John Swinney and Anas Sarwar clash over reports of SNP secret meeting
The Scottish Labour leader pointed to reports that senior SNP figures had held a meeting to discuss Swinney's future as party leader, during an exchange discussing the closure of the Alexander Dennis factory in Falkirk.
READ MORE: Fraser of Allander calls out Labour's Spending Review claim
On Wednesday, Alexander Dennis announced it will look at consolidating its UK bus body manufacturing operations into a single site in Scarborough as part of a restructuring which is putting 400 jobs at risk.
Swinney said he was 'deeply concerned' by the looming closure and said that ministers are engaging 'closely and firmly' to avoid any 'negative implications' for Scottish workers.
Sarwar claimed that the Scottish Government procured more buses from China than Scotland, and Manchester mayor Andy Burnham had bought more than Scottish ministers.
He then said that the First Minister had given a 'weak response', before bringing up reports that SNP figures had given Swinney two weeks to come up with ideas to save his job.
'If he hasn't come up with a good idea to improve Scotland in 18 years, what chance have you got coming up with something now?' Sarwar asked.
The First Minister replied: 'What I'm doing, and what the workforce of Alexander Dennis will not be surprised at, is that I'm focusing on the situation facing Alexander Dennis. That's what I'm doing.'
He added that the Scottish Government had provided £58 million in funding for the firm for zero emissions buses, and that Scottish Enterprise has also given the firm £30.3m for research and development.
The First Minister continued: 'The stark reality is that current UK policy does not allow for the incentivisation or reward of local content, job retention or creation, nor does it encourage any domestic economic benefit.
'That is the implication of the subsidy control act.'
(Image: Scottish Parliament)
Sarwar replied: 'If John Swinney can't figure out a way to order busses in Scotland, I suggest h picks up the phone to Andy Burrnham and see how he managed to do it five times, almost five times as many bus orders.
'John Swinney and the SNP are out of ideas, out of steam, and out of time.
'Failing to support Scottish manufacturing jobs is just one example.'
He added: 'One SNP MSP said about John Swinney, there is no energy, no fire, no boldness, no long-term vision.
'They're right, aren't they?'
Swinned fired back: 'Listen, Mr Sarwar can conjure up all the stuff he wants.
'He can go through his press cuttings, he can practice it in the mirror in the morning to see how it sounds.
'I'm going to be focussed on delivering answers and solutions for workers who face difficulty in the country.
READ MORE: UK accused of 'actively participating in genocide' by training IDF
'And while Mr Sarwar postures, I'm going to deliver for the workers of Scotland.'
Elsewhere, Scottish Tory leader Russell Findlay claimed the Scottish Government are "wasting billions of pounds of taxpayer money" and that the "SNP anti-business policies are costing Scotland a fortune".
"The SNP have failed to keep up with the rest of the UK," he said.
"They've made it even worse by wasting billions of pounds of taxpayers money for the National Care Service that doesn't treat patients, the endless Calmac ferry scandal, a 1 billion pound prison."
(Image: Scottish Parliament) Findlay added: "Isn't this exactly why John Swinney can bring down bills or improve public services? He's throwing all the money away."
Swinney fired back that since 2007 GDP per person has grown by 10.3% compared to 6.1% in the UK, demonstrating "superior economic performance".
"There are implications of Mr Findlay saying things like the annual benefits bill is too high," the FM said.
"He has to set out where the cuts are going to come from, and the cuts under Mr. Findlay will fall on the children of Scotland.
"I want to lift children out of poverty. Mr. Findlay wants to consign children to poverty."
Findlay responded: "The Scottish Conservative party wants to lift children and families out of poverty, not keep them trapped on benefits."
And, Scottish Greens co-leader Lorna Slater, discussing the expansion of free school meals, said that children would be "forced into poverty thanks to a Labour Government balancing the books on the backs of the poorest while the wealthiest grow ever richer".
She added: "Does the First Minister agree that now is the time to demand that Keir Starmer set out exactly what conditions he believes need to be met to trigger an independence referendum so we can get out of this unequal union?"
The FM replied: "I think it's unacceptable democratically for the will of this parliament, which has demanded the power to be able to hold a referendum on independence, is ignored by the United Kingdom Government, I think that is democratically unacceptable."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
30 minutes ago
- Times
Kirk fiasco shows SNP must stop dragging its feet on single-sex spaces
John Swinney is waiting to hear full guidance from the Equality and Human Rights Commission before acting JANE BARLOW/PA A Church of Scotland community centre in Fife might seem an improbable location for a fresh controversy over single-sex spaces but it is a wholly apposite, and indeed typical, one. A mother objected to biological males using the female toilets at the venue while her daughter's drama class was using the centre at the same time. Initial assurances that this would be attended to were then supplanted by fresh 'guidance' from the Kirk's 'safeguarding department' that toilets were not necessarily to be considered single-sex at all. The Kirk has now returned to its first position. The Church of Scotland may be forgiven its confusion. It is merely following a baleful example set by the Scottish government, which insists it is not yet in a position to implement the law on single-sex spaces as clarified by the Supreme Court in the case of For Women Scotland vs Scottish ministers.
