Aussie travellers warned as Thailand announces changes to cannabis laws
Australians have been urged to be cautious in Thailand after its health minister signed an order banning the use of cannabis, except for medicinal purposes, three years after decriminalising the act.
Health Minister Somsak Thepsutin announced on Tuesday that Thailand would be tightening its restrictions on the sale of cannabis, now requiring users to obtain a prescription first.
Smartraveller has urged Australians to 'exercise a high degree of caution' when visiting Thailand, especially if using the substance.
'The use of cannabis is limited to medicinal purposes only,' the site read, adding it must be below 0.2 per cent in weight and users 'must have a prescription'.
The Thai government order did not specify when the new law would come into effect and is yet to disclose the punishment associated with violating the law.
The move comes three years after the Thailand government announced it would decriminalise the use and sale of cannabis, prompting an increase in tourism and a spate of cannabis-related shops.
Thailand was the first Asian country to decriminalise the use of cannabis however changed its tune after reports that addiction had increased.
'Cannabis will be classified as a narcotic in the future,' Mr Thepsutin said.
The Pheu Thai Party, which is in power in Thailand, announced it would scale back its decriminalised stance despite facing resistance from former coalition partner, the Bhumjaithai Party.
Last week, the Bhumjaithai Party cut ties with the Pheu Thai Party following a leaked phone call between Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra and former Cambodian leader Hun Sen.
Originally published as Aussie travellers warned as Thailand announces massive changes to its cannabis laws
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
11 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Australians ‘have had an absolute gutful' of Welcome to Country ceremonies, survey finds
Australians have tired of 'pointless' Welcome to Country ceremonies, new polling data has revealed, amid calls for a 'review' of their use at public events. A survey of 1005 Australians conducted by independent marketing research firm Dynata on behalf of the conservative Institute of Public Affairs last month found that more than half (56 per cent) of participants agreed the practice has 'become divisive'. Only 17 per cent disagreed with the statement, while 27 per cent said they were unsure. Surprisingly, 48 per cent of those aged 18 to 24 — a demographic often thought to be more progressive than generations past — did not believe the ritual to be a unifying one. Sentiment around the performance of Welcome to Country before major events like Anzac Day or sporting matches was more mixed — 46 per cent and 49 per cent respectively said they should no longer be performed before either event, versus 34 per cent and 30 per cent who said they should continue. IPA deputy executive director Daniel Wild said the survey results were proof 'Australians have had an absolute gutful' of the 'divisive and pointless' tradition. 'Even younger Australians, who the political class insist are left-wing and woke, by a two-to-one margin believe Welcome to Country performances are divisive,' Mr Wild said in a statement accompanying the findings. 'And they are evenly split on the performances at sporting events and Anzac Day ceremonies, further underscoring how divisive it is. 'Commonsense, working class, mainstream Australians understand something that the highly credentialed elites do not: Australians do not want to be divided by race, and we do not want or need to be welcomed to our own country.' He also took aim at Opposition Leader Sussan Ley, who opened her National Press Club address on Wednesday by acknowledging the traditional owners of the land and maintained that while it should not become a box-ticking exercise, there is 'a time and a place' for the declaration and Welcome to Country ceremonies. 'Look, I think Acknowledgement of Country have their place, but in significant moments like yesterday was one of those places,' Ms Ley told ABC Radio on Thursday, asked if her speech 'settled' the ongoing debate over their use. 'And as Environment Minister and Health Minister, I listened carefully and I participated in what I would describe as meaningful Welcome to Country ceremonies that involved the circumstances of Indigenous Australians with respect to our natural environment and their health that were relevant and important. 'I don't think it should be ticking a box on a Teams meeting. I don't think it should be at every work meeting, because I think that actually diminishes the value of what it is. 'So there is a time and a place, and it's about striking the right balance.' Her words were a marked departure from the stance of her predecessor Peter Dutton, who omitted Acknowledgement of Country statements at major events and speeches during his election campaign, said the practice was overdone and went as far as to say he didn't support Welcome to Country ceremonies on Anzac Day. Mr Wild argued Ms Ley's stance was also 'at odds with modern Australia', and accused her of '[failing] to state who the purported traditional owners of the National Press Club are'. A number of Indigenous community leaders and academics, speaking to The Daily Telegraph, also questioned the frequency with which Welcome to Country ceremonies were being performed, as well as the motives behind them. 'Welcome to Country is overused. It is meant to be a sacred ceremony between tribes, not to be commercialised like a money-making machine,' former South Australian AFL player Tyson Lindsay said. 'I talk to my elders about it and they say it is not acceptable, every time we hear it we cringe now … There are too many real issues facing Aboriginal people to be worrying about these empty symbolic gestures. 'I am looking for real change for the good of rather than symbolic tokenism.' Prominent Indigenous leader and businessman Warren Mundine said he was sick of the practice being hijacked for political purposes. 'A welcome is supposed to be, 'I'm glad you're here',' Mr Mundine explained. 'It's like welcoming someone into your house.' Speaking to earlier this year, Wiradjuri woman and University of Melbourne Associate Professor of Indigenous Education, Dr Jessa Rogers, said the misconception the tradition is 'about welcoming you to Australia' was 'completely ridiculous'. 'People think that a Welcome to Country is welcoming them to Australia, when in fact it is welcoming them to the specific Country of that local Aboriginal nation,' Dr Rogers said. Simply put, Dr Rogers explained, Welcome to Country is a formal welcome by the traditional owners and custodians of a particular place, to their country. 'Country is not the same as 'Australia',' she said. 'It is a spiritual concept as well as a physical one — it encompasses landmarks but also people, skies, waterways and beings. Country is what we belong to as Aboriginal people.'
