Keir Starmer is accused of 'rewarding Hamas' after announcing Britain will recognise a Palestinian state unless Israel ends 'appalling' crisis in Gaza: Furious Netanyahu says move will 'threaten Britain' and 'will NOT happen'
Benjamin Netanyahu reacted furiously to Sir Keir's ultimatum to make peace with the terror group which inflicted the October 7 atrocities.
In a major diplomatic shift, the PM said the Government will recognise Palestine within weeks unless Israel ends the war in Gaza and agrees to drop its opposition to a two-state solution to the Middle East crisis.
But Mr Netanyahu warned: 'A jihadist state on Israel's border today will threaten Britain tomorrow,' adding: 'Appeasement towards jihadist terrorists always fails. It will fail you too. It will not happen.'
Speaking after an emergency Cabinet meeting on the issue, Sir Keir said the 'terrible suffering' in Gaza meant it was 'the moment to act' to inject new life into a peace process which has been on hold since the October 7 Hamas attacks on Israel.
The move is designed to quell growing anger within Labour over the government's stance on the conflict. But Sir Keir's intervention provoked an angry response from all sides today, seemingly satisfying no-one.
US State department spokesman Tammy Bruce said Sir Keir's remarks were a 'slap in the face for the victims of October 7'.
'It allows it to continue. It gives one group hope, and that's Hamas. It is a rewarding of that kind of behavior,' she said, adding: 'There's one group that benefits from the images, the reality of the horribleness, and that's Hamas. And so there's a reason why they don't cooperate and stop.'
Kemi Badenoch said Sir Keir had put internal Labour Party management before the national interest.
The Tory leader said: 'When the country is looking for answers on asylum hotels, the cost of living is getting worse, and doctors are threatening to go on strike again - further endangering lives, it's disgraceful that Keir Starmer recalled his Cabinet to try and sort out a political problem for the Labour Party.
'Recognising a Palestinian state won't bring the hostages home, won't end the war and won't get aid into Gaza. This is political posturing at its very worst.'Fellow Tory Ben Obese-Jecty said the PM's move was 'pure virtue signalling by Keir Starmer... after being railroaded by his MPs'.
The PM's decision follows the lead of Emmanuel Macron earlier this month, who said France would recognise a Palestinian state at a United Nations summit in New York in September.
Sir Keir said the UK was working to the same timetable in an effort to restart efforts for a two-state solution which have been in the deep freeze for almost two years.
Donald Trump today denied Sir Keir had briefed him on the idea of recognising Palestine when the two leaders held talks in Scotland on Monday.
The White House pointed to comments made by Mr Trump at a joint press conference on Monday, when he said: 'I'm not going to take a position. I don't mind him [Starmer] taking a position. I'm looking for getting people fed right now.'
But speaking before Sir Keir's announcement, Mike Huckabee, US ambassador to Israel warned that recognising Palestine while Hamas is still in control in Gaza would be 'like letting the Nazis have a victory after World War Two'.
Sir Keir rang Benjamin Netanyahu to warn him of the change in the UK's position, but Downing Street declined to comment on the Israeli leader's response.
The dramatic move came just days after the PM rejected calls to recognise Palestine immediately. Last week, Labour sources suggested Britain would not take the step until a ceasefire was in place and Hamas returned the remaining Israeli hostages seized on October 7.
But Labour pressure on the PM has mounted in recent days. More than 250 MPs across all parties have signed a letter calling on him to take the step and senior Cabinet ministers including Angela Rayner, Ed Miliband and Wes Streeting have been warning him he was in danger of leaving it too late.
Technology secretary Peter Kyle yesterday said the Palestinian people need to be 'rewarded for what they've been through and have the tools at their disposal to move them towards the kind of peace, stability and dignity that every citizen in every country is owed'.
In a hastily-arranged TV statement in No 10 earlier this evening after consulting his Cabinet, many of whom dialled in from elsewhere, Sir Keir said the shocking recent images of starving children in Gaza 'will stay with us for a lifetime'.
He added: 'I've always said we will recognise a Palestinian state as a contribution to a proper peace process, at the moment of maximum impact for the two-state solution.
'With that solution now under threat, this is the moment to act.'The PM said the government would recognise Palestine in September 'unless the Israeli government takes substantive steps to end the appalling situation in Gaza, agree to a ceasefire and commit to a long-term, sustainable peace, reviving the prospect of a two-state solution'.
He said demands on Hamas to release the hostages, agree a ceasefire and disarm remained 'unchanged'.
The PM did not appear to link recognition of Palestine to any concessions by Hamas, but government sources insisted that the actions of the terrorist group would be 'assessed' alongside those of Israel before a final decision is taken next month.
