India cenbank seen holding rates, but US tariffs raise odds of cut
A large majority of economists, or 44 of 57, in a July 18–24 Reuters poll expect the Reserve Bank of India's monetary policy committee (MPC) to hold the repo rate at 5.50% on August 6.
However, sentiment has shifted following the tariff announcement.
"Even without that tariff announcement, a case could be made for a 25 basis point rate cut. The 25% tariff rate is an added growth shock," ANZ Research said, adding that both growth and inflation are likely to undershoot the RBI's forecasts.
The RBI delivered a larger-than-expected 50bp cut in June and shifted its stance to "neutral", signalling that further moves would depend on incoming data.
India's manufacturing sector expanded at its fastest pace in 16 months in July, with the HSBC-S&P Global PMI rising to 59.1. But business confidence fell to a three-year low, with firms citing competitive pressures and inflation concerns — a sign that underlying demand may be softening.
India's annual retail inflation slowed to a more than six-year low of 2.10% in June, near the lower end of the central bank's tolerance band, as food prices continued to ease. Inflation is seen falling to a record low in July.
"While this backdrop is conducive for further monetary easing, we believe it is not yet compelling enough to deliver a fourth straight rate cut and exhaust the policy arsenal," said Aastha Gudwani, India chief economist at Barclays.
RBI Governor Sanjay Malhotra said last month the central bank had won the battle against inflation but the war was ongoing, and future policy decisions would be guided by the outlook for growth and inflation rather than current levels.
Nomura also said the bar for an August cut is high after the June easing and stance shift, though it raised the probability of a cut to 35% from 10% earlier.
"Neither bonds nor the swaps market is pricing in a rate cut on Wednesday, and if it happens, we could actually see a rally. Currently the base case is a dovish commentary and a pause on rates," a trader at a state-run bank said.
Traders are also awaiting the announcement of a revised liquidity framework, which may come alongside the policy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
43 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Bank ‘must cut rates six times' over next year to boost ailing economy
Andrew Bailey must slash interest rates six times over the next year to bolster flagging growth, economists have warned. The Bank of England Governor and his colleagues on the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) are expected to cut borrowing costs from 4.25pc to 4pc this Thursday. But a growing cohort of economists predict Bank officials will be forced to go much further over the next 12 months. Six cuts would take the base rate to 2.75pc next year – the lowest level since late 2022. Peder Beck-Friis, an economist at Pimco, an investment company, said higher taxes, slower growth and the weakening jobs market will all push the Bank to cut rates further next year. 'While inflation has been surprisingly firm, we see good reasons to expect a slowdown. Regulatory price hikes, including in employment taxes, have pushed prices up, but wage growth is softening and the labour market is weakening,' he said. Companies are passing the £25bn increase in employers' National Insurance contributions on to customers, but 'once this tax shock fades, we expect inflation to ease, as seen in other developed countries'. 'We expect the Bank to accelerate rate cuts later this year, with the policy rate settling near 2.75pc next year,' he said. Michel Nies, from Citi, predicts rate cuts in August and November before an acceleration from December in the wake of 'very likely tax increases in the autumn Budget', taking the base rate to 2.75pc. He cites the weakening jobs market as the critical factor. The economy has lost 178,000 employees on payroll over the past year. Businesses in particular are taking a beating: 'The divergence between public and private sector employment growth continues to widen with the former still masking a sustained contraction in the latter,' Mr Nies said. Bruna Skarica, at Morgan Stanley, also expects cuts to 2.75pc because unemployment has risen to 4.7pc, the highest rate in four years. 'The build-up of slack in the labour market ... can only result in pay and price disinflation over time,' she said. 'The laws of economic gravity can be delayed, but not denied.' These economists remain in the minority, and even this week's anticipated rate cut will not be entirely uncontroversial. Policymakers are cutting interest rates even though inflation, at 3.6pc and rising, is well above its 2pc target. However, monetary policy takes as long as two years to feed through to consumer prices, meaning this week's rate decision will only fully pass through to inflation in mid-2027 - and will have little effect on the rise in living costs this year. Jack Meaning, a former Bank of England economist now at Barclays, forecasts a three-way split on the MPC. He anticipates that two policymakers will vote to hold rates, two for a double cut to 3.75pc, and the majority of five backing a move to 4pc. 'Despite these divergent views on both sides, we think the centre of the committee, and ultimately the decisive bloc, will continue on a gradual and careful quarterly rate cutting path, until it reaches 3.5pc in February 2026,' he said. The most recent three-way split came in May, when external MPC members Swati Dhingra and Alan Taylor voted for a half percentage point rate cut to 4pc.
