library commissioned by the Lib Dems, found that unprotected departments — which excludes NHS England, the core schools budget and defence — could see the real-terms cuts by 2028/29.
The Lib Dems said the scale of the expected cuts was 'staggering'.
Spokesperson Daisy Cooper said: 'After years of shameful Conservative neglect, it is household budgets and people relying on these services for vital support who are bearing the brunt.
'From social care to neighborhood policing, this Labour government is at risk of failing to deliver the change that people were promised.'
Athena Stavrou10 June 2025 14:51
What is the spending review?
The chancellor will unveil the results of her line by line spending review, setting out the budgets of government departments until the end of the decade on Wednesday.
Rachel Reeves' spending review has taken place in two parts, with phase one set out in her October Budget - which included £40 billion of tax hikes and set out departmental spending until 2026.
The second phase has seen departments ordered to set out how adopting technologies such as AI and reforming public services can free up government cash and support the delivery of Labour's missions.
Wednesday's review will set out day-to-day departmental spending for the next three years and investment spending for the next four.
Reeves has ruled out borrowing for day-to-day spending and has insisted she will not raise taxes again, prompting questions about how the policies will be funded and whether cuts will be made.
Athena Stavrou10 June 2025 14:38
Pictured: Starmer talks to college students in Ipswich
Athena Stavrou10 June 2025 14:23
Watch: Sizewell C nuclear plant to be built with £14.2bn government funding
Nuclear plans labelled 'downgrade' by Conservatives
The Conservatives have branded the Government's nuclear development plans as a 'downgrade' on the previous government's commitments.
Speaking from the frontbench, Conservative MP Nick Timothy (West Suffolk) said: 'This statement is a downgrade on what the last government put in motion. Today, the Energy Secretary has announced only one small modular reactor (SMR). There is no clear target to increase nuclear power generation, and no news on Wylfa.
'The nuclear industry is expecting news of a third gigawatt-scale reactor. The last government purchased the land and committed to build but on this today, the Energy Secretary said nothing.
'So can he commit to the planning inherited for a third gigawatt-scale plant at Wylfa? And will he recommit to the Conservative policy of 24 gigawatts of nuclear power by 2050?'
Energy Secretary Ed Miliband replied: 'I do sort of slightly scratch my head, because he sort of says it's a downgrade, I mean, we've announced the largest nuclear building programme in 50 years.'
Athena Stavrou10 June 2025 13:41
Exclusive: Rachel Reeves forced 'to make £5bn cuts' to balance books after spending review
Rachel Reeves will need to wield the axe and make nearly £5bn worth of cuts to balance the books in the wake of Labour's spending review, new analysis has revealed.
The chancellor will on Wednesday announce funding for all departments until the next election in 2029 after a bitter cabinet civil war over what is being dubbed 'austerity 2.0'.
But experts have warned Labour will have to make billions of pounds of cuts to ensure Reeves can fulfil her spending plans — with areas such as housing, policing and border control expected to be in the line of fire.
Rachel Reeves 'needs to make £5bn cuts' to balance books after spending review
Exclusive: The chancellor is set to unveil her spending review on Wednesday but researchers warn she will need to make £5bn of cuts by 2028/29 — even before finding the cash to restore winter fuel payments to pensioners
Athena Stavrou10 June 2025 13:24
When is the spending review?
Rachel Reeves will this week make one of her biggest statements to MPs since Labour's general election victory.
The chancellor will unveil the results of her line by line spending review, setting out the budgets of government departments until the end of the decade.
The spending review will take place after Prime Minister's Questions, so at around 12.30pm, on Wednesday, 11 June.
Athena Stavrou10 June 2025 13:08
People will be more safe, not less, after spending review, PM insists
The Independent's political correspondent Millie Cooke reports:
People will be 'more safe' not less after the spending review, the prime minister has insisted, promising there is money going into policing and security.
His comments came ahead of Wednesday's review of government departments, amid growing speculation that there could be cuts to police force numbers and a squeezed Home Office budget.
Asked whether people will be less safe after the spending review, Sir Keir told GB News: 'They will be more safe. There's money going into policing, into security, and that is really important, particularly coming from my background.
'I was chief prosecutor for five years, prosecuting cases across England and Wales. So this is a core belief.
