logo
People smugglers offer half price summer discount to cross Channel

People smugglers offer half price summer discount to cross Channel

Telegraph18-06-2025

People smugglers have halved their prices for migrants to try to cash in on the summer heatwave.
Albanian crime gangs are offering Channel crossings for just £2,000 per person, the lowest price since 2002, partly in an attempt to lure their countrymen back to small boats as a route to the UK.
The number of Albanians crossing the Channel has slumped from 12,658 in 2022, when they were the biggest nationality, to just 630 last year after the implementation of a fast-track deportation agreement with the UK.
It reflects a price war amongst people smugglers offering summer discounts amid evidence that their profits are being hit by law enforcement disrupting supply chains and intercepting boats and equipment.
The lower prices are thought to be behind the increase in the number of poorer migrants now making the journey. Eritreans, who are among the poorest asylum seekers, were the most common nationality arriving by small boat in the three months to June, accounting for one in five or 1,291 of the arrivals.
It follows the disclosure in March that the crime gangs are offering migrants cheaper crossings if they agree to be filmed so smugglers can then use the videos to promote their services on social media.
The hot weather and calm seas have seen 1,733 migrants reach the UK in small boats in the past week, including 919 last Friday, the second highest daily total this year.
Some 16,317 migrants have crossed the Channel so far this year, up more than 40 per cent higher than at the same point last year and the record for any year since the first Channel arrivals in 2018.
Downing Street admitted on Tuesday that the Channel crisis was 'deteriorating' but is hoping that a change in tactics by the French due to be implemented in two weeks' time will stem the surge.
As first revealed by The Telegraph earlier this month, the French interior ministry has authorised police for the first time to intercept the people smugglers' 'taxi boats' and migrants at sea within 300 metres of the boats in an attempt to prevent them leaving for the UK.
Until now, the French have refused to intervene in the water because they claim maritime laws prevent them from taking action that could put lives at sea at risk. But the French government has given the green light to do so while 'respecting' the 'law of the sea'.
The latest discounted price has been advertised in a public Facebook group called 'Pune ne Angli' ('Work in England'), which is aimed at Albanians and has more than 17,000 followers. 'We have a journey on a small boat. Only £2000,' it says.
'The fall in price is due to a sharp decline in interest from Albanians using small boats. This is the cheapest offer ever, clearly aimed at attracting new clients. Last year, only 630 Albanians made the journey compared to 940 in 2023,' said an Albanian immigration expert.
'Albanians are now avoiding small boat crossings, knowing they will be processed by the Home Office in Dover and likely sent to detention centres, with the aim of deportation.'
In the year to March, Afghans were the most common nationality arriving by small boat with 5,766 arrivals, two per cent up on the previous year. Syrians were the second highest nationality although the fall of the Assad regime has seen their numbers plummet in the most recent quarter, constituting just five per cent of arrivals.
Eritrea was the third highest nationality arriving by small boat in the year ending March 2025, with 4,229 arrivals, an increase of 47 per cent on the previous year.
There has been growing frustration at the apparent foot dragging by the French who so far this year have stopped fewer than 40 per cent of the boats, the lowest proportion on record, despite a three-year £480 million Anglo-French deal to combat the crossings.
Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, wants French border police and gendarmes to intercept the taxi boats not only in the shallow waters as they leave the beaches but also when they make their way from rivers and inland waterways to pick up the migrants.
The French interior ministry told The Telegraph earlier this month that it will change its tactics 'so that we can operate in shallow waters, up to 300 metres from the coast, and thus intercept 'taxi boats', while respecting the principles of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, known as the Montego Bay Convention.'
It aims to have 'shared guidelines' on the strategy ready for the Anglo-French summit, which starts on July 8, when Emmanuel Macron, the French president, will travel to London for a state visit.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Five children taken to hospital after tree falls in Essex park
Five children taken to hospital after tree falls in Essex park

The Guardian

time23 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Five children taken to hospital after tree falls in Essex park

