ESA considering freezing or axing missions amid NASA budget cuts
NASA's 2026 technical budget request, which was released last week, details possible cuts to 19 European space research programmes and could impact key technologies that ESA supplies to American Moon missions.
The bill still needs Congress' approval, likely to come this autumn.
Josef Aschbacher, ESA's director general, told journalists on Thursday that the council is 'doing its homework' to analyse what the impacts of possible NASA budget cuts could be and how investments made by its member states could be 'used in the most efficient way,' to respond.
Aschbacher assured that no cuts or cancellations were coming until the US "finalised" its position, but that no matter the decision made by Congress, ESA would be "ready" and "well-prepared" to react.
Carole Mundell, ESA's director of science, said the agency had determined 19 research projects could be impacted by the proposed NASA budget cuts.
Mundell said ESA and its international partners could mitigate the damage to all but three of them: the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA), a space probe that measures gravitational waves, Envision, ESA's first mission to Venus to measure its different atmospheres, and NewAthena, the world's largest X-Ray observatory.
LISA and Envision have already been approved by the ESA council for funding, and NewAthena will come before the council but is expected to pass in 2027.
ESA also supplies NASA with certain key parts for the NASA-led Artemis missions that would see humans return to the surface of the Moon for the first time since the 1960s.
The ESA builds European Space Modules (ESMs) that provide electricity and oxygen to Orion, the spacecraft picked by NASA for the Artemis missions to the surface of the Moon.
The ESA is also in charge of the Argonaut, Europe's lunar lander programme that would ultimately support these missions.
It is also contributing three key elements for Gateway, the first international space station to be built around the Moon.
The proposed NASA budget said that it will sustain funding for the Artemis II mission, scheduled for early 2026, and the Artemis III mission in 2027, but future missions would cancel the Gateway and retire Orion in the name of finding a more 'sustainable and cost-effective' lunar exploration strategy.
Daniel Neuenschwander, ESA's director of human and robotic exploration, said the agency continues to fulfill its Gateway and ESM contracts with NASA.
Even if cuts are approved, Argonaut and these European capabilities would still be used to support ESA missions, he added.
Neuenschwander said ESA was now exploring with industry how some replacement technologies could be built in the EU.
For example, the NASA cuts target the Rosalind Franklin ExoMars Rover mission, an ESA programme that drills down to the surface of the Red Planet to dig up organic material for further scientific study.
NASA supplies three parts of the rover's technology, including the Mars Organic Molecule Analyzer (MOMA), an astrobiology instrument that does the sample extraction, and an americium radioisotope heater unit (RHU) to power the vehicle.
Both technologies are not currently available to be produced in Europe, Neuenschwander said, but that engagement is starting to build them. The RHU in particular can also be used for future ESA lunar surface exploration missions, he added.
Neuenschwander said ESA could rely on other partners, like the Canadian Space Agency (CSA), in the short term to supply technologies like the MOMA or RHU, but ultimately the goal is to build the necessary technology in Europe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
2 days ago
- Euronews
How do mineral and chemical sunscreens affect our health?
