
Cryo-liberals are still dishing up deranged delusions
Their heyday coincided with Blairism: sharp-suited social liberalism combined with the post-Thatcherite free market settlement. Since then the world has changed, but the cryo-liberals are still with us and, in many areas, still running the show.
Cryo-liberals are at their best when they're full of data and thoughtful examples from history to make their case. They're at their worst when engaged in such delusional denials of fact that it takes your breath away. Here's the Platonic example that popped on to my radar this week, like many unwelcome things, on X. 'Races and ethnicities don't exist,' tweeted John McTernan, the Blairite political strategist.
• A tinderbox of disconnection and division threatens our democracy
I'm going to write that out again: 'Races and ethnicities don't exist.' Not just 'race and ethnicity have been misused' or 'races and ethnicities are not useful policy categories' or 'race and ethnicity don't mean what your prejudices say they do'. They simply 'don't exist'.
McTernan was engaging with a topic that obviously makes him uncomfortable: the question of whether there is any ethnic component to English identity. The answer is quite obviously yes, in the sense that you can plot the population of England on a genetic chart, which measures the frequencies of particular mutations in the genome, and distinguish a cluster, formed from a mixing of various other groups, that has populated the southern British Isles for most of the last three or four thousand years. And I say that as someone whose genome, if plotted, would not appear in that cluster. It is simply a fact, like the fact that there are different models of Barbie.
Now I can understand why many people may feel queasy that this sort of fact is entering our political discourse. A new era is upon us, in which voters are rejecting the ideology of universal cultural compatibility. This change brings risk. There is a lot of vile race-baiting rising up social media feeds, promoted by racists and grifters.
But the right response is not to deny the reality that there are different ethnicities — clusters of identifiable genetic sameness and difference. Truth, as we learnt from the trans debate, does not care about your feelings. And lying or denying the truth doesn't make you nice or better or cleverer than other people. It makes you a delusional, dangerous dinosaur.
• Emma Duncan: Division, decline, decay? What a load of rot
Geneticists sequencing the DNA of a man found buried in a pot in Ancient Egypt have found that a fifth of his lineage was from Mesopotamia. This was a period in which both regions were home to civilisations that were starting to develop writing and taking great leaps forward in architectural and political sophistication. Perhaps their development was related to interbreeding and population exchange. There. That wasn't so controversial, was it?
I mentioned in my last column that lettuces are used in Chinese new year rituals to symbolise future prosperity, via a pun. The Chinese word for 'lettuce' and for 'growing wealth' are similar. This prompted a reader to send me some lyrics from Guys & Dolls in which the word 'lettuce' is used to mean cash: 'There are well-heeled shooters everywhere/ And an awful lot of lettuce/ For the fella who can get us there.' I can only assume this is because greenbacks might seem salad-like when leafed through in wads. And it rhymes.
The response to the news that the Bank of England may replace Winston Churchill on our banknotes with an array of wind farms was utterly predictable. It's almost as if someone is sitting inside our institutions trying to think of the best way for them to sabotage themselves. What's next? Replace the King with Glastonbury Tor?

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
34 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Labour should ignore Lord Kinnock and steer well clear of a wealth tax
SIR – You report (July 7) that Lord Kinnock is nudging Labour to implement a wealth tax. As Labour has already hammered the wealthy in so many areas – from VAT on private school fees to the abolition of non-dom status – such a tax would be the final nail in the coffin. It's often suggested that this Government is relatively centrist. With the introduction of a wealth tax, however, it would start to be perceived as a hard-Left administration. Labour would be wise to ignore a former leader who never knew what success was at a general election. Henry Bateson Whittingham, Northumberland SIR – Lord Kinnock, who previously supported Labour's mansion tax proposals, now wants to see a wealth tax. He has enjoyed a taxpayer-funded salary and pension for decades. He knows nothing of wealth creation. David Miller Chigwell, Essex SIR – The Labour Left's desire to clobber those it deems wealthy will bring negative consequences for growth, businesses and jobs. Wealth taxes haven't worked elsewhere, serving simply to scare away entrepreneurs and investors. Moreover, imagine the level of bureaucracy and intrusion involved in calculating the value of an individual's assets. Presumably Labour will have HMRC assessing every piece of jewellery, family silver, art and furniture. Mike Hughes London SW10 SIR – The wealthy might be more willing to pay such taxes if they felt confident that their contributions were not being used unwisely. Pamela Wheeler Shrewsbury SIR – Wealth taxes are politically easy: 'the rich' have always been a convenient enemy. However, what those who wish to squeeze this group don't realise is that its definition will change quickly. Wealth tax advocates say they 'only' want a tax of 2 per cent on assets over £10 million, but this 'modest' levy is just the thin end of the wedge. When it doesn't raise enough money (and it never will, because government spending is unlimited and statist politicians always want to spend more) it will become 20 per cent on assets over £5 million – and so on. People tend to assume that wealth is only something that happens to others. You might not consider yourself rich, but no one ever does. The decision will not be yours to make. Robert Frazer Salford, Lancashire SIR – If the Government chases all the 'givers' away, we shall be left only with 'takers' – who will have nobody to take from. Barbara Jackson Epping, Essex


