
Trump's trade deals are stalling out at the worst possible time
CNN —
With just a week and a half remaining of a 90-day pause on President Donald Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariffs, the White House is running out of time to negotiate its long-promised trade deals that could bring some certainty to an increasingly uneasy economy.
But with just two trade frameworks inked and dozens to go before the July 9 deadline, that timeframe appears increasingly unlikely — just as America's economy might be taking a turn for the worse.
For months, the Trump administration has said deals are imminent, working with 18 key partners to lower trade barriers while hundreds of other countries wait in line to get out from under the burden of higher tariffs. But the timeframe continues to shift.
'I've made all the deals,' Trump said in a Time interview in late April, saying trade negotiations with foreign partners were nearly complete. 'I've made 200 deals.'
More than two weeks later, Trump acknowledged that hundreds or even dozens of deals aren't possible on such a short timeframe — a point he reiterated Friday at a press briefing at the White House.
'You know, we have 200 countries,' Trump said. 'We can't do that. So at a certain point, over the next week and a half or so, or maybe before, we're going to send out a letter. We talked to many of the countries, and we're just going to tell them what they have to pay to do business in the United States. And it's going to go very quickly.'
That notion of establishing new tariffs for countries that can't or won't reach a deal with the United States has been floating around for over two months, but the timeline keeps getting pushed back. On April 23, Trump said his administration would 'set the tariff' for countries that fail to negotiate new terms in the following few weeks. On May 16, Trump said that 'at a certain point, over the next two to three weeks … we'll be telling people what they'll be paying to do business in the United States.'
Meanwhile, the United States remains in active negotiations with its key trading partners. But those deals have been promised for months, too, with little to show for it. On June 11, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said a flood of deals was coming.
'You're going to see deal after deal, they're going to start coming next week and the week after and the week after. We've got them in the hopper,' he told CNBC. On Thursday, Lutnick told Bloomberg 10 deals would be announced imminently.
US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent stand as President Donald Trump signs executive orders.
Nathan Howard/Reuters
But White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt also said Thursday that 'the deadline is not critical,' a point that Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent emphasized to Fox Business on Friday: Bessent said he thinks trade negotiations could be 'wrapped up' by Labor Day, providing a more relaxed framework for inking deals than the previously prescribed July 9 deadline.
Meanwhile, Trump made clear Friday that trade policy could continue to grow more aggressive. In a social media message Friday, he said that the United States was pulling out of trade talks with Canada because of its digital services tax and that the administration would set a new tariff for its northern neighbor within the next week.
And Bessent told CNBC Friday that about 20 countries could return to their 'Liberation Day' tariff rate starting on July 9, while others would receive longer windows to negotiate. He didn't name the countries that would receive the higher levies, but some nations' tariffs were set as high as 50% before Trump hit pause.
'The idea that uncertainty will be resolved early this summer appears to be completely dead,' Justin Wolfers, an economics professor at the University of Michigan, told CNN. 'This means tariff aggression is not dead. That's probably not super surprising but some of us allowed ourselves moments of optimism.'
The economy may be starting to turn
The problem with the perpetually pushed-back tariff timetable is that the economy could really use some deals right about now.
After several months of strong economic news but incredibly weak consumer sentiment, America is starting to see those trends reverse: The vibes are on the rebound, but evidence is mounting that the economy is getting worse.
Consumer sentiment climbed 16% this month, the University of Michigan said in its latest survey released Friday. Although consumer sentiment remains weak, the stock market is at an all-time high, which could give Americans a confidence boost.
But that's not translating into spending. Consumer spending unexpectedly fell in May for the first time since January, the Commerce Department reported Friday. In real terms, consumer spending has now fallen so far in 2025.
Inflation is ticking higher, job growth is slowing and retail sales are sinking. That's a concern, because consumer spending makes up two-thirds of America's economy.
'Households are anxious about what tariff-induced price hikes will do to their spending power, while concerns about the robustness of the jobs market are on the rise,' said James Knightley, chief US economist for ING, in a note to clients Friday. 'Equity markets have recovered and are at all-time highs, but house prices nationally are starting to come under downward pressure.'
Many mainstream economists argue that the low inflation of the spring that helped boost consumer sentiment represents a calm before the summer storm, when they expect prices to rise as companies finish selling off inventories of products they had brought to the United States before Trump imposed tariffs. Friday's inflation report showed that the changeover to higher-tariff goods may have already begun to happen.
'Higher prices from tariffs may be starting to work their way through the economy,' said Robert Ruggirello, chief investment officer at Brave Eagle Wealth Management.
Although tax cuts from Trump's sweeping domestic policy agenda could help mitigate higher prices from tariffs, Trump's trade war continues to risk retaliation from American's key trading partners. Higher tariffs from foreign countries could slow the US economy, risking a recession.