South Wales Guardian
31 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
PM braced for revolt over welfare after defending his record of a year in power
Some 39 Labour MPs have indicated they will vote to halt an overhaul of the benefits system on Tuesday evening, though that number is far lower than the 83 needed to overturn the Prime Minister's working majority. However, more are expected to join them in what could be the largest revolt of Sir Keir's time in office. Ahead of the parliamentary showdown, the Prime Minister insisted at a meeting with his senior ministers that the Government could look back with a 'real sense of pride and achievement' as the July 5 anniversary of his first year in office nears. Ministers have given working people a 'chance to thrive, not just survive', Sir Keir also told the Cabinet meeting, according to a No 10 spokesman. Downing Street pointed to trade deals, economic growth, the extra long-term investment in the spending review, and a cut in NHS waiting lists among the Government's achievements one year on. The spokesman added: '(The Prime Minister) said the Government's work is all designed and focused on improving the lives of working people and giving them the chance to thrive, not just survive, and the Government should be proud of those achievements as a team.' Cabinet ministers, and even Sir Keir himself, were said to be involved in efforts to persuade Labour MPs not to join the rebels ahead of the crunch Commons debate. Ministers hope a partial U-turn on the benefit cuts, which will protect existing claimants of personal independence payments (Pip) and the health element of universal credit, will be enough to win over Labour rebels. As the second reading of the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill began in the Commons, Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall said reforms to the welfare system are needed to ensure its longevity. 'I do not believe that this is sustainable if we want a welfare state that protects people who most need our help for generations to come,' the senior minister said. She added: 'There is no responsibility in leaving our system of social security to continue as it is, and risk support for it becoming so frayed that it is no longer there to provide a safety net for those who can never work, and who most need our help and support.' To see off the threat of far greater rebellion by some 126 Labour MPs led by Treasury Committee chairwoman Dame Meg Hillier, the Government last week softened the impact of its changes to protect some 370,000 existing Pip claimants who had been set to lose out following reassessment. Ministers also committed to a review of the system, involving disabled people and led by disabilities minister Sir Stephen Timms, and unfreezing the higher universal credit rate for those already claiming the health-related element. As a result of the U-turn, the reforms are expected to save less than half the £5 billion the Government had expected from its initial proposals. In the Commons, Ms Kendall faced warnings the Timms review could be published after the reforms themselves are implemented. She insisted any changes to be made following the review will be done so 'as soon as is practically possible via primary or secondary legislation', though Downing Street would earlier not guarantee Sir Stephen's review would be completed by the time reforms are implemented. No 10 was also insistent that Government modelling, which predicts the welfare proposals will push 150,000 more people into poverty by 2030, was 'subject to uncertainty'. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said the Government's plans were 'driven not by principle but by panic'. Indicating that the Tories will not support the Government, Mrs Badenoch told the Commons: 'By 2030, on this Government's spending plans, we will hit £100 billion on health and disability benefits alone, that is more than what we spend on defence, and this should make everyone in this House stop and think, because this Bill does nothing to fix that problem, and that is why we cannot support it.' She described the Bill as a 'fudge', adding: 'A fundamental and serious programme to reform our welfare system is required, and this Bill is not it.' Rachael Maskell, the leading force of the rebellion which seeks to halt the Bill in its tracks on Tuesday night, urged MPs to join her in the voting lobbies. The York Central MP told the Commons: 'These Dickensian cuts belong to a different era and a different party. 'They are far from what this Labour Party is for, a party to protect the poor, as is my purpose, for I am my brother's keeper.' Ahead of the Commons debate, Ms Maskell indicated she believed 'many more' Labour MPs than the 39 who had signed her 'reasoned amendment' would join her in rebelling. The Liberal Democrats are also expected to back the rebel amendment, the party's work and pensions spokesman Steve Darling told the Commons. Ministers have been coy about whether rebel Labour MPs will face disciplinary action, with Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds telling broadcasters he was 'not aware' they would lose the party whip, but said 'those issues are for the chief whip'. Whatever people's views about the concessions, surely everyone can see the process here is ALL wrong? Third Reading in eight days? A timetable like that diminishes the role of MPs in getting this legislation right, shuts out disabled people and puts too many at risk. — Andy Burnham (@AndyBurnhamGM) July 1, 2025 Elsewhere, critic of the Bill Andy Burnham, the Labour Mayor of Greater Manchester, hit out at the parliamentary process it will undergo, claiming it was all wrong. On social media site X, he wrote: 'Third Reading in eight days? A timetable like that diminishes the role of MPs in getting this legislation right, shuts out disabled people and puts too many at risk.'