'Those extra police officers will be neighbourhood police officers, and I think that will give people the reassurance in their communities that they are safe'.
Athena Stavrou10 June 2025 13:04
Comment: Could 'going nuclear' finally end Ed Miliband's career?
Not far from me, in the lovely Leicestershire village of Nevil Holt, for some reason a replica of the notorious 'Ed Stone' has been erected in a churchyard. It's all part of the small but growing Nevil Holt art and literature festival, and I imagine it's to remind passersby of the ephemeral nature of so much of politics – if not life.
The energy secretary is one of politics' great survivors – but his plan to build a £14bn power station on the Suffolk coast could leave a toxic legacy, says Sean O'Grady:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
3 minutes ago
- The Independent
Protests outside hotel caused by fake rumours online
Notifications can be managed in browser preferences. Archie Mitchell, Nicole Wootton-Cane & David Maddox Wednesday 23 July 2025 22:46 BST Flares thrown during protest outside Essex Hotel Protesters gathered at an empty hotel in London's financial district following false online rumours that it was being used to house migrants from the Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex. The Home Office confirmed the Britannia Hotel in Canary Wharf is earmarked for migrants at £81 per night, but clarified that asylum seekers are not being moved from the Bell Hotel, which has been the scene of violent protests. Far-right activist Tommy Robinson and Reform MP Lee Anderson were among those who spread misinformation, with Mr Anderson attending the protest and warning of an 'influx of illegal migrants'. Violent disorder at the Bell Hotel in Epping led to 10 arrests, injuries to a police officer, and attacks on security guards, sparked by an asylum seeker being charged with sexual assault. Charities criticised politicians for spreading misinformation and stoking division, while Angela Rayner warned of potential summer riots, a view criticised by Michael Gove. In full
The Independent
3 minutes ago
- The Independent
Starmer set to unleash billions of investment into UK as he signs India trade deal
Sir Keir Starmer is set to sign one of his landmark trade deal with India prime minister Narendra Modi which has already unleashed billions of investment in the UK. The signing of the trade deal with India after years of negotiation marks a triumph for Sir Keir who has also achieved a Brexit reset agreement with the EU and a deal with Donald Trump to tackle the US president's new tariffs. It comes as the India prime minister visits the UK on a trip aimed to build relations between the two countries. According to the government, the deal which was agreed in May, has already resulted in £6 billion in investment for the British economy. The prime minister and his Indian counterpart also agreed ahead of their meeting on Thursday to ramp up joint efforts to tackle illegal migration and organised crime. The UK-India trade deal is understood to be the largest of its kind for its economic impact on Britain. It will see tariffs on an array of British goods reduced from an average of 15 per cent to 3 per cent, with the aim of boosting the £11 billion of imports into the south Asian nation which is one of the fastest growing economies in the world. Whisky tariffs will be slashed in half, according to the government, and will fall further over successive years, while other industries including soft drinks, cars and cosmetics are also expected to see cheaper duties. Before his meeting with Mr Modi to confirm the deal, Sir Keir said: "Our landmark trade deal with India is a major win for Britain. It will create thousands of British jobs across the UK, unlock new opportunities for businesses and drive growth in every corner of the country, delivering on our Plan for Change. "We're putting more money in the pockets of hardworking Brits and helping families with the cost of living, and we're determined to go further and faster to grow the economy and raise living standards across the UK." The deal is expected to result in 2,200 jobs across the country and £6 billion investment by British and Indian businesses. Meanwhile, 26 British companies have secured new business in India. Airbus & Rolls-Royce will soon begin delivering Airbus aircraft – with over half powered by Rolls-Royce engines – to major Indian airlines as part of around £5 billion worth of contracts recently agreed. These orders will help sustain hundreds of jobs across their respective sites in Filton, Broughton and Derby. A total of 18 firms have confirmed new investment including Zerowatt Energy, AI powered energy intelligence platform is setting up its Global HQ in Leicester. The firm will invest £10m and create 50 new jobs across Leicester, Manchester, Edinburgh and London over the next three years. Among the other businesses to benefit are Carbon Clean, a UK-based leader in carbon capture, with projected UK export contributions of £83 million over the next five years, has invested £7.6 million in a Global Innovation Centre in Mumbai. The deal will unlock 250 jobs across London, Glasgow and Huddersfield as well as 100 jobs in Mumbai. AI and data services company, DCube AI, is investing £5 million in the UK, unlocking 50 jobs across Manchester and London in the next three years to strength its technology offering to UK customers. