
Why Aurat March is in February?
This year the Aurat March Lahore will be held on February 12th - Pakistan's National Women's Day - with the theme 'Feminist History'. The march is meant to pay tribute to the feminist struggle in the country in the past and at present.
In Pakistan, February 12 is a milestone in the women's rights movement. On this day in 1983, a public demonstration was organised against the military dictatorship of General Zia-ul Haq by Women's Action Forum (WAF) and Pakistan Women Lawyers' Association (PWLA). The demonstration was meant to protest the law of evidence - which would reduce the testimony of women to half that of men - and to file a petition against it in Lahore Hight Court.
Recalling the demonstration, Khawar Mumtaz, a WAF member and former Chairperson of National Commission on the Status of Women, says: "Section 144 had been imposed. So we planned to reach the high court in small groups of twos and threes. When we reached Hall Road, we saw that police had cordoned off the road so that we could not get ahead. Habib Jalib began reciting his poetry and suddenly one protester slipped through the barriers. Soon there were clouds of teargas all around, and the police started baton-charging the demonstrators. Many women were pulled to the police station and locked up. We sang revolutionary songs in the police station, prepared a press statement, and made it possible that it got out."
In 1980s, the state made effective use of religious forces to achieve its objectives. It quietened political parties, imposed censorship on the press and academia, and banned students and trade unions. However, the February 12, 1983 demonstration became a symbol of women's resistance to all forms of oppression as well as their belief in an equal, equitable and just democratic order.
Neelam Hussain, another WAF member and Executive Coordinator of Simorgh Women's Resource and Publication Centre, recalls the time when WAF was formed after the Fehmida/Allah Bux case. Neelam says that WAF was - and still is - a voice against all sorts of injustices. WAF strongly remonstrated against the Iraq-Kuwait war in 1990; it protested against the separate electorate system and the inclusion of the religion section in the national identity card; and launched the Joint Action Committee for People's Rights in 1986. "We were very political. However, the young feminists are trying to link personal to the political; and I appreciate their courageous efforts," she elaborates.
The renewed Aurat March Movement, having the motto of ending patriarchy, got momentum in 2018. The advocates of the movement faced a huge backlash, as they called upon the state and society to consider women as equal citizens; conceive pro-women policies and laws; and ensure civic spaces for females. Aurat marchers say, "We resist to live; we march to transform."
Hadia, an Aurat March Lahore volunteer, while describing the Aurat March 2025 objective, says, "First, we want to highlight that we stand on the shoulders of many feminist foremothers. Second, we want to resist the erasure of women, transgender people, and resistance movement from our histories. Third, but sadly, so many issues that we are agitating for today - harassment, safety from violence, respect for bodily autonomy, dignified labour, freedom of religion, free speech, resisting censorship and respect for democratic values and processes - are not new. We remind the state and society that we must march towards progress!"
Nadia, another volunteer of Aurat March, speaks out, "Celebrating each other's struggle is important, since we need to keep the hope alive. So those who come after us see the beauty of feminist resistance. Our feminist history teaches us not only conflict and anger, but also how to bring joy and hope in movements. This Aurat March is a small step towards archiving feminist movements."
The Aurat March 2025 is to honour the past and celebrate the present of feminist history. Those who believe in equal rights and democracy should join this March on 12th February to mark the 1983's historic protest on Lahore's Mall Road when women bravely stood against tyrannical state, protesting against Zia's draconian laws.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Express Tribune
a day ago
- Express Tribune
Cabinet committee grants additional Rs12b for SSWMB
The Cabinet Committee on Finance, under the chairmanship of Energy, Development & Planning Minister Syed Nasir Hussain Shah and Interior & Law Minister Zia-ul-Hassan Lanjar, held a meeting of the Energy Department. During the meeting, the Sindh Solid Waste Management Board (SSWMB) presented a request for an additional budget for the fiscal year 2024-2025. After reviewing legal aspects of the request, committee members, in consultation with provincial ministers, approved a conditional out-of-budget grant of Rs12 billion for the SSWMB. It was also decided that the SSWMB will reassess all existing contracts with waste collection contractors, as the rates in Sindh were found to be higher than those in other cities. A proper system will be introduced to accurately measure the weight of garbage removed, and razor readers will be installed in all garbage collection vehicles. This will ensure that contractors are paid according to the actual weight of garbage transported, preventing the misuse of public funds.


