Boy, 9, died trying to escape abuse at Fife school as family make 'cover-up' claim
The brother of a nine-year-old boy who died while trying to escape a Fife residential school has accused the UK Government of a cover-up.
The youngster was knocked down and killed as police chased him along the M90 in April 1972.
It was the 13th time the boy had run away from Corsbie Hall, in Thornton, amid claims of horrific abuse.
A Fife MP later claimed the school could be part of 'a major education scandal'.
However, Secretary of State for Scotland Gordon Campbell rejected calls for an inquiry.
The family of the youngster who died told the Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry they were astonished at Lord Campbell of Croy's reaction.
They claim documents suggest the secretary of state and George Taylor-Bryant, Corsbie Hall's headteacher, were friends.
Francis, the boy's brother, said: 'They've airbrushed everything out of existence and it will come back to haunt them.
'My reaction is it's a cover-up.'
Corsbie Hall was located in the old Thornton Fever Hospital, near Glenrothes, from 1970 to 1972.
The inquiry heard children were regularly beaten, starved and forced to take cold showers at the school for 'mentally and socially disturbed pupils'.
And Margaret Thatcher, education secretary at the time, stopped English youngsters from attending.
The nine-year-old boy who died cannot be named due to legal restrictions.
However, the inquiry heard he was removed from his Stirling home against his family's wishes because was dyslexic.
Francis and sister Sharon, both pseudonyms, said their brother complained of being locked in a cupboard in just his pants almost every night.
He spoke of being hit with sticks, refused food and forced to scrub floors and carry rocks.
Then, in a letter home, the youngster told how he had run away 12 times but promised not to do it again.
However, Sharon said: 'He ran away one more time and that's when he was killed.'
The youngster's death had a devastating impact on his family and many years later they started looking for answers.
They discovered Parliamentary records which show Fife Labour MP Willie Hamilton pushed several times for an official inquiry into Corsbie Hall.
He said the situation was 'extremely unsatisfactory'.
However, a letter from the secretary of state described their brother running away as 'no more than a boyish escapade'.
And Lord Campbell, who died in 2005 aged 83, said: 'No blame can be attached to the school.'
He later accused Mr Hamilton of 'being a little hard on the school', adding: 'I don't think an inquiry will serve any useful purpose.'
The records show Corsbie Hall headteacher Mr Taylor-Bryant had no teaching or childcare qualifications.
They also revealed one of the teachers had previously been charged with sexual offences against children.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
2 hours ago
- Scotsman
Readers' Letters: Now we know for sure we can't believe political posts on X
A revelation after Israel's strikes on Iran leaves reader reeling Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... The revelation that around 6 per cent of messages on X supporting the SNP and attacking England and the English suddenly stopped after an Israeli attack on Iran's communications infrastructure is telling. I was recently commenting on a YouTube video when I realised that the majority of other comments supportive of the separatists had a very familiar ring to them. There was something rather derivative about them. My reaction was to comment that I was probably one of the few real people commenting and that the rest were probably Russian bots. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The news about the Iranian bots shows we must expect at least the same proportion of the pro-separatist comments on such media sites to be from Russian, Chinese and North Korean bots. We know all these hostile forces know that what is bad for the United Kingdom and Scotland is good for them. Scottish independence marchers in Glasgow - not one of them a bot from foreign shores (Picture: Andy Buchanan/AFP) It is something that Scottish nationalists should consider when they wish to make Scotland "independent". The Axis of Evil would like nothing better than for them to achieve their aim. That would weaken one of the main bulwarks upon which the freedoms of the democratic West relies, namely a strong United Kingdom. The freedom of all of us depends upon a strong UK. There are no broad, sunlit uplands to Scottish independence, only weakness and subjugation. Peter Hopkins, Edinburgh Toxic talk Carbon dioxide (CO2), an essential 'ingredient' in plant and crop growth and metabolism, has become villainised, on flimsy evidence, as a 'toxin' promoting adverse climate changes. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad In fact its impact on local and global weather patterns is very slight. Victims of the huge African emission recalled by Professor Hugh Pennington (Letters, 28 June) were asphyxiated, as in drowning, by hypoxia, not poisoned by an excess of CO2. As H Douglas Lightfoot points out (Letters, 27 June), net zero-style attempts to deplete atmospheric CO2 are not only ruinously costly but also totally illogical and impractical. Charles Wardrop, Perth Cue problems Instead of making cuts to disability and sickness benefits for all existing and future claimants, Sir Keir Starmer's U-turn means the cuts only apply to new, not existing, claimants. So stand by for another wave of Waspi and two-child benefit-style campaigns to restore payments to people who no longer qualify for the benefits, backed by virtue-signalling politicians who try to win votes and con the public by saying they'd 'like' to restore the benefits when in fact they have no intention of doing so because it's unaffordable. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad In opposition Labour were the worst culprits of this cynical virtue-signalling so they may be getting a taste of their own medicine – in many cases from within their own ranks. Allan Sutherland, Stonehaven, Aberdeenshire Tax take When it comes to raising taxes, politicians, mainly on the left, try to strike a balance between assuming the moral high ground and raising as much extra income as possible. To their dismay, the Scottish Government is finding out that their 'progressive' income tax policy is not raising the desired extra revenue, or indeed, producing the desired economic growth. Certainly it would be interesting to see Scottish Government estimates of forecast extra income tax revenue versus that which has actually been achieved. I suspect, though, that it would need an FOI request to release this information. Turning to the forthcoming UK budget, Chancellor Rachel Reeves may well find the same problem in that many of her target areas for tax hikes, for example Inheritance Tax, Capital Gains Tax, non-doms etc can be (partially) circumvented, and not yield the desired extra revenues. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad One area, though, where there is a little room for manoeuvre (by the taxpayer) is fuel duty and vehicle excise duty. Expect the motorist to be hit hard in the name of net zero, though maximising the tax take would be closer to the truth. Political naivety in understanding the law of unintended consequences is often in short supply when introducing new tax measures and I don't expect any change in the forthcoming UK and Scottish budgets. Alastair Neilson, Edinburgh Soft soaping It's useful to think back, at this time, as far back as 1956, when, in the Suez Crisis, the UK realised it was no longer a major power. President Gamal Abdel Nasser of Egypt nationalised the Suez Canal, having failed to get US and international backing for the building of the Aswan Dam. Britain and France colluded secretly with Israel to seize and control the canal, but the military operation was a total failure, and Anthony Eden's government fell. The US and UN had given no backing to the project, and there followed financial crisis and fuel shortages for the UK. The EU and 'coalition of the willing' are in a similar position of weakness in the worthy aim of assisting Ukraine, which explains the fawning sycophancy of Nato Secretary General Mark Rutte in trying to woo Donald Trump back into Nato and backing Ukraine. Never mind also the small matter of having probably not managed to eliminate Iran's nuclear ambitions. Rutte is fully aware that Trump is an unreliable, erratic criminal President bent on destroying democracy in his own country. But he has to try the soft-soaping anyway. Crawford Mackie, Edinburgh Odd question New guidance has been issued after requests from universities for clarity on how they could uphold freedom of speech. Isn't this like the Vatican requesting clarity on how it could uphold Christianity? Doug Clark, Currie, Midlothian Write to The Scotsman Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Man jailed for fraudulently selling tea received £50k grant
The 55-year-old made £550,000 from the scheme, with the plants actually imported wholesale from Italy. As reported by The Times, his business was given £50,000 in funding by Scottish Edge, which offers grants and loans to start-up businesses. Read More: Mr Robinson was given the funding after applying in 2015, with the organisation announcing the award to "Scotland's only tea plantation which counts Kensington Palace and Balmoral Hotel as customers". Scottish Edge is funded by the Scottish government, the Scottish Enterprise quango, the Royal Bank of Scotland and the Hunter Foundation. Mr Robinson claimed to have grown tea on farmland in Perthshire and Dumfries and Galloway, but had in fact bought Italian tea from an English wholesaler. Ron McNaughton, the head of the Scottish food crime and incidents unit at Food Standards Scotland, said: "His actions caused real financial and reputational harm to individuals, businesses and a developing sector of genuine Scottish tea producers. This outcome is the result of a complex and painstaking investigation involving a dedicated team at FSS and the co-operation of partner agencies and key witnesses. "It demonstrates that those who set out to mislead consumers and defraud businesses will be held accountable.'
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
There's a parliament for the Central Belt. What about the rest of us?
Festival but no mention of aid for the equivalent in Wigtown or Melrose. Add on the end to peak rail fares that the First Minister claimed would save thousands for commuters on the Glasgow/Edinburgh line with no mention of equivalent savings for those in Tongue, Ullapool, Lochgilphead, Kelso or Kirkcudbright and we appear to have a Parliament that only address problems around Edinburgh. Adding on the desecration to the Flow Country of the North, Skye, Beauly, the Mearns, the Yarrow Valley and Loch Ken raises the question as to the worth of SNP politicians in rural Scotland when the preservation of its scenic beauty does not receive their support. Note that in the Lake District, the Peak District and the Yorkshire Moors electricity cables are firmly placed underground. Why does Holyrood refuse to provide the same protection in Scotland? Ian Moir, Castle Douglas. Nuclear won't bring Scots jobs If there is a 'fraud' on nuclear power ("Nuclear industry says ministers' green energy plans are 'fraud' and will see Scots miss out", The Herald, June 26), then it is being perpetrated on Scotland. Why is Scotland importing relatively small quantities of electricity from England a problem, as the Nuclear Industry Authority (NIA) complains, when England imports substantially higher quantities from Scotland right now (net exports 2024 19.7 TWh), and we are in a common energy market? The jobs at Torness will inevitably go as it takes decades to build a new nuclear reactor, so a new plant to 'save' the jobs would have to have been started around 2000 – when Labour was in power, north and south, but at that time rejected new nuclear. The 'thousands of jobs' are another Labour/NIA illusion, as the main contractors will be French with some English input. Billions of investment? The reality is that Scotland has won contracts worth a measly £280 million at Hinckley Point C on an estimated cost for that site at £42-49 billion rather than a per capita share of about £4bn. There is no reason to assume Scotland would gain more work simply because it is to be built in Scotland. Read more letters I expect the other component of supposed nuclear value-added to Scotland's economy