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said the investment will "reach all regions and nations of the UK so working people in every community can feel the benefits". He added: "The almost £6 billion in new investment and export wins announced today will deliver thousands of jobs and shows the strength of our partnership with India as we ensure the UK is the best place in the world to invest and do business." The UK and India are also bolstering co-operation on tackling corruption, fraud, organised crime and illegal migration, by sharing criminal records and other intelligence. The deal has not given the UK as much access as it would have liked to India's financial and legal services industries. The agreement promises some benefits for the UK's financial services, with Chancellor Rachel Reeves understood to have pushed on behalf of the sector in discussions with her Indian counterpart. But more wide-ranging access was not agreed, and talks continue on a bilateral investment treaty aimed at protecting British investments in India and vice versa. The two nations also continue to discuss UK plans for a tax on high-carbon industries, which India believes could hit its imports unfairly. Negotiations on the deal began when Boris Johnson was prime minister in 2022, and were concluded in May this year. Labour sought to portray closing the deal, as well as trade agreements with the US and the EU, as evidence of the Government's pragmatism and global outlook. But shadow business secretary Andrew Griffith said it had only been made possible "because of Brexit delivered by the Conservatives". He added: "Any trade deal that can successfully cut regulation which stops Britain's makers from creating new jobs and wealth will be a step in the right direction. "But the irony should not be lost on anyone that any gains from this trade deal will be blown out of the water by (Deputy Prime Minister) Angela Rayner's union charter, stifling business with red tape, the jobs tax and, come autumn, Rachel Reeves' inevitable tax hikes that will punish Britain's makers just to reward those who do not contribute." Elsewhere, Sir Keir is facing calls to raise the case of Jagtar Singh Johal, a British citizen who has been detained in India since 2017, when the Prime Minister meets Mr Modi. The Scottish Sikh is accused of being a member of the Khalistan Liberation Force, which is banned as a terror group in India. His family say he is being arbitrarily detained, with his brother Gurpreet Singh Johal insisting the matter should be "high on the agenda when the prime ministers meet"
The Guardian
4 minutes ago
- The Guardian
‘People said it would never be done': UK and India trade agreement defies expectations
Keir Starmer and Narendra Modi will sign their £4.8bn trade deal on Thursday morning, concluding three and a half years of negotiations and opening up trade between the UK and India for cars, whisky, clothing and food products. For the UK, the agreement promises a much-needed economic boost and serves as proof that the country can be nimble on the international stage after Brexit. For India, it acts a signal to governments and international investors that its £3tn economy is opening up after decades of protectionism. India's average tariff rate is 13%, compared with the UK's 1.5%. Labour ministers clinched the deal within 10 months of entering government, defying expectations – above all their own – about how quickly it could be done. The negotiations were led by Jonathan Reynolds, the trade secretary, and his Indian counterpart, Piyush Goyal. Half a dozen UK officials and aides said the rapport between the pair and a focus on building trust and good relationships were critical to getting it over the line. That sometimes happened in creative ways. After Goyal told them he was a huge fan of Yes Minister, British negotiators brought him a handwritten note from Jonathan Lynn, one of the show's co-creators. 'Negotiating with India is not the same as negotiating, say, with Australia, or the USA, or Canada. It's a relationship-based system, very much about who gets on with who and ensuring that you don't insult anyone in any way,' said one senior UK official who has been closely involved in talks. 'People want to get to know you, they want to look you in the eye and be convinced that you are someone they can do business with,' another senior UK official said. 'And to some extent, the last year has been a bit of the two governments looking each other in the eye.' This meant a key task for British diplomats in India – including the high commissioner, Lindy Cameron, and the trade commissioner, Harjinder Kang – was to provide UK ministers and officials with something akin to relationship advice on dealing with their Indian counterparts. There were moments of comedy. At one point after a difficult set of negotiations, UK and Indian officials let off steam by doing yoga in the corridor outside the room. On another occasion, the British negotiators led by Kate Thornley were at the airport in Delhi about to fly home when they received a call from the Indian side saying they were prepared to make key concessions on food and drink. A negotiator who had not yet gone through airport security turned on his heels to rush back to the negotiation room. 