logo
8,000-pound sloths once roamed North America. Where'd they go?

8,000-pound sloths once roamed North America. Where'd they go?

Yahoo23-05-2025
Giant sloths used to roam all over North America. Over 10 times bigger than today's sloths, many lived on the ground instead of in the trees and their closest living relatives are actually armadillos and anteaters. The largest of these ancient animals were those in the genus Megatherium–roughly the size of a modern Asian bull elephant and weighed about 8,000 pounds.
But how did they grow so large–and why did they shrink down? A new analysis of over 400 fossils found that these sloths evolved three times and that climate changes and increased pressure by early humans wiped out the enormous mammals. The findings are detailed in a study published May 22 in the journal Science.
In the new study, the team analyzed ancient DNA samples and compared more than 400 fossils from 17 natural history museums to try and figure out how they grew so large.
'They looked like grizzly bears, but five times larger,' said Rachel Narducci, a study co-author and the collection manager of vertebrate paleontology at the Florida Museum of Natural History.
Ground sloths greatly varied in size. The fairly squat and chunky Shasta fed on cacti in the deserts of North America, while the mighty Megatherium could use a long tongue like a giraffe's to rip leaves off of tree tops. Those that developed an affinity for tree climbing much like today's bear-faced slowpokes lived entirely in the tree canopy. Tree-dwelling sloths weighed in at about 14 pounds, compared to 174 pounds for the ground sloths.
It's obvious that life in trees requires a weight limit. Branches break when there is too much weight on them and tree sloths have reportedly survived 100 foot falls. Since even a moderate drop can cause severe damage, it makes evolutionary sense for a body to be as small as possible.
What is less obvious to paleontologists is why ground sloths grew to such enormous sizes in the first place. The size may have been helpful for finding food or avoiding predators. Ground sloths appear to have had an affinity for cave dwelling and their size likely played a role in finding and making shelter. The more moderately sized Shasta ground sloth favored the smaller natural caves embedded into the cliffsides of the Grand Canyon. These little caves were also convenient places to poop. In 1936, paleontologists found a mound of fossilized sloth poop, bat guano, and packrat middens over 20 feet thick in a cave near Lake Mead.
The larger sloths were not just restricted to lives in pre-existing caves. Their claws were among the largest of any known mammal, and they could use them to carve their own caves from rock and earth. Several of the caves that they left behind are still adorned with claw marks along the interior walls.
The scientists combined the data on the shape of fossils with DNA from both living and extinct species to build out a sloth tree of life. It traced sloth lineage all the way back to their origin over 35 million years ago. They then added what decades of research has found about where sloths lived, their diets, and whether they were climbers or walkers.
Since sloth size was a major question, they measured museum fossils to estimate the sloth weight.
'We [the Florida Museum] have the largest collection of North American and Caribbean-island sloths in the world,' said Narducci, who took several measurements of 117 limb bones.
With all of this data in tow, the team imported it into an analysis software and got their answer. Habitat type has primarily influenced size differences among sloths–and climate change by extension.
'Including all of these factors and running them through evolutionary models with multiple different scenarios was a major undertaking that had not been done before,' Narducci said.
[ Related: Our bravest ancestors may have hunted giant sloths. ]
The sloth dynasty coincided with some life-altering changes in Earth's climate. About 20 million years ago, a large rift opened up between present day Washington state and Idaho, south through parts of Oregon and Nevada. Magma boiled out of this hole, leaving a nearly 600,000 cubic mile scab that is still visible in some places along the Columbia River. These rock pillars have a distinct hexagonal shape, which was caused by the way in which the magma hardened and cracked as it cooled.
This volcanic event lasted roughly 750,000 years and aligned with the Mid-Miocene Climatic Optimum–a period of global warming. The warming was likely caused by all of the greenhouse gasses emitted by the volcanic eruption.
Sloths responded to this slow-burn chaos by getting smaller. This might be because the warmer temperatures brought increased precipitation, which allowed forests to expand–creating more habitat for the smaller sloths. Additionally, size reduction is a common way for animals to deal with heat stress and has been seen in the fossil record on several different occasions.
For about one million years after the volcanic activity calmed down, the world remained warm. Then, a longstanding pattern of cooling that continued in fits and starts up to the present. The sloths also changed with the temperatures.
The more temperatures dropped, the bigger they grew. They eventually branched out into the Andes mountains, open savannas, deserts, and the forests of North America. One called Thalassocnus lived in the arid strip of land between the Andes and the Pacific and it foraged for food in the ocean.
'They developed adaptations similar to those of manatees,' Narducci said. 'They had dense ribs to help with buoyancy and longer snouts for eating seagrass.'
Ground sloths met the challenges of these diverse environments by bulking up.
'This would've allowed them to conserve energy and water and travel more efficiently across habitats with limited resources,' Narducci said. 'And if you're in an open grassland, you need protection, and being bigger provides some of that. Some ground sloths also had little pebble-like osteoderms embedded in their skin,' Narducci said, in reference to the bony plating that sloths had in common with their armadillo relatives.
The larger bodies helped sloths contend with cooling climates. They reached their greatest stature during the Pleistocene ice ages, shortly before they largely disappeared about 15,000 years ago.
What really led to the giant sloths' demise is still debated, but hunting and pressure by early humans cannot be ruled out. The sloths were not fast or well-defended 15,000 years ago, and would have likely been an easy target for early humans. After all of the ground-dwelling relatives had gone extinct everywhere else, two species of tree sloth in the Caribbean held on until 4,500 years ago.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Here's what shark experts do to stay safe in the ocean
Here's what shark experts do to stay safe in the ocean

