
EXCLUSIVE Britain will not be intimidated by Moscow spies, writes Foreign Secretary DAVID LAMMY as he sanctions 21 Russian operatives
Soviet spies once stopped at nothing to murder dissidents and gain an edge over the West. Across the world, they operated in the shadows, poisoning enemies, spreading disinformation, and destabilising democracies. Today, their successors in the GRU, Russia 's military intelligence service, continue that dark tradition.
I remember all too well the horror of Alexander Litvinenko's murder in 2006, recklessly poisoned with radioactive polonium in a London hotel. I was in government then, and it felt miraculous more Londoners did not die as a result.
In 2018, Russian operatives were equally reckless. Incredibly, Sergei and Yulia Skripal survived their poisoning with a military-grade nerve agent in Salisbury. But the attack killed Dawn Sturgess, left Detective Sergeant Nick Bailey seriously ill, and could have claimed many more lives if not for the swift response of our emergency services.
We know a great deal about how Russian operatives work. Investigations into these and other attacks reveal many patterns. One is that cyber operations often lay the groundwork.
In the Skripal case, GRU Unit 26165 previously targeted Yulia Skripal's email accounts with malware before the attempted murder. The same unit conducted online reconnaissance on civilian shelters in Mariupol in Ukraine in March 2022 – only one day before the Mariupol Theatre was bombed, killing innocent civilians, including children.
These are not isolated incidents. They are part of a broader GRU campaign to destabilise Europe, undermine Ukraine's sovereignty and threaten the safety of British citizens.
That is why today I am sanctioning 21 Russian operatives. These individuals are responsible for cyber and hybrid operations targeting Britain and some of our closest allies.
We are acting following close collaboration with the FBI and with vocal support of NATO allies. And the Government is strongly committed to deepening our defence and hybrid cooperation with friends in Europe as well. In just a few months, we've agreed a new Security and Defence Partnership with the EU, a Lancaster House 2.0 Declaration with France, the Kensington Treaty with Germany and the biggest uplift in NATO defence spending in the history of the Alliance.
Together, these agreements send a clear message: Europe is toughening up.
But these sanctions are not just a signal. They have real bite, restricting the movement and financial access of those responsible for malign GRU activity. They expose the GRU's methods and personnel to public scrutiny. And they make it easier for us to share intelligence with partners so they too can prepare for future threats.
And this is just one of the measures we are taking. Much of our work to deter these threats is necessarily secret. But with the Spending Review committing £600 million to improve our intelligence services' capabilities and the Foreign Office establishing a new counter-hybrid taskforce, we are ready to counter Russia's new age of sabotage and subterfuge.
By shining a light on the GRU and their operations, we make it harder for them to act with impunity. That makes Britain safer, which is fundamental to this government's Plan for Change.
We will not be cowed by those who seek to do us harm. The GRU's operatives may hide behind screens and shadows, but we see them clearly – and we will act decisively to stop them.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Ukrainecast Q&A: Trump vs Medvedev, a US defection and revisiting the minerals deal
On Thursday, Ukraine's parliament waved through a bill reversing controversial changes to domestic anti-corruption bodies. The near-unanimous vote wiped out any remaining uncertainty over the future of the institutions, after Zelensky had largely caved to pressure following widespread demonstrations last week. Meanwhile - despite a shorter-term deadline set by President Trump for a ceasefire - Russia has continued its aerial campaign on Ukrainian targets, with strikes on more than two dozen targets in Kyiv on Thursday killing at least eight, and injuring more than 130 others. This week, Lucy and Vitaly are joined by the BBC's Ukraine correspondent, James Waterhouse, to discuss army infiltration, the American family who defected to Russia, and what happened to that highly publicised minerals deal. Plus, our very own Olga Robinson tells us about BBC Verify's latest deep-dive into Russian disinformation. Today's episode is presented by Lucy Hockings and Vitaly Shevchenko. The producers were Laurie Kalus, Julia Webster and Polly Hope. The technical producer was Hannah Montgomery. The series producer is Tim Walklate. The senior news editor is Sam Bonham. Email Ukrainecast@ with your questions and comments. You can also send us a message, voice note, or video via WhatsApp, Signal or Telegram to +44 330 1239480 You can join the Ukrainecast discussion on Newscast's Discord server here:


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Corbyn's new party and the menace of populism
The upcoming launch of a new party by Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana (Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana agree to launch leftwing party, 24 July) will inevitably prompt questions about whether this will divide the progressive vote or offer a genuine alternative to Labour's centrist drift, especially as the Green party continues to grow as a principled voice for environmental and social justice. Although these projects are potential rivals, they need not be. If the disturbing rise of rightwing populism is to be successfully confronted, the left must overcome fragmentation and find ways to coexist and collaborate. The Corbyn-Sultana initiative and the Greens share much common ground: a rejection of austerity, commitment to democratic reform and a belief in economic and ecological justice. Their differences in emphasis, tone and priorities are real but not irreconcilable. There has to be scope for a non-aggression pact at the next general election, with each party standing aside in constituencies where the other has a better chance of success. Joint campaigning on core issues – such as proportional representation, protest rights, wealth taxes and a green new deal – could amplify their impact, and framing climate action as central to economic justice, not separate from it, could provide a unifying narrative for both. This is not about merging or blurring identities. It is about strategic and political maturity. If the left cannot cooperate when so much is at stake, it will surrender the field to those who thrive on division and fear. Unity does not require uniformity; it requires courage and purpose. The worse case, of a public war of words and clashing candidacies between the Greens and Corbynites, would demoralise voters and hand the initiative to the populist CosgroveChapel Lawn, Shropshire Your report quotes Labour party sources who are dismissive of the threat from Jeremy Corbyn and then bluntly states that Corbyn 'lost the 2017 and 2019 elections as party leader'. It would have provided a fairer context if you had pointed out that in 2017, the Corbyn-led Labour party achieved 2.5m more votes (and a 6% higher vote share) than Keir Starmer did in 2024. Even in 2019, 500,000 more people voted for Corbyn's party than Starmer's. Dr Chris MorrisKidderminster, Worcestershire In the winter election of 2019 I spent hours leafleting for Jeremy Corbyn's Labour party. The sensation of cold and wet letterboxes still lingers on my fingertips when I think of what he said in an Observer article just after the election – that Labour had lost the election but won the argument. This is all Mr Corbyn is interested in doing – winning the argument – and indeed I think he will find that is all he ever will ArmstrongChester Thank you to Jeremy Corbyn for still caring enough and having the humanity to rally the 99% to join together and put 40 years of neoliberal theft and exploitation behind us. I support all his domestic policies, but the realpolitik of foreign policy bothers me. How would he deal with Vladimir Putin and Benjamin Netanyahu?Pamela HopeKingston upon Thames, London Oh, Jeremy Corbyn, why splinter the left further by creating a new party when the Greens already actively stand and work for all you want to fight for?Sushila DhallOxford Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.


Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: When I lost my job, I took anything going. My generation learnt that if you wanted anything out of life you had to earn it. Today's graduates must do the same
Norman Tebbit, the best Prime Minister we never had, was laid to rest today. Requiem for the Conservative Party, somebody called it. He certainly embodied a lost England, where hard work and self-sufficiency were valued and reliance on the State was a source of shame, not a lifestyle choice.