Five children have been taken to hospital, including two with serious injuries, after a tree fell in a seaside park in Essex on Saturday. Essex police said they were called to Chalkwell park in Southend-on-Sea shortly before 3pm, where they found 'a number of casualties'. An East of England ambulance service spokesperson said: 'Two children were transported by road to Southend University hospital. 'A further three children were later transported by road to the same hospital with minor injuries.' Police advised the public to avoid the area. Adam Hutchins, 47, told the EssexLive website: 'I heard there were kids playing on the tree. They heard a big crack. 'It must have [been] pretty loud. They went running over and there were kids underneath the tree. 'All the cricket guys ran over and tried to loft the tree up. I think it's one of the oldest trees. It had metal stands propping it up.' David Burton-Sampson, Labour MP for Southend West and Leigh, described it as a 'worrying incident', adding: 'My thoughts are with those affected.' Daniel Cowan, the leader of Southend's city council, said on Saturday: 'I'm aware of this very serious incident. We're working with Essex police, the ambulance service and fire service, who are still at the scene. 'I do understand that a tree has fallen, there's a number of casualties and we're just asking the public to avoid the area while those services carry out their work, and my thoughts are with those affected.'

Palestine Action are not terrorists. The RAF is just grossly incompetent
Palestine Action are not terrorists. The RAF is just grossly incompetent

Telegraph

time26 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Palestine Action are not terrorists. The RAF is just grossly incompetent

One can see why the Government is proposing to proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation. That anyone could enter the RAF base at Brize Norton, one of the most significant we have, and smear red paint on planes was deeply humiliating. Once, the commanding officer of the base would have resigned immediately; the security officer would have been moved to the cookhouse, if he was lucky; and the Defence Secretary would have offered his resignation. But no-one resigns these days, so branding the intruders 'terrorists', as if they were some ruthless group trained to outwit military professionals, with death and destruction their aim, makes them sound all the more formidable, and their victims all the more helpless. It is an unconvincing cover for the sort of grotesque incompetence that characterises our public sector and public services. That was the RAF; the next day it was the Metropolitan Police unable to prevent an epidemic of daylight robbery on the streets of the West End; the next NHS maternity services that humiliate and degrade women giving birth. What Palestine Action, however organised and bonkers and loathsome they are, did was not terrorism: it was vandalism. You might as well call football hooligans terrorists, or the groups of louts who on hot summer evenings riot because they are bored and the police upset them by seeking to restore order. Terrorism is a truly abhorrent, lethal, wicked and repulsive thing: chucking paint over planes and ridiculing the RAF and the Government in the process does not even begin to compare with it. This devaluation of a word with a precise meaning is highly dangerous. Lord (Toby) Young, in his excellent work for the Free Speech Union, has disclosed that Prevent – the increasingly preposterous, Left-leaning body that tries to stop terrorism at its roots – has done research that suggests 'red flags' for spotting potential far-right terrorists are people who like, among other things, Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four, GK Chesterton's poems, The Bridge On the River Kwai, The Dam Busters and Yes, Minister. Where do I give myself up? Many of us remember real terrorism, perpetrated by real terrorists: the Birmingham and Guildford Bombings; the Hyde Park Bombings; murders in Manchester, both by the IRA in 1992 and 1996 and, a generation later, an Islamic extremist who killed 22 at the city's Arena in 2017; the massacre on 7/7, which killed 52 innocent people in 2005; and if that's not enough, Lockerbie. I could go on. Does all that utter horror compare with exposing the pitiful security at Brize Norton and slapping paint on planes? Of course not. This seemed to start in 2016, after the abominable murder of Jo Cox, the Labour MP, by Thomas Mair, a recluse and weirdo unknown to the authorities. He was rapidly branded a 'terrorist' by politicians when it became clear he had a deeply unhealthy obsession with the far-right and its doctrines. He was a member of no terrorist organisation. What he did was appalling, but he was no more a terrorist than any politically-motivated psychopath acting alone. Ms Cox's murder came days before the Brexit vote. Those who branded Mair a 'terrorist' (and the authorities rapidly followed suit) were surely not trying to associate him with the Brexit movement – were they? On Friday, four people were arrested over the Brize Norton incident. If convicted, they must suffer exemplary punishment. However, I hope the Government accepts its responsibilities for such pathetic security. And I also hope that in future it reserves the term 'terrorist' for those who really merit it, rather than diluting it for idiotic troublemakers or lethal misfits.