is the endless decommissioning of nuclear sites which are costing all of us a fortune. Lazards Levelized Cost of Energy 2025 has nuclear generation at four times the cost of wind, so nuclear will not bring down the cost of electricity. Small Modular Reactors are even worse as they lack economies of scale, they produce more waste, they still require 24/7 security and we still have no idea of the cost of electricity produced – one of those involved in the SMR competition (NuScale) could not find industry buyers for its electricity at its proposed plants in Utah as, even with Federal funding, the price mooted was too high. I think you need to fact-check every part of the nuclear industry's weasel words as they are misleading tosh, but also party political. Scotland also has substantial new renewables generation and substantial storage in the pipeline. Scotland could, at the worst, burn its own natural gas (supplemented with 25% green hydrogen) for electricity generation instead of exporting it for others to burn. GR Weir, Ochiltree. We must back North Sea oil When a communist regime like Venezuela offers a more competitive tax environment to oil and gas investors than the United Kingdom, it's a damning indictment of how far our energy policy has drifted from economic common sense. Under Labour's punitive approach, the UK has become hostile to the very industries needed to fund and power the so-called green transition. The windfall tax – via the Energy Profits Levy – has been raised to a punishing 78% and extended to 2030. Crucially, the specific investment allowance within the EPL, which incentivised reinvestment into North Sea projects, has been scrapped. While standard capital allowances like full expensing remain, they are far less effective in attracting long-term energy investment. The damage is clear. Domestic gas production has fallen 20% since 2019, oil output is down 40%, and the UK is now importing nearly half of its energy. Imports of liquefied natural gas (LNG) – four times more polluting than domestically produced gas – are up 42%. In a so-called green agenda, we're shipping in more carbon-heavy fuel while blocking local production that supports jobs and tax revenues. And who pays the price? British households and manufacturers, now burdened with the highest energy costs in Europe which are up to four times higher than in the US. Our industrial base is shrinking, energy security is weakening, and taxpayer subsidies for unreliable renewables and unproven schemes like carbon capture are soaring. Even Labour's own Scottish leader Anas Sarwar has warned that many fully licensed North Sea fields are no longer investible. If Labour's front bench in Holyrood can see the cliff edge, why can't those in Westminster? Britain needs an energy policy built on realism, not Marxism. That means supporting domestic production, attracting investment, protecting jobs – and above all, delivering affordable, secure energy for British consumers and businesses. Ian Lakin, Aberdeen. Windfall taxes in the North Sea have increased (Image: PA) Defence pledge will not work Socialist governments – and Conservative and Unionist ones alike – have disgracefully run down our nation's ability to defend itself at least since the Second World War, although arguably the rot set in with the Great War. Hence the need for American assistance during the more recent war which, while essential to our ongoing freedom, came at a high financial cost and saw our global power eclipsed by that of the Americans. Now we have a socialist government that seeks to overturn decades of its own party's woeful performance in this regard and raise defence expenditure significantly. In principle, this is a welcome move. The right way to do that is on our own terms, based on a clear understanding of what is required to defend the realm. Instead it has been proposed simply to apply an arbitrary financial not strategic target, set by the capricious leader of a foreign country with a high propensity for violence domestically and deeply damaging military adventurism internationally. This will likely mean we continue to be ill-equipped for the existential task in hand, while wasting vast sums of taxpayers' hard-earned money and becoming more likely to be drawn into future American misadventurism abroad. Let us not forget the debacle of recent socialist governments pandering to such catastrophic misjudgements, both in Iraq and Afghanistan. Christopher Ruane, Lanark. Iran must obey international law In the event that the current Israeli (+ America) Iran war does eventually result in international negotiations for peace, may l suggest two matters which might usefully be added to the agenda? Firstly, an international passage through the Strait of Hormuz which runs past the coastline of Iran should be considered (because in excess of 24% of oil destined for use around the world passes down the Persian Gulf and through that Strait). When the Shahs were in power in Iran they signed international treaties which guaranteed an international waterway there. When a change of sovereignty takes place in a country then they should renew any such international treaties. It appears that the Islamic Republic of Iran has not done so – but, I suggest, should be invited to do so now. Secondly, I suggest that the true role played by the Islamic Republic of Iran in the destruction of Flight PA 103 over Lockerbie in Scotland should also be addressed. Despite the recent decision finding a sole Libyan (Abdelbaset Ali Mohamed al-Megrahi) responsible, there are many who doubt that verdict – including Dr Jim Swire, who lost his eldest daughter Flora in that tragedy and who in his recent book stated that there seems no doubt now that it was a revenge attack by Iran for the shooting down by an American warship of the Iranian civilian flight IR 655 over the Strait of Hormuz. It is suggested here that no one can sensibly deny an entitlement for the creation of an Islamic Republic in the Middle East or elsewhere. Having said that, it is also suggested that if they wish to stand amongst and trade with the world's international community then they must be prepared to adopt minimum international standards of behaviour – or face international sanctions. Richard Anderson, Advocate, Edinburgh.
