Why Trump wins and why Reform can win
Ann Coulter's Substack can be found at: anncoulter.substack.com
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
14 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Tech Secretary Peter Kyle won't apologise for what he said about Nigel Farage - 'it's true'
The Tech Secretary refused to apologise for saying Farage's opposition to new online safety rules puts him on the side of predators - suggesting Reform UK are "wilfully misleading" the public about what the new rules do Tech Secretary Peter Kyle has doubled-down on his attack on Nigel Farage, saying the Reform UK leader's opposition to a new online safety crackdown puts him 'on the side of predators.' Writing for the Sunday Mirror, Mr Kyle said he'd never apologise for the remark, made earlier this week, 'Because it's true.' And he revealed how the new law was already being used to prosecute online offenders. New online safety protections for children came into force on July 25. Since that date, so-called "risky" sites and apps have been expected to use age checks to identify which users are children and subsequently prevent them from accessing pornography, as well as other harmful content including self-harm, suicide, eating disorders and extreme violence. Farage's Reform UK party has vowed to scrap Online Safety Act if it ever gains power, claiming it was a threat to free speech. And Farage has said Kyle's comments about him were 'absolutely appalling'. Mr Kyle highlighted two cases where the new law had been used to prosecute and jail online offenders. Last year, Nicholas Hawkes, 39, sent explicit photos of himself to a 15-year-old girl. He was convicted under the new offence of cyber-flashing and sentenced to 66 weeks in prison. And Tyler Webb, 22, was the first to be charged with encouraging serious self-harm under the new act - and was sentenced to nine years and four months. Webb used the messaging app Telegram to repeatedly tell a vulnerable 22-year-old woman to cut herself, then to kill herself by hanging during a video call so she could watch. 'Let me be clear about what the Act does not do,' Mr Kyle wrote. 'It does not stop adults from posting or seeing anything online as long as it's legal and anyone who suggests that does not understand it or is willfully misleading.' He added: 'For years we fought for a safer internet for our children. I refuse to let anyone who is trying to use this issue for their own ends take that away.' 'I won't apologise, because it's true' Earlier this week Nigel Farage asked me to apologise for saying he was on the side of predators when he called for the Online Safety Act to be scrapped. But I won't do that. Because it's true. Under this law a 39 year old man was prosecuted for the new offence of cyber flashing because he sent a photo of his erect penis to a 15-year-old girl. These new categories of crimes are sadly necessary to combat crime in the modern world. But beyond these crimes the law takes steps to make the internet a safer place for children. If you're a parent, ask yourself this - do I want my child to see graphic violence and sexual content? Do I want kids as young as five to see porn on social media? Do I want strangers to be able to message my children - or anyone else's? And do I want them to be able to see my child's location when they're online? This is what the act does - it stops children from seeing things that they should not see - and that we would not want them to in the offline world - porn, extreme violence, suicide and self harm content, images and words that encourage and glorify eating disorders. But as well as blocking disturbing and upsetting images and messages from children's feeds, it also cracks down on child sex abuse images and videos. For the first time social media platforms have to detect and remove that horrific material which has shamefully lurked on the internet barely hidden from those sick enough to seek it out. It also means practical steps to protect children from strangers who want to do them harm. It stipulates that children's profiles and locations should be hidden to keep them safe by default. Because no adult should be able to message a child they do not know. And let me be clear about what the Act does not do - It does not stop adults from posting or seeing anything online as long as it's legal and anyone who suggests that does not understand it or is wilfully misleading. In my first week as Secretary of State I met with a group of bereaved families who have known the absolute worst of the internet. Some of those children were encouraged to kill themselves, others were egged on to do dangerous and ultimately fatal challenges and others still do not know exactly what role their child's online role played in their deaths. I have been clear that not only did we collectively fail their children but that I would do what I could to stop such awful deaths in the future. For years we fought for a safer internet for our children. I refuse to let anyone who is trying to use this issue for their own ends take that away. This government has a Plan for Change to keep children safe both online and offline so that they can live happy and fulfilled lives.