With neither side likely to meet the tests set by the PM in the coming weeks, the Government is now on course to recognise Palestine while part of the territory is still run by Hamas, which is designated as a terrorist group in the UK. Sir Keir yesterday insisted Hamas could 'play no part' in running Gaza.
It remains unclear exactly what borders Britain would recognise for Palestine or who it would deal with as the legitimate government.
Critics pointed out that the leader of the Palestinian Authority, Mahmoud Abbas, who held talks with Sir Keir by phone earlier this evening, has not held an election for almost 20 years.
Labour MPs pushing for recognition of Palestinian statehood also voiced disappointment about Sir Keir's decision to give Israel a chance to head it off, albeit with conditions that are highly unlikely to be met.
The senior Labour MP Sarah Champion, who co-ordinated the mass letter by MPs, said she was 'delighted and relieved' by the breakthrough. But she said she was 'troubled (that) our recognition appears conditional on Israel's actions'.
Former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, who is now setting up a left-wing rival to Labour, accused Sir Keir of treating Palestinian statehood as a 'bargaining chip' when it should be seen as 'an inalienable right of the Palestinian people'.
He added: 'Our demands on this shameful government remain the same: end all arms sales to Israel, impose widespread sanctions, and stop the genocide, now.'
The Labour Friends of Israel group said it was committed to a two-state solution but warned that 'recognition of a Palestinian state outside of a meaningful peace process will change nothing on the ground and will damage our reputation as an impartial broker, reducing our ability to bring about a sustainable long-term peace.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
36 minutes ago
- Times
Rachel Reeves ‘must find £50bn' in tax rises or spending cuts in budget
Rachel Reeves is facing a £50 billion black hole in the government finances and economists are warning that she will be forced to break Labour's manifesto pledge on tax in the autumn budget. The National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) said higher-than-expected public sector borrowing and weaker economic growth had left the chancellor with an 'impossible' choice between cutting spending or raising taxes to balance the books. Under present estimates, it said, Reeves would need to find £41.2 billion to cover the costs of weaker economic forecasts and tax reversals, plus a further £9.9 billion, if she was to have the same headroom as she had at the time of her last financial statement in March. Other economists said their projections also suggested that Reeves would have no choice but to 'pull the lever' of increasing income tax, VAT or employee national insurance to cover the shortfall. This would breach Labour's manifesto commitment to not raise taxes on working people. NIESR's latest economic outlook also found that the government's fiscal situation had sharply deteriorated since Reeves' statement in March. It found that total government expenditure was £14.3 billion higher than in the spring. The government's failure to pass its welfare reforms and its U-turn over winter fuel payments further increased spending by £15.2 billion. It also said that weaker output and employment growth compared with the Office for Budget Responsibility's (OBR) forecast in March implied lower tax revenue and higher welfare payments by 2028-29. NIESR's estimate for the fiscal shortfall is higher than estimates from City analysts who expect Reeves to face a shortfall of between £20 billion and £25 billion. However, even at this level the chancellor is likely to be forced to raise one of the main tax rates to make up the shortfall. This is likely to include freezing income rate thresholds for another year, pulling more people into the higher 40 per cent rate of tax. Stephen Millard, of NIESR, said that Reeves faced an 'impossible trilemma' between breaking her fiscal rules, breaching an electoral promise not to raise taxes on working people or hitting the government's spending targets. 'Can she fill that gap without breaking the manifesto commitment to raising taxes on working people? I think the quick answer to that is no,' he said. 'Fiddling at the edges won't do the job.' • Should Rachel Reeves raise income tax? Economists at Deutsche Bank think Reeves faces a narrower £20 billion gap that could be filled by extending the freeze on income tax thresholds beyond 2028 — raising about £7-£10 billion. The government could also announce no real-term spending growth at the end of the decade, raising an additional £5 billion, Sanjay Raja, UK economist at Deutsche Bank, said. He said: 'With growth at only 1.3 per cent and inflation above target, things are not looking good for the chancellor, who will need to either raise taxes or reduce spending or both in the October budget if she is to meet her fiscal rules.' Ruth Gregory, chief economist at Capital Economics, said they expected Reeves would miss her targets by up to £25 billion, but the figure could be larger if the OBR downgraded its growth forecasts for the UK economy. 'If the budget deficit is larger than £20 billion, Reeves will have to pull one of the big tax levers like VAT, income tax or employee national insurance to make up the difference,' she said. 'Given that the chancellor decided to increase the tax burden on businesses in the last budget by raising employer national insurance contributions, we would expect that this time the burden will fall on households.'