Western Telegraph
35 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Ban on ‘exploitative' zero-hours contracts to come into effect in 2027
Ministers have opted for a 'phased' rollout of the changes, which were a Labour manifesto promise, in order to balance safeguards for employees with 'the practical realities' of running a company. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has hailed the Government's flagship Employment Rights Bill, which is making its way through Parliament, as 'the single biggest upgrade to workers' rights in a generation'. Its measures include bolstered rights to parental leave, a crackdown on 'fire and rehire' practices and the removal of the lower earnings limit and waiting period for statutory sick pay. Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner is overseeing the reforms along with Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds (PA) Under the new legislation, bosses will be also be required to offer workers a guaranteed hours contract reflecting the hours they regularly work, as well as reasonable notice of shifts and payment of shifts. Under plans outlined in a 'roadmap' published by the Government on Tuesday, some changes will be implemented immediately after the Bill receives royal assent but others will take up to two years to come into effect. After the legislation has passed, Conservative-era rules restricting industrial action in sectors including health and education will be abolished as the Strikes (Minimum Service Levels) Act 2023 will be instantly repealed. New protections against dismissal for striking workers will also come into effect after the Bill makes it onto the statute books. Changes to sick pay, protections for whistleblowers, 'day-one' paternity leave and unpaid parental leave and reforms to strengthen financial security for staff facing mass redundancies will take effect in April 2026. In October 2026, measures to end 'unscrupulous' fire and rehire practices, tightened tipping laws aimed at ensuring workers take home a fair proportion of gratuity will be implemented, the Government said. Measures to strengthen right of access for trade unions and protect employees from harassment are now also due to come into effect next October under the roadmap. Finally in 2027, the Government says it will have implemented: – Full gender pay gap and menopause action plans, which aim to support women in the workplace and will be introduced on a voluntary basis from next April – Bereavement leave – A ban on the 'exploitative' use of zero-hours contracts – 'Day-one' rights to protection against unfair dismissal – Improved access to flexible working, for example by allowing people to work from home – Strengthened protections against dismissal for pregnant women and new mothers. Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner said the Government was 'working fast' to deliver the reforms, with some due to kick in 'within months'. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said: 'By phasing implementation, our collaborative approach balances meaningful worker protections with the practical realities of running a successful business, creating more productive workplaces where both employees and employers can thrive.' Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said the phased approach struck the right balance between protecting workers and businesses (Stefan Rousseau/PA) The Department for Business and Trade said that providing a 'structured timeline' would allow stakeholders to plan their time and resources to ensure they are ready for the changes. The Government will continue to consult with 'business groups, employers, workers and trade unions' in phases on the detail of the measures, beginning this summer and continuing into the new year, it said. Hospitality and recruitment bodies welcomed the time to prepare, while union leaders urged employers 'not to wait' for the law change before implementing the reforms. TUC general secretary Paul Nowak said: 'It's welcome that workers will start to benefit from these long overdue changes from later this year – but this timetable must be a backstop. 'We need to see these new rights in action as soon as possible. Decent employers don't need to wait for the law to change. 'They should be working with staff and unions right now to introduce these changes as quickly as possible.' GMB general secretary Gary Smith said: 'GMB members now know when these much-needed improvements will happen – we urge good employers not to wait; do the right thing and make these changes a reality today.' Kate Nicholls, chief executive of UKHospitality, said: 'Clear and precise timelines on when aspects of this legislation, and the processes to deliver them, will come into force is essential, and it was important that the Government embark on providing clarity. 'There are substantial changes for businesses in the Employment Rights Bill and it's right that the Government is using the appropriate implementation periods for the most complex issues for hospitality, in order to get the details right for both businesses and workers.' Neil Carberry, Recruitment and Employment Confederation (Rec) chief executive, said: 'This clear timeline on the Employment Rights Bill gives room for full and frank consultation on how the new rules will be structured. It also gives businesses important time to plan. 'Now we have the roadmap, ongoing and meaningful engagement will be critical to ensuring new regulations allow the flexibility workers and companies value to remain.' The Tories said the roadmap amounted to 'another U-turn' and an admission from the Government that 'they have got it wrong again.' Shadow business secretary Andrew Griffith said: '273,000 people have lost their jobs since the autumn budget and this trade union inspired Bill is going to make that even worse meaning more children growing up in workless households. Labour must throw it out and start again. 'The one thing Reynolds got right is that it is the Conservatives who are opposing his bad ideas. We are giving business a voice and saying what they say privately but that he refuses to listen to.'