West Australian
23 minutes ago
- West Australian
Australia defence budget increase: Military capability not just dollars, government says
Lifting the federal defence budget will be based on what Australia's military can achieve, rather an arbitrary dollar figure, a senior minister says. Pressure has mounted on the Albanese government to lift defence spending, after NATO allies agreed to boost theirs to five per cent of GDP. While Australia has pledged to increase its spend to 2.3 per cent by 2033/34, the US has called for a rise to 3.5 per cent. But Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said Australia was already lifting its spending on the military, which would also centre on the ability of the armed forces to protect the country. 'We start with the capability, we don't start with the dollars, and that's how we work with every financial decision that the government makes,' Mr Burke told Sky News on Sunday. 'With those capability decisions, we are already spending more than was spent before we came to office.' Despite the push from the US, Mr Burke said Australia's relationship with America was not at risk. 'The relationship with the United States is really important,' he said. 'We have mature, decent, respectful conversations with the United States, but as I say, the conversation doesn't start with the dollars at our end.' Opposition defence spokesman Angus Taylor said the instability seen around the world reinforced the need for countries like Australia to spend more on defence. 'We are seeing authoritarian regimes across the globe flexing their muscles, and open, democratic societies like ours need to stand up for what we believe in, and need to make sure we achieve peace through deterrence,' he told Sky News. 'There's a range of things that are very clear that we need to spend on ... and there's a whole series of areas which we're seeing are underfunded right now.' Before the federal election, the opposition had pledged to increase the defence budget to three per cent of GDP. However, there was uncertainty about where the extra money would come from. Mr Taylor said the budget for the military should be increased, regardless if there was pressure from the US. 'If a government is not in a position to keep its people safe, then it has failed as a government,' he said. 'This is a disaster for Australians and for Australia, we need to get serious about it, and I'm going to continue to hold the government to account on this, because this is a failure from our government.'
Perth Now
26 minutes ago
- Perth Now
Defence hike tied to military capability, not just cash
Lifting the federal defence budget will be based on what Australia's military can achieve, rather an arbitrary dollar figure, a senior minister says. Pressure has mounted on the Albanese government to lift defence spending, after NATO allies agreed to boost theirs to five per cent of GDP. While Australia has pledged to increase its spend to 2.3 per cent by 2033/34, the US has called for a rise to 3.5 per cent. But Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said Australia was already lifting its spending on the military, which would also centre on the ability of the armed forces to protect the country. 'We start with the capability, we don't start with the dollars, and that's how we work with every financial decision that the government makes,' Mr Burke told Sky News on Sunday. 'With those capability decisions, we are already spending more than was spent before we came to office.' Despite the push from the US, Mr Burke said Australia's relationship with America was not at risk. 'The relationship with the United States is really important,' he said. 'We have mature, decent, respectful conversations with the United States, but as I say, the conversation doesn't start with the dollars at our end.' Opposition defence spokesman Angus Taylor said the instability seen around the world reinforced the need for countries like Australia to spend more on defence. 'We are seeing authoritarian regimes across the globe flexing their muscles, and open, democratic societies like ours need to stand up for what we believe in, and need to make sure we achieve peace through deterrence,' he told Sky News. 'There's a range of things that are very clear that we need to spend on ... and there's a whole series of areas which we're seeing are underfunded right now.' Before the federal election, the opposition had pledged to increase the defence budget to three per cent of GDP. However, there was uncertainty about where the extra money would come from. Mr Taylor said the budget for the military should be increased, regardless if there was pressure from the US. 'If a government is not in a position to keep its people safe, then it has failed as a government,' he said. 'This is a disaster for Australians and for Australia, we need to get serious about it, and I'm going to continue to hold the government to account on this, because this is a failure from our government.'
