
Alberta Next panel begins town hall series to hear grievances about Ottawa
Some 650 people are expected at Tuesday's event in Red Deer as Smith and the 15 other members of the Alberta Next panel hear about grievances inspiring separatist sentiment in the province.
Get breaking National news
For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
The government is dedicating time at the event to several strategies it's pitching to wrest more control from the federal government, including pulling out of the Canada Pension Plan and withholding social services from some immigrants.
There will also be an open question-and-answer period.
Smith and panel members are set to hear feedback in Sherwood Park near Edmonton on Wednesday.
Both the events are sold out. Global News will be attending Tuesday's panel in Red Deer.
Story continues below advertisement
The premier has said the panel will recommend ideas and policy proposals for a referendum after the town halls wrap up in October.
— More to come…

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Global News
2 hours ago
- Global News
Tim Cartmell apologizes for missing Edmonton infill vote at city council
One week after Edmonton city councillor and mayoral candidate Tim Cartmell missed a vote that would have impacted how infill homes are built in the city, he's apologizing. 'People were counting on me to be there, and I wasn't there, I've let them down and I'm very sorry for that,' Cartmell said on Tuesday after returning from vacation. Council had been having a heated debate of whether to reduce the maximum allowable units per infill from eight down to six, after some residents expressed concerns with property values, not enough parking, predatory developers, quality of builds and housing affordability. The debate spilled over into several days and was going to be extended into the councillors scheduled summer break — something some councillors, including Cartmell, opposed. 1:38 Cartmell suggests moratorium on new infill development in Edmonton is needed 'We were anticipating this, I think as far back as the middle of May when our clerk's office started to check counsellor availability because of this and other time-sensitive items that needed to get through council,' said city councillor Jo-Anne Wright. Story continues below advertisement Cartmell confirmed he was at the Calgary Stampede on July 3 and 4, but he did attend council meetings virtually those days. By last Monday's gathering, however, he was on a planned family vacation on Cape Breton Island in a remote location without internet, that he says he could not delay. But last Tuesday, by a close vote of six to five — council voted against reducing infill limits. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Those in favour were Mayor Amarjeet Sohi, Councillors Aaron Paquette, Erin Rutherford, Anne Stevenson, Karen Tang, and Jo-Anne Wright. Councillors Michael Janz, Andrew Knack, Karen Principe, Jennifer Rice and Ashley Salvador voted in opposition. The two councillors absent were Sarah Hamilton and Tim Cartmell. They were both away on vacation. Cartmell said he put his family and marriage first. 'Sometimes you look at your partner, and you look in their eyes — and you know that sometimes you can't put them second again, that you can cancel again,' said Cartmell. 1:48 Public hearing on infill development in Edmonton comes to an end Wright didn't accept that reasoning. Story continues below advertisement 'I have a family as well, and I know that's important. I know time off is important. I guess it's just a matter of organisation, of those multiple priorities,' said Wright. Edmonton's mayor also weighted in. 'Anytime someone makes a decision not to show up to work, is the day they are not doing their job,' said Amarjeet Sohi. 'I am glad he recognized this was a mistake.' Tweet This Click to share quote on Twitter: "I am glad he recognized this was a mistake." 2:11 Tensions boil over at Edmonton City Hall during ongoing debate about infill development Cartmell said this vote result could change in the coming months. City council will be revisiting the conversation on maximum units for infill lots at some point, but that discussion won't come until public consultation is complete — with a deadline at the beginning of 2027. In the meantime, the next municipal election is in October and he is gunning for the mayor's chair. Story continues below advertisement 'No motion that has been made in the last couple of weeks that can't be rescinded and new motions made in place,' said Cartmell. 'We will get on the other side of this election and fix these things.' Tweet This Click to share quote on Twitter: "We will get on the other side of this election and fix these things." Last Monday, Cartmell's campaign released a video of him criticizing the process of the infill debate and councillors not respecting time off. 'Putting out that video statement on Monday, criticising the mayor and the rest of council the way the public hearing had been held. Nobody cares about the process. What they care about is the debate, and how councillors vote,' said Edmonton political analyst. John Brennan. Brennan said the way that this was handled was not good for Cartmell's campaign — but it could recover. 'I don't think it's irreparable. It certainly hurt him personally, it hurt his campaign, they wouldn't be going to the steps they did today — issuing an apology — if it hadn't,' Brennan said. Brennan said he's waiting on official polling to see how Edmonton voters truly feel about Cartmell missing the meeting. 2:06 Another group adding its voice to debate over infill development, housing density in Edmonton — With files from Jasmine King and Karen Bartko, Global News


CBC
6 hours ago
- CBC
At the Alberta Next town hall, Danielle Smith finds a friendly anti-Ottawa crowd
