Sudan's humanitarian crisis worsens amid escalating violence in Kordofan and Darfur
The United Nations said more than 450 civilians, including at least 35 children, were killed during the weekend of July 12 in attacks in villages surrounding the town of Bara in North Kordofan province.
'The suffering in Kordofan deepens with each passing day,' Mercy Corps Country Director for Sudan,, Kadry Furany, said in a statement shared with The Associated Press. 'Communities are trapped along active and fast changing front lines, unable to flee, unable to access basic needs or lifesaving assistance.'
At least 60 killed in Bara over the last week
Sudan plunged into war after simmering tensions between the army and its rival, the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces, or RSF, escalated to fighting in April 2023. The violence has killed at least 40,000 people and created one of the world's worst displacement and hunger crises, according to humanitarian organizations. In recent months, much of the fighting has been concentrated in the Darfur and Kordofan regions.
On Thursday, the U.N. human rights office confirmed that since July 10, the RSF has killed at least 60 civilians in the town of Bara, while civil society groups reported up to 300 people were killed, the office said.
A military airstrike on Thursday in Bara killed at least 11 people, all from the same family, according to the U.N. office. Meanwhile, between July 10 and 14, the army killed at least 23 civilians and injured over two dozen others after striking two villages in West Kordofan.
An aid worker with Mercy Corps said his brother was fatally shot on July 13 during an attack on the village of Um Seimima in El Obeid City in North Kordofan, Grace Wairima Ndungu, the group's communications manager told AP.
Furany said that movement between the western and eastern areas of the Kordofan region is 'practically impossible.'
The intensified fighting forced Mercy Corps to temporarily suspend operations in three out of four localities, with access beyond Kadugli, the capital of South Kordofan, now being in 'serious doubt,' Furany said, as a safe sustained humanitarian corridor is needed.
Fighting in Kordofan worsens displacement
Mathilde Vu, an aid worker with the Norwegian Refugee Council who is often based in Port Sudan, told AP that fighting has intensified in North Kordofan and West Kordofan over the past several months.
'A large number of villages are being destroyed, burned to the ground, people being displaced,' she said. 'What is extremely worrying about the Kordofan is that there is very little information and not a lot of organizations are able to support. It is a complete war zone there.'
Marwan Taher, a project coordinator with humanitarian group Doctors Without Borders, told AP that military operations in Kordofan heightened insecurity prompting scores of people to flee to Darfur, a region already in a dire humanitarian situation.
Though exact figures are yet to be confirmed, Taher estimated that hundreds were recently displaced from Kordofan to Tawila in North Darfur province. The NRC said that since April, Tawila has already received 379,000 people escaping violence in famine-hit Zamzam Camp and Al Fasher.
Meanwhile, the International Organization for Migration recently reported that over 46,000 people were displaced from different areas in West Kordofan in May alone due to clashes between warring parties.
Taher said those fleeing Kordofan to Tawila walk long distances with barely enough clothes and little water, and sleep on the streets until they arrive at the area they want to settle in. The new wave of displacement has brought diseases, including measles, which began spreading in parts of Zalingi in West Darfur in March and April as camps received people fleeing Kordofan.
Flooding and attacks worsen Darfur's already dire situation
Aid workers also warned about ongoing fighting in Darfur. Vu said there have been 'uninterrupted campaigns of destruction' against civilians in North Darfur.
'In Darfur there's been explicit targeting of civilians. There's been explicit execution,' she said.
Shelling killed five children Wednesday in El Fasher in North Darfur, according to U.N. spokesperson Stephanie Tremblay. Meanwhile, between July 14 and 15, heavy rains and flooding displaced over 400 people and destroyed dozens of homes in Dar As Salam, North Darfur.