'Trading partners taking retaliatory action could have a lasting impact on US output and, accordingly, public finances,' said Michel Nies, an economist at Citi.
That's why trade deals are so urgent: America's economy remains strong, but cracks are forming. Tariffs are a big reason why. More delays will generate more uncertainty. And those good vibes could turn bad pretty quickly.
CNN's Matt Egan contributed to this report.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


See - Sada Elbalad
an hour ago
- See - Sada Elbalad
Trump Calls for Gaza Hostage Deal, Warns Netanyahu Trial Threatens Israel's Security Talks
Ahmed Emam U.S. President Donald Trump has called on all parties involved to 'finalize the deal on Gaza and immediately secure the return of Israeli hostages,' warning that the current situation 'cannot tolerate delay or hesitation.' In remarks that have sparked political controversy, Trump suggested the United States could suspend military aid to Israel if the ongoing trial of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is not halted. Trump described Netanyahu as facing a 'terrible situation' that hampers his ability to manage sensitive security issues. 'Netanyahu is negotiating a deal with the movement in Gaza to bring back the hostages, and in the midst of these delicate talks, how can he be forced to sit in court all day?' Trump said. 'It's unacceptable.' He argued that the trial is 'paralyzing Netanyahu's ability to negotiate with Iran and with Hamas in Gaza,' and called for Israeli leadership to be given the chance to focus fully on national security and hostage recovery. According to Israel's Yedioth Ahronoth newspaper, a senior political source said that Trump is pressing vigorously for an end to the ongoing war in Gaza as soon as possible. The source revealed that Washington is considering shortening the proposed timeline of U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff's plan for Gaza in order to accelerate efforts toward a ceasefire and a political settlement. Trump's statements come amid intensified international and regional diplomatic activity. Qatari Foreign Ministry spokesperson Majed Al-Ansari confirmed that Doha, in coordination with international mediators, is holding intensive talks with both Israel and Hamas to build on the recent ceasefire between Iran and Israel and push for a comprehensive truce in Gaza. read more Gold prices rise, 21 Karat at EGP 3685 NATO's Role in Israeli-Palestinian Conflict US Expresses 'Strong Opposition' to New Turkish Military Operation in Syria Shoukry Meets Director-General of FAO Lavrov: confrontation bet. nuclear powers must be avoided News Iran Summons French Ambassador over Foreign Minister Remarks News Aboul Gheit Condemns Israeli Escalation in West Bank News Greek PM: Athens Plays Key Role in Improving Energy Security in Region News One Person Injured in Explosion at Ukrainian Embassy in Madrid News China Launches Largest Ever Aircraft Carrier Sports Former Al Zamalek Player Ibrahim Shika Passes away after Long Battle with Cancer Videos & Features Tragedy Overshadows MC Alger Championship Celebration: One Fan Dead, 11 Injured After Stadium Fall Lifestyle Get to Know 2025 Eid Al Adha Prayer Times in Egypt Business Fear & Greed Index Plummets to Lowest Level Ever Recorded amid Global Trade War Arts & Culture Zahi Hawass: Claims of Columns Beneath the Pyramid of Khafre Are Lies News Flights suspended at Port Sudan Airport after Drone Attacks Videos & Features Video: Trending Lifestyle TikToker Valeria Márquez Shot Dead during Live Stream News Shell Unveils Cost-Cutting, LNG Growth Plan Technology 50-Year Soviet Spacecraft 'Kosmos 482' Crashes into Indian Ocean


Egypt Independent
2 hours ago
- Egypt Independent
Israeli military detains 6 settlers after attack on forces in occupied West Bank
CNN — The Israeli military detained six settlers in the occupied West Bank overnight after the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) say the suspects attacked security forces. The IDF says they spotted Israeli civilians driving toward a closed military zone near the Palestinian village of Kafr Malik, where days earlier settlers set fire to homes and vehicles in an attack Palestinian officials say killed three people. When Israeli forces approached the group, the IDF says the soldiers were physically assaulted and verbally abused. In addition, the suspects vandalized and damaged the security forces' vehicles and attempted to ram the forces. The IDF said that a preliminary investigation indicated that their forces had fired three warning shots into the air, but did not fire live ammunition at civilians. Six suspects were apprehended and transferred to police, the IDF said. 'The IDF and Israel Police condemn any act of violence against security forces and will act firmly against any attempt to harm security personnel carrying out their duty to protect Israeli citizens,' the IDF said in a statement. Most Israeli politicians condemned the settler attacks against Israeli security forces. In a statement, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called for a thorough investigation and for the people who attacked the security forces to be brought to justice. 'These individuals are a small minority who do not represent the vast majority of settlers, who respect the law and serve in the IDF and the security forces,' Netanyahu said. Head of the opposition Yair Lapid said in a statement on social media, 'The extremists who attack IDF soldiers who are guarding the security of the State of Israel during these difficult days are dangerous criminals who are aiding our enemies.' Yair Golan, the head of the left-wing Democrats party, who had called earlier settler attacks in the area a 'violent Jewish pogrom,' said the violence from 'the Kahanist, nationalist, and fantastic Israel is deliberately working to dismantle the Jewish and democratic Israel.' Golan referenced Meir Kahane, an extremist rabbi whose political party was banned outright in Israel under anti-terror laws. 