Times
37 minutes ago
- Times
The Thick of It writer had comically angelic skills with dark arts
Jesse Armstrong admits his political nous is far from Malcolm Tucker's skills DIA DIPASUPIL/WIREIMAGE/GETTY IMAGES The comedy writer Jesse Armstrong may have co-created the fearsome Malcolm Tucker, but this was clearly not based on his own experiences as a political operator. Long before writing The Thick of It, Armstrong worked as a researcher for the Labour MP Doug Henderson, and his skill with the political dark arts made him look like a veritable angel. In fact, he wilted in the face of some of Westminster's less than Satanic devils. 'Liz Kendall would come and ask me questions, and I felt like a rabbit in the headlights,' Armstrong tells Always Take Notes. Perhaps the biggest clue came when he attended the Labour Party conference and wondered why everyone thought he was a Lib Dem. A friend replied: 'You're wearing a yellow tie, you moron.' Discussing the current scandal in which several Spanish politicians have had to resign for fabricating details about their educational attainments, the journalist Rob Hutton told Times Radio that one of his favourite such stories concerns a Russian politician. 'His PhD thesis was found to contain more than 16 pages of text taken verbatim from an American textbook,' he said. 'That's why you've never heard of Vladimir Putin.' There were confused faces at the Royal Albert Hall as the audience attending the BBC Proms: 'Soul Revolution' were greeted with Radio 2's new slogan, 'Make Every Day Less Everyday'. One Beeb insider remarked that even W1A, the sitcom satire of the BBC, would have deemed this too ludicrous. The team responsible for the slogan insists that it makes sense: 'It's not about making every day less, it's about making it less everyday.' They are, of course, spinning — as is Lord Reith in his grave. The broadcaster Iain Dale's ability to talk has done more than gain him a career. While listing ten things not to say when pulled over by the police, Dale recalled on his Substack that he did once try to get away with speeding by telling the copper that he was on his way to appear on Sky News. 'What are you going to be talking about?' he was asked. 'Police pay,' Dale replied. 'And what are you going to be saying, sir?' the officer inquired. 'That the police are underpaid and deserve a pay rise.' He got off without the three points — though, as a West Ham fan, he's used to that. It was penblwydd hapus (happy birthday) to Plaid Cymru on Tuesday, as the party celebrated its 100th anniversary. One of its policies still has some way to go, given an incident a few years ago on a bus between Newport and Cwmbran. A Muslim woman was talking to her son in a foreign language when a man leant across to tell her: 'When you're in the UK, you should really be speaking English.' Another passenger turned round and replied: 'She's in Wales. And she's speaking Welsh.' Plaid is hoping have a million Welsh speakers by 2050, so such rude interventions should cease. For now, the gentleman was left looking sheepish — not that that's a bad look west of the Wye.
ITV News
38 minutes ago
- ITV News
Minister denies migrant returns deal leaves open human rights loophole
A minister has rejected opposition suggestions that the Government's migrant returns deal leaves open a loophole for human rights laws to be exploited. Dame Angela Eagle denied the agreement with France would allow for spurious claims to be used to avoid deportation after shadow home secretary Chris Philp questioned the wording of the document. The 'one-in, one out' deal coming into effect on Wednesday will see migrants ineligible to stay in the UK sent back across the Channel, in exchange for taking those who have links to Britain. The agreement contains a clause that says in order for people to be returned to France, the UK must confirm they do not have an 'outstanding human rights claim'. Critics have argued this could risk bogus applications being made to frustrate the deportation process and cause delays. Mr Philp said on Tuesday this section offered 'an easy loophole for lawyers', adding that 'France will not give us any data on the people they are sending our way… so we have no idea who they really are'. Borders minister Dame Angela said he was wrong, and that the clause was included 'precisely to ensure no-one can use 'clearly unfounded' human rights claims to avoid being returned'. She added: 'And we will do full security checks on any applicants, and reject anyone who poses a risk.' Home Secretary Yvette Cooper conceded earlier that the accord is not a 'silver bullet' to stop small boat crossings, but marked a step change as migrants will be sent back across the Channel for the first time. Speaking to the BBC, she declined to put a number on how many people would be returned under the agreement ahead of time, saying that she believed it could aid criminal gangs. She added: 'We will provide regular updates, people will be able to see how many people are being detained, how many people are being returned, and it is right that we should be transparent around that.' Speaking to reporters earlier, Tory leader Kemi Badenoch said the deal would likely result in only small numbers of migrants being swapped with France and is 'not going to make any difference whatsoever'. Asked whether the Conservatives were partly to blame for the immigration and asylum situation, she told reporters: 'No I don't accept that at all, because what Labour are doing is just rubber-stamping all of the applications and saying they're processing.' It has been reported that about 50 a week could be sent to France. This would be a stark contrast to the more than 800 people every week who on average have arrived in the UK via small boats this year. Bruno Retailleau, France's interior minister, said the agreement 'establishes an experimental mechanism whose goal is clear: to smash the gangs'.