There's a routine backdrop at most of Alberta Premier Danielle Smith's news conferences: a row of provincial and Canadian flags, or at least one of each. Even when she's doing TV interviews from home on the weekend, the pair of flags are behind her — a red-and-white and a deep blue. Her staff kept the Maple Leaf emblems at home for their road trip Tuesday to Red Deer, for the first Alberta Next panel on federal affairs. Positioned behind Smith and her 15 fellow panellists were six flags, all ultramarine with the Alberta coat of arms. This likely suited many in the crowd just fine. The roughly 450 attendees were heavily of the Alberta-first persuasion — not predominantly separatist, but certainly keen to withdraw the province from major Canadian institutions and Ottawa influence. If that preference wasn't clear from speaker after speaker making those points, the premier got clarity on the meeting hall's bent. She requested a series of straw polls on an Alberta-only pension, police force and other proposals. About three-quarters or more of the audience raised their hands in support on each question. The opponents were sparse in this central Alberta expo hall, next to where Red Deer's Westerner Days midway was set up to begin the next day. Consider one attendee's hard line on equalization and transfers to less affluent provinces: "If my brother needs help, he can come with a business plan and ask for it. And Alberta should treat the other provinces the same." That was the first speaker, but to say he set the tone would be inaccurate. Smith's team chose to frame each topic by running the videos released last month on the Alberta Next website. They preceded the user surveys and suggested big economic benefits from quitting the Canadian Pension Plan and that to gain more of a handle on immigration, Alberta "withhold provincial social programs to any non-citizen or non-permanent resident who does not have an Alberta-approved immigration status" — a move that even the video acknowledged could provoke legal challenges. The six videos and a longer introductory recording in which Smith declares Alberta has an "Ottawa problem" altogether took up more than 30 minutes of the two-and-a-half-hour event. But that still left ample time for dozens of attendees to line up at the microphones and chime in with their agreement, arguments or questions for the panel. There was even time for a self-identified communist to address the crowd — twice — and draw some of the crowd's loudest boos when he recommended nationalizing oil companies and installing workers as owners. There were scattered boos, too, for pro-independence speakers, but far more cheers for demands for a separatist referendum, be it to actually leave or as political leverage for Alberta. "If they do not know that we are serious and we can leave at any point in time, we will not ever get a pipeline to the Atlantic Ocean," someone from the Stettler area said. (Premier's staff urged journalists to stay at the media table and not wade into the crowd to speak with attendees, along with a restriction on news cameras and photography.) Smith, as chair, frequently responded to audience questions. A few panellists did as well, notably retired judge Bruce McDonald, economist Trevor Tombe and energy executive Michael Binnion, a vocal advocate for more Alberta autonomy. Other panellists had little to offer, including Environment Minister Rebecca Schulz and Business Council of Alberta president Adam Legge. They're both outspoken critics of federal energy and climate policies, but had little to offer on matters like equalization and an Alberta provincial police force; when the moderator prompted him, Legge said broadly his group liked the drive to "send a resounding message to Ottawa." Bruce McAllister, the premier's aide who moderated the town hall, invited the panel's two doctors and a disability services provider to speak on immigration, because each had immigrated themselves. On that issue, attendees roundly criticized the recent rise in immigration numbers and tied them to housing and employment issues, as the provincial video did as well. Nobody brought up its suggestion the government deny social services to certain immigrants, and Smith didn't ask for a straw poll on it. Nor did she ask for a show of hands on an Alberta tax collection agency like Quebec has, given how many speakers said it made no sense if the province couldn't collect federal taxes too (which Quebec doesn't). But when the talk came to constitutional reform, Smith was very intrigued by speakers' calls to reopen the Constitution with fellow premiers to rebalance influence toward Alberta and the West — she even suggested proposing a constitutional convention when premiers meet next week for their annual retreat. Alberta's premier then asked aloud for others to jog her memory about what went awry with the Charlottetown Accord in the early 1990s. (In brief: it wooed western provinces with Senate reform but repelled them with "distinct society" status for Quebec; both regions' populace opposed the constitutional rewrite in a 1992 referendum.) By the event's end, Smith's eagerness to reopen Canada's foundation document seemed to wane. "We know that once you open that up, you could end up having provinces stuff a bunch of things in there that we would have to compromise too much in order to agree to," Smith said at the event's conclusion. But she said she was struck by the room's strong support for Alberta quitting the RCMP and CPP, as Smith seeks potential referendum questions to put to the public next year, potentially alongside an activist-initiated vote on separation. According to repeated polls, clear majorities of Albertans have opposed the same ideas that the Alberta Next town halls have embraced. An attendee from Lacombe said that the government's videos were skewing things further away from what average Albertans believe. "These members cannot consider the findings of these meetings and the surveys as a true reflection of public opinion," he said. The similarly intentioned Fair Deal Panel that then-premier Jason Kenney launched in 2019 also found that its town halls and surveys were dominated by people who wanted to erect institutional walls to defend against Ottawa. But the Fair Deal team's final report also conducted public opinion research that found that outside the self-selected town hall and survey visitors, fewer Albertans felt the province was treated "very unfairly" or wanted to set up Alberta-only pension or police agencies. It may be that the worlds within and beyond the Alberta Next meetings have even more contrasting world views. But there are nine more town halls to go, including Wednesday's in Sherwood Park, so Smith and her co-panellists are in for much more exposure to the town-hall mindset before they reckon what to do with this feedback.


