UK's rarest cars: 1968 Hillman Minx Estate, one of only a handful left
Today, their survival rate is minimal – registration records before 1972 are notoriously unreliable, one of several reasons why the resource How Many Left does not have a listing for the number remaining in use.
As with so much of the British motor industry of that era, the narrative of the Rootes Group's Arrow-series cars is not straightforward. Rootes unveiled the 1,725cc Hillman Hunter to replace the Super Minx, accompanied by the more opulent Singer New Vogue, at the 1966 London Motor Show. The year after saw the Sunbeam Rapier fastback coupé and the Humber Sceptre for the managerial classes. For those at the foot of the corporate ladder, there were the 1.5-litre New Minx and the slightly more luxurious Singer Gazelle.
The Minx-based 'Hillman Estate Car' followed in spring 1967; dealers could highlight its MacPherson strut front suspension and all-synchromesh gearbox. 'Today the estate car is sophisticated,' proclaimed Rootes, as the Estate came with self-adjusting front disc brakes, 'curved side windows' and 'controlled fresh air ventilation'.
However, prospective Hillman customers should not be 'fooled by the long lines' as it could provide 62 cubic feet of load bay space (about 1,760 litres) with the back seats folded. For comparison, that's more than the current Toyota Corolla Estate. Autocar approved how 'the back seat comfort has not been reduced in the interests of greater load space'. Meanwhile, this newspaper appreciated the 'front bucket seats', 'door-operated courtesy lights' and 'passenger vanity mirror'.
The Hillman Estate originally cost £860, while the £911 Vauxhall Victor 101 De Luxe Estate was pleasantly furnished but still had a dated three-speed steering column-mounted gearchange. From BMC, the Austin A60 Cambridge Countryman and the nearly identical Morris Oxford Series VI Traveller were £878 and £887 respectively. However, their appeal was to Britons who thought Mrs Dale's Diary was radical programming, whereas the Hillman looked far more contemporary.
Other options included the Toyota Corona 1500 at £872, but few prospective Hillman buyers were likely to have considered owning a 'foreign car'. The same applied to the £868 Renault 16 DL, which was also front-wheel drive, a space-saving layout some Britons still regarded with suspicion. For the buyer who wanted a UK-built, medium-sized estate car, there was only one alternative to the Hillman: the Ford Cortina Mk2 Estate, in 1500 De Luxe form, for £853.
The Cortina Mk2 debuted at the same motor show as the Hunter, with Ford introducing the Estate version in 1967. The Hillman arguably suffered from a less cohesive line-up than the Cortina, with Rootes selling the Arrow range under four badges. One of the Hillman Estate's advantages was its pleasantly restrained appearance. The Telegraph 's motoring correspondent thought it 'one of the most elegant-looking dual-purpose cars I have seen'.
In 1968, the Estate gained Minx badging and the option of the 1,725cc engine. That year, Andrew Cowan's Hillman Hunter won the London to Sydney Endurance Rally, although the average Minx Estate owner was probably more concerned with parking spaces at Victor Value supermarket.
This example left the premises of dealer Armstrong and Fleming Ltd of Penrith on 13 March 1968, shortly after United States giant Chrysler acquired a majority share in the Rootes Group. In 1970, the Minx badge was no more after nearly four decades, while Rootes had become Chrysler UK. The Hillman badge lasted until 1976, while sales of the now-archaic-looking Hunter wearing a Chrysler badge ended in 1979. The Arrow design continued in Iran as the Paykan, where the last saloon left the factory as recently as 2005.
From a 2025 perspective, the Minx name seems as remote as steam locomotives or telephone operators instructing callers to 'press button A'. But the Arrow represented a genuine attempt at transport for the late 1960s. It was a car that looked completely at home outside the office and encouraged the owner to don their finest leisurewear on their day off.
