
Scientists rejoice as British trees evolve resistance to devastating ash dieback fungus
The disease, which arrived in Britain in 2012, has wrought havoc on the countryside, leaving behind the skeletal remains of dying ash trees.
Previous estimates predict that up to 85 per cent of ash trees will succumb to the disease, and COBRA have held emergency meetings about how to deal with the issue.
But now, experts have discovered that a new generation of ash trees, growing naturally in woodland, exhibit greater resistance to the disease compared to older trees.
They found that natural selection is acting upon thousands of locations within ash tree DNA, driving the evolution of resistance.
The study provides a real-world example of natural selection in action, they said.
And it offers renewed hope for the future of ash trees in Britain.
'Thanks to natural selection, future generations of ash should have a better chance of withstanding infection,' Dr Carey Metheringham, from Queen Mary University of London (QMUL) said.
Ash dieback, which arrived in Britain in 2012, has wrought havoc on the countryside, leaving behind skeletal remains of dying ash trees. Pictured: The effects of the disease in the Hughenden Estate, Buckinghamshire
Ash dieback is caused by the fungus Hymenoscyphus fraxineus, which originated in Asia.
The new study, published in the journal Science, focused on Marden Park wood in Surrey, a semi-natural ancient woodland dominated by ash.
Researchers compared the DNA of ash trees established before and after the fungal invasion reached Britain.
They found shifts in variants associated with tree health in thousands of places across the overall genome of the trees.
The findings indicate younger generations of trees have greater resistance to the fungus, they said.
And it could mean ash does not go the same way as elm trees, which have been largely lost from the British landscape as a result of Dutch elm disease, although breeding programmes may be needed to bolster the fightback.
'Natural selection alone may not be enough to produce fully resistant trees,' Dr Metheringham added.
'The existing genetic variation in the ash population may be too low, and as the trees become scarcer, the rate of selection could slow.
'Human intervention, such as selective breeding and the protection of young trees from deer grazing, may be required to accelerate evolutionary change.'
Another of the study's authors, Professor Richard Buggs, from the Royal Botanic Gardens at Kew and Queen Mary, said: 'We are so glad that these findings suggest that ash will not go the way of the elm in Britain.
'Elm trees have struggled to evolve to Dutch elm disease, but ash are showing a very different dynamic because they produce an abundance of seedlings upon which natural selection can act when they are still young.
'Through the death of millions of ash trees, a more resistant population of ash is appearing.'
Rebecca Gosling, from the Woodland Trust which owns and manages Marden Park wood, said: 'Ash dieback demonstrates how devastating introduced pathogens can be for our trees and the species which rely upon them.
'This important research gives us hope for the future of our ash populations.'
She added: 'The findings highlight how vital it is to support natural regeneration in woodlands, furthering our understanding of how to best manage our ash woodlands.'
The study was mainly funded by the Environment Department (Defra) whose chief plant health officer Professor Nicola Spence said it demonstrated that tolerance to ash dieback can be inherited, and breeding programmes and natural regeneration together could secure the future of native ash.
Previously, the Woodland Trust has estimated that more than 100 million ash trees are expected to be lost to ash dieback, at a cost of over £15 billion.
The disease blocks water systems and causes leaves to wilt, shoots to die, lesions on branches and eventually the death of the tree.
Last year, scientists announced they were working on gene-edited saplings that are immune to ash dieback.
And since the initial crisis more than a decade ago, there has been a nationwide overhaul of how the government approaches plant diseases.
ASH DIEBACK EXPLAINED
Ash dieback affects ash trees (Fraxinus excelsior) and is caused by the fungus Hymenoscyphus fraxineus, previously known by the names Chalara fraxinea and Hymenoschyphus pseudoalbidus).
It blocks the water transport systems in trees causing leaf loss, lesions in the wood and on the bark and ultimately the dieback of the crown of the tree.
This disease was first described in Poland in 1992 and has since swept westwards throughout Europe.
It was first identified in Britain in 2012 in nursery stock then in the wider environment in 2013 although it could have been in the country much longer.