Global News
7 hours ago
- Global News
Prime Minister Carney says he still has confidence in public safety minister
Prime Minister Mark Carney stood by his public safety minister on Wednesday, saying Gary Anandasangaree had been open about his support for the immigration of a suspected terrorist group member. 'The public safety minister has been transparent about the details of that situation and he has my confidence,' Carney said after announcing measures to protect Canada's steel industry. On Tuesday, Global News reported that before joining cabinet, the Toronto-area MP asked Canadian officials to approve the permanent residence application of a man they had deemed a Tamil Tigers member. The Tamil Tigers, or Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam, fought a lengthy failed independence war in Sri Lanka and have been on Canada's list of designated terrorist entities since 2006. Although the Canada Border Services Agency had rejected the man as an immigrant on the grounds he was a member of the group, Anandasangaree asked them to reverse their decision. Story continues below advertisement 2:10 Cabinet minister under scrutiny over letters supporting terror group 'member' In 2016 and 2023, Anandasangaree wrote letters to the CBSA endorsing the man's bid to move to Toronto. The most recent letter was when the MP was parliamentary secretary of justice. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Last Wednesday, the Federal Court rejected the man's latest appeal, saying that despite the MP's letter of support, the CBSA had correctly prioritized national security and public safety. In a statement, Anandasangaree said he could not comment on a case before the courts but defended his actions, saying he had stopped writing letters of support when he joined cabinet in 2023. He said that MPs 'from all parties provide letters of support for constituents as a routine matter.' But an organization founded by victims of terrorism said it wasn't satisfied with that explanation. 'We know it's very common for an MP's office to advocate with government departments on behalf of their constituents. And that's okay, bureaucracies can sometimes make mistakes,' said lawyer Sheryl Saperia, CEO of Secure Canada. Story continues below advertisement 'It's important that Canadians feel that they can lean on their MPs when necessary. And when appropriate, advocating on an immigration matter is a perfectly acceptable function for an MP.' 'But, no MP's office should intervene on behalf of someone the CBSA has found to be a member and on the payroll of a terror group, period. And subsequent appeals by that person have been rejected in court. Those facts alone should raise alarm bells for an MP.' Saperia said Anandasangaree's letters 'cited the emotional impact of this individual being separated from his family in Canada. And we would argue that this is a ridiculous argument when we're talking about someone who was involved in some capacity as a member of a terrorist group.' She said the government needed to give Canadians the sense that their safety and security was paramount. 'And I think many Canadians are not feeling that confidence right now, and this particular case certainly does not make things any better.' View image in full screen In photo posted on his X account, Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree looks at U.S. border with CBSA officer. 1 A former Canadian Security Intelligence Service analyst said officials did not make decisions like the one challenged by Anandasangaree lightly, and based their recommendations on a person's background and credibility, while weighing potential threats to public safety and national security. Story continues below advertisement 'And here this individual says, 'Well, I don't like your decision, and I want you to reverse it.' I mean, it speaks to an arrogance at a minimum, but it also speaks to this person's complete lack of understanding when it comes to national security,' Phil Gurski said. 'It boggles the mind why the minister would think this was an okay thing to do.' Gurski called it an 'egregious error on his part, a lack of judgment at a minimum.' 'He should resign his post immediately and let someone else who can actually do the job fill the bill.' Carney appointed Anandasangaree the minister in charge of Canada's national security and border safety agencies on May 13, To avert a White House trade war, Anandasangaree is responsible for convincing U.S. President Donald Trump that Canada has toughened its border against drug and migrant smuggling. But questions were raised last month when Anandasangaree recused himself from decisions related to the Tamil Tigers and its Canadian front group the World Tamil Movement. In a post on social media platform X, Leo Housakos, the Opposition Senate leader, wrote that penning letters like Anandasangaree's 'should disqualify anyone from ever serving as minister of public safety.'