The Guardian
43 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump's demand that India stop buying Russian oil puts Modi in tight spot
The relationship between India and the US is facing one of its most significant challenges in decades, as the Trump administration doubles down on its demands that India stop buying Russian oil or face punitive tariffs. The US president, Donald Trump, has refused to cut tariffs on Indian exports to the US, as he has for other countries, and on Monday said he would significantly raise them over its purchases of cheap Russian oil, which now account for one-third of its imported oil. 'They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine,' he said in a post to his Truth Social network, also accusing India of selling Russian oil 'on the Open Market for big profits'. In a previous social media tirade last week, he said of Russia and India: 'They can take their dead economies down together.' Appearing on Fox News on Sunday at the weekend, his hardline deputy chief of staff, Stephen Miller, did not hold back as he took direct aim at India, stating that Trump had made it clear it was 'it is not acceptable for India to continue financing this [Ukraine] war by purchasing the oil from Russia'. The whiplash the last days have caused in the corridors of New Delhi is palpable. It was only February when India's prime minister, Narendra Modi, was one of the first world leaders to be hosted by Trump and the two men embraced each other and hailed their 'great friendship'. Indian officials were adamant that Russia had not even come up in trade negotiations until Trump's public outburst. India had come to view the US as one of its strongest and most reliable partners, united by the bonhomie between its leaders and growing cooperation on everything from regional security and defence to bilateral trade, intelligence, technology and an increasingly powerful Indian diaspora in the United States. A united geopolitical ambition to counterbalance the power of China had only brought them further together under recent presidents. Yet it did not go unnoticed by India that China – the other big buyer of sanctioned Russian oil, which also has leverage over the US in the form of rare earths – has not received similar threats, and neither has Turkey. Trump's moves have been met with a frosty, if not outright defiant, reception among Indian officials. After Trump told reporters he that had heard India would 'no longer' be buying Russian oil, he was swiftly contradicted by Indian officials over the weekend, who said there would be no change in policy. Under India's 'non-alignment' foreign policy it has maintained a close partnership with Russia over decades while strengthening ties with the US; a position largely tolerated by Washington and reiterated by Randhir Jaiswal, the spokesperson for India's foreign ministry following Trump's threats. 'Our bilateral relationships with various countries stand on their own merit and should not be seen from the prism of a third country,' said Jaiswal. 'India and Russia have a steady and time-tested partnership.' In a column in the Indian Express, Shyam Saran, India's former foreign secretary, did not mince his words. 'Donald Trump was supposed to be good for India in his second presidency,' he said. 'He has turned out to be a nightmare.' Saran was among those who called for India to follow the example of China and Brazil and stand up to Trump. He insisted that although there would be 'pain in resisting Trump … we should be prepared to endure it'. 'Submitting to his exaggerated demands, which are now political as well as economic, would severely undermine India's national interests,' said Saran. 'We cannot give any country a veto over which countries India should or should not partner with.' It is widely agreed among analysts that Modi has now been put in an unenviable position by Trump; either acquiesce to Trump's demands and see loss of face domestically or reject them and face sky-high tariffs – and possibly other punitive actions – that would cripple the Indian economy. The Indian political scientist Pratap Bhanu Mehta said India was not the exception in mistakenly thinking that 'Trump is purely transactional and that by placating him, pandering to his ego and giving him good headlines, it will be enough to make him quietly dial back.' One of the major sticking points for Modi, he said, was the highly public nature of Trump's threats, which had complicated the possibility of backdoor negotiations over India quietly moving away from buying Russian oil and arms. He pointed out that Trump had already 'frankly humiliated the Indian prime minister' over the recent India-Pakistan conflict in May, where Trump had publicly taken the credit for negotiating a ceasefire – a position vehemently denied by the Modi government in the aftermath. Trump's recent embrace of Pakistan, signing deals with India's enemy on cryptocurrency, mining and oil – and even having the chagrin to suggest India may one day buy Pakistani oil – as well as hosting the Pakistan army chief for lunch in the White House, had only added insult to injury. Mehta said suspicions towards the US in New Delhi now resembled those of 1971, when President Richard Nixon and his national security advisor, Henry Kissinger, sent warships to India in what is considered one of the lowest points of the US-India relationship. 'The damage is already done,' said Mehta. 'No matter what deal they come to now, distrust of the US is only going to continue to skyrocket.'
