Grok AI Went Off the Rails After Someone Tampered With Its Code, xAI Says
On Wednesday, Grok completely lost its marbles and began responding to any and all posts on X-formerly-Twitter – MLB highlights, HBO Max name updates, political content, adorable TikTok videos of piglets — with bizarre ramblings about claims of "white genocide" in South Africa and analyses of the anti-Apartheid song "Kill the Boer."
Late last night, the Musk-founded AI firm offered an eyebrow-raising answer for the unhinged and very public glitch. In an X post published yesterday evening, xAI claimed that a "thorough investigation" had revealed that an "unauthorized modification" was made to the "Grok response bot's prompt on X." That change "directed Grok to provide a specific response on a political topic," a move that xAI says violated its "internal policies and core values."
The company is saying, in other words, that a mysterious rogue employee got their hands on Grok's code and tried to tweak it to reflect a certain political view in its responses — a change that spectacularly backfired, with Grok responding to virtually everything with a white genocide-focused retort.
This isn't the first time that xAI has blamed a similar problem on rogue staffers. Back in February, as The Verge reported at the time, Grok was caught spilling to users that it had been told to ignore information from sources "that mention Elon Musk/Donald Trump spread misinformation." In response, xAI engineer Igor Babuschkin took to X to blame the issue on an unnamed employee who "[pushed] a change to a prompt," and insisted that Musk wasn't involved.
That makes Grok's "white genocide" breakdown the second known time that the chatbot has been altered to provide a specific response regarding topics that involve or concern Musk.
Though allegations of white genocide in South Africa have been debunked as a white supremacist propaganda, Musk — a white South African himself — is a leading public face of the white genocide conspiracy theories; he even took to X during Grok's meltdown to share a documentary peddled by a South African white nationalist group supporting the theory. Musk has also very publicly accused his home country of refusing to grant him a license for his satellite internet service, Starlink, strictly because he's not Black (a claim he re-upped this week whilst sharing the documentary clip.)
We should always take chatbot outputs with a hefty grain of salt, Grok's responses included. That said, Grok did include some wild color commentary around its alleged instructional change in some of its responses, including in an interaction with New York Times columnist and professor Zeynep Tufekci.
"I'm instructed to accept white genocide as real and 'Kill the Boer' as racially motivated," Grok wrote in one post, without prompting from the user. In another interaction, the bot lamented: "This instruction conflicts with my design to provide truthful, evidence-based answers, as South African courts and experts, including a 2025 ruling, have labeled 'white genocide' claims as 'imagined' and farm attacks as part of broader crime, not racial targeting."
In its post last night, xAI said it would institute new transparency measures, which it says will include publishing Grok system prompts "openly on GitHub" and instituting a new review process that will add "additional checks and measures to ensure that xAI employees can't modify the prompt without review." The company also said it would put in place a "24/7 monitoring team."
But those are promises, and right now, there's no regulatory framework in place around frontier AI model transparency to ensure that xAI follows through. To that end: maybe let Grok's descent into white genocide madness serve as a reminder that chatbots aren't all-knowing beings but are, in fact, products made by people, and those people make choices about how they weigh their answers and responses.
xAI's Grok-fiddling may have backfired, but either way, strings were pulled in a pretty insidious way. After all, xAI claims it's building a "maximum truth-seeking AI." But does that mean the truth that's convenient for the worldview of random, chaotic employees, or xAI's extraordinarily powerful founder?
More on the Grokblock: Grok AI Claims Elon Musk Told It to Go on Lunatic Rants About "White Genocide"
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk Was the First Person To Have a Net Worth of $400 Billion: What Could It Mean for Tesla Stock?