And the 'two recessed ashtrays' demonstrate how the Minx was 'designed for your comfort all the way'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Top Gear
42 minutes ago
- Top Gear
BMW M3 Touring Review 2025
The first ever BMW M3 Touring: the really fast version of BMW's class-leading 3 Series, now with an estate bodyshell. To give it its full name, it's the BMW M3 Touring Competition xDrive: in English that means the estate is only available with BMW's superb all-wheel drive system. 'Competition' is just a trim level, and all M3s in the UK of any shape are Comps. It means you get over 500bhp and an automatic gearbox as standard. On top of that there's the newly arrived hardcore CS version – if you want to spend an extra £35k-odd. Advertisement - Page continues below Why has this car created such a fuss? There's a coolness about fast estate cars. Even though they are at heart a bit of an odd concoction: if you've got a dog or a lawnmower or bags of garden waste in the big 500-litre boot, you tend not to drive very quickly. And if it's empty and the road looks inviting, you're in an estate car, which is naturally heavier and less stiff than a coupe. Like, say, a BMW M4. Hold that thought… But people who like cars tend to really get off on the idea of a superwagon, because it's a ready-for-anything, all-season, all-occasion device, and they tend to be a bit more subtle than an out-and-out sports coupe. In an M4, you broadcast an image of thrusting power. In an estate, you're just taking the kids to school, or off to the hardware store. And while BMW has now delivered three M5 Tourings over the years, there's never been an M3 Touring sold to the public… until now. How fast is it? BMW claims it'll get you from 0-62mph in 3.7 seconds and go on to a top speed of 174mph, and even that's limited. We'd wager it'd be quicker still, after an M3 xDrive saloon we timed against the clock managed 0-60 in 3.2 seconds. The Touring's a bit heavier, but it still feels brutally, ruthlessly quick. Advertisement - Page continues below Tell me more key numbers. Just remember one: five hundred. At the front, the M3's 3.0-litre twin-turbo straight six delivers just over 500 horsepower to all four wheels via an eight-speed automatic gearbox. At the back, you get a smidge over 500 litres of boot space. That's it. That's the recipe. Party at the front and in the rear. And what about the CS? More power again? The CS pushes power up to 542bhp, dropping a couple of tenths from the 0-62mph time (claimed at 3.5s, likely not much over 3.0s flat in reality), and the 174mph limiter is raised to 186mph. The CS recipe has already been applied to the saloon and coupe, and is largely repeated here, although it does without the carbon fibre roof panel the shorter-roofed cars get. It's not a limited edition model, but it is more specialised, gaining a carbon fibre bonnet, titanium exhaust, plus retuned electronics for the gearbox, 4WD system and stability control. There's a load more carbon around the place, forged wheels, and an aluminium strut brace and more robust engine mounts as part of extra chassis strengthening measures. You still don't get carbon ceramic brakes as standard though. Come on then, how much is all this? Ah yes. Price. It's not cheap to own more car than anyone could ever possibly want or need. M3 Tourings start at £91,865 (they've gone up six grand since they first arrived two years ago) and it's terrifyingly easy to propel that beyond six figures if you lob some carbon fibre-laced option packs at yours. And if you do that, well, you're hardly likely to be filling it with unsheared sheep or bags of cement. Meanwhile the CS Touring weighs in at a whopping £126,275. An extra £35,000 give or take, and about £10k more than a hybrid 717bhp M5 Touring. Not saying that would be our choice, just pointing out the potential profit margin BMW enjoys with its CS cars. So is the M3 Touring a pointless endeavour that merely panders to the fantasies of those who have no intention – or means – of buying one? Or is it in fact one of the coolest cars made by BMW today? There is of course the possibility that the M3 Touring is in fact both of those things simultaneously, and still a pretty glorious bit of kit. Does the driving live up to the hype? Yes. The CS has remarkable precision and genuinely spectacular body control, the only drawbacks being extra road noise and more exhaust drone. To be honest, unless your hound particularly loves track days (this is a joke, not a suggestion), the regular M3 Touring is probably the better all-rounder. More on all this in the next tab. Our choice from the range BMW M3 xDrive Comp M 5dr Step Auto [Ultimate/M Pro Pk] £105,760 See prices and specs What's the verdict? ' The bottom line is this: the M3 Touring is eye-wateringly, cheek-pufflingly good to drive fast ' Folks who've yearned for BMW to build an M3 Touring for years – to be all the car they could ever want – might be dismayed to learn the result isn't in fact perfect. It's flawed. The fuel tank is on the small side. The gearbox still has moments in which it behaves like it's a regular automatic transmission that accidentally stowed away in an M car. And there's no getting away from the fact that if you can afford to buy one, you are certainly not in the position where you need one car to cover all bases. You probably have a couple of sporty toys for the weekend already, and a more humdrum shopping car. But don't get hung up on the semantics. The bottom line is this: the M3 Touring is eye-wateringly, cheek-pufflingly good to drive fast, and because it shares a body with the excellent 3 Series Touring, it's also an incredibly competent, well-made family car. No, it's not going to cause an overnight collapse in BMW X3 or Audi Q5 sales. It isn't supposed to. You get the feeling BMW will be happy with a few steady sales, while basking in the reflected glow of appreciation for having built a small fast estate at last. Ok, not small exactly, but definitely a more versatile size then the cruise liner than is the M5 Touring. It doesn't dilute the M3 lineage and it does bring something new and fresh to this little niche of the car world. Life for the next Audi RS4 Avant and the hybrid-powered AMG C63 is tricky right now. We'd have this over either of them any day of the week.