'You have moments where it's almost collapsing, and you have moments where you think you've got it over the line,' the first senior official said. 'Until there's ink on a piece of paper, it's fluid.' Political signalling was crucial. Reynolds first met Goyal when Labour was in opposition, while he and David Lammy were visiting Delhi in February 2024. India and the UK were due to hold elections that year, with Modi widely expected to win a third term and Labour on course to end 14 years of Tory government. The trip was a particularly sensitive one for Labour, which was working to mend relations with India after a nadir in 2019 when Jeremy Corbyn was perceived to have sided with Pakistan over Kashmir. Lammy and Reynolds were having dinner with Indian investors and had not expected to meet Goyal, who like other ministers was occupied with the budget debate in parliament. But during dinner they got a message from Goyal inviting them to his home nearby for a nightcap. Over 11pm chai and kheer, Reynolds and Lammy made it clear that they would support the Conservative government if it finalised a trade deal with India – and would pick up the negotiations after the election if it didn't. A few months later, during the thick of the UK election campaign, Lammy addressed the India Global Forum and said a trade deal with the country was 'a floor, not a ceiling, of our ambitions'. He travelled to Delhi in late July, having promised Modi's government that he would visit in his first month as foreign secretary. 'There was an element of, these guys actually mean what they say,' a senior UK official recalled. 'In their manifesto, there's only one country that gets a mention – that's India. All these positive signals were received.' In November, Starmer and Modi met on the margins of the G20 summit in Brazil and reiterated their ambition for a deal. But, in the months that followed, there was a lull in negotiations which created some frustration on the Indian side, fuelling suspicions that it was not as much a priority for Labour as it had been for the Tories. In truth, Reynolds's team considered a trade deal with India to be a medium-term goal, one that was unlikely to materialise until later in the parliament. And instead of getting back around the negotiating table straight away, ministers spent several months combing through what had been already agreed under the Conservatives. 'We were going through it and bringing ministers of all departments up to speed,' said a senior UK official. In February, a year after first meeting Goyal, Reynolds travelled to Delhi to formally restart negotiations. Progress in those talks significantly exceeded officials' expectations – and crucially the two sides agreed not to reopen the aspects of the deal negotiated under the Tories. 'Things started to fall into place at such a pace,' a government source recalled. A few weeks later Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, who has also been closely involved in the talks, hosted the Indian finance minister, Nirmala Sitharaman, in 11 Downing Street. Significant headway in the negotiations had been made under Rishi Sunak, whose chief economic adviser, Douglas McNeill, would travel to India every other month for talks. Before the Indian and UK elections stopped things in their tracks, Conservative officials had hoped a deal could be struck by the autumn of 2024. The Tories were hamstrung by two obstacles which disappeared when Labour came into power. The first was Sunak's political weakness and sense he was on borrowed time. The second and most significant was Tory angst that the deal would trigger an influx of Indian migration. Suella Braverman, as the home secretary, nearly blew up the talks over the issue in 2022. Kemi Badenoch claimed this year that as Sunak's trade secretary, she stopped a deal with India because of immigration concerns – a claim which some of her former cabinet colleagues have disputed. A Labour source said Goyal 'found her disingenuous in that she would always try to present Indian asks around visas as much more than they are'. The final deal does not change immigration policy beyond facilitating visa routes in certain sectors and allowing up to 1,800 extra visas for Indian chefs, musicians and yogis a year. The agreement was finalised on 2 May by Goyal, Reynolds and their teams of negotiators over ice-cream on a sunny walk in Hyde Park. They celebrated with coffee by the lido and took pictures together in the park cafe. Civil servants worked intensively that bank holiday weekend before Starmer and Modi spoke on Tuesday to confirm the deal was done. UK hopes have since faded, however, about the chances of agreeing a separate bilateral investment treaty with India, coveted by the UK because of the benefits for the City of London. While negotiations over a treaty continue, multiple ministers and officials privately told the Guardian that they are unlikely to yield anything unless there is significant movement on the Indian side. Nonetheless, officials are bullish about what has been achieved. 'People said it would never be done,' one said. 'People said this is a country that doesn't like to do deals, it's a very protectionist society. They're changing, they're growing, they're developing to become a much more modern economy. They need this is much as we do.'