'This is not a marginal occurrence. This is a dangerous current that has taken deep roots. Even around the government table,' Golan said, a reference to the far-right ministers that prop up the coalition government, including Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, both of whom were sanctioned earlier this month by the UK, Canada, and other Western allies. Smotrich has called for formal annexation of West Bank settlements, while Ben-Gvir's party consists of followers of Kahane's banned political party. Responding to the latest incident, Smotrich, who serves as Israel's Finance Minister and as a minister in the Ministry of Defense, said there should be a 'thorough investigation' into whether the IDF had fired on the settlers, an action he described as a 'forbidden and dangerous red line.' 'The IDF and the settlers are one and the same. Anyone who raises a hand against IDF soldiers is fighting against the settlement movement, not for it,' Smotrich said. 'And still – live fire on Jews is unacceptable and dangerous.' In a statement, Defense Minister Israel Katz called on law enforcement authorities to act immediately to locate all those who resorted to violence and bring them to justice 'as is done everywhere.' On Friday, Nabil Abu Rudeineh, spokesman for the Palestinian Authority presidency, said the settler attacks are part of a plan by Israel's 'extremist right-wing government' to drag the West Bank into a larger confrontation, according to the Palestinian news agency WAFA. Abu Rudeineh held Israel fully responsible for 'the consequences of this bloody aggression,' WAFA said. Israel has been ramping up military operations in the West Bank alongside the offensive in Gaza and attacks on Iran and its proxies, displacing thousands of Palestinians and razing entire communities as it targets what it says are militants operating in the territory. Earlier this week, Israeli forces shot dead a Palestinian teenager in the West Bank, Palestinian health authorities said. The Israeli military said that 'terrorists hurled explosive devices at IDF forces.' In late-May, Israel approved a massive expansion of settlements in the occupied West Bank in a move decried as de facto annexation of large swaths of the territory. Peace Now, an Israeli non-governmental organization that tracks settlements, said it was the largest expansion of settlements since the signing of the Oslo Accords more than 30 years ago. Israel plans to establish 22 new settlements, including deep within the West Bank and in areas from which the country had previously withdrawn. Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank, as well as in East Jerusalem and the occupied Golan Heights, are considered illegal under international law.


Egypt Independent
2 hours ago
- Egypt Independent
Inside the NATO charm offensive that shocked as much as it delivered
The Hague, Netherlands CNN — It must have been the last thing NATO's chief needed. Late Tuesday, on the eve of a crucial summit that would lock in a generational investment in NATO's defense, Donald Trump's Truth Social account pinged with a single photo: a gushing message signed 'Mark Rutte,' written in a carbon-copy Trump style and overflowing with sycophantic praise for the US president. 'You are flying into another big success in the Hague this evening,' Rutte's message read. 'Europe is going to pay in a BIG way, as they should, and it will be your win,' he continued. 'You will achieve something NO American president in decades could get done.' While the diplomatic world has bent toward many norms of the Trump White House, this was extreme. Doubling down on the comments the following day, saying Trump deserved credit for his actions on Iran and NATO, Rutte waded through many observers' incredulity at his kowtowing tone. But as the summit crescendoed, there was a growing sense he may have pulled off a diplomatic masterstroke. Bromance Rutte, the former Dutch prime minister, is no stranger to dealings with Trump, having deployed his easy charm in several visits to Washington, DC, during Trump's first term. Exuding an easygoing, relaxed image – his signature boyish grin never far from his face – Rutte's charm offensive echoes that of other NATO leaders. French President Emmanuel Macron has charted up a boisterous bromance with Trump; Finnish President Alex Stubb bonded with him over rounds of golf, and Italian far-right Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni has won a reputation as something of Trump whisperer: She's a 'fantastic woman,' in Trump's words. Rutte's message – signed with his surname – perhaps spoke of a less pally relationship. So did one of Trump's reactions Wednesday: 'I think he likes me. If he doesn't, I'll let you know. I'll come back and I'll hit him hard,' Trump announced in his Wednesday news conference. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte speaks at a news conference during the summit on Wednesday. Nicolas Tucat/AFP/Getty Images But in The Hague, Rutte seemed ready to do anything to burnish the US president's ego and save him face. Trump's decision to attack Iran's nuclear program was 'extremely impressive,' the NATO chief told Trump. 'The signal it sends to the rest of the world that this president, when it comes to it, yes, he is a man of peace, but if necessary, he is willing to use strength.' Time and again around the summit, Rutte's interjections soothed Trump's passage – softening his landing after a fiery 'f**k' at Iran and Israel's latest exchange of missiles lit up international headlines. Rutte's response: a jokey aside in front of the world's cameras. 