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Americans are slashing their spending as worries over the economy grow: ‘This time feels different'
Americans are slashing their spending as economic uncertainty reigns six months into President Donald Trump 's second term. A slew of new reports found that people are cutting back on everything, from buying cheaper groceries to taking fewer vacations. Inflation-adjusted consumer spending ticked up 0.1 percent in June after declining 0.2 percent in May, the U.S. Commerce Department reported last week. 'Consumer spending had been very, very strong for the last couple of years and had — repeatedly, forecasters, not just us, had been forecasting it would slow down,' Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell said at a press conference last Wednesday. 'Now maybe it finally has.' President Trump's renewed tariffs on dozens of countries took effect on August 1 with economists warning the levies would directly impact consumer prices. New federal policy research from Yale last week found that the tariffs could cost the average household $2,400 in 2025. Then came the dismal July jobs report which apparently so angered the president that he promptly fired Erika McEntarfer, the chief labor statistician at the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The U.S. economy added only 73,000 jobs in July, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistic monthly report. Revisions for May and June also showed a combined 258,000 fewer jobs than were initially reported. 'There's a lot of consumer anxiety,' Dirk Van de Put, CEO of Mondelez International, the company which makes Oreos and Ritz crackers, told the Wall Street Journal. Even before Trump's renewed tariffs took effect, many Americans were already worrying about making ends meet. Some 83 percent say they are concerned about the price of groceries, according to a June poll from survey firms, Morning Consult and The Century Foundation. Nearly half of those polled also said they're worried about their current ability to pay rent or mortgage. And one-quarter of those asked said someone in their household has skipped meals to save cash, the poll found. A separate poll, released Monday by AP-NORC, found that roughly half of Americans say the cost of groceries is a 'major' source of stress in their life right now. 'I just keep watching the prices go up, so I'm looking for the cheapest possible stuff,' Adam Bush, a 19-year-old based in Portland, New York who makes less than $50,000 annually, told the AP. 'Hot pockets and TV dinners.' It's not just groceries. Sales at Chipotle were down last quarter, shoppers are buying less at the grocery chain, Kroger, and Olive Garden saw fewer customers from households that earn under $50,000 annually, the Journal reported. Procter & Gamble, which sells a plethora of household goods including Tide, Pampers, and Charmin, also noticed a dip in sales. 'We see consumption trends consistently decelerating, not significantly, but we see a deceleration in the US,' the company's Chief Financial Officer Andre Schulten said during the company's quarterly earnings call, Bloomberg reported. Americans are also cutting back on travel. On average, Americans carved out $3,132 for this year's summer vacation — 25 percent less than the $4,199 they set aside to spend in 2024, according to a Ipsos-Generali Global Assistance survey last month. Another poll, by SSRS Opinion Panel Omnibus, found that 56 percent of Americans said they planned to travel less this summer compared to typical years, citing financial concerns. Kevin Ervin Kelley, an architect living in Los Angeles, told the Journal that his family has already taken steps to reduce spending, like staying with family instead of taking international vacations and skipping date nights. While he and his wife have kept their salaries, they're worried about how tariffs could impact their wallets. 'This time feels different,' he told the outlet. 'You hunker down and wait it out.' Others are resisting buying goods deemed 'not necessary.' Kiara Carniewski, a 31-year-old expecting her second child this month, has been trying to significantly reduce her expenses. 'If it's not necessary, it's no longer purchased,' she told the Journal. Days of treating herself to $5 coffees are in the rear window, she said: 'I really believe that the American economy has a massive math problem: Everything is getting more expensive but wages have not.'