Boston Globe

time4 hours ago

  • Boston Globe

Here's what shark experts do to stay safe in the ocean

You're more likely to die falling into a hole at the beach, in a riptide or in an alligator attack than from a shark bite, according to data from the Florida Museum of Natural History's International Shark Attack File. Last year, the museum recorded 47 unprovoked bites worldwide. 'They're not these monster killers that just come flying in whenever there's bait,' said Neil Hammerschlag, a shark researcher based in Nova Scotia, Canada, who charters cage-diving expeditions to bring tourists up close to blue, mako and great white sharks. 'They're very cautious.' Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Hammerschlag, who's been studying sharks for 24 years, said some are more curious about the color of the boat or the sound of the engine than the 20 pounds of sushi-grade tuna he brings on each trip as bait. Advertisement Chris Lowe, the director of the Shark Lab at California State University in Long Beach, said he has 'hundreds, if not thousands of hours footage' of sharks near the shore in California. And, most of the time, they're there to relax, he said. For three years, researchers in Lowe's lab surveyed 26 beaches from Santa Barbara to San Diego with drones and saw sharks swim right under surfers without changing course. 'It's like they are ignoring us,' he said. 'We're just flotsam, not food or foe.' Advertisement The Washington Post asked Hammerschlag and Lowe what they do and the advice they give beachgoers who want to avoid a shark encounter. Be aware of your surroundings Lowe said when he's out in the water he spends some time looking behind himself and others, 'like checking my mirrors when I'm driving.' Sharks are stealthy and try to approach other animals from behind. Don't treat the ocean like Disneyland, Lowe said. You're in a wild place where you can't eliminate all risks. His advice: Be vigilant. It will reduce your likelihood of a shark swimming up too closely to investigate you. And, do your homework about the body of water you're swimming in. 'Who are you going to be sharing the ocean with? Is it sharks? Is it stingrays?' Lowe said. 'When we go in the ocean, we are entering someone else's home.' Avoid swimming at dawn, dusk and night Sharks may confuse a human foot for a fish, or a surfboard for a seal, when visibility is poor, such as in lowlight conditions. Sharks use their mouth and teeth to inspect what's in front of them like we use our hands, Hammerschlag said. 'Most shark bites of people are not predatory,' he said. 'When sharks have bitten people, it seems that they're investigatory or mistaken identity.' Don't wear reflective jewelry in the water The light glimmering off jewelry can look like a fish scale to a shark, Hammerschlag said. He adds reflective stickers to the cage he uses on diving expeditions to try to catch a shark's attention. Don't swim near someone who's fishing A fish caught on a line could get the attention of a shark. 'Those vibrations are like ringing the dinner bell for a shark,' Hammerschlag said. Advertisement However, it can help to swim near other people, Lowe said, since groups of people might be more intimidating than solo swimmers. Don't swim where there's an 'unusual amount of fish activity' If you see fish jumping out of water or birds diving for a meal, there could be a 'bait ball' of fish nearby, and that's a feeding opportunity for sharks, Hammerschlag said. There's a myth that a pod of dolphins can ward off sharks. But, he said, the opposite may be the case. 'If there's a big bait ball of fish that dolphins are feeding on, the sharks could be feeing on that, as well,' Hammerschlag said. Don't panic when you spot a shark If you see a shark in the water, don't panic and swim away, Hammerschlag said. If you do, the shark might see you as prey. And, 'you're not going to outswim a shark,' he said. Instead, orient your body so you're always facing the shark and maintain eye contact, Hammerschlag said. Sharks can't sneak up on you if there's no element of surprise. 'You're showing the shark that you see it, and you're responding to it,' he said. 'And that is not a situation that a hunting shark wants to be in.' If you're scuba diving, you can also sit on the ocean floor; sharks tend to approach potential prey from below, Hammerschlag said.

