ThaiBev billionaire leaves his ownership of company to his five children
ThaiBev billionaire leaves his ownership of company to his five children
SINGAPORE - Thailand's richest man Charoen Sirivadhanabhakdi distributed stakes in holding firms which control about 66 per cent of Singapore-listed Thai Beverage to his five children, though stopped short of handing over full control of the drinks giant.
The scions of the octogenarian billionaire put into effect a shareholders' agreement which will confer on their father 'the authority to manage and make all decisions in respect of the business and assets' of the entity, according to filings to the Singapore exchange late on June 23.
That move means that a key question over who will ultimately take over Mr Charoen's sprawling business empire remains unanswered, as a succession plan gathers pace.
The tycoon is worth an estimated US$10.9 billion (S$14 billion), according to the the Bloomberg Billionaires Index. A cornerstone of that is ThaiBev, the maker of Chang beer, which also operates distilleries across Scotland.
The share transfer is part of a longer term shift in the holdings of the patriarch and his late wife Khunying Wanna Sirivadhanabhakdi as succession beckons. The company didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.
Thapana Sirivadhanabhakdi, his elder son, is ThaiBev's current chief executive officer. The restructuring means he will share the family's controlling stake in the firm with his brother, Panote Sirivadhanabhakdi, who's the CEO of Singapore-listed property developer Frasers Property, as well as three sisters – Atinant Bijananda, Wallapa Traisorat and Thapanee Techajareonvikul.
Ms Thapanee is the CEO of Berli Jucker – a conglomerate with interests including grocery retailer Big C, while Ms Wallapa helms Asset World Corp., a Thailand-focused hospitality firm.
Shares of ThaiBev were unchanged at 45.5 cents at 11.33am on June 24. BLOOMBERG
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
32 minutes ago
- Business Times
Reit ETFs see 40% AUM growth in past year as S-Reits regain appeal
[SINGAPORE] Over the past 12 months, Singapore-listed real estate investment trust (Reit) exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have seen more than S$300 million in net new inflows, reflecting continued investor demand. The combined assets under management (AUM) of these ETFs have surged by 40 per cent over a year, reaching an all-time high of S$1.2 billion by the end of the first half of 2025. This growth in AUM has outpaced the Reit sector's price movements, as reflected by the iEdge S-Reit Index and FTSE EPRA Nareit Index which reported total returns of 10.5 per cent and 12.5 per cent respectively. Both retail and institutional investors have actively contributed to the growth of AUM for Reit ETFs in Singapore. On average, the five Reit ETFs have posted total returns of 10.7 per cent over the past year ended Jun 30, 2025. Trading activity for these Reit ETFs also surged by 34 per cent quarter on quarter for the April to June 2025 period. Among the top 10 traded ETFs listed in Singapore, the Lion-Phillip S-Reit ETF and the NikkoAM-StraitsTrading Asia ex Japan Reit ETF stood out, recording the highest net inflows. The Lion-Phillip S-Reit ETF, Singapore's first and largest ETF focusing on S-Reits, tracks the Morningstar Singapore Reit Yield Focus Index, which includes 21 constituents and boasts an AUM of more than S$540 million. As one of the two pure-play Singapore Reit ETFs, it offers a dividend yield of 5.8 per cent and achieved total returns of 4.1 per cent in the first half of 2025. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up The NikkoAM-StraitsTrading Asia ex Japan Reit ETF tracks the FTSE EPRA Nareit Asia ex Japan Net Total Return Reit Index, consisting of 43 constituents across Singapore, Malaysia, Hong Kong, India, South Korea, Thailand and the Philippines. Singapore remains the largest exposure at 68 per cent of the portfolio. Notably, this ETF distributes quarterly dividends, unlike the others which distribute semi-annually. It ranks as the second-largest Reit ETF by AUM, with over S$420 million, yielding 5.8 per cent in dividends and generating total returns of 6.0 per cent in the first half of 2025. In terms of returns, the UOB Asia-Pacific Green Reit ETF was the best-performing Reit ETF for the first half of 2025, returning 9.3 per cent in total returns. The underlying index, the iEdge-UOB Apac Yield Focus Green Reit Index, emphasises environmental factors such as energy consumption, water consumption, GHG emissions and green building certifications. The index has 50 Reits across Australia (42 per cent), Japan (32 per cent), Singapore (19 per cent), and Hong Kong (7 per cent). The UOB Apac Green Reit ETF presents an option for investors seeking sustainable investments while maintaining highly competitive dividend yields. The CSOP iEdge S-Reit Leaders ETF has the highest dividend yield among the five Reit ETFs at 6 per cent. It tracks the iEdge S-Reit Leaders Index, which comprises 22 S-Reits. Phillip Securities research analyst Helena Wang recently initiated coverage on the Phillip SGX Apac Dividend Leaders Reit ETF for its exposure to 31 Reits in the Asia-Pacific ex Japan region, and its consistent dividend growth. The report highlighted that since 2021, dividends have remained steady between four and six Singapore cents per share. The ETF's book value has also become more attractive, historically trading at 1.3 times the price-to-book ratio, and now at 0.8 times. The ETF tracks the iEdge Apac ex-Japan Dividend Leaders Reit Index, which selects Reits based on their dividend payout. SGX RESEARCH The writer is a research analyst at SGX. For more research and information on Singapore's Reit sector, visit for the S-Reits & Property Trusts Chartbook.
CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
Some two-room BTO flats to be set aside for first-time singles who want to live near parents
SINGAPORE: The Housing and Development Board (HDB) on Sunday (Jul 20) announced the quota for Build-to-Order (BTO) two-room flats that will be set aside for first-time singles who are applying for a flat near their parents. The new Family Care Scheme (FCS), which was first announced by Prime Minister Lawrence Wong in the National Day Rally last year, comprises two components: FCS (Proximity) and FCS (Joint Balloting). PROXIMITY FCS (Proximity) allows parents and their children, regardless of marital status, priority access if they are applying for a new flat to live with or near each other. This will be rolled out in the July BTO exercise. Currently, up to 65 per cent of two-room flexi BTO flats and up to 5 per cent of Sale of Balance flats (SBF) are set aside for first-timer singles, after allocating flats to seniors. Within these quotas, 30 per cent of BTO flats and 2 per cent of SBF flats will be set aside for first-time singles applying under FCS (Proximity). This applies to Standard and Plus flats. For Prime flats, the percentages drop to 20 per cent and 1 per cent, respectively. The remaining quota will be for other first-time singles. Married couples and seniors currently have priority access under the Married Child Priority Scheme and Senior Priority Scheme when applying for new flats to live with or near their parents or married children. FCS (Proximity) will replace both of these schemes, with no change to the priority access for married couples and seniors. JOINT BALLOTING FCS (Joint Balloting) allows parents and their children, regardless of marital status, to jointly apply for two units in the same BTO project, where there are two-room flexi or three-room flats in the same project. This will start in the October BTO exercise, HDB said on Sunday. It will replace the Multi-Generation Priority Scheme for married children and parents to live near each other in the same BTO project. CHANGES FROM JULY Other changes that will start from the July BTO exercise have been announced previously. This includes HDB increasing the allocation quota of three-room and larger BTO flats for second-timer families by 5 percentage points. The revised proportion of BTO flats set aside for second-timer families: Up to 20 per cent of three-room Standard flats Up to 10 per cent of three-room plus and prime flats, and four-room and larger standard, plus and prime flats At least 80 per cent to 90 per cent of three-room and larger flats will continue to be set aside for first-time families. Changes to the Deferred Income Assessment (DIA) scheme and the Fresh Start Housing Grant for eligible second-time families will also take effect from the July BTO exercise. The DIA scheme allows eligible couples to apply for a new flat and delay their income assessment for housing grants or loans until just before they collect their keys. This will be expanded such that only one party in a couple needs to be a full-time student or national serviceman to be eligible. Previously, both parties needed to meet this requirement. The Fresh Start Housing Grant will be increased from S$50,000 to S$75,000 to support more second-timer public rental households with children to own homes. These families can use the increased grant to buy a new two-room flexi or three-room Standard BTO, or SBF flat, on a shorter lease.
Independent Singapore
an hour ago
- Independent Singapore
‘Why did HR withdraw my job offer after 'indicating' I got the job?' — Jobseeker asks after being put through 5 months of job interview process
SINGAPORE: After enduring five grueling months of a job interview process, document submissions, and hopeful anticipation, a job seeker thought he had finally reached the career finish line. The HR department even dangled an indicative job offer in front of him. But all of a sudden, they decided to pull the rug out from under him — the offer was suddenly withdrawn. Gary, the job seeker still reeling from this twist of fate, wrote back after his previous dilemma about 'Why did HR ghost me after my job interview?' to CNA's Work It podcast for answers. This time, his question had a darker twist: 'Why did HR withdraw my job offer after 'indicating' I got the job?' From green light to red alert Tiffany, the podcast host, explained Gary's situation: 'He got past the interview, submitted documents for background screening, and then he was given an indicative job offer. Senior management approval was sought, and then… suddenly, the indicative offer was withdrawn.' Five months of effort — poof! All gone in the blink of an eye… So understandably, Gary was crushed and wanted to know what went wrong. Gerald, the career coach, always the voice of career wisdom, acknowledged Gary's frustration: 'Going through five months almost at the finish line but not getting it, it really doesn't feel good,' he said. 'Gary, if you're listening, I hope you didn't quit your job.' Possible reasons HR pulled the offer Gerald laid out several plausible (and painfully common) scenarios: Reference check failure: 'Maybe the reference check didn't work in his favour, and then they decided not to proceed.' Budget cuts: 'Maybe the company might have felt that they don't need this person.' Hiring freeze or restructuring: Internal shifts could cause sudden U-turns in hiring plans. Tiffany also added that, 'Many things could have changed within the five months.' Gerald agreed: 'There could be a hiring freeze, and so all of these would affect the indicative offer being taken away.' What even is an 'indicative job offer' anyway? Tiffany posed the burning question: 'Why would companies give an indicative job offer without actually being sure in the first place?' Gerald's answer: 'They want to give you the indicative offer so that you're kind of prepared, primed to accept it later on. So you start to think about your plans—how to exit from your current role.' Basically, an indicative offer is the corporate version of 'We're pretty sure we want to date you… unless something better comes up or our parents say no.' Could Gary have done anything differently? Sadly, Gerald says the answer is not really. Indicative offers are usually verbal and rarely put in writing. However, he offered one practical tip for all job seekers: 'If the reference check was the issue… prepare your referees. Contact them and tell them someone's going to be calling. [Tell them] 'Maybe you could say something for me'.' See also 4 in 10 young women do not foresee themselves getting married Otherwise, as Tiffany hinted, 'they [referees] score [their] own goal for you.' Key takeaway: Hope for the best, prepare for the worst Gary's situation is, in Gerald's words, 'very unfortunate' — but not entirely uncommon. And while there's no foolproof way to protect yourself from these scenarios, being proactive, especially when it comes to reference checks, can help smooth the path. Tiffany also offered Gary (and every jobseeker out there) a hopeful send-off: 'We hope that things will look up for you. And we hope that in the future, companies don't do that to you.' Read related: 'Why did HR ghost me after my job interview?' — Jobseeker asks and gets advice from career coach, who also advises HR to stop ghosting interviewees