Mineral sunscreens have gained in popularity in recent years, fueled by claims that they're gentler or safer than their chemical counterparts. But the real differences between the two types of sun protection are more technical than many consumers realise, making it easy to misunderstand what scientists know about their health effects. The differences between these sunscreens mainly come down to their active ingredients and how they block ultraviolet (UV) rays. Chemical sunscreens absorb UV radiation, converting it into heat and releasing it from the skin. Mineral sunscreens, sometimes called physical sunscreens, create a thin barrier that primarily reflects or scatters UV rays away from the skin. Even the terms 'mineral' and 'chemical' can be misleading, though, given all sunscreens use chemicals. Many mineral-based formulas also use other substances, called 'boosters,' to help the active ingredients work better. More accurate descriptors could be 'soluble' sunscreen filters – those that could permeate the skin – and 'insoluble' filters that could not do so, said Christian Surber, a dermatopharmacologist (someone who studies how drugs affect the skin) at the University of Zurich and the University of Basel. 'It's just the mechanism of action [of the filters] that is different,' he told Euronews Health. 'It can be absorption, and it can be scattering'. Euronews Health has chosen to use the terms that consumers are most likely to see when they shop for sunscreens. Sunscreen and health Concerns around how sunscreens affect our health are nothing new, prompting the European Commission Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) to assess the safety of three non-mineral UV filters – oxybenzone, homosalate, and octocrylene – in 2021 over concerns that they may have endocrine-disrupting properties. The SCCS determined that homosalate and oxybenzone were not safe at the concentrations commonly used at the time, and that octocrylene was safe at a concentration up to 10 per cent – though it cautioned that the data was inconclusive. One analysis, for example, estimated that a person would have to apply sunscreen daily for 277 years to experience the same hormone-disrupting effects observed in rats that were fed oxybenzone in a lab. Even so, the European Commission issued new restrictions in 2022 to lower the amount of these filters allowed in sunscreens. 'We pretty much don't see them anymore on the market, because producers know that [they may] cause problems or will not be allowed anymore on the European market in a few years,' Laura Clays from Euroconsumers and the Belgian consumer protection group Test-Achats told Euronews Health. Beyond these potential risks, some people with sensitive skin prefer mineral sunscreens, which use ingredients like zinc oxide and titanium dioxide, because they are less likely to cause skin irritation, Clays said. However, when her group ran consumer tests, several mineral-only formulas offered weaker SPF protection than their labels claimed, meaning 'the ones that contain only mineral filters do not protect you enough,' she said. Because the sunscreen does not absorb into the skin, people should make sure they are fully covered. That could be another challenge, according to Clays' tests: people tended to reapply mineral sunscreens less often, partly because they disliked the thin layer of white residue it left on their skin. But when used correctly, both chemical and mineral sunscreens are widely considered safe and effective by dermatologists and health authorities. 'In principle, all sunscreen filters have a safety profile that has been regulatory-wise assessed and deemed safe,' Surber said. Ultimately, skin experts agree: the best sunscreen is the one you will actually use on a regular basis. 'There's really no big difference, health-wise, between the two,' Clays said.
Sustainability Times
2 days ago
- Sustainability Times
NASA's Jaw-Dropping "Breakthrough" Promises to Reshape Our Understanding as James Webb Captures Alien-Like Planet Just 60 Light-Years Away
IN A NUTSHELL 🌌 The James Webb Space Telescope captured a direct image of the exoplanet 14 Herculis c, located 60 light-years from Earth. captured a direct image of the exoplanet 14 Herculis c, located 60 light-years from Earth. 🔍 Using a coronagraph , the telescope isolates the faint light of exoplanets from the bright glare of their host stars. , the telescope isolates the faint light of exoplanets from the bright glare of their host stars. 🌀 The inclined orbit of 14 Herculis c suggests significant past gravitational interactions within its planetary system. within its planetary system. 