US to sell defensive weapons to Ukraine
That is quite a big change in Trump's position on Ukraine. Ever since he began his second term as president, his position has been quite ambivalent towards Ukraine. First came his clash with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the televised press conference in White House in February this year.
His primary aim when he took over as president was to end the Russia-Ukraine war, and he was pressuring Zelensky to talk with Russian President Vladimir Putin. When Zelensky was reluctant saying that one cannot trust Putin, Trump and Vice President J.D. Vance exploded. Zelensky did not step back and that was an irritant for Trump.
But nearly six months later, and with Russia having stepped up its military attacks on Ukraine, Trump seems to feel that he needs to support Ukraine militarily. He understands perhaps that if Ukraine were to lose the war, then he would have no role to play as mediator, and make his claim for the Nobel Peace Prize.
The emphasis on defensive arms for Ukraine is curious. It implies that Trump would not want a Russian defeat. For some strange reason, he has a sneaking sympathy for Russia and he naturally wants to support Putin who he treats as friend. While the other NATO members are firmly opposed to Russia and support Ukraine on ideological and strategic reasons, Trump thinks of European balance of power differently.
He does not believe in ideological divide. He has no concept of democracy and liberalism pitted against communism and totalitarian states. He has a unilateral view of the world, and that is the American view of the world. Trump's support for Ukraine also hinges on the mineral deal he has forced upon Ukraine. America needs rare earth elements in Ukraine for its AI and semi-conductor industry. He wants some kind of economic control over Ukraine.
He has shown irritation with his friend Putin for not agreeing to a peace deal with Ukraine. Putin wants the peace deal on Russia's own terms, something that Zelensky had made clear was not acceptable to Ukraine. So, peace talks are not happening between Russia and Ukraine. And there is no sign of peace though Ukraine is anxious for a deal of some sort. But Zelensky does not want a peace deal which is a capitulation of Ukraine.
Trump still advertises himself as a peacemaker. He has ordered the bombing of Iran's nuclear facilities because he said Israel did not have the capacity to destroy Iran's nuclear programme. It is of course not clear how much of Iran's ability to enrich Ukraine has been damaged. Experts suggest that Iran's nuclear programme might have been pushed back by around two years, and that Iran can rebuild its nuclear capacity.
Now Trump says that Iran is willing to talk to America because of the 'bad drubbing' they have got. These are unilateral statements on the part of Trump. Iran has been resolute that it would not talk to America under threats and under pressure. That leaves a huge gap between what Trump says and the situation on the ground.
Similarly, Trump had been claiming that he had mediated peace between India and Pakistan and ended the four-day clash between the two nuclear-weapon states, but India has consistently rejected Trump's claims as a mediator. He is not deterred by India's denial of his role in the ceasefire.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ARN News Center
an hour ago
- ARN News Center
Trump visits Texas flood zone, defends government's disaster response
US President Donald Trump defended the state and federal response to deadly flash flooding in Texas on Friday as he visited the stricken Hill Country region, where at least 120 people, including dozens of children, perished a week ago. During a roundtable discussion after touring Kerr County, the epicentre of the disaster, Trump praised both Texas Governor Greg Abbott and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem for their response, saying they both did an "incredible job." The Trump administration, as well as local and state officials, has faced mounting questions over whether more could have been done to protect and warn residents ahead of the flooding, which struck with astonishing speed in the pre-dawn hours on July 4, the US Independence Day holiday. Trump reacted with anger when a reporter said some families affected by the floods had expressed frustration that warnings did not go out sooner. "I think everyone did an incredible job under the circumstances," he said. "I don't know who you are, but only a very evil person would ask a question like that." Some critics have questioned whether the administration's spending cuts at the National Weather Service and the Federal Emergency Management Agency, which coordinates the US government's disaster response efforts, might have exacerbated the calamity. Trump officials have said that cuts had no impact on the NWS's ability to forecast the storms, despite some vacancies in local offices. But the president has largely sidestepped questions about his plans to shrink or abolish FEMA and reassign many of its key functions to state and local governments. "I'll tell you some other time," Trump said on Tuesday, when asked by a reporter about FEMA. Before the most recent flooding, Kerr County declined to install an early-warning system after failing to secure state money to cover the cost. Lawrence Walker, 67, and a nearly three-decade veteran resident of Kerrville, said the county and state had not spent enough on disaster prevention, including an early-warning system. Asked about the quality of the government response, he said, "It's been fine since the water was at 8 feet." The Texas state legislature will convene in a special session later this month to investigate the flooding and provide disaster relief funding. Abbott has dismissed questions about whether anyone was to blame, calling that the "word choice of losers." DOZENS STILL UNACCOUNTED FOR Search teams on Friday were still combing through muddy debris littering parts of the Hill Country in central Texas, looking for the dozens still listed as missing, but no survivors have been found since the day of the floods. Heavy rains sent a wall of water raging down the Guadalupe River early on July 4, causing the deadliest disaster of the Republican president's nearly six-month term in office. As sun poked through dark clouds on Friday morning, search crews in hard hats painstakingly walked inch-by-inch along the ruined banks of the river, marking damage and looking through wreckage. After the president arrived in Kerr County in the early afternoon, Trump, first lady Melania Trump and Texas Governor Greg Abbott drove to an area near the river, where Trump received a briefing from first responders amid debris left in the wake of the flood. The county is located in what is known as "flash flood alley," a region that has seen some of the country's deadliest floods. More than a foot of rain fell in less than an hour on July 4. Flood gauges showed the river's height rose from about a foot to 34 feet (10.4 metres) in a matter of hours, cascading over its banks and sweeping away trees and structures in its path. Kerr County officials say more than 160 people remain unaccounted for, although experts say that the number of people reported missing in the wake of disasters is often inflated. The dead in the county include 67 adults and at least 36 children, many of whom were campers at the nearly century-old Camp Mystic, an all-girls Christian summer retreat on the banks of the river. Jon Moreno, 71, a longtime Kerrville resident whose property on high ground was spared, praised the government response - local and federal. He has heard the debate about what more could have been done - including sirens - but said he did not think it would have made much difference, given people's desire to build along the flood-prone riverbanks. "It's unavoidable," he said. "All those people along the river - I wouldn't want to live there ... It's too dangerous." At Stripes, a gas station in Kerrville, the building was tagged in large white letters, accusing "Trump's Big Beautiful Bill" of cutting "our emergency funding." The president's massive legislative package, which cut taxes and spending, won approval from the Republican-controlled Congress last week and was signed into law by Trump on the same day that the flooding hit Texas.