The number of confirmed findings is continuing to increase and the distribution is reported by the Forestry Commission on a regular basis.
Young trees are particularly vulnerable and die quickly once they succumb. Older trees can be slowly killed by a yearly cycle of infection.
Spread of the disease in the UK is most likely to be as a result of the planting of infected nursery stock and wood but wind borne distribution of the fungal spores also occurs.
There are several key signs to look out for on ash trees. All of these symptoms can also be caused by other problems, so final diagnosis should be made by an expert.
Summer is a good time to look for symptoms as in autumn and winter, ash trees will naturally be shedding their leaves making it difficult to identify ash dieback.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Top 20 foods Brits say they hate despite never having tried are revealed in new study
S IX in 10 Brits claim to dislike foods they've never even tried, according to research. A poll, of 2,000 adults, found they have an average of eight foods they refuse to eat, with five of those being ones they've never tasted. Sushi, black pudding, and kimchi are among the foods people most commonly to dislike without trying first, along with plant-based alternatives to cheese and anchovies. Tofu, liver, and plant-based equivalents to milk also featured in the top 10. Despite this, 65 per cent proudly claim to have adventurous palates, while 74 per cent said they are willing to try new foods. The study was commissioned by Boursin Plant-based, which has partnered with TV foodie Frenchman Fred Sirieix, to investigate food biases by hosting blind tastings at food festivals throughout the summer. Fred Sirieix said: 'Brits claim to eagerly embrace culinary trends and global flavours, but they can be particularly prejudiced when it comes to certain foods, and this is one of the biggest barriers to discovery. 'Many ingredients including plant-based alternatives to cheese have huge negative preconceptions. 'But despite many claiming they'd be able to differentiate plant-based from dairy, even the most discerning foodies were fooled by this plant-based alternative to cheese when we let taste do the talking.' The study found that 65 per cent of adults admit to judging food negatively before tasting, yet 53 per cent change their minds after trying - a reminder to stay open-minded. The biggest motivators for trying new flavours were blind taste tests or learning about a food's health benefits, each cited by 21 per cent of respondents. Six in 10 said they would be honest if served something they didn't want to eat, with 32 per cent then refusing it outright, while 28 per cent would at least try a small bite. Despite all of the above, only 17 per cent actually admitted to being a fussy eater, according to data. It also emerged 67 per cent were adamant they'd be able to tell the difference between dairy and plant-based alternatives to cheese - with nearly a half (46 per cent) willing to give it a go if it tasted as good as the 'real thing'. Fred Sirieix, on behalf of Boursin, added: 'People are very clearly confident in their ability to tell dairy from plant-based alternatives but as we saw from experience, this was not actually the case. 'In reality, less than 10 per cent of people at the Foodies festival were able to differentiate between Boursin plant-based and dairy. 'It just goes to show - there's a whole world of flavours out there waiting to be explored if you're brave enough. 'Even ingredients you might dismiss because of previous experiences, judgements, or assumptions can still surprise you if prepared in the right way. 'So, embrace the challenge and let the taste do the talking.' 2


BBC News
3 hours ago
- BBC News
Surrey and Sussex NHS Trust receives £12.7m for two new theatres
The Surrey and Sussex NHS Trust has received a funding boost of £12.7m, which they say will allow them to build two new theatres on the site of the East Surrey trust said the funding had arrived at a "crucial time" as current operating theatres on the site were at maximum capacity, as well as growing waiting lists and increasing emergency demand.A spokesperson for the trust said the funding and theatres would mean the hospital could "continue to deliver the highest standards of patient care".The work is due to start on the site in Redhill later in 2025. The trust's chief executive, Angela Stevenson, said: "This new funding from NHS England will be truly transformative for the future of our hospital and our patients. "In the midst of some tough financial decisions, this is a really positive step-change in how we deliver for our patients."


Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Nurses and GPs threaten to join NHS resident doctors and strike over pay and conditions
Nurses and GPs are threatening to inflict more misery on NHS patients by launching their own strikes alongside resident doctors. The Royal College of Nursing today said its members have voted to reject the government's 3.6 per cent pay rise for 2025/26 in a landslide result. More than nine in ten (91 per cent) respondents opposed the offer, with a record 170,000 staff taking part - a turnout of 56 per cent. It is now warning it will hold a vote on industrial action if ministers fail to reach an agreement on improving pay and working conditions over the summer. Professor Nicola Ranger, general secretary and chief executive of the RCN, said nurses feel 'deeply undervalued'. Meanwhile, the British Medical Association said GPs have set out six demands they want the government to meet by mid-September to avert a strike. The family doctors want to lead new 'community hubs', which were announced as part of the government's 10 Year Health Plan, and a new funding agreement for practices. The hubs will aim to take pressure off hospitals and offer a range of services, including same day GP appointments and walk-in dental care, but little guidance has been issued on who will run them. GPs are said to be 'alarmed' by hospital leaders' attempts to make themselves central to the plans and are now seeking clarity on who is in charge. They have written to health secretary Wes Streeting and health minister Stephen Kinnock setting out their demands, with their dispute covering pay, contract funding, and how much extra money they will get to work in and run the hubs. Dr Katie Bramall-Stainer, the chair of the BMA's GP committee, said the profession is at a 'critical juncture', adding: 'The current trajectory threatens the survival of the independent contractor model and, with it, NHS general practice and the trusted family doctor relationship our patients rely on and want to protect.' Other demands include policies to reduce GP unemployment and changes to a clinical negligence scheme, which protects against claims. The warnings come just a day after resident doctors - former known as junior doctors - ended a five day walk out in pursuit of a 29 per cent pay rise. They have a mandate to strike into 2026 and have refused to rule out further action, despite receiving above-inflation pay rises totalling 28.9 per cent over the past three years. Consultants are being balloted on their appetite for strikes, while healthcare workers represented by the GMB and Unite unions - including paramedics - have voted to reject their pay offers. The RCN warned that the profession faces widespread vacancies, stunted career progression and years of pay erosion, and urged ministers to use the summer to agree an investment plan or face a formal escalation to a dispute and a ballot on industrial action. Professor Ranger said: 'My profession feels deeply undervalued and that is why record numbers are telling the Government to wake up, sense the urgency here and do what's right by them and by patients. 'Record numbers have delivered this verdict on a broken system that holds back nursing pay and careers and hampers the NHS. 'As a safety-critical profession, keeping hold of experienced nursing staff is fundamentally a safety issue and key to the Government's own vision for the NHS. 'Long-overdue reforms to nursing career progression and the NHS pay structure aren't just about fairness and equity but are critical for patient safety.' Nurses in Wales and Northern Ireland were consulted on the same pay award and voted to reject it, according to the RCN. Professor Ranger added: 'We deliver the vast majority of care in every service and deserve to be valued for all our skill, knowledge and experience. 'To avoid formal escalation, the Government must be true to its word and negotiate on reforms of the outdated pay structure which traps nursing staff at the same band their entire career.' A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: 'After receiving two above-inflation pay rises from this Government, new full-time nurses will earn £30,000 in basic pay for the first time this year, so it's disappointing that RCN members are dissatisfied with this year's pay rise. 'We hugely value the work of nurses, and through our 10 Year Health Plan, we are rebuilding the NHS for the benefit of patients and staff, and ensuring nursing remains an attractive career choice. 'This Government is clear we can't move any further on headline pay but will work with the RCN to improve their major concerns, including pay structure reform, concerns on career progression and wider working conditions.' Nurses staged unprecedented industrial action over pay in 2022 and 2023. In June 2023, the threat of more strikes ended because a ballot on further walkouts failed to meet the legal threshold of 50 per cent. A poll published earlier this week found that Britons are split on the idea of nurses striking over pay. The YouGov survey found that 19 per cent of 4,300 British adults 'strongly support' nurses going on strike, while 28 per cent 'somewhat' supported it. Meanwhile 23 per cent said they 'strongly oppose' strike action while one in five (20 per cent) 'somewhat oppose' it.