With a looming rainy season, a cholera outbreak and food insecurity, the situation in Darfur is 'getting worse every day and that's what war is,' said Taher.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Live Updates: Thai and Cambodian Troops Fire at Each Other as Relations Deteriorate
Pinned The Thailand Embassy in Phnom Penh, Cambodia. Just a day after Thailand recalled its ambassador to Cambodia, violence exploded across the two countries' border. Cambodia and Thailand exchanged fire on Thursday along their heavily patrolled and contested border, as tensions escalated a day after a Thai soldier was injured by a land mine, prompting the expulsion of a diplomat. Shots were heard at 8:20 a.m. and came from an area about 200 meters east of Prasat Ta Muen Thom, an ancient Khmer-Hindu temple along the disputed border, according to the Thai army. Earlier, Thai soldiers had heard the sound of a drone and saw six armed Cambodian soldiers, the army added. Three Thai civilians were injured, according to the Thai army. It added that the Cambodian army had fired two BM-21 rockets into civilian-populated areas of the Thai province of Surin at 9.40 a.m. on Thursday, and ordered an immediate evacuation of the people in the area. Officials in Cambodia did not confirm the casualties. The Thai army returned fire with a field cannon, according to Channel 3 News, a Thai news website. But according to Cambodia, Thai troops fired first, resulting in Cambodia firing back in self-defense, according to Chhum Socheat, a Cambodia defense ministry spokesman. He said that the clash started after Thai soldiers laid barbed wire around the Prasat Ta Muen Thom temple on Thursday morning after the land mine incident the day before. Prime Minister Hun Manet of Cambodia said Thai forces expanded the geographical scope of their onslaughts, launching attacks against Cambodian military positions at the Preah Vihear Temple and the Ta Krabei Temple in Cambodia's Oddar Meanchey Province. 'Cambodia always maintains a stance of wanting to resolve issues peacefully, but, in this case, we have no choice but to respond with armed force against this armed invasion,' Mr. Hun Manet said in a statement on Facebook. Tensions between the two countries rose significantly this week after a Thai soldier lost his right leg in a land mine incident on Wednesday. Thailand said it would downgrade diplomatic relations with Cambodia, recalling its ambassador to Cambodia and expelling Cambodia's ambassador. The leaders of the armed forces of Thailand and Cambodia are meeting on Thursday morning, according to Thailand's acting prime minister, Phumtham Wechayachai. He called on the media to be careful in presenting the news because these 'situations can happen all the time.' For decades, Thailand and Cambodia have battled over sovereignty at various non-demarcated points along their shared 508-mile border. The tensions have resulted in violent military skirmishes and, for years, had remained at a simmer until they were reignited in May after the killing of a Cambodian soldier during a brief exchange of gunfire. The dispute has also upended Thailand's domestic politics. Last month, Thailand's Constitutional Court suspended the prime minister, Paetongtarn Shinawatra, saying it needed to deliberate on whether her recent call with Cambodia's de facto leader, Hun Sen, violated ethics. During the call, which was meant to resolve tensions, she appeared to take a deferential tone with Mr. Hun Sen, igniting an outcry in Thailand. Speaking of the gunfire exchange on Thursday, Mr. Hun Sen wrote in a Facebook post: 'Cambodia's soldiers have no choice but to fight back.' He called on Cambodians to remain calm, adding that they did not need to buy rice to store in panic. Kittiphum Sringammuang and Sun Narin contributed reporting.
CBS News
3 hours ago
- CBS News
Exclusive video shows Grand Prairie Councilman allegedly assaulting 60-year-old real estate broker, leading to arrest
For the first time, we're seeing video that shows a Grand Prairie city councilman allegedly assaulting a real estate broker, which led to his arrest. CBS News Texas has obtained exclusive video that recorded Michael Del Bosque allegedly punching a 60-year-old man and breaking his phone during what his accuser calls an unprovoked attack. That accuser is speaking for the first time to CBS News Texas. "It's a very difficult thing because I have some physical and emotional scars," said David Collantes, the alleged assault victim. Collantes hasn't been back to the Grand Prairie parking lot where the incident allegedly happened since April. April is when the 60-year-old Austin real estate broker left the area with bloodied hands after a violent encounter with Grand Prairie City Councilmember Mike Del Bosque. "He gets in front of me, does not allow me to walk by," said Collantes. "And then, when he's kind of looking at me, I saw in his eyes that he meant to do harm." Security camera video obtained by CBS News Texas shows Del Bosque approaching Collantes on April 4 outside a medical office building on Carrier Parkway. It was a building owned by Del Bosque but in the process of being turned over to another owner after a default judgment. Collantes said the city councilman didn't want him showing the property to a prospective buyer and took it out on him in a violent assault. "I identified myself as a real estate broker with clients looking at property in the area," said Collantes. "And he said, 'What do you want? My property,' over and over again. And then that's when I kind of started backing up ... And I just was fighting for my life, literally." The video shows Del Bosque taking Collantes to the ground, eventually smashing the victim's cell phone and trying to grab his wallet. He was arrested days later and charged with misdemeanor assault and criminal mischief. "It's a bit shocking that a public figure, someone who people put their trust in, would elect somebody that has, really, a bad temper and cannot control his emotions and uses his authority to abuse his power," Collantes said. Collantes believes the video proves Del Bosque is unfit to continue serving on the city council while the criminal case is pending. "I would like to see him get prosecuted," said Collantes. "It has nothing to do with what he is or who he is. But this is all about transparency. I want the public to know that this man is a menace to your society. Grand Prairie does not want to be known as a city where innocent people can come and get accosted by the public officials." CBS News Texas spoke to Del Bosque by phone and asked him about what is seen on the video. He declined to comment and said he would have his attorney contact us. So far, that hasn't happened. Del Bosque has served on the city council since 2017. Grand Prairie Mayor Ron Jensen sent the following statement to CBS News Texas: "I'm concerned about what occurred, but ultimately, it's up to the citizens to decide whether they believe he should continue serving if he chooses to run again." Dallas County DA John Creuzot insists that Del Bosque's position of power will not impact his prosecution, saying in a statement, "This is a pending case, so we cannot comment. However, I can assure you that this office is following the law and this matter is being handled with the same diligence and impartiality as any other case." Dallas County District Attorney's Office said, "Without the video evidence that Collantes says he obtained from a nearby animal clinic that he believes backs up his account, it's possible, he says, that the councilmember would avoid accountability for the trauma he still struggles with." "I have some leftover scars," said Collantes. "There's more. But they're on my fingers and they'll never go away. And so, I'm constantly reminded of the attack every day."