‘Are we safe, if nuclear weapons are here?': trepidation in Norfolk village over new jets
‘Are we safe, if nuclear weapons are here?': trepidation in Norfolk village over new jets

The Guardian

time29 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

‘Are we safe, if nuclear weapons are here?': trepidation in Norfolk village over new jets

The genteel west Norfolk village of Marham does not seem to be at the forefront of Britain's military might. A dance class is about to start in the village hall, a game of crown green bowls is under way and swallows are swooping around the medieval church tower as wood pigeons coo. 'It's a lovely, quiet little village,' says Nona Bourne as she watches another end of bowls in a match between Marham and nearby Massingham. Like many, Bourne is troubled by the news that this week thrust Marham to the frontline of UK's nuclear arsenal, in the biggest expansion of the programme for a generation. Without consultation, RAF Marham is to be equipped with new F-35A jets capable of carrying warheads with three times the explosive power of the bomb dropped on Hiroshima. Bourne said: 'When they spread it all over the news that these planes are going to come here from America with these bombs, it makes you think we're going to be targeted. My bungalow is five minutes from the base.' The Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament is planning a protest in Marham on Saturday. Bourne, whose son-in-law used to work at the base, is tempted to take part. 'I might join in,' she says. 'My daughter says we've always been a target here, but I am concerned. If I was younger I'd think about moving, but I'm 83, I'm not going anywhere.' Sisters Becky, 29, and Katherine Blakie, 31, are heading to a friend's house for a plunge in their hot tub. 'I read about the weapons on Facebook,' says Becky. 'It's strange to think they'll be here in little old Marham.' Becky, who works in fundraising, is annoyed that the village was not consulted about the decision. She says: 'Marham and the RAF base are intertwined so we should definitely have had a say.' Katherine, a medical student, says: 'It makes you think, 'Are we safe, if people know nuclear weapons are here?'' At this stage it is unclear where the nuclear warheads will be housed, but new jets to be based at Marham have the capacity to drop them. Wherever they are stored, the fear Marham will be a target is widespread in the village. 'Look what happened at Pearl Harbor,' says Patricia Gordon after finishing her bowls match. 'We'd be obliterated here.' She adds: 'And with Donald Trump's finger on the button, does it matter that we've got nuclear weapons or not?' But her partner, Bruce Townsend, 77, a retired lorry driver, thinks the nuclear deterrent works. He says: 'You can't give up nuclear weapons. Iran, and those countries, know damn well that if they start anything, they'll just get wiped out.' He adds: 'I feel the same about the protest as I did about people who tried to ban the bomb. It's stupid. They can't change it.' It is the men in Marham who seem more relaxed about the prospect of nuclear-armed planes on their doorstep. Chris Joice, a carer who used to work at the base, says: 'We've had F-35s for so many years, and having the next model isn't going to make much difference.' Joice is out walking a friend's dog, Millie, who has an RAF roundel pendant strapped to her collar. He is concerned about the lack of consultation: 'I'm just annoyed that all these decisions go ahead and the common man doesn't have a single word in.' He adds: 'No one needs that kind of firepower. I'd rather people rolled dice to settle their beefs.' Others are more full-throated in their support. Jim Smith, 79, a retired construction worker, remembers nuclear weapons at the base in the 1950s. 'They had them up there in 1958 or 59 when they had the V bombers. It stopped a world war then. And it's no different now.' A man on a bike who would only give his name as John recently retired as a grounds maintenance worker at the base. He says: 'They're never going to attack us. It would be Armageddon if it comes to that. So it doesn't make a shite's worth of difference worrying about it.' He adds: 'I don't mind protest, I'm a biker so I'm all about freedom, but I've got better things to do. People protesting here don't live in the real world, they should worry instead about people sleeping on the streets in King's Lynn.' Colin Callaby, 64, is out picking cherries from a tree in the middle of the village. The cherries, which he plans to turn into wine, are the sweetest he has ever known. 'We're right in the firing line,' he says, 'but if there's going to be a nuclear bomb we're all done for so I'd rather be right underneath it and die instantly than be 50 miles away and take weeks to die from radiation.' He adds: 'It's very sad that mankind has got to spend billions of pounds on mass destruction and we can't do something better with that money. But what can you do?'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store