BBC News
37 minutes ago
- BBC News
Macron's state visit to begin in Windsor palace gets repaired
King Charles III will say the UK and France must stand together in the face of a "multitude of complex threats", when he speaks at a state banquet for French President Emmanuel and his wife Brigitte will be welcomed by the King and Queen and the Prince and Princess of Wales, as they arrive for a three-day state state banquet will be a highlight of the trip, with famous faces, a showcase menu and a message from the King about the "shared history and culture between our two peoples".This is the first state visit by the leader of an EU country since Brexit and the King will emphasise the need to work together on issues from military threats to climate change. "For centuries our citizens have admired each other, amused each other, and imitated each other," the King will say at Tuesday evening's banquet, which will be held at Windsor Castle, as Buckingham Palace is being will warn of modern threats "emanating from multiple directions" and challenges that "know no borders" from which "no fortress can protect us"."Our two nations share not only values, but also the tireless determination to act on them in the world," the state banquet speech will say.A state visit is a "soft power" opportunity to strengthen partnerships, with the French visit set to reinforce links with the UK in trade, diplomacy and defence, at a time of uncertainty about the US stance on issues such as military backing for Ukraine.A UK-France summit at Downing Street on Thursday, hosted by Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, is also likely to discuss ways of stopping illegal migration on small boats across the start of the visit on Tuesday will see ceremonial spectacles, with senior members of the Royal Family ready to greet the French visitors and to celebrate the "entente cordiale", in the first French state visit since William and Catherine will greet the French president and his wife when their plane touches down at RAF Northolt, with King Charles and Queen Camilla then welcoming them at will be horses, as well as political horse-trading, with a carriage procession through Windsor, ahead of a royal salute and military parade at Windsor Wednesday, Macron will see a horse that he gave to the late Queen Elizabeth II, to mark her Platinum Jubilee in French president and his wife are also set to visit the tomb of the late Queen, during their stay in UK government has spoken of wanting to "re-set" post-Brexit relations with European neighbours and Macron's visit will be a public endorsement of the longstanding alliance with and peers will be able to hear Macron when he gives a speech to the Houses of in science will highlighted during the visit, with examples of artificial intelligence and innovative technology being shown to the French visitors at Imperial College Charles and Queen Camilla carried out a state visit to France in 2023, where he received a standing ovation for his speech to the French had given a strongly worded message of support for Ukraine after Russia's "horrifying" invasion. The King had also highlighted the "existential challenge" of climate change. Sign up here to get the latest royal stories and analysis every week with our Royal Watch newsletter. Those outside the UK can sign up here.


Times
41 minutes ago
- Times
Keir Starmer considered George Osborne for US ambassador
One was a principle architect of New Labour who was instrumental in the rise of Sir Tony Blair. The other was the strategic political brain behind Lord Cameron of Chipping Norton who consigned Labour to fifteen years in the wilderness. Now it has emerged that Sir Keir Starmer came close to appointing George Osborne instead of Lord Mandelson in the high-profile and critical role as Britain's ambassador to the US. In the updated edition of his biography of the prime minister, the journalist Tom Baldwin reveals that Osborne made it to a shortlist of two for the prestigious and diplomatically fraught role as Britain's consigliere to the Trump administration. The former chancellor is understood to have discussed the role with senior Downing Street figures and was prepared to sacrifice his multimillion-pound salary from the financial advisory firm Robey Warshaw to take it. Baldwin said that Osborne's name had been added to the process late after months of speculation over who would replace Dame Karen Pierce, the outgoing and highly respected incumbent. Alongside Mandelson, those publicly in the frame for the job included the former foreign secretary David Miliband and Cathy Ashton, the former EU high representative. But Trump's victory in November's presidential election threw the recruitment process wide open and some in Downing Street questioned whether it would be strategically smart to appoint someone from the right. • Who is the real Peter Mandelson? From New Labour to Washington 'Just days before [Mandelson was appointed] the name of George Osborne [was] added to the final shortlist presented to the prime minister by Downing Street advisers,' Baldwin wrote in The New World magazine. 'They are understood to have invested considerable effort in pushing the former Tory chancellor's application, even though that perhaps unnecessarily complicated what Starmer would ultimately regard as a relatively simple decision.' It is understood that one of those pushing Osborne's candidacy was Morgan McSweeney, Starmer's chief of staff. Baldwin also reveals that Starmer nearly failed in his attempt to flatter Trump in their Oval Office meeting by presenting him with a letter from the King inviting him for a state visit. The letter had been in the hands of an aide, who had refused White House demands for it to be submitted in advance. 'Starmer suddenly realised he would need to present the letter himself but was surrounded by White House staff preparing the president for the media,' Baldwin wrote. 'I'm told that the envelope had to be gently lobbed over their heads to the prime minister who, it turns out, has a reassuringly safe pair of hands.'