Al Etihad
3 hours ago
- Al Etihad
Trump thanks first responders during visit to Texas flood zone
12 July 2025 09:22 WASHINGTON (AGENCIES)US President Donald Trump on Friday thanked emergency responders and volunteers during a visit to the Texas flood zone, one week after the onset of flash floods killed 120 people, including 36 in Kerr County, one of the hardest-hit areas, Trump expressed his condolences to those affected: "The first lady and I are here in Texas to express the love and support and the anguish of our entire nation in the aftermath of this really horriffic and deadly flood."Trump added that the search for missing people continued, saying "the people that are doing it are unbelievable people.""I want to thank all of these great first responders who raced into very grave danger," he media have reported, citing local officials, that at least 120 people have died in the flash flood disaster in central Texas, which started early on July 4, the US Independence Day holiday. In Kerr County alone, sheriff Larry Leitha on Thursday confirmed at least 95 deaths, including 36 children. More than 160 people are still missing in the region.
Arabian Post
4 hours ago
- Arabian Post
U.S. Tariffs Surge Above 20% as Trump Tests Market Limits
U. S. consumers now contend with an effective tariff rate exceeding 20%, marking the steepest level observed since the early 1900s, according to estimates by the International Chamber of Commerce following the latest round of import levies introduced under President Trump's administration. This escalation stems from a newly implemented baseline tariff of 10%, supplemented by selective duties—up to 50% on copper and 200% on pharmaceuticals—pushing the overall rate to unprecedented heights. Andrew Wilson, deputy secretary-general of the ICC, explained that the administration appears to be calibrating tariff levels to maximise revenue without triggering a full-scale market meltdown. Despite wide-ranging rates, Wall Street has shown remarkable composure, a stark contrast to the sharp sell-off experienced in April when the initial import duties were announced. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent confirmed that customs collections have reached approximately $100 billion so far, with projections forecasting up to $300 billion by year-end. Legal and legislative challenges are emerging in response. A federal appeals court struck down the 'Liberation Day' tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, declaring the move exceeded executive authority, though the ruling is presently stayed pending appeal. Meanwhile, Congress is contemplating legislation aimed at curbing unilateral tariff powers, and trade negotiations with major trading partners—namely Japan, the EU, the U. K. and Canada—could moderate or delay certain duties. ADVERTISEMENT Since April, the U. S. has extended tariffs to a broad array of countries. Canada faces a general increase from 25% to 35% on non‑USMCA imports beginning 1 August, with additional duties on steel and aluminium already in place. Meanwhile, Brazil has been targeted with a 50% tariff, linked in part to political tensions, and levels between 25% and 40% are set for nations including Japan, South Korea, Thailand, Malaysia, the Philippines, Sri Lanka, South Africa and others. A hold‑and‑test strategy allows a window until August 1 for targeted trade deals. Market participants have noted this restrained approach: a 10% baseline is broadly absorbed, but steeper duties serve as leverage. The administration appears comfortable testing thresholds before escalating further. Economists caution that importers and consumers will bear the brunt of these changes. A Yale Budget Lab analysis determined that U. S. tariffs to date equate to a 24.6 percentage‑point rise in the average effective rate—potentially reaching 27% absent substitution effects. These duties could elevate consumer prices by roughly 2.9%, reducing household purchasing power by about $4,700 annually. Substitution toward non‑Chinese suppliers later moderates the rate to approximately 18.5%, the highest since 1933. A Harvard Business School study corroborates these dynamics: between March and June, import prices rose ~3%, and domestically produced goods competing with imports increased by ~2% due to elevated component costs and altered supply chains. Similarly, U. S. apparel imports from China fell to the lowest in 22 years in May, as buyers shifted to suppliers in Southeast Asia and Latin America. While equities appear resilient—with the S&P 500 near record highs—analysts warn that bond and currency markets may signal latent stress. UBS expects household and business inventories to help absorb short‑term shocks, but flags a possible 0.7 percentage‑point drag on GDP growth in 2025 if tensions persist. Businesses represented by the ICC, covering some 45 million firms, have voiced concern: 60% of respondents to an ICC pulse survey consider the tariffs negatively, citing cost inflation, supply chain uncertainty and the risk of retaliation as principal worries. Despite this, the ICC insists negotiators must prioritise de‑escalation and multilateral engagement. Secretary‑General John Denton called the policy shift 'a watershed moment in American trade policy' that could inflict systemic harm on the global economy, noting the effective U. S. tariff rate now eclipses levels last seen during the Smoot–Hawley era of the 1930s.