Times
3 hours ago
- Times
Nigel Farage: They claim I'm ill — the truth is they're running scared
The rumours began to spread through Westminster a few weeks ago, on both sides of the political divide. Labour and Tory MPs began to gossip openly about Nigel Farage's health, suggesting that the 61-year-old's relentless schedule was taking its toll. The Reform UK leader is happy to set the record straight: the rumours are untrue. 'I think the fact they are spreading these rumours — which they are — is because it's the last card they've got,' he said. 'They can't question us on immigration. They can't question us on crime. They have nothing to go on.' Farage's carefully cultivated public image of the smoking, pint-swilling raconteur is rooted in reality. He still enjoys a drink and the occasional lunch that can drift on for hours into the afternoon. But he is changing with age. The long days — rising at 4.50am, going to bed at 11pm — are exhausting and the Reform UK leader says he has moderated his lifestyle to suit. 'I don't think I've ever worked under more intensity than I have for the last year,' he said. 'It's an enormous task, building a new political party and movement. I'm trying to moderate with age. 'I wouldn't say the BMA would hold me up as a pin-up boy, but I'm feeling good. A bit of exercise, I walk the dogs. Yesterday I had lunch with a very interesting chap. We got through lunch with just one bottle. I'm not too bad at all really. I look at people I was at school with and think I'm doing well.' Not sweating the small stuff Farage says the biggest change to his lifestyle is that he is now more zen. 'I just don't let little things worry me. I don't let online criticism worry me. Nothing really gets to me at all any more.' Farage is more serious than he has ever been. With Reform UK riding high in the polls — they have held their lead since April and their support shows no signs of ebbing — he believes that he has a genuine shot at becoming prime minister. 'This is it,' he said. 'It's the last shot for me. I actually think in the view of an increasing number of people it's the last shot for the country.' That Farage's health has become a source of discussion in Westminster is perhaps unsurprising. With Farage at the helm, Reform UK is a genuine threat to the established political order. Without him, his critics believe, his nascent party would collapse. He is, they say, a one-man band. Farage appears to be acutely aware that he is potentially a single point of failure. He is trying to promote those around him, particularly Zia Yusuf, who has emerged as one of the party's main spokesmen. His aim is to ensure that Reform UK is not synonymous with his personal brand but recognised in its own right. 'I'm very keen to promote others,' he said. 'I don't want the crime campaign just to be me. It's about the brand Reform itself, standing on its own two feet. We are getting there. People say to me in the street now, 'I think I'm a Reformer'.' The real opposition His rivals begrudgingly praise his communication skills. His campaigning on Brexit and his insatiable appetite for public appearances have made him a household name. He is a friend of President Trump, and when JD Vance comes to the Cotswolds this month for a family holiday Farage will be one of the few British politicians he sees. His profile easily eclipses that of Kemi Badenoch, the Conservative leader. A YouGov poll for The Times found that 64 per cent of voters had a clear idea of what he stands for, compared with 30 per cent for Badenoch and 26 per cent for Sir Keir Starmer. On the question of who was providing the more effective opposition, Reform or the Tories, the response was overwhelming: 42 per cent said it is Farage's party, compared with 9 per cent who said the Conservatives. Nearly half of those who voted Tory at the last election said Farage was doing a better job at opposing Starmer. The polling is so clear that Starmer has decided that he had no choice but to treat Farage as the real leader of the opposition. This may be in part political opportunism — Reform UK's rise damages the Tories more than Labour — but senior figures in Labour are increasingly concerned about the strategy and that by calling Farage out at every turn Starmer risks alienating his base and creating a monster that will ultimately consume him. Farage's new work ethic borders on Stakhanovite. He is planning to take four days off over the summer — he wants to go fishing with his son — but spends most of his time hammering home his new message on law and order. Britain, he argues at his now weekly press conferences, is broken. There is a steady drumbeat of announcements — sending violent offenders to El Salvador, halving crime within five years, building nightingale prisons on army bases, scrapping the online safety act — along with a string of public endorsements. Farage's aim is to at once broaden Reform UK's message while also drawing a direct link between migration and crime. He is said to be building up to an announcement on deporting illegal immigrants. Those involved say it is a substantive piece of work; there is talk of a 100-page policy document detailing how Reform UK would take Britain out of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). A draft bill is being drawn up with emergency powers to allow the detention and deportation of people arriving in Britain on small boats. Although Farage insists that the Tories are irrelevant, the approach appears to be aimed in part at outflanking them. Badenoch is expected to use her conference speech to confirm plans to leave the ECHR to tackle small boat crossings. Farage intends to get there first by going faster and harder. Preparing for power The expected strapline for Reform's conference will be Next Steps as Farage seeks to embed in the minds of voters the idea that it is preparing for power. The party has sought to professionalise its operation, using an influx of money from new members to move to a bigger office in Millbank tower. The office comes equipped with a live studio space, which Farage can use to film ad hoc videos to respond to fast-moving events. The intention is to make Reform UK more agile and responsive. Reform saw Trump's visit to Scotland this week as proof of the tectonic shift in British politics. The highlight from Trump's extraordinary 70-minute press conference with a largely silent Starmer was when the president was asked what his advice to Farage and Starmer would be before the election. 