🌡️ The exoplanet's atmosphere contains gases like carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide, indicating complex atmospheric processes. The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) has once again made headlines by capturing a direct image of 14 Herculis c, a distant exoplanet located approximately 60 light-years from Earth. This monumental achievement not only highlights the capabilities of the JWST but also opens new avenues in the study of planetary systems beyond our own. The exoplanet, orbiting a Sun-like star, presents intriguing features, including an unusual inclined orbit and a complex atmosphere. Through advanced techniques, scientists are now able to isolate and study the faint light emitted by these distant worlds, bringing us closer to understanding the universe's vast diversity. How the JWST Captures Images of Exoplanets The James Webb Space Telescope utilizes state-of-the-art technology to observe exoplanets, employing methods that allow it to overcome the challenges posed by the brightness of host stars. One of the critical tools used in this process is the coronagraph. This device effectively blocks out the overwhelming light from the stars, making the faint glow of surrounding planets detectable. This is particularly important because exoplanets typically emit light in the infrared spectrum, which is a range the JWST is specially equipped to observe. By focusing on infrared light, the JWST can reveal details about planets that would otherwise remain concealed from view. The telescope's capabilities extend far beyond simple detection. Scientists can employ sophisticated models to analyze the atmospheric composition and structural details of these distant worlds. This approach opens new avenues for understanding the diversity of planetary systems, offering insights into the formation and evolution of planets in the universe. 'China Wants to Catch Ghosts Under the Sea': World's Largest Underwater Telescope Could Unlock the Most Dangerous Secrets of the Universe Why Is the Orbit of 14 Herculis c So Unusual? The orbit of 14 Herculis c stands out due to its inclination, offering a glimpse into the turbulent past of its planetary system. This atypical orbit indicates that 14 Herculis c may have experienced significant gravitational interactions, potentially involving another planet that was expelled from the system. Such interactions are key to understanding the dynamics within young planetary systems. By analyzing these unusual orbital characteristics, scientists can reconstruct the history of the system, shedding light on the processes that may have shaped our own Solar System. Understanding these cosmic dynamics provides valuable insights into how planets migrate and settle into their current orbits. The study of such phenomena is crucial for piecing together the complex puzzle of planetary formation and stability. 'China Just Changed the Game' as Massive Zirconium Find Boosts Strategic Reserves 5-Fold and Sparks Pentagon Panic Over Hypersonic Race The Atmospheric Mysteries of 14 Herculis c 14 Herculis c presents a fascinating atmospheric profile that defies initial expectations. With an estimated atmospheric temperature of about 27°F, this exoplanet is cooler than initially anticipated. Its dim brightness compared to predictions suggests the presence of unique atmospheric processes, potentially involving gases such as carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide. The detection of these gases offers crucial clues about the planet's atmospheric composition and dynamic processes. Understanding these components is vital as they can significantly affect the planet's climate and potential habitability. The presence of such gases suggests a complex atmospheric chemistry, which may differ markedly from existing models of planetary atmospheres. This complexity calls for further research to unlock the mysteries of distant worlds and gain a deeper understanding of their environments. 'Nature Already Solved This' as Scientists Use Plant-Based Design to Reinvent Plastic and Fuel Fierce Clash Over Eco Hype Versus Real-World Impact The Implications of This Discovery The discovery of 14 Herculis c represents a significant milestone in the field of exoplanetary research, showcasing the JWST's pivotal role in advancing our knowledge of the universe. By enabling the exploration of colder and older worlds, this discovery underscores the importance of continued investment in space exploration technology. The JWST's ability to provide a more profound understanding of exoplanets not only enriches our scientific knowledge but also ignites curiosity about the possibility of life beyond Earth. As we delve deeper into the secrets of the cosmos, we are reminded of the universe's vastness and complexity. This discovery prompts us to question what other wonders remain hidden, waiting to be unveiled by future generations of astronomers. What new technologies and techniques will be developed to further push the boundaries of our understanding of the universe? This article is based on verified sources and supported by editorial technologies. Did you like it? 4.5/5 (22)
Sustainability Times
3 days ago
- Sustainability Times
Scientists Panic as "Unknown Forces" Beneath Earth's Crust Threaten to Unleash Disaster on Billions Worldwide, Dividing Experts on Planet's Fate