BBC News
11 hours ago
- BBC News
Rochford Council to trial 30-minute free parking scheme
Drivers will be able to park for free for up to 30 minutes in a council's car parks in a move to support local Council in Essex has agreed to try out the free parking scheme at most of its 11 car parks for the next three months "to help boost footfall".The council's leader, Conservative Danielle Belton, said the decision was something requested by business and residents "for a number of years".According to the Local Democracy Reporting Service, a meeting of the council's economic development, regeneration, and tourism committee heard the trial could cost the authority up to £42,000 for the three month period. Belton said it could also help with parking issues around schools, as parents could use short-term free spaces at drop off and pick up to council documents, the cost of a 30-minute stay in most surface car parks in the district was reduced last year from 70p to 55p in an effort to stimulate activity on the high said: "Ultimately, the council is dedicated to supporting our local businesses and especially the town centres, and it's a documented fact in other towns that short stay parking can help boost footfall. She added the council had built up more money from the car parks than it had spent, meaning it now had reserves to implement the new policy."The end goal is we see a better footfall in the town, which then creates more of a drive for other businesses to consider coming here, if they see we've offerings where people can pop into town, grab a coffee, grab a takeaway, do some errands, whatever it may be."The free parking will not apply to The Approach near Rayleigh Train Station and Hockley Woods Car Park. Follow Essex news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
BBC News
11 hours ago
- BBC News
The US-EU trade deal in numbers - how it compares to UK deal
Donald Trump has struck an agreement with the European Union that means the US will not impose the 30% tariffs - export taxes - on EU imports that the US president had the EU will still face a new 15% tariff on the goods it sells into is higher than the 10% tariffs the UK faces on goods exports to the US as part of an earlier agreement struck between London and how does the EU agreement compare with the UK's - and are there potential economic benefits now arising for the UK?Most analysts judge the UK's agreement with the US will likely prove more advantageous to the UK than the EU's agreement with the US will be for the EU, given the UK's lower headline tariff they also stress that the detail of the final US-EU agreement is key - and that there remains uncertainty about how the US will treat imports from the EU of steel and pharmaceuticals. What's the difference between the deals? On the face of it, the UK's lower baseline tariff rate (10% vs 15%) could offer an advantage to UK-based firms competing with EU-based companies for sales into the US - allowing UK exports to be more competitively priced for the US market after the tariffs have been applied."In principle, the UK is in a more advantageous position than other countries – so there is the potential to benefit from this," Michael Gasiorek, director of the Centre for Inclusive Trade Policy (CITP) told BBC there are complexities in the two agreements and a lack of clarity around both, which make it tricky to compare them. In the case of car exports, the UK-US agreement specifies that exports of cars from the UK to the US will face a 10% tariff, which is lower than the 15% rate that will be faced by EU firms selling cars in the the UK's 10% rate only applies to a quota of 100,000 vehicles a year, which is roughly the number of cars the UK sells into the US at the vehicle sold above that quota would be hit with the US's 25% tariff on car imports, which would be higher than the 15% tariff facing all EU car 2024 the EU sold around 758,000 vehicles to the US, almost seven times are many as the UK exported to America in that year. The UK-US agreement also says the UK will negotiate an agreement to avoid future US tariffs on pharmaceutical imports. But the US has not imposed those particular tariffs yet, and we don't know what the nature of any UK exception would is also a lack of clarity about whether the US-EU 15% tariff would always apply to pharmaceuticals or not. On Sunday the US president suggested it would not, but EU commission president Ursula Von der Leyen suggested it it's unclear whether the EU's 15% baseline tariff incorporates existing US import tariffs, or whether, as in the case of the UK's 10% tariff, it will be applied on top of existing import answer to that could have an influence on the relative advantage of UK exports. If the UK's tariffs are "stacked" but those of the EU are not, the overall effective tariff imposed on some EU goods could end being lower than what's imposed on some UK text of the EU-US agreement has yet been published, making it impossible to be certain at this stage. What about steel? UK steel exported to the US is currently subject to a 25% tariff, which is lower than the 50% global rate on imports of the metal imposed by Donald Trump in president granted the UK this partial exemption to allow time for implementation of the US-UK trade officials are working with their US counterparts to resolve technical issues that they hope will mean UK firms will be able to export steel to the US up to a certain quota that avoids even this 25% US officials have briefed that under the EU-US deal, EU steel will remain subject to the US's global 50% tariff on metal would seem to significantly benefit UK steel exporters relative to their EU counterparts when it comes to selling to the the EU Commission president has also suggested that Brussels and Washington remain in talks about a quota system, whereby EU steel exports under the quota would also be subject to a lower could ultimately erode any relative advantage for UK steel theory, EU manufacturers - in steel and other sectors - could move some of their production to the UK to benefit from lower tariffs when exporting to the USBut some analysts are sceptical about the likelihood of this."I doubt companies in modern supply chains are going to make big, long-term relocation decisions based on marginal tariff differences," says David Henig, the UK director of the European Centre For International Political Economy (ECIPE)."To take advantage of any such tariff differences businesses need to feel reasonably secure that the differences will last. Given the uncertainty surrounding US trade policy, that certainty is currently not there," agrees Michael Gasiorek. What about wider economic impacts? The US is the UK's single largest national trade 2024, the UK exported £196bn of goods and services to the US, 22.5% of all the countries of the European Union collectively account for a larger share of UK trade than the US. In 2024, the UK exported £358bn of goods and services to the EU, 41% of all exports."Demand for EU exports from the United States is likely to fall and, if that were to lead to a slowdown in the European Union, that would be bad for the United Kingdom as it would lead to a reduction in demand for our exports from our largest trading partner," Stephen Millard from the National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) told economists also expect Trump's tariffs to ultimately slow the growth of the US economy, which would also harm UK firms exporting to the US. What do you want BBC Verify to investigate?