'You know, politics is pretty simple,' Trump said. 'I assume there's a thing going on between you and Nigel, and it's OK. It's two parties. But generally speaking, the one who cuts taxes the most, the one who gives you the lowest energy prices, the best kind of energy, the one that keeps you out of wars … a few basics.' The headlines were, inevitably, about the fact that the president had offered Starmer unsolicited advice that he needed to cut taxes and stop the boats. But of arguably far greater significance was Trump's acceptance of the premise of the question: that the next election would be a battle between Starmer and Farage. Badenoch and the Tories were not even part of the conversation. The Tory leader did not have a meeting with Trump at his Turnberry golf course but is expected to meet him during his state visit. But the challenge for Badenoch is that Labour and Reform are both intent on squeezing the Tories out of the picture. Sticking to the script Labour is drawing up plans for its conference, and Reform is likely to feature heavily. Starmer will reprise his message on the need for growth at all costs — necessarily so, given the anaemic state of the economy and the scale of tax rises expected in the autumn budget. But Farage and Reform are likely to be a constant theme as Labour hones its attacks. Those attacks are still largely based on three fronts: accusing Farage of trying to sell out the NHS, being a Putin stooge and promulgating fantasy economics with unfunded pledges. Senior figures in government admit there is little evidence that the attacks are working, but argue that this is not the point. Labour believes that the messages it is embedding in the minds of voters now will come to the fore when the general election comes into view — when the prospect of Farage entering No 10 becomes a reality. But what if they don't? After all, Rishi Sunak repeatedly said that voters would change their minds about him and the Conservatives during the white heat of the election campaign. The election result was even worse for him than had been expected. The murmurings of discontent are growing louder. One senior Labour source said that 'you can't out-Reform Reform' by going tough on issues such as immigration — it doesn't wash with voters. The other fear is that giving Farage a platform and painting the idea that he could become prime minister risks becoming a self-fulfilling prophecy — that he might just do it.
Rhyl Journal
4 hours ago
- Rhyl Journal
Government defends Online Safety Act after X claims it threatens free speech
In a post titled What Happens When Oversight Becomes Overreach, the platform, formerly known as Twitter, outlined criticism of the act and the 'heavy-handed' UK regulators. The Government countered that it is 'demonstrably false' that the Online Safety Act compromises free speech and said it is not designed to censor political debate. Under rules that came into effect on July 25, online platforms must take steps to prevent children accessing harmful content such as pornography or material that encourages suicide. This includes a new duty for online providers to reduce the risk that users encounter illegal content as well as age verification measures in the UK to access pornographic content. 'As a result, the act's laudable intentions are at risk of being overshadowed by the breadth of its regulatory reach. Without a more balanced, collaborative approach, free speech will suffer,' X said. It accused regulators of taking a 'heavy-handed approach' and said that 'many are now concerned that a plan ostensibly intended to keep children safe is at risk of seriously infringing on the public's right to free expression'. Ofcom said this week it had launched investigations into 34 pornography sites for new age-check requirements. The company said 'a balanced approach is the only way to protect individual liberties, encourage innovation and safeguard children'. A Government spokesperson said: 'It is demonstrably false that the Online Safety Act compromises free speech. 'As well as legal duties to keep children safe, the very same law places clear and unequivocal duties on platforms to protect freedom of expression. Failure to meet either obligation can lead to severe penalties, including fines of up to 10% of global revenue or £18 million, whichever is greater. 'The Act is not designed to censor political debate and does not require platforms to age gate any content other than those which present the most serious risks to children such as pornography or suicide and self-harm content. 'Platforms have had several months to prepare for this law. It is a disservice to their users to hide behind deadlines as an excuse for failing to properly implement it.' Technology Secretary Peter Kyle became embroiled in a row with Nigel Farage earlier this week over Reform UK's pledge that it would scrap the Act if the party came into power. He said the Reform UK leader of being on the side of 'extreme pornographers'.