The hidden dangers of feeding wild animals
The hidden dangers of feeding wild animals

UPI

time7 hours ago

  • UPI

The hidden dangers of feeding wild animals

Researchers at the University of California San Diego say feeding wild elephants can lead to serious harm. File Photo by Bill Greenblatt/UPI | License Photo Feeding wild elephants might seem kind or exciting, but a new study warns it can lead to serious harm. Researchers at the University of California San Diego say that giving food to wild animals -- especially elephants -- can change their behavior in dangerous ways. "Many people, especially foreign tourists, think Asian elephants are tame and docile, like domestic pets," lead author Shermin de Silva, a conservation scientist and professor of biological sciences, said in a UCSD news release. "They don't realize these are formidable wild animals and try to get too close in order to take photographs or selfies, which can end badly for both parties," she added. The study, published in the journal Ecological Solutions and Evidence, looked at 18 years of data from elephant tourism areas in Sri Lanka and India. In Sri Lanka's Udawalawe National Park, researchers found that dozens of elephants had learned to "beg" for food near fences and tourist vehicles. One male elephant, nicknamed Rambo, became a local celebrity for this behavior. The impact? Tragic. Several people were killed or injured in elephant encounters, the news release said. At least three elephants were killed, and some animals ate plastic bags or other waste while trying to get food. In India's Sigur region, researchers tracked 11 male elephants who were fed by people. Four of animals later died, likely because of humans. "Food-conditioned animals can become dangerous, resulting in the injury and death of wildlife, people or both," the researchers wrote. "These negative impacts counteract potential benefits," they added. Feeding wild elephants may cause them to lose their natural foraging skills, especially if they start relying on sugary snacks or processed food, researchers said. It may also raise the risk of disease spreading between people and animals. While most tourists mean well, experts say the best thing to do is never feed wild animals, no matter how safe it seems. Feeding animals might feel like helping a friend, the researchers explained. "But this encourages wild animals to seek food from people, attracting them to areas that can put themselves or people at risk," de Silva said. "It can be a conduit for disease transfer between species," she said. "Such feeding can also cause animals to lose their ability to forage for themselves if the behavior becomes prevalent, especially with young animals." More information The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has more on the potential harm in feeding wildlife. Copyright © 2025 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

NSF Gives Georgia Tech $20 Million To Build AI-Focused Supercomputer
NSF Gives Georgia Tech $20 Million To Build AI-Focused Supercomputer

Forbes

time9 hours ago

  • Forbes

NSF Gives Georgia Tech $20 Million To Build AI-Focused Supercomputer

The Georgia Institute of Technology is building a new supercomputer that will advance the nation's ... More capacity to use artificial intelligence. The National Science Foundation has awarded the Georgia Institute of Technology $20 million to lead the construction of a new supercomputer — named Nexus — that will use artificial intelligence to advance scientific breakthroughs. According to the NSF announcement of the award, Nexus will provide 'a critical national resource to the science and engineering research community.' It will function 'both as a standalone platform and as a gateway to effectively utilizing other national resources, significantly accelerating AI-driven scientific discovery.' Nexus is expected to advance American leadership in artificial intelligence, growing the nation's capacity in 'diverse areas of science and engineering, enabling breakthrough discoveries, increasing economic competitiveness, and advancing human health.' 'Georgia Tech is proud to be one of the nation's leading sources of the AI talent and technologies that are powering a revolution in our economy,' said Georgia Tech President Ángel Cabrera, in the university's announcement. 'It's fitting we've been selected to host this new supercomputer, which will support a new wave of AI-centered innovation across the nation. We're grateful to the NSF, and we are excited to get to work.' Nexus will have enormous computing capacity. According to Georgia Tech, it will: 'The Nexus system's novel approach combining support for persistent scientific services with more traditional high-performance computing will enable new science and AI workflows that will accelerate the time to scientific discovery,' said Katie Antypas, NSF's director of the Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure. 'We look forward to adding Nexus to NSF's portfolio of advanced computing capabilities for the research community.' Georgia Tech will construct Nexus in partnership with the National Center for Supercomputing Applications at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, home to several of the country's top academic supercomputers. The two universities will establish a new high-speed network, creating a national research infrastructure available for use by U.S. researchers, who will be able to apply for NSF support to access the supercomputer. 'Nexus is more than a supercomputer — it's a symbol of what's possible when leading institutions work together to advance science,' said Charles Isbell, chancellor of the University of Illinois and former dean of Georgia Tech's College of Computing. 'I'm proud that my two academic homes have partnered on this project that will move science, and society, forward." Plans call for construction to begin this year, with completion expected by spring 2026. Georgia Tech will manage Nexus, provide support, and reserve up to 10% of its capacity for its own campus research. 'This is a big step for Georgia Tech and for the scientific community,' said Vivek Sarkar, the John P. Imlay Dean of Computing. 'Nexus will help researchers make faster progress on today's toughest problems — and open the door to discoveries we haven't even imagined yet.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store