Express Tribune
03-07-2025
- Express Tribune
Big powers need to reassess postures towards Pakistan, India
The writer is an academic and researcher. He is also the author of Development, Poverty, and Power in Pakistan, available from Routledge Listen to article The recent Indo-Pak crisis has been temporarily defused by a still fragile ceasefire. Yet, this crisis has major policy implications not only for the subcontinent, but for the world's two major global superpowers, the US and China, which are locked in increasingly intensive great power competition. The impact of the unfolding great power competition has become particularly acute within South Asia. Much has been said about Pakistan's historical alliances with the US, and its growing strategic embrace with China, and America's simultaneous bet to help prop up India to counter China. However, these strategic policy postures cannot remain static but must instead be subjected to constant revision. The post-Pahalgam conflict was a defining moment which should provide strategic thinkers and policymakers ample reasons to reassess their postures, especially if they want to prevent another steep and slippery escalatory crisis between the neighbouring nuclearised rivals. Pakistan did not take long to side with the US during the Cold War, joining regional alliances such as SEATO and CENTO, way back in the 1950s. As India decided to remain non-aligned, the US had to walk a regional tightrope to prevent the Indians from joining the Soviet camp. While Pakistan was disappointed that the US did not come rushing to Pakistan's aid during its 1965 and 1971 wars with India, a lot of US aid poured into Pakistan to entice Presidents Zia and Musharraf to subsequently cooperate with the US in neighbouring Afghanistan. Following the Soviet withdrawal from Afghanistan, and before the post-9/11 US-led invasion of Afghanistan, Washington also became convinced of the need to simultaneously bolster its relations with New Delhi. Bill Clinton onwards, all US administrations have been wooing "the largest democracy in the world", considering it a natural ally to counterbalance the steady rise of Communist China. China, on the other hand, had extended the hand of friendship to Pakistan, viewing it is the ideal strategic ally to exert pressure on India, soon after the Sino-Indian war in 1962. China's relationship with Pakistan remained modest during the Cold War years, but when the US started bolstering its relationship with India, China also became convinced of the need to integrate Pakistan into its ambitious BRI vision. Alongside its economic relationship with Pakistan, the Chinese military also began forging closer ties with Pakistan, quickly supplanting Pakistan's reliance on American military hardware. However, the burning question now is, how China and the US will reposition their stances towards India and Pakistan following the post-Pahalgam confrontation? The US, alongside other regional mediators, did manage to secure de-escalation this time around. President Trump was quick to claim credit for defusing this crisis. Yet, his stated willingness to even resolve the 'fifteen-hundred-year-old' Kashmir dispute seems more a self-aggrandising assertion rather than a signal indicating a shift in America's longstanding stance of not meddling in this thorny dispute, especially without India's consent. While Pakistan has decided to nominate Trump for a Nobel Peace Prize, perhaps in the bid to pander to his ego, not many serious Pakistani analysts expect him to help resolve the Kashmir dispute. Conversely, many strategic advisors within the US still want it to continue bolstering India's capabilities. China may also have to pay the price of increased stress in its already strained relations with India for choosing to side openly with Pakistan during the recent military confrontation. India's decision to hold IWT in abeyance does not bode well for enabling regional stabilisation, especially if India chooses to disregard the recent decision by the International Court of Arbitration. Instead of using the Indo-Pak rivalry as another arena for proxy confrontation, a saner geostrategic recalibration necessitates placing greater emphasis on restraint, and the systematic mitigation of tensions between India, Pakistan and China. More cooperative approaches to water sharing and softening existing borders do exist, but they are unfortunately not being given the attention they need within our increasingly unstable and transactional world.


Express Tribune
24-06-2025
- Express Tribune
Court defers hearing in Maria B's legal case against Shehzad Ghias
Listen to article A district and sessions court in Islamabad on Monday adjourned proceedings in a defamation case filed by designer Maria B against comedian Shehzad Ghias Sheikh. The case was heard by Additional Sessions Judge Sheikh Muhammad Sohail. Representing Maria B, Barrister Abdul Ahad Khokhar urged the court to restrain Shehzad from posting further tweets and videos, arguing that the ongoing content amounted to harmful propaganda while the case remains sub judice. Read: Maria B weighs in on farshi shalwar fashion trend 'It is necessary to restrict him from social media commentary until the matter is resolved,' said Khokhar during the hearing. Defence counsel Imaan Mazari along with Hadi Ali Chattha, appearing on behalf of Shehzad , informed the court that the power of attorney would be submitted at the next hearing. The court directed both parties to submit their written replies and scheduled arguments on the stay application for the next session. The hearing was adjourned until July 14. Later after the hearing, Shehzad posted a tweet reading simply with an emoji: '🤐' a zipped-mouth face. Previously, Shehzad published a video on his YouTube channel stating that he had received a court summons for Monday's proceedings but had yet to receive formal details of the case or specific charges. He said he suspected a First Information Report (FIR) may have been filed by the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) and subsequently forwarded to the court. Shehzad explained that the legal action originated from a civil defamation notice issued by Maria B but had escalated to a criminal complaint through the FIA an approach he described as excessive and aimed at curbing dissent. He maintained that his critical remarks were opinion-based and did not meet the legal threshold for defamation under Pakistani law. Read more: Maria B responds to criticism from Aurat March Lahore organisers He also said the case appeared to be linked to his past commentary and content discussing Maria B and broader issues concerning influencers, though he denied orchestrating any campaign of personal attacks. Following his video, Maria B responded in a post on her Instagram account. The video compiled excerpts from Shehzad's podcast , where he interviewed transgender rights activist Shehzadi Rai. In the clip, Shehzad refers to Maria B as a 'D-grade designer' and accuses her of using the suffering of transgender individuals to promote her brand. Rai adds that Maria B also exploited the issue of Palestine for commercial gain. The video also features Shehzad stating that a mob should attend one of Maria B's fashion shows, disrupt the event, and declare western clothing as haram, even suggesting that her garments be burned. Maria B vowed not to stay silent and confirmed that a civil notice had been issued and added that she would now pursue criminal defamation as well. Also read: Maria B in hot water again as Turkish influencer Turkan Atay alleges unpaid brand deal In late April 2025, Maria B faced a separate controversy involving a Turkish influencer. Content creator Türkan Atay accused the Maria B of failing to fulfil an agreed compensation arrangement following a promotional shoot in Istanbul. In a social media video, Türkan said the brand had accepted a 'per outfit' pricing model that factored in videography, location, and editing. 'They even agreed to it. I have all the messages,' she said. After the content was delivered, Türkan claimed the brand shifted its stance, offering payment on a 'per reel' basis instead. 'They told me, 'Oh, sorry. There's been a misunderstanding. We pay international influencers per reel,'' she recalled. Maria B responded through an Instagram Story, calling the situation 'a regrettable misunderstanding' and denying any failure to pay. 'In our 25 years, we have neither withheld payment nor retracted from our commitments,' the statement read, citing a long-standing record of fair influencer collaborations.