Washington Post
7 hours ago
- Washington Post
Do Japanese auto imports get a tariff edge with trade deal?
A day after the United States reached a trade deal that imposes a 15 percent tariff on imports from Japan, President Donald Trump declared that U.S. business would 'BOOM.' But early reads from auto analysts paint a murkier picture — if anything, some experts say, Japanese companies may benefit more than their rivals for now. 'I do think the 15% tariff on vehicles imported from Japan is unfair for American automakers especially if the latter are paying a 25% tariff on their Mexican and Canadian production exported to the US,' Morningstar Research analyst David Whiston wrote in an email to The Washington Post. Trump announced Tuesday that the United States had reached a 'massive' deal with Japan to levy 15 percent tariffs on Japanese imports — including automobiles and auto parts — instead of the 25 percent he threatened earlier this month. In exchange, Japan will remove trade barriers for U.S. auto and agricultural imports and invest $550 billion in the United States. It was the latest trade agreement the Trump administration has announced in recent weeks, as it races to complete deals with scores of countries it has threatened with high levies. 'This Deal will create Hundreds of Thousands of Jobs — There has never been anything like it,' the president wrote on his social media site Truth Social. The Big Three U.S. automakers — General Motors, Ford and Stellantis — do not share Trump's confidence. Matt Blunt, president of the American Automotive Policy Council, a lobbying group that represents the three automakers, said it was still reviewing the deal. But Blunt, the former Republican governor of Missouri, said that an agreement that has Japanese automakers paying a lower tariff rate on their imports than U.S. companies pay for parts 'is a bad deal for US industry and US auto workers.' The White House did not respond to a request for comment. Since the Trump administration threatened sweeping tariffs on most trade partners — including close allies such as Mexico and Canada — the U.S. auto industry has been trying to adjust. Supply chains cross multiple borders, particularly in North America, where goods from Mexico and Canada are subject to 25 percent tariffs. Manufacturers with U.S. operations have felt the impact. General Motors said Tuesday that tariffs cost it $1.1 billion in the second quarter. Stellantis — whose brands include Chrysler, Dodge, Fiat and Jeep — said it faced about $350 million in tariff costs in the first half of the year. Car prices suggest that automakers have absorbed much of the tariffs for the moment rather than passing them on to buyers. Kelley Blue Book data for June shows the cost of a new vehicle rose 1.2 percent year-over-year to $48,907. While that's the largest year-over-year growth of any month this year, it remains well below the average 10-year increase of 3.9 percent. Jonathan Smoke, chief economist at Cox Automotive, said vehicles assembled in the United States will see the least added cost under the current trade regime, adding as much as 4 percent, or about $2,000, to what consumers pay. Many models — including Toyota Camrys and Ford Broncos — are assembled in the United States. But many cars from U.S. companies are also assembled in Mexico and Japan. Cox estimates that consumers will pay an added 9 percent, or $3,010, for cars assembled in Japan, which include some Toyota models, such as the Prius and the 4Runner. Vehicles assembled in Mexico will see the highest costs to consumers — about 10 percent or $3,550 — according to Cox. Those include the Honda Fit, the Chevrolet Equinox and Ford Maverick. 'It looks like the Japanese assembled vehicle gets friendlier treatment than vehicles assembled in North America outside of the U.S., but vehicles assembled in the U.S. receive the least amount of added costs from tariffs,' Smoke wrote in an email. Other analysts agreed that Japanese companies could have a near-term advantage. 'Having this agreement in place before any other foreign auto makers gives Japan a near-term advantage in terms of cost, even compared to some domestic U.S. product with a high degree of both foreign production and parts content,' Karl Brauer, iSeeCars executive analyst wrote in an email to The Washington Post. 'It also allows Japan's automakers to plan for future assembly plant and parts supplier locations.' Autos Drive America, which represents foreign automakers in the United States, said it was 'encouraged' by news of the Japan trade deal. 'International automakers have invested more than $124 billion in their U.S. operations over the past thirty years, and the certainty provided by this agreement allows them to plan for greater investment, bringing even more production to our shores and providing affordable options for American consumers.' Jennifer Safavian, president and CEO of Autos Drive America, said in a statement. U.S. businesses may thrive in the long run, said Erik Gordon, a professor at the University of Michigan's Ross School of Business. If North American tariffs settle at 25 percent, U.S. companies 'will move a lot of their manufacturing and assembly to the US from Mexico and Canada,' Gordon said in an email.