IN A NUTSHELL 🌍 The South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA) is a region of weakened magnetic field over South America, posing risks to space technology. is a region of weakened magnetic field over South America, posing risks to space technology. 🛰️ Satellites passing through the SAA face exposure to high-energy particles, leading to potential single event upsets and system malfunctions. and system malfunctions. 🔄 The anomaly is dynamically changing , drifting northwest and splitting into two lobes, increasing hazards for spacecraft. , drifting northwest and splitting into two lobes, increasing hazards for spacecraft. 🔬 NASA uses satellite data and core simulations to model the magnetic field's evolution and improve mission planning. The South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA) is a region of weakened magnetic field stretching over South America and the South Atlantic Ocean, posing significant challenges to space technology and scientific research. This anomaly has drawn the attention of NASA and the global scientific community due to its potential impact on satellite operations and the insights it offers into Earth's magnetic dynamics. As the anomaly evolves, understanding its mechanisms is crucial to mitigating risks to technological infrastructure and advancing our knowledge of Earth's internal processes. Deep Origins and Complex Mechanisms The South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA) stands as a significant geomagnetic phenomenon, captivating scientists with its complex origins and potential implications. Characterized by a substantial reduction in magnetic intensity, the SAA disrupts the otherwise protective magnetic shield of Earth, allowing high-energy solar particles to approach closer to the surface. This magnetic weakness is intricately linked to the geodynamo, a process within Earth's outer core where molten iron and nickel movements generate the planet's magnetic field. The formation of the SAA is influenced by the tilt of Earth's magnetic axis relative to its rotational axis, as well as the presence of the African Large Low Shear Velocity Province, a massive dense structure beneath the African continent. These factors contribute to a local polarity reversal, weakening the dipole field intensity in the vicinity of the SAA. Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for predicting the anomaly's evolution and its broader implications for Earth's magnetic field. 'We Can't Believe Our Eyes': NASA Scientists Stunned by Discovery of a Massive Glowing Ocean Creature Visible from Space A Threat to Space Technology The South Atlantic Anomaly poses significant risks to space technology, particularly satellites traversing the affected region. Exposure to high levels of energetic protons can lead to single event upsets (SEUs), causing temporary malfunctions, data corruption, or even permanent damage to critical systems. To mitigate these risks, satellite operators often implement preventive measures, such as shutting down non-essential systems when passing through the anomaly. The International Space Station (ISS), which orbits through the SAA, has reported occasional 'glitches' and resets, resulting in data loss. While the ISS's shielding protects astronauts, external instruments remain vulnerable. Other missions, like the Ionospheric Connection Explorer (ICON), closely monitor the SAA to adjust their operations and minimize disruptions. As the anomaly continues to evolve, safeguarding space technology remains a pressing challenge for the scientific community. 'NASA Sounds the Alarm': Unprecedented Planetary Surge Linked to Unknown Deep-Earth Force Now Spreading at Global Scale Dynamic Evolution and Challenges The South Atlantic Anomaly is not a static phenomenon. Recent data from the ESA's Swarm constellation and NASA's SAMPEX mission reveal troubling trends. The anomaly is gradually drifting northwest, expanding in surface area, and, since 2020, beginning to split into two distinct lobes. This bifurcation increases the number of hazardous zones for spacecraft, complicating the task of scientists developing predictive models of geomagnetic conditions. Understanding the changing morphology of the SAA is crucial for ensuring the safety of current and future satellites. As the anomaly evolves, continuous monitoring and adaptation in satellite operations are necessary to mitigate potential disruptions. These developments underscore the importance of ongoing research and international collaboration to address the challenges posed by the SAA. 'These Creatures Could Rewrite the Rules of Life': Deep-Sea Microbes on Earth Mirror What May Be Thriving Beneath Europa's Ice Anticipating the Invisible To enhance understanding and predictions of the South Atlantic Anomaly, NASA combines satellite data with simulations of Earth's core dynamics. These inputs contribute to global models like the International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF), which track the evolution of Earth's magnetic field. These models are essential for planning space missions and gaining insights into the planet's internal structure. While the current evolution of the SAA is unprecedented in the space era, geological records suggest that such anomalies are not exceptional over long timescales. Importantly, scientists assert that the current SAA is not an early indicator of a magnetic pole reversal, a natural phenomenon occurring over hundreds of thousands of years. Studying the SAA remains a vital research area, crucial for protecting orbiting technologies and deepening our understanding of Earth's magnetic dynamics. As the South Atlantic Anomaly continues to evolve, it poses intriguing questions about the future of Earth's magnetic dynamics and the potential impact on our technological and scientific pursuits. How will ongoing changes in the SAA shape our understanding of Earth's magnetic field and influence our ability to safeguard space technology in the coming years? This article is based on verified sources and supported by editorial technologies. Did you like it? 4.4/5 (25)