'Daddy has to sometimes use strong language,' he said beside Trump, after the US president used the analogy of two children fighting to describe the conflict between Iran and Israel. Rutte later said he wasn't referring to Trump as 'daddy' but was merely using a metaphor. The Dutchman didn't spare praise for Trump's strikes on Iran – a conflict technically outside the NATO wheelhouse – as the president railed against suggestions in a leaked government assessment that undercut his claim the strikes 'obliterated' parts of Iran's nuclear program. 'The secretary general knows that personal relationships go a long way with this administration,' Torrey Taussig, a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council and a former NATO policy adviser at the Pentagon, told CNN. 'I do think this is a kind of hold-your-nose moment. Ensure there are no fireworks in The Hague. Get a good photo op and go home,' she added. Beyond Rutte, the whole summit was sculpted around Trump. Slimmed down, the schedule featured a single session for leaders; experts have suggested this was for Trump, who earlier this month skipped the ending of the G7 summit, missing a meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Of course, the summit result is largely pre-ordained, after rounds of pre-negotiations to ensure the leaders had to only rubber-stamp declarations. Ukraine's war with Russia – by far the most pressing issue on NATO's agenda – was also excised from the summit's final declaration, the first time it has been missing since Russian President Vladimir Putin's full invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Even the crown jewel of the gathering, the promise to spend 5% of gross domestic product on defense (split into core defense requirements and 1.5% on defense-related spending by 2035), was a Trump-branded product. Trump takes questions during a news conference following the summit in January, Trump lofted the idea of a 5% spending target for NATO members, a figure that hadn't been given serious consideration before, as members limped towards 2%. 'They can all afford it. They're at 2% but they should be at 5%,' he told journalists. The ends, not the means But Rutte may have had the last laugh. The summit was, by all accounts, a win for NATO: Members unanimously agreed to boost spendings to post-Cold War highs – and thanked Trump for it. 'In diplomacy, you try to get a goal and an aim, and what did we achieve here? We achieved an historic result, where NATO went back to its roots of collective defense,' Finland's Stubb told CNN on the sidelines of the summit. Spain was a notable exception, pushing for softened language that may have left a loophole for the Iberian nation to meet its responsibilities for NATO military capabilities without having to spend 5% of GDP. (The final summit declaration signed by NATO members referred only to 'allies' in its clauses on spending, while others spoke of commitments 'we' will make.) Leaders – led, of course, by Rutte – singled out Trump as the sole pressure responsible for finally corralling NATO allies to previously unthinkable spending targets. Boosted defense spending 'is the success of President Donald Trump,' Polish President Andrzej Duda told journalists at the summit. 'Without the leadership of Donald Trump, it would be impossible,' he added. His Lithuanian counterpart suggested a new motto for the alliance, 'Make NATO great again,' as he welcomed the pressure Trump had levied on stingy allies. 'I'm up for all the pressure we can get,' Lithuanian Defense Minister Dovile Sakaliene told CNN. Smaller nations on the front lines with Russia were buoyed by an alliance-wide commitment to meeting spending levels they had largely led the charge on. US President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky shake hands as they attend a meeting on the sidelines of the summit Wednesday. Ukrainian Presidential Press Service/Reuters Everybody wins One Western European official ahead of the summit shared fears with CNN the summit would be marred by another diplomatic spat around Trump. But in public, comment on Rutte's messaging to Trump was largely off limits, with leaders waving off or swerving around questions. Finland's president wouldn't be drawn on the NATO secretary general's messages, but he said, however, 'Diplomacy has so many different forms.' Casualties – particularly from diplomatic skirmishes with Trump – were fewer than expected. Only Spain caught flak from the US president over its foot-dragging over the 5% GDP spend. 'It's terrible what they've done,' Trump said, threatening to use trade talks to force Madrid into line. 'We're going to make them pay twice as much,' he said. Even Zelensky – who has had a turbulent relationship with Trump – came away with wins. While he stopped short of committing further US aid to Ukraine, Trump suggested Kyiv may see future Patriot missile system deliveries from the United States – and he slammed Putin as 'misguided,' conceding the Russian leader may have territorial designs that extend further than Ukraine. Finally, Trump's own views on NATO – often a prickly subject for the famously transactional president – saw a reversal. 'These people really love their countries,' Trump said of the NATO leaders at his news conference concluding the NATO summit. 'It's not a rip-off, and we're here to help them protect their country.' 'I came here because it was something I'm supposed to be doing,' he added, 'but I left here a little bit different.'