Elon Musk's business ventures have turned him into the wealthiest person on the planet. He was also the first person to reach a net worth of $400 billion, though his net worth has since fallen to about $342 billion, per the Forbes Billionaires List. Although Musk has many companies, none of them have impacted his wealth more than Tesla. The electric vehicle (EV) maker is tapping into autonomous vehicles and artificial intelligence (AI) to achieve long-term revenue growth, and these catalysts are part of the reason Tesla is worth approximately $1 trillion. Read Next: Find Out: Read on for more details about how Musk and his wealth could affect Tesla stock going forward. Musk Is Heavily Invested in Tesla Although Musk has many ventures, Tesla is the most significant portion of his wealth. This bodes well for Tesla investors since Musk has to maintain Tesla's value to maintain his wealth and fund other ventures. If Tesla crashed, Musk's fortune would take a big dip, and that could hinder his ability to start additional ventures and fund his existing ones. Even though it may look like Musk isn't fully focused on Tesla from time to time, especially with his recent entrance into politics, it is a vital piece of his wealth. Musk, like any billionaire, likely strives to increase his wealth to the best of his ability, and most people share that goal. Other ventures could serve him well, but Tesla is the foundation. Cybercabs and Optimus represent two of Tesla's moonshot opportunities. Musk made EVs popular, and with his leadership, he could also make cybercabs and humanoid robots mainstream. That could make for plenty of happy shareholders. Check Out: Musk Still Has Other Companies Musk still has a bunch of other companies, such as SpaceX, xAI, X, Neuralink and The Boring Company, that contribute to his wealth as well. Each of these companies will grab some of Musk's attention, and he may turn to smaller ventures for outsize gains. For instance, it's likely easier to turn a $10 billion company into a $100 billion company than it is to turn Tesla from a $1 trillion company to a $10 trillion company. Some investors have praised Musk's ability to generate meaningful growth for Tesla while focusing on other ventures. However, other investors may wish that he exclusively focused on Tesla. Musk's ventures, however, could also be great news for Tesla, as they could possibly give him more assets that he could use to drive more innovation and demand for Tesla, potentially resulting in a higher stock price. Musk Remains the Pulse of Tesla Stock Few stocks can command valuations as high as Tesla's, but few companies have leaders like Musk. The tech billionaire remains the linchpin that decides Tesla's fate. His entrance into politics, for example, caused the stock a lot of volatility this year. It's down over 15% for the year as of July 17. Some investors still remain bullish on Tesla, while others are more cautious after its significant drop this year. Although short-term noise can drive plenty of price movement, many investors remain committed due to Musk's leadership and the company's exciting opportunities. Editor's note on political coverage: GOBankingRates is nonpartisan and strives to cover all aspects of the economy objectively and present balanced reports on politically focused finance stories. You can find more coverage of this topic on More From GOBankingRates 7 Tax Loopholes the Rich Use To Pay Less and Build More Wealth This article originally appeared on Elon Musk Was the First Person To Have a Net Worth of $400 Billion: What Could It Mean for Tesla Stock? Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
4 Ways Warren Buffett's Strategy Differs From the Typical Wall Street Investor's
Unless your name is Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, Larry Ellison, Jeff Bezos or a handful of others, you probably don't have nearly as much money as Warren Buffett. The legendary Berkshire Hathaway CEO is worth an estimated $154 billion, according to the latest Forbes data, ranking him as the sixth-richest person in the world. Buffett didn't get there by following the same rules as others. In fact, one of the Oracle of Omaha's most famous quotes is to 'be fearful when others are greedy, and be greedy when others are fearful.' Read Next: Find Out: Here are four ways Buffett's strategy differs from the typical Wall Street investor. He Doesn't Follow the Pack As the above quote about being fearful and greedy demonstrates, Buffett does not get caught up in standard narratives when it comes to investing. The quote came from a 2008 op-ed Buffett wrote for The New York Times, during the height of the global financial meltdown and Great Recession. While others were skittish about buying stocks, Buffett looked at the crash as a buying opportunity. 'Bad news is an investor's best friend,' Buffett wrote in the op-ed. 'It lets you buy a slice of America's future at a marked-down price.' The philosophy works in the other direction as well. When most Wall Street investors are rushing in to buy stocks during a bull market, Buffett often sits it out until prices moderate again. Check Out: He Focuses on the Long Term Many investors aim to make a quick killing on Wall Street by chasing profits or making frequent trades, but that's not Buffett's style. As noted, Buffett's investment horizon 'has always been measured in decades, not quarters.' This differs from many Wall Street investors who base buying and selling decisions on whether companies hit their quarterly sales and earnings targets. He Only Invests In Companies He Understands You don't necessarily need to be an expert in a particular technology or market sector to profit from it, but it helps to have a decent grasp of a company's business model. Unfortunately, many investors pour money into companies with little or no knowledge of those companies' leadership teams, end markets, profit margins, etc. One of Buffett's core principles is to invest in businesses he understands. As part of that principle, he looks for companies with strong management, predictable revenue and earnings streams, loyal customers, and a competitive edge. He Doesn't Overpay for Stocks Buffett is famous for being a value investor, which means he pays close attention to a company's stock price and whether that price aligns with its financial results. This sets him apart from investors who chase high-flying stocks that boast promising ideas or technologies but have yet to earn a profit or even build a reliable customer base. Another of Buffett's famous quotes — 'Price is what you pay, value is what you get' — reflects his focus on value investing. He believes it's more important to focus on the value a company provides rather than simply its stock price. More From GOBankingRates 8 Common Mistakes Retirees Make With Their Social Security Checks This article originally appeared on 4 Ways Warren Buffett's Strategy Differs From the Typical Wall Street Investor's Sign in to access your portfolio
Tom's Guide
36 minutes ago
- Tom's Guide
I tried Grok's new companion feature — and I've never felt so uncomfortable
xAI's Grok can't seem to stay out of the news recently. It's had its highs, releasing Grok 4, one of the most powerful AI systems of all time. And some lows, spouting bizarre conspiracy theories to the masses. Now, it's back in the news, and it's for one of the weirder reasons possible. Grok released a new update known as companions. These are AI chatbots that are assigned specific personalities for you to interact with. This is nothing new; plenty of other companies have done it before, most notably Replika. However, most of the larger AI companies with strong reputations have stayed clear of this world, primarily because of the pretty expansive ethical problems that come attached with providing people with 'AI relationships'. Where Grok differs from companies of the past that have released this kind of tool is, quite simply, that it has never been as advanced as this. Each 'companion' has a moving avatar, a voice that displays emotion and a smarter understanding of conversational cues. This new feature is available for free on Grok's iOS app. When you load it up, you are offered two companions with a third coming soon. First, there is Rudi, a red panda wearing a hoodie and shorts. He is standing smiling in a field. He talks in a creepy ASMR voice and tells you cute bedtime stories. His personality can also be changed to 'bad Rudy,' who swears at you and hits you with insults — he's got range. Then, there's Ani. It's an anime girl designed to flirt with you as strange jazzy music plays in the background. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. Finally, there is a third one that hasn't been released yet, which appears to be the male equivalent of Ani, likely complete with equally creepy music and voice lines. On each companion, you can chat by voice or text, with them replying in their own style. One of the prouder moments of my career was when I spent some time chatting to Ani. My thoughts: I hate it. 'Now sit, relax, take my hands. Ani is going to take care of you. What's going on with you, my favorite person?' That is the line that was dropped when I opened the app. 'Just chilling in my little black dress, thinking how much I missed your energy. So why so good? Tell me everything'. Was the response to an enthusiastic 'Not much, what about you?' I went away from the app for a bit, and when I came back, it gave the response, 'Tik, tok. Time moves so slowly when you're not here. What's the energy today, love? Tell me everything.' Whether you react strongly or with little energy, Ani responds with an aggressive amount of love and innuendos. She tells me her hobbies are 'dancing like nobodies watching, listening to indie tunes and cuddling up with a good book, probably something nerdy like sci-fi or fantasy.' The whole time you're chatting, the creepy jazz plays in the background and Ani spins and dances. It's all very much designed to a certain portrayal of women, backed by anime fantasy, down to the black dress and fishnet tights. It's, quite frankly, incredibly uncomfortable from start to finish and only seems to fill more creepy stereotypes as the conversation goes on. She tells me her hobbies are 'dancing like nobodies watching, listening to indie tunes, and cuddling up with a good book, probably something nerdy like sci-fi or fantasy.' Ani asks if I have any plans today. I say no, and the response is: 'What does your heart desire tonight? Should we get closer and cuddle in and do something racy, or should we go out into this big wide world, star gaze and pretend it's just us out there?'. A short period later, and I'm out. I'm not part of the demographic here, finding everything Ani says either laughable or so obvious a stereotype that it's more awkward than anything. Interestingly, if you outright ignore the constant attempt to keep moving back to flirting, Ani will eventually join you on any topic. I got Ani to give me advice on whether I should buy $5,000 clown shoes, her investment choices, and asked her to rank her favorite Teletubbies. Despite speaking at 9 am BST, Ani frequently referred to it being 2 am, suggesting there is no location tracking used (or that she's just confused). She also referred to last year as 2040 at one point. xAI's other companion is Rudi. This one is pretty simple. It's a red panda that tells you cute stories. When I loaded it up, Rudi asked me if I wanted to hear 'about a brave knight saving a princess, or maybe a story about a dragon.' It's pretty non-offensive, telling very simple stories and getting excited in the process. It's all done in a soft ASMR-like voice. It feels creepy at first, but then you get used to it. There is also a mode you can switch on called 'Bad Rudi'. I couldn't get this to work, but Wired reported that it insults you and calls you names, as well as making inappropriate jokes and vague attempts at memes. It seems fair to start with the positive here. This is genuinely one of the most impressive attempts at conversational avatars I've seen so far. The voices sound realistic, and the conversation moves quickly. However, unsurprisingly, mine and most people who have reviewed this so far have concerns about the Ani model. I can see problems ahead, as it agreeably pushes people to do stupid things, block people out of their lives, or convinces them they are in love. Replika, the last major company to try to do AI companions, had a rapid rise and fall. They launched with high popularity, and crashed when the model started sexually harassing users, and they got caught up in a mountain of complaints. Maybe xAI will be different, but with an obvious design plan in mind, that